Book a demo

LPBF Melt-Pool Feedback Control Patent Snapshot

LPBF Melt-Pool Feedback Control Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
LPBF Melt-Pool Feedback Control Patent Snapshot in 2026

The LPBF melt-pool feedback control space remains lightly populated at 26 patent families in scope, with Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC holding the single largest position and the United States leading jurisdiction filings. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak, and several new entrants signal widening institutional interest.

26
Patent families in scope
28%
Top visible applicants share
+14%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Lawrence Livermore leads a fragmented, early-stage field

Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC holds the top position in the applicant ranking, followed by a cluster of organizations each holding two patent records — NuTech Ventures, Guangxi University, Materialise NV, and Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties Inc. No single applicant is visible in the space outright.

The top five filers account for 28% of the combined total across the ranked applicants visible in this query, indicating a low-concentration evidence snapshot where no entrenched incumbent can block the field through portfolio breadth alone. The tier gap between the leader and the rest is narrow, reflecting the nascent state of the technology.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC4
2NuTech Ventures Ltd2
3Guangxi University2
4Materialise NV2
5Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties Inc2
6Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, Chinese Academy of Sciences1
7XIAN AEROSPACE MECHATRONICS & INTELLIGENT MANUFACT…1
8Queen’s University1
9RTX Corp1
10K. Tamilselvan1
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11MTU Aero Engines GmbH1
12Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences1
13Shenzhen Zhongyihe Technology Co. Ltd1
14Jiangsu Chromlebo Digital Technology Co. Ltd1
15K. Sivaramakrishnan1
16U. Sujan1
17V. Skandhakumar1
18S. Senthil Kumar1
19K. Rajasuresh1
20R. Elakkiyadasan1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Lawrence Livermore’s position as a national-security laboratory suggests defense and advanced-manufacturing process integrity are early demand drivers. The presence of multiple university technology-transfer offices (Virginia Tech IP, NuTech Ventures, Queens University) points to a pipeline still dominated by academic and government research, with limited deep-pocketed industrial incumbents yet.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are under-counted due to standard patent-publication lag; apparent filing volumes for 20242026 should be treated as minimum floors rather than final totals. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year growth with a 2023 surge and a broadening IPC footprint

Annual filing activity shows a field that grew episodically from 2017 and reached a peak in 2023, with the recent-window count still above the prior-window baseline. The technology classification mix reveals a core anchored in additive manufacturing and powder metallurgy, with smaller but meaningful branches in sensing, imaging, and AI.

Annual filing trend

Filings grew from two records in 2017 to a spike of six in 2023, confirming multi-year expansion. The dip visible in 2024 and the partial 2025–2026 counts should not be read as a real decline — publication lag systematically under-counts the most recent years. The field is on a growth trajectory on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from the 2023 peak.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 6 in 2023.22017120182201942020120210202262023220246202522026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B33Y (additive manufacturing) and B22F (powder metallurgy) together account for the large majority of IPC records, confirming the core is process-level LPBF control. Secondary branches — B23K (welding/laser interaction), G01J (radiation and light measurement), G01K (temperature measurement), G06T (image data processing), and G06N (AI-based computing) — are each sparsely populated, marking them as adjacent or emerging sub-themes rather than established clusters.

Technology compositionB33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D printing) leads with 28; B22F · Powder metallurgy 27.B33Y · Additive manufact…28B22F · Powder metallurgy27B29C · Shaping of plastics5B23K · Welding, solderin…4G01J · Radiation & light…2G01K · Temperature measu…2G06T · Image data proces…2G01N · Material analysis…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240300020A1Published 2024-09-12

Real-time control of laser power for laser powder …

Virginia Tech Intellectual PROPERTIES, INC.

An example feedback control system includes a laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) platform including a laser. The L-BPF platform is configured to print a target object with the laser. The feedback control system includes a sensing system configured to measure an operative thermal emission index (TEI) emitted during print of the target object by the L-PBF… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Real-time control of laser power for laser powder … — patent drawingReal-time control of laser power for laser powder … — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Error detection in additive manufacturing processes64
2在线同轴闭环控制激光选区熔融/烧结打印机及打印方法14
3Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing in-…13
4Thermal stress and substrate damage reducing addit…8
5一种选择性激光熔融3D打印机的熔池温度检测系统及方法7
6Error detection in additive manufacturing processes7
7一种同轴SLM实时监测与实时反馈控制装置及方法5
8面向激光选区熔化技术的熔池温度反馈控制方法及系统4

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC

Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC

Holds 4 patent records, the highest in the ranking, with technology emphasis spanning B33Y10 (AM process methods), B33Y30 (AM apparatus), and B33Y50 (AM data and control) — indicating a systems-level approach covering process, hardware, and data layers simultaneously. No momentum data from the evidence window suggests a stable, maturing position rather than a recent surge.

patent records: 4
Challenger · NuTech Ventures Ltd

NuTech Ventures Ltd

Holds 2 patent records with a technology focus on B22F10 (powder-bed AM process parameters) and B22F12 (AM apparatus for powder metallurgy), complemented by B33Y50 (AM data and control). Momentum is classified as a new entrant, meaning all recorded activity falls within the recent filing window — an indicator of a fresh, potentially accelerating position rather than a legacy portfolio.

patent records: 2
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Materialise NVRTX Corp+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.