Book a demo

Machine Vision System Patent Landscape 2026

Machine Vision System Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Machine Vision System Patent Landscape in 2026

The machine vision system patent space spans 1,093 patent families, with a moderate concentration among a small group of portfolio entities and industrial specialists. The field has plateaued near its 2019 peak, with the United States as the dominant filing jurisdiction and robotics-control integration as the core technology axis.

1,093
Patent families in scope
25%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-1%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Portfolio aggregators lead, with industrial specialists forming a distinct second tier

Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLC holds the top position with 76 patent families, followed closely by Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016 LLC with 67 and Fastbrick IP Pty Ltd with 56. The top five applicants together account for 25% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, signaling moderate rather than hyper-concentrated control.

A clear tier gap exists between the top three portfolio-oriented entities and the broader industrial players below them. Kimberly-Clark Worldwide (53 families) and. The Boeing Co (40 families) anchor a second tier of domain-specific filers, while names from rank six onward drop to 37 families or fewer.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLC76
2Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016 LLC67
3Fastbrick IP Pty Ltd56
4Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Inc53
5The Boeing Company40
6Outrider Technologies Inc37
7Liberty Robotics Inc37
8Procemex32
9Cognex Corporation32
10iRobot Corporation31
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Carnegie Mellon University26
12MACDONALD DETTWILER & ASSOC INC24
13ABB (Schweiz) AG23
14Mitutoyo Corporation22
15DP World UAE Region FZE20
16Relativity Space Inc18
17Ascend Robotics LLC17
18Blackdot Inc16
19Magna International Inc15
20Makeblock Hong Kong Holding Ltd14
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leadership of two Strong Force portfolio vehicles suggests that a significant portion of the top-ranked IP is held for licensing or assertion purposes rather than direct commercialization, which has implications for freedom-to-operate and licensing risk assessments. Industrial practitioners such as Cognex Corp, iRobot Corp, and ABB (Schweiz) AG appear further down the ranking but represent operational deployment expertise.

Filing counts for 20242026 are likely under-reported due to typical patent publication delays of 18–24 months; conclusions about recent trends should be drawn cautiously for that window. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Activity peaked in 2019 and 2022, with robotics and control systems dominating the technology mix

The annual filing trend and the IPC technology composition together reveal a maturing field with a broad but robot-centric technical base. Reading them together helps identify where incremental investment is dense and where adjacent branches remain comparatively sparse.

Annual filing trend

Filings surged to a first peak of 188 families in 2019, fell back in 2020, then recovered to a second peak of 183 in 2022 before easing to 151 in 2023. Figures for 2024 onward reflect publication lag and should not be read as a sustained decline. The dual-peak pattern is consistent with a field that absorbed a broad set of industrial IoT and robotics claims across two waves of innovation.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 188 in 2019.992017982018188201996202013920211832022151202384202451202542026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

Manipulators and robots (B25J) and control and regulating systems (G05B) are by far the most densely populated branches, reflecting the tight coupling between machine vision and robotic guidance. Image data processing (G06T), business and administrative data processing (G06Q), and AI-model computing (G06N) form a secondary cluster, while conveying and material handling (B65G), dimensional measurement (G01B), and additive manufacturing (B33Y) show meaningful but lower volumes, indicating application-specific build-outs.

Technology compositionB25J · Manipulators & robots leads with 1,065; G05B · Control & regulating systems 689.B25J · Manipulators & ro…1,065G05B · Control & regulat…689G06T · Image data proces…260G06Q · Business, commerc…205G06F · Electric digital …180G06N · Computing based o…162B65G · Conveying & mater…152G01B · Measuring length …104↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US5940296APublished 1999-08-17

Method and system for interactively developing a g…

Integral VISION, INC.

A method and system are provided for interactively developing a graphical, control-flow structure and associated application software for use in a machine vision system using a computer system without the need for a user to write any code. Preferably, the method and system "marry" the ActiveX control standard and the Grafcet/IEC 1131 standard. The structure… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Method and system for interactively developing a g… — patent drawingMethod and system for interactively developing a g… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Methods and systems for data collection, learning,…960
2Platform for facilitating development of intellige…721
3Intelligent vibration digital twin systems and met…694
4System and method for monitoring and managing equi…517
5Methods and systems for data collection, learning,…506
6Robotic storage buffer system for substrate carrie…485
7System and method for servoing robots based upon w…381
8Industrial digital twin systems and methods with e…376

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural dimensions — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — each carry distinct implications for teams deciding where to direct development effort and IP spend.

Maturity

Field is at or near plateau, with annual volume eased from its 2019 peak

The lifecycle stage is assessed as Maturity, with annual filings having plateaued near their peak. Teams entering now face a dense prior-art landscape in the core robotics-guidance space. Differentiation requires moving into adjacent or application-specific branches rather than competing head-on in the saturated B25J and G05B classes.

