Book a demo

LPBF Powder Recycling & Reconditioning Patent Snapshot

LPBF Powder Recycling & Reconditioning Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
LPBF Powder Recycling & Reconditioning Patent Snapshot in 2026

The LPBF powder recycling and reconditioning space is a small but expanding field in its Growth stage, with 35 patent families in scope and a 64% rise in recent-window filings; China accounts for the dominant share of jurisdictional coverage. The competitive structure is fragmented, with Ansaldo Energia IP UK Ltd and Jiangsu University jointly leading, while most filers hold only one or two patent records.

35
Patent families in scope
42%
Top visible applicants share
+64%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Fragmented field co-led by an energy OEM and a Chinese university

Ansaldo Energia IP UK Ltd and Jiangsu University each hold 5 patent records, placing them jointly at the top of the ranking. Nanjing Zhongke Raycham Tech follows with 4 patent records, and RTX Corp and Beijing Power Machinery Institute each hold 2.

The top five filers account for 42% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, indicating moderate-to-low concentration: no single organization has established a commanding position, and the majority of ranked applicants hold only a single patent record.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Ansaldo Energia IP UK Ltd5
2Jiangsu University5
3Nanjing Zhongke Raycham Laser Technology Co., Ltd.4
4RTX Corp2
5Beijing Power Machinery Institute2
6KUNMING UNIV OF SCI & TECH2
7Zhejiang University of Technology1
8Nanyang Technological University1
9Dongguan Keheng Hand Model Co., Ltd.1
10Suzhou Vocational University (Suzhou Open University)1
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Shanghai Jiao Tong University1
12Shenyang Jinghe CNC Technology Development Co., Ltd.1
13Sichuan Yuguang Intelligent Manufacturing Technology Co., Ltd.1
14Shenzhen Yidong Aviation Technology Co., Ltd.1
15CHINA IRON & STEEL RES INST GRP1
16BLT (Shenzhen) Additive Manufacturing Co., Ltd.1
17Geely Automobile Institute (Ningbo) Co., Ltd.1
18Dongguan University of Technology1
19Nanjing Institute of Technology1
20Wuhan Pengze Mechanical Equipment Co., Ltd.1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The co-leadership of an Italian energy OEM’s IP vehicle (Ansaldo Energia IP UK Ltd) alongside Chinese academic and industrial applicants signals two distinct strategic motivations — industrial quality assurance for aerospace-grade alloys on one side, and process-oriented academic research on the other — creating an opportunity for focused differentiation.

Filing counts for 2024 and 2025 are understated due to publication lag; the apparent easing from the 2023 peak should not be read as a decline in underlying activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Activity surged in 2023; powder metallurgy and additive manufacturing dominate the technology mix

Two charts together show that LPBF powder recycling is still expanding on a multi-year basis, with a clear 2023 activity spike, alongside a technology composition that is heavily weighted toward powder metallurgy and additive manufacturing process classes.

Annual filing trend

Filings were negligible before 2019, rose steadily to a plateau of 5 in 2020–2021, then surged to 10 in 2023 — the highest single-year count in evidence. The 2024 and 2025 figures of 6 each are likely understated due to publication lag and should not be interpreted as a reversal. The recent three-year window remains well above the prior three-year window, consistent with the field’s Growth lifecycle stage.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 10 in 2023.020170201812019520205202122022102023620246202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B22F (Powder metallurgy) and B33Y (Additive manufacturing) together account for the overwhelming majority of IPC classifications, confirming that activity is tightly clustered around core process and materials handling methods. Adjacent classes — B08B (Cleaning), B23K (Welding), B29C (Shaping of plastics), C22C (Alloys), and C23G (Metal surface cleaning) — each appear at very low frequency, marking them as under-served branches relative to the core.

Technology compositionB22F · Powder metallurgy leads with 40; B33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D printing) 34.B22F · Powder metallurgy40B33Y · Additive manufact…34B08B · Cleaning (general)3B23K · Welding, solderin…2B29C · Shaping of plastics2C22C · Alloys2C23G · Cleaning of metal…2A61C · Dentistry & oral …1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240408676A1Published 2024-12-12

Determining quality of reused build powder for add…

Rtx Corporation

A method for determining whether build powder is fit for reuse in a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing (LPBF) process includes constructing a model for determining a Powder Reuse Index indicative of whether build powder is fit for reuse in the LPBF process based upon LPBF process operating parameters. A build design is selected to be built using… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Determining quality of reused build powder for add… — patent drawingDetermining quality of reused build powder for add… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1适用于同步辐射光源的小型选区激光熔化增材装置12
2Method for treatment of metallic powder for select…11
3用于选择性激光熔化的金属粉末的处理方法7
4一种使用掩膜实现同层异质材料选区激光熔化的增材制造方法6
5用于大尺寸激光选区熔化设备的补粉与铺粉系统及其控制方法6
6一种SLM金属3D打印用刮刀4
7用于激光选区熔化设备的补粉与铺粉系统4
8一种基轴式SLM金属打印机用的补粉刮粉一体装置4

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Ansaldo Energia IP UK Ltd

Ansaldo Energia IP UK Ltd

Holds 5 patent records, tied for first. Technology emphasis is on B22F 1 (powder material properties and treatment) and B22F 3 and B22F 9 (compaction and powder production methods), consistent with an energy OEM’s focus on qualifying recycled powder for high-integrity components. GE Vernova (evidenced as a separate applicant with overlapping B22F 1/3/9 focus) holds a complementary position. Ansaldo’s filings span EPO, UK, and US jurisdictions, giving it the broadest Western coverage among ranked applicants.

5 patent records
Challenger · Jiangsu University

Jiangsu University

Also holds 5 patent records and is flagged as a new entrant, meaning its activity is concentrated in the recent filing window. Focus is tightly on B22F 10 (additive manufacturing process steps for powder bed fusion) and B33Y 40 (post-processing in additive manufacturing), reflecting process-level research into powder handling within the print cycle rather than standalone reconditioning systems. Filing is domestic (China), so its portfolio presents limited freedom-to-operate risk in Western markets at present.

5 patent records
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Nanjing Zhongke Raycham TechRTX Corp+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.