Magnesium Alloy Composition Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
- Filing has cooled since 2019. Annual filings peaked at 30 in 2019 and have fallen every year since, with the 2022 midpoint down to 3 — a signal that composition claim space filled early and fast.
- China dominates the receiving-office count. 127 China filings lead the next-largest offices (Europe and the US, 76 each), pointing to where examiners are seeing the densest overlapping claims.
- No tracked assignee filed in the latest year. Every leading assignee in the momentum ranking shows zero filings in the most recent year — consistent with publication lag, but also with a market that has stopped adding new composition claims at its former pace.
Filing growth compares 2021 (6 records) with 2024 (11) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 436 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks 436 patent families filed against magnesium alloy composition work — Mg-Al-Zn systems, rare-earth magnesium alloys, alloying-element selection and composition design — filed between 2017 and the 2026 cut-off. Records are drawn from filings classified under C22C23/00, C22C23/02 and C22C23/06, the core IPC subclasses for magnesium and magnesium-alloy compositions, cross-referenced against text mentioning alloying strategy rather than incidental use of the alloy.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one to two years in any trend understate real activity. Read the recent-year numbers as a floor, not a ceiling, and weight the shape of the curve — rise, peak, decline — more than the exact count in the final bar.
Filing trend and technology concentration
Two views matter here: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the bulk of the record set. Both point to a field that built its core composition claims early and has since spread into adjacent processing and application classes.
A decade of rise and retreat
Filings rose from 15 in 2017 to a peak of 30 in 2019, then declined through the following years, with the 2022 midpoint down to 3. That shape is typical of a subfield where the primary alloy-system claims were staked out early, leaving later filers to compete for narrower composition windows or move into processing and treatment claims instead.
Where the claims sit
C22C (alloys) covers the full 436-record set by definition, but C22F (non-ferrous metal treatment, 167 records) and B22D (metal casting, 108) show where composition claims are most often paired with a processing step. Smaller but notable clusters in A61L (sterilising, 47) and A61F (implants, 14) mark the biodegradable-implant branch of magnesium alloy work, a distinct commercial track from structural or automotive alloys.
Shares are the percentage of the 436 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Magnesium Alloy Alloy Composition with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about magnesium alloy alloy composition and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited prior art in this set
Wrought magnesium alloy with improved properties and a high-speed extrusion method
This application relates to a wrought magnesium alloy and a method of manufacturing the same, and a high-speed extrusion method for manufacturing an extrudate using the same. In one aspect, the magnesium alloy includes 2.0 wt% to 8.0 wt% bismuth, 0.5 wt% to 6.5 wt% aluminum, the balance magnesium, and inevitable impurities. Using this alloy for high-speed extrusion allows manufacture of an extrudate with good surface quality without hot cracking, even under high-temperature (300°C-450°C) and high-speed (40-80 m/min die-exit speed) extrusion conditions.Filed by Kyungpook National University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation, 2021-09-30.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6139651A | Magnesium alloy for high temperature applications | 67 |
| 2 | CN1804083A | 高强耐热稀土镁合金 | 49 |
| 3 | CN108220725A | 一种高性能镁合金棒材的制备方法 | 46 |
| 4 | WO2005108634A1 | Magnesium alloy having improved elevated temperature performance | 46 |
| 5 | US20120269673A1 | Magnesium alloy | 43 |
| 6 | CN101760683A | 一种高强度铸造镁合金及其熔制方法 | 39 |
| 7 | US5552110A | Heat resistant magnesium alloy | 38 |
| 8 | US5855697A | Magnesium alloy having superior elevated-temperature properties and die castability | 35 |
| 9 | CN102648300A | 镁合金 | 34 |
| 10 | CN1425785A | 一种含稀土的镁铝锌合金及其制备方法 | 33 |
Citation counts accumulate over time inside the searched corpus, so older records are structurally favoured. Treat this table as a map of foundational prior art, not a ranking of current relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
The filing curve, the IPC spread and the receiving-office split together describe a field where the core composition space is crowded but adjacent processing and biomedical branches remain comparatively open.
Composition filing has cooled sharply
The peak of 30 filings in 2019 has not been approached since, with a drop to single digits by the 2022 midpoint. New composition claims narrower than the alloy systems staked out in the peak years face a denser prior-art field.
China leads office-level filing by a wide margin
China's 127 filings outpace Europe and the US at 76 each, suggesting Chinese examiners and competitors are the first point of contact for most new composition claims in this space.
