Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (6 records) with 2024 (11) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 436 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This dataset tracks 436 patent families filed against magnesium alloy composition work — Mg-Al-Zn systems, rare-earth magnesium alloys, alloying-element selection and composition design — filed between 2017 and the 2026 cut-off. Records are drawn from filings classified under C22C23/00, C22C23/02 and C22C23/06, the core IPC subclasses for magnesium and magnesium-alloy compositions, cross-referenced against text mentioning alloying strategy rather than incidental use of the alloy.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one to two years in any trend understate real activity. Read the recent-year numbers as a floor, not a ceiling, and weight the shape of the curve — rise, peak, decline — more than the exact count in the final bar.
Two views matter here: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the bulk of the record set. Both point to a field that built its core composition claims early and has since spread into adjacent processing and application classes.
Filings rose from 15 in 2017 to a peak of 30 in 2019, then declined through the following years, with the 2022 midpoint down to 3. That shape is typical of a subfield where the primary alloy-system claims were staked out early, leaving later filers to compete for narrower composition windows or move into processing and treatment claims instead.
C22C (alloys) covers the full 436-record set by definition, but C22F (non-ferrous metal treatment, 167 records) and B22D (metal casting, 108) show where composition claims are most often paired with a processing step. Smaller but notable clusters in A61L (sterilising, 47) and A61F (implants, 14) mark the biodegradable-implant branch of magnesium alloy work, a distinct commercial track from structural or automotive alloys.
Shares are the percentage of the 436 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about magnesium alloy alloy composition and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThis application relates to a wrought magnesium alloy and a method of manufacturing the same, and a high-speed extrusion method for manufacturing an extrudate using the same. In one aspect, the magnesium alloy includes 2.0 wt% to 8.0 wt% bismuth, 0.5 wt% to 6.5 wt% aluminum, the balance magnesium, and inevitable impurities. Using this alloy for high-speed extrusion allows manufacture of an extrudate with good surface quality without hot cracking, even under high-temperature (300°C-450°C) and high-speed (40-80 m/min die-exit speed) extrusion conditions.Filed by Kyungpook National University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation, 2021-09-30.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6139651A | Magnesium alloy for high temperature applications | 67 |
| 2 | CN1804083A | 高强耐热稀土镁合金 | 49 |
| 3 | CN108220725A | 一种高性能镁合金棒材的制备方法 | 46 |
| 4 | WO2005108634A1 | Magnesium alloy having improved elevated temperature performance | 46 |
| 5 | US20120269673A1 | Magnesium alloy | 43 |
| 6 | CN101760683A | 一种高强度铸造镁合金及其熔制方法 | 39 |
| 7 | US5552110A | Heat resistant magnesium alloy | 38 |
| 8 | US5855697A | Magnesium alloy having superior elevated-temperature properties and die castability | 35 |
| 9 | CN102648300A | 镁合金 | 34 |
| 10 | CN1425785A | 一种含稀土的镁铝锌合金及其制备方法 | 33 |
Citation counts accumulate over time inside the searched corpus, so older records are structurally favoured. Treat this table as a map of foundational prior art, not a ranking of current relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →The filing curve, the IPC spread and the receiving-office split together describe a field where the core composition space is crowded but adjacent processing and biomedical branches remain comparatively open.
The peak of 30 filings in 2019 has not been approached since, with a drop to single digits by the 2022 midpoint. New composition claims narrower than the alloy systems staked out in the peak years face a denser prior-art field.
China's 127 filings outpace Europe and the US at 76 each, suggesting Chinese examiners and competitors are the first point of contact for most new composition claims in this space.
Nearly two in five records also carry a C22F treatment classification, showing that alloy-composition protection is frequently bundled with a specific heat-treatment or ageing step rather than claimed alone.
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, with the strongest pairings tied to specific research-institute and OEM relationships rather than broad industry consortia.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to magnesium alloy alloy composition, with the prior art for and against each one.
The assignee ranking shows a mix of research institutes, OEMs and materials producers, several of them linked through repeated co-filing. None of the leading names in the recent-year momentum table added a new filing in the latest year, consistent with both publication lag and a maturing core claim space.
Every assignee in the recent-year momentum ranking, including established research institutes and automakers, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. This is likely partly a publication-lag artefact, but it also reflects a slowdown from the 2019 peak.
The strongest co-assignee links — a Korean research institute paired with an industrial partner, and a Dead Sea magnesium producer paired with a major automaker — point to applied-research partnerships rather than broad cross-licensing networks.
With China nearly double the next-largest receiving office, competitive monitoring for this space should treat Chinese-language filings as a primary rather than secondary source of new composition claims.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH) | 0 | — |
| Biotronik AG | 0 | — |
| Meotec GmbH | 0 | — |
| Toyota Industries Corporation | 0 | — |
| Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (Baosteel) | 0 | — |
| Dead Sea Magnesium Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Volkswagen AG | 0 | — |
| U&I Corporation | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a crowded core and a thinner periphery. The next step is usually to test a specific composition or process idea against the claims that are actually blocking, not just the ranking.
Run the alloy system you are evaluating — element ranges, weight percentages, processing pairing — against the highest-citation records to see how close your composition sits to claimed ranges.
Explore in EurekaThe biomedical and high-speed extrusion branches show fewer overlapping claims than core structural alloys; a focused search there can surface genuine white space faster than a broad landscape read.
Explore in EurekaFiling peaked at 30 records in 2019 and has fallen in most years since, reaching as low as 3 at the 2022 midpoint. This pattern typically shows up when the core composition ranges for the dominant alloy systems — here, Mg-Al-Zn and rare-earth magnesium alloys — have already been claimed, leaving later filers to pursue narrower variations or shift into adjacent processing claims. It does not necessarily mean interest in magnesium alloys has declined; it more often means the easiest composition space has already been staked out. Readers should also account for publication lag, which understates the most recent one to two years in any patent trend.
China leads with 127 filings at its receiving office, well ahead of Europe and the United States, which each show 76. Australia, the WIPO PCT route and South Korea follow at smaller volumes. This distribution suggests that new composition claims are most likely to first appear in Chinese-language filings, making China-focused monitoring important for anyone tracking competitive activity in this space, even for companies based elsewhere.
Mg-Al-Zn systems are the workhorse structural alloys, generally claimed for general-purpose strength and formability, while rare-earth magnesium alloys are typically claimed for elevated-temperature performance or specific mechanical properties gained by adding rare-earth elements. Both families appear throughout the dataset's most-cited records, including foundational patents on high-temperature performance. The choice between the two families in a new filing usually comes down to whether the target application needs heat resistance (favoring rare-earth additions) or lower-cost general structural use (favoring standard Mg-Al-Zn).
The clearest under-claimed branches sit outside the core structural-alloy space: biodegradable implant-grade compositions (A61F/A61L overlap, only 14 and 47 records respectively against a 436-record base), high-speed extrusion-specific composition windows, and low rare-earth-content heat-resistant variants. These branches show meaningfully fewer overlapping records than the core Mg-Al-Zn and high rare-earth systems, which suggests more room for a narrowly drafted first claim without running into the densest prior art.
The assignee ranking includes a mix of Korean research institutes, Japanese automakers and materials producers, and a Dead Sea magnesium producer with strong co-filing ties to a major automaker. None of the leading assignees in the recent-year momentum table show filings in the latest tracked year, which is consistent with both publication lag and a general slowdown from the 2019 peak. Co-assignee pairings are limited to ten pairs overall, indicating collaboration in this field tends to be bilateral and applied rather than broad industry consortia.
Go past this page: query the whole magnesium alloy alloy composition corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page