Mature field
Concentration

Moderate top-5 concentration, with a notable portfolio-holder overhang

The top five filers hold 25% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total. Two of those five are non-practicing portfolio entities, meaning a disproportionate share of high-ranked IP may be available for licensing or subject to assertion. Industrial filers — Boeing, Kimberly-Clark, Cognex, iRobot — cluster in the second and third tiers, leaving room for focused technical players to build defensible positions in under-served branches.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

Co-filing activity is minimal; iRobot and Raytheon BBN Technologies are the sole identified co-filers

Evidence shows one recorded co-filing relationship: iRobot Corporation and Raytheon BBN Technologies, with a single jointly filed patent family. This near-absence of collaborative IP activity suggests the field is dominated by proprietary, siloed development rather than consortium or joint-venture approaches. Organizations seeking ecosystem partnerships may find relatively open ground for structuring formal R&D alliances.

Low collaboration
Geography

US-centric filing base, with Europe and PCT as secondary protection routes

The United States leads decisively as the primary filing jurisdiction. Europe via the EPO and WIPO PCT filings form the next tier, while China, Canada, and Australia each show meaningful but substantially lower coverage. The comparatively thin presence in China and Japan relative to the technology’s global deployment is a notable gap, suggesting that IP protection strategies in those markets may be under-resourced by current filers.

US-dominant
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
iRobot CorporationRaytheon BBN Technologies1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence in the machine vision system corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Strong Force VCN leads by volume; Liberty Reach Inc is the sharpest new entrant by momentum

The ranking is shaped by two distinct player types: portfolio aggregators that hold large, cross-sector claim sets, and operationally focused companies with narrower but technically deep filing programs. Momentum data reveals diverging trajectories within the top tier.

Leader · Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLC

Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLC

The top-ranked filer holds 76 patent families and shows a sharply rising trajectory, with recent filings running at 3.8× the level of the prior three-year period. Its technical emphasis spans business and administrative data processing (G06Q), manipulators and robots (B25J), and control systems (G05B), pointing to a broad industrial automation claim set oriented toward licensing across multiple verticals.

families: 76
Challenger · Liberty Reach Inc

Liberty Reach Inc

Liberty Reach Inc enters as a new entrant with 25 patent families in the most recent period and no prior three-year baseline, making it the highest-momentum new filer in the corpus. Its technical focus is tightly concentrated on image data processing (G06T) and manipulators and robots (B25J), complemented by dimensional measurement (G01B), which reflects a core machine vision guidance and metrology positioning — a more operationally specific profile than the portfolio aggregators above it.

families: 25 (recent)
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Unlock rankings, momentum trends, and technology emphasis for all top-100 filers in the machine vision system corpus.
Cognex CorpABB (Schweiz) AG+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLC60▲ 3.8× vs prior 3-yr
Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016 LLC26▼ -40%
Fastbrick IP Pty Ltd12▼ -40%
Outrider Technologies Inc18▲ +20%
Liberty Reach Inc25▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards reflect patent family counts and technology focus from the applicant ranking and momentum evidence.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant robotics core

Several IPC branches intersect technically with machine vision but carry materially lower filing counts relative to the dominant B25J and G05B classes. These are observations of relative sparsity; whether they represent actionable opportunities depends on technical fit and competitive context.

G06N · Computing based on AI models

With 162 patent records, AI-model computing is notably sparse relative to the volume of image processing and robotic control activity in the corpus. Given that deep-learning-based inference is now central to industrial visual inspection and defect detection, this gap suggests that machine-vision-specific AI model architectures, training pipelines, and edge-inference optimizations remain comparatively under-claimed. Teams with expertise in embedded or real-time neural inference have a plausible entry path by targeting application-specific AI model claims tied to visual quality control or robotic scene understanding.

Search this in Eureka →

G06V · Image/video recognition

Image and video recognition (G06V) accounts for only 88 patent records despite being the most direct IPC classification for machine vision output interpretation. This relative sparsity alongside the much larger G06T (image data processing) and B25J (robotics) counts suggests that higher-level semantic recognition — object classification, scene parsing, anomaly detection — is under-protected as a standalone capability. Applicants focused on vision-based quality assurance in manufacturing or logistics could find defensible space here, particularly at the intersection of G06V and B65G (conveying and material handling).

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access the complete adjacent-branch analysis, including filing density, key filer gaps, and technology overlap scores across the machine vision system corpus.
G01S · Radar, sonar & positioningB33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D printing)+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch observations are based on relative IPC filing counts within the machine vision system corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading filers differ by technology route emphasis

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerB25J 9 · Manipulators & robotsG05B 19 · Control & regulating systemsB25J 19 · Manipulators & robotsG06T 7 · Image data processing & generationB25J 15 · Manipulators & robots
Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLCStrong · 51Strong · 46AbsentModerate · 21Absent
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide IncAbsentStrong · 52AbsentModerate · 19Absent
Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016 LLCAbsentStrong · 70AbsentAbsentAbsent
Liberty Reach IncStrong · 31AbsentAbsentStrong · 32Absent
Fastbrick IP Pty LtdStrong · 40AbsentModerate · 14AbsentAbsent
MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates IncStrong · 18AbsentStrong · 13AbsentStrong · 18
Blackdot IncStrong · 16Strong · 14AbsentAbsentStrong · 14
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own machine vision patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.