Composition claims travel with treatment claims
Nearly two in five records also carry a C22F treatment classification, showing that alloy-composition protection is frequently bundled with a specific heat-treatment or ageing step rather than claimed alone.
Collaboration is limited and concentrated
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, with the strongest pairings tied to specific research-institute and OEM relationships rather than broad industry consortia.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to magnesium alloy alloy composition, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the ground, and where the gate is thin
The assignee ranking shows a mix of research institutes, OEMs and materials producers, several of them linked through repeated co-filing. None of the leading names in the recent-year momentum table added a new filing in the latest year, consistent with both publication lag and a maturing core claim space.
Leaders have gone quiet in the most recent year
Every assignee in the recent-year momentum ranking, including established research institutes and automakers, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. This is likely partly a publication-lag artefact, but it also reflects a slowdown from the 2019 peak.
A handful of tight research-industry pairings
The strongest co-assignee links — a Korean research institute paired with an industrial partner, and a Dead Sea magnesium producer paired with a major automaker — point to applied-research partnerships rather than broad cross-licensing networks.
Filing base skews toward China
With China nearly double the next-largest receiving office, competitive monitoring for this space should treat Chinese-language filings as a primary rather than secondary source of new composition claims.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH) | 0 | — |
| Biotronik AG | 0 | — |
| Meotec GmbH | 0 | — |
| Toyota Industries Corporation | 0 | — |
| Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (Baosteel) | 0 | — |
| Dead Sea Magnesium Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Volkswagen AG | 0 | — |
| U&I Corporation | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a crowded core and a thinner periphery. The next step is usually to test a specific composition or process idea against the claims that are actually blocking, not just the ranking.
Map a specific composition against the crowded core
Run the alloy system you are evaluating — element ranges, weight percentages, processing pairing — against the highest-citation records to see how close your composition sits to claimed ranges.
Explore in EurekaCheck the under-claimed branches for freedom to operate
The biomedical and high-speed extrusion branches show fewer overlapping claims than core structural alloys; a focused search there can surface genuine white space faster than a broad landscape read.
Explore in EurekaCommon questions about magnesium alloy composition patents
Filing peaked at 30 records in 2019 and has fallen in most years since, reaching as low as 3 at the 2022 midpoint. This pattern typically shows up when the core composition ranges for the dominant alloy systems — here, Mg-Al-Zn and rare-earth magnesium alloys — have already been claimed, leaving later filers to pursue narrower variations or shift into adjacent processing claims. It does not necessarily mean interest in magnesium alloys has declined; it more often means the easiest composition space has already been staked out. Readers should also account for publication lag, which understates the most recent one to two years in any patent trend.
China leads with 127 filings at its receiving office, well ahead of Europe and the United States, which each show 76. Australia, the WIPO PCT route and South Korea follow at smaller volumes. This distribution suggests that new composition claims are most likely to first appear in Chinese-language filings, making China-focused monitoring important for anyone tracking competitive activity in this space, even for companies based elsewhere.
Mg-Al-Zn systems are the workhorse structural alloys, generally claimed for general-purpose strength and formability, while rare-earth magnesium alloys are typically claimed for elevated-temperature performance or specific mechanical properties gained by adding rare-earth elements. Both families appear throughout the dataset's most-cited records, including foundational patents on high-temperature performance. The choice between the two families in a new filing usually comes down to whether the target application needs heat resistance (favoring rare-earth additions) or lower-cost general structural use (favoring standard Mg-Al-Zn).
The clearest under-claimed branches sit outside the core structural-alloy space: biodegradable implant-grade compositions (A61F/A61L overlap, only 14 and 47 records respectively against a 436-record base), high-speed extrusion-specific composition windows, and low rare-earth-content heat-resistant variants. These branches show meaningfully fewer overlapping records than the core Mg-Al-Zn and high rare-earth systems, which suggests more room for a narrowly drafted first claim without running into the densest prior art.
The assignee ranking includes a mix of Korean research institutes, Japanese automakers and materials producers, and a Dead Sea magnesium producer with strong co-filing ties to a major automaker. None of the leading assignees in the recent-year momentum table show filings in the latest tracked year, which is consistent with both publication lag and a general slowdown from the 2019 peak. Co-assignee pairings are limited to ten pairs overall, indicating collaboration in this field tends to be bilateral and applied rather than broad industry consortia.
Research Magnesium Alloy Alloy Composition in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole magnesium alloy alloy composition corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.