Book a demo

LPBF Scan-Strategy & Process Optimization Patent Snapshot

LPBF Scan-Strategy & Process Optimization Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
LPBF Scan-Strategy & Process Optimization Patent Snapshot in 2026

The LPBF scan-strategy and process optimization patent space is nascent and fragmented, with no single applicant holding more than 2 patent families and China-based filers dominating the filing geography. Activity is in a growth phase with a 50% increase in recent filings, and the field is still expanding on a multi-year basis with no concentration around a single dominant route.

28
Patent families in scope
33%
Top visible applicants share
+50%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Fragmented field with no dominant leader — universities and research institutes set the pace

Five applicants are tied at the top of the ranking, each holding 2 patent families: NuTech Ventures Ltd, Nikon SLM Solutions AG, Central South University, Jiangsu XCMG Construction Machinery Research Institute, and Tianjin University. No single organization has established a commanding position.

The top five filers account for 33% of the combined output of the ranked applicants visible in this query, indicating moderate early-stage concentration rather than entrenched oligopoly. The gap between the top tier and the remainder of the field is narrow — one family separates leaders from all other ranked applicants.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1NuTech Ventures Ltd2
2Nikon SLM Solutions AG2
3Central South University2
4Jiangsu XCMG Construction Machinery Research Institute Co., Ltd.2
5Tianjin University2
6Xi’an Jiaotong University1
7Vallurupalli Nageswara Rao Vignana Jyothi Institute of Engineering and Technology1
8Cao Sen1
9Shanghai Leimou Technology Co., Ltd.1
10INST OF CORROSION SCI & TECH1
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Shenyang Liming Aero-Engine Group Corporation1
12Inner Mongolia University of Technology1
13HARBIN UNIV OF SCI & TECH1
14HUAZHONG UNIV OF SCI & TECH1
15The Research Foundation for the State University of New York1
16Xi’an University of Technology1
17Shanghai Union Technology Corporation1
18NANJING UNIV OF SCI & TECH1
1910th Research Institute of CETC1
20Materials Institute of China Academy of Engineering Physics1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The joint leadership of an equipment OEM (Nikon SLM Solutions AG), an IP-licensing entity (NuTech Ventures Ltd), and three Chinese universities signals that fundamental process knowledge is still being staked out rather than consolidated by vertically integrated manufacturers.

Filings from approximately 2024 onward are likely under-counted due to standard patent publication lag; the apparent plateau in those years should not be read as a slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Rising filing volumes driven by powder-metallurgy and AI-assisted process control

Two charts frame the field’s trajectory: annual filing counts from 2017 onward reveal a growth-phase pattern, while the IPC class breakdown shows where technical effort is concentrated and where it remains thin.

Annual filing trend

Filings were negligible before 2019 and began stepping up meaningfully from 2021. The field is in a growth phase with recent-window activity up 50% versus the prior period. Years 2024–2026 appear flat or declining in raw counts but are materially under-counted because of publication lag; do not read those years as a genuine slowdown.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 6 in 2025.02017020181201922020520212202252023520246202522026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B22F (powder metallurgy) and B33Y (additive manufacturing) are visible in the IPC mix, consistent with core process claims on laser-bed fusion. G06F (digital data processing) is the third-largest branch, reflecting the growing share of simulation and optimization software claims. G06N (AI/ML models) and G16C (computational chemistry) are present but sparse, suggesting they remain adjacent rather than core filing territory.

Technology compositionB22F · Powder metallurgy leads with 22; B33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D printing) 19.B22F · Powder metallurgy22B33Y · Additive manufact…19G06F · Electric digital …16G06N · Computing based o…6B23K · Welding, solderin…3G16C · Computational che…3C22C · Alloys2C22F · Non-ferrous metal…2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20220033946A1Published 2022-02-03

Composition design optimization method of aluminum…

Central South University

A composition design optimization method of aluminum alloy for selective laser melting, including the following steps: S1: making alloy ingots with different composition; S2: pre-treating and processing the alloy ingots to obtain alloy sample blocks with different composition; S3: twice laser surface scanning treatment; S4: treating the alloy sample blocks… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Composition design optimization method of aluminum… — patent drawingComposition design optimization method of aluminum… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Composition design optimization method of aluminum…12
2一种高熵合金激光选区熔化工艺参数优化方法10
3选区激光熔化铝合金的成分设计优化方法9
4Thermal stress and substrate damage reducing addit…8
5Method of designing and manufacturing a hydraulic …6
6Systems and Methods6
7基于深度强化学习的激光功率参数优化方法5
8一种SLM成形性能预测与工艺参数优化方法及系统5

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · NuTech Ventures Ltd

NuTech Ventures Ltd

NuTech Ventures Ltd holds 2 patent families focused on powder metallurgy process parameters (B22F 10, B22F 12) with secondary coverage in additive manufacturing data and quality control (B33Y 50). The applicant entered recently and is flagged as a new entrant with rising momentum, suggesting these filings represent an early-stage IP-staking effort rather than an established manufacturing position.

families: 2
Challenger · Nikon SLM Solutions AG

Nikon SLM Solutions AG

Nikon SLM Solutions AG holds 2 patent families with a distinct emphasis on digital simulation and process modeling (G06F 30), alongside core powder-metallurgy process claims (B22F 10, B22F 12). This combination — the only equipment OEM in the top tier coupling simulation to hardware process claims — positions Nikon SLM as the closest to a system-level scan-strategy approach among the current leaders.

families: 2
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Central South UniversityTianjin University+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.