Book a demo

Magnesium Alloy Composition Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026

Magnesium Alloy Composition Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/magnesium-alloy-alloy-composition-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Advanced Materials & Metallurgy
Magnesium Alloy Composition Patents: Who Is Filing, and Where the Field Has Gone Quiet
  • Filing has cooled since 2019. Annual filings peaked at 30 in 2019 and have fallen every year since, with the 2022 midpoint down to 3 — a signal that composition claim space filled early and fast.
  • China dominates the receiving-office count. 127 China filings lead the next-largest offices (Europe and the US, 76 each), pointing to where examiners are seeing the densest overlapping claims.
  • No tracked assignee filed in the latest year. Every leading assignee in the momentum ranking shows zero filings in the most recent year — consistent with publication lag, but also with a market that has stopped adding new composition claims at its former pace.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
436
Published Records
28%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+83%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (6 records) with 2024 (11) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 436 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 436 patent families filed against magnesium alloy composition work — Mg-Al-Zn systems, rare-earth magnesium alloys, alloying-element selection and composition design — filed between 2017 and the 2026 cut-off. Records are drawn from filings classified under C22C23/00, C22C23/02 and C22C23/06, the core IPC subclasses for magnesium and magnesium-alloy compositions, cross-referenced against text mentioning alloying strategy rather than incidental use of the alloy.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one to two years in any trend understate real activity. Read the recent-year numbers as a floor, not a ceiling, and weight the shape of the curve — rise, peak, decline — more than the exact count in the final bar.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1KOREA INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY38
  2. 2EMK CO LTD29
  3. 3BIOTRONIK AG23
  4. 4MAGONTEC16
  5. 5TOYOTA INDUSTRIES CORP14
  6. 6U & I CO LTD13
  7. 7BAOSHAN IRON & STEEL CO LTD12
  8. 8TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK11
  9. 9DEAD SEA MAGNESIUM11
  10. 10VOLKSWAGEN AG11
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Alloy Composition covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology concentration

Two views matter here: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the bulk of the record set. Both point to a field that built its core composition claims early and has since spread into adjacent processing and application classes.

A decade of rise and retreat

Filings rose from 15 in 2017 to a peak of 30 in 2019, then declined through the following years, with the 2022 midpoint down to 3. That shape is typical of a subfield where the primary alloy-system claims were staked out early, leaving later filers to compete for narrower composition windows or move into processing and treatment claims instead.

A decade of rise and retreat08152330152017201830201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Where the claims sit

C22C (alloys) covers the full 436-record set by definition, but C22F (non-ferrous metal treatment, 167 records) and B22D (metal casting, 108) show where composition claims are most often paired with a processing step. Smaller but notable clusters in A61L (sterilising, 47) and A61F (implants, 14) mark the biodegradable-implant branch of magnesium alloy work, a distinct commercial track from structural or automotive alloys.

Where the claims sitC22C · Alloys436100.0%C22F · Non-ferrous metal treatment16738.3%B22D · Metal casting10824.8%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting4710.8%B21C · Metal extrusion & drawing255.7%B21B · Metal rolling163.7%C22B · Metal extraction & refining153.4%A61F · Implants & prostheses143.2%Other6414.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 436 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Alloy Composition covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Magnesium Alloy Alloy Composition with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about magnesium alloy alloy composition and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited prior art in this set

Representative filing
US20210301373A12021-09-30

Wrought magnesium alloy with improved properties and a high-speed extrusion method

KYUNGPOOK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY INDUSTRY-ACADEMIC COOPERATION FOUNDATION

This application relates to a wrought magnesium alloy and a method of manufacturing the same, and a high-speed extrusion method for manufacturing an extrudate using the same. In one aspect, the magnesium alloy includes 2.0 wt% to 8.0 wt% bismuth, 0.5 wt% to 6.5 wt% aluminum, the balance magnesium, and inevitable impurities. Using this alloy for high-speed extrusion allows manufacture of an extrudate with good surface quality without hot cracking, even under high-temperature (300°C-450°C) and high-speed (40-80 m/min die-exit speed) extrusion conditions.Filed by Kyungpook National University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation, 2021-09-30.

US20210301373A1 — patent drawing 1US20210301373A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6139651AMagnesium alloy for high temperature applications67
2CN1804083A高强耐热稀土镁合金49
3CN108220725A一种高性能镁合金棒材的制备方法46
4WO2005108634A1Magnesium alloy having improved elevated temperature performance46
5US20120269673A1Magnesium alloy43
6CN101760683A一种高强度铸造镁合金及其熔制方法39
7US5552110AHeat resistant magnesium alloy38
8US5855697AMagnesium alloy having superior elevated-temperature properties and die castability35
9CN102648300A镁合金34
10CN1425785A一种含稀土的镁铝锌合金及其制备方法33

Citation counts accumulate over time inside the searched corpus, so older records are structurally favoured. Treat this table as a map of foundational prior art, not a ranking of current relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Alloy Composition covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

The filing curve, the IPC spread and the receiving-office split together describe a field where the core composition space is crowded but adjacent processing and biomedical branches remain comparatively open.

Filing momentum
30 → 1
Peak (2019) to latest year

Composition filing has cooled sharply

The peak of 30 filings in 2019 has not been approached since, with a drop to single digits by the 2022 midpoint. New composition claims narrower than the alloy systems staked out in the peak years face a denser prior-art field.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Geographic concentration
127 filings
China receiving office

China leads office-level filing by a wide margin

China's 127 filings outpace Europe and the US at 76 each, suggesting Chinese examiners and competitors are the first point of contact for most new composition claims in this space.

Receiving offices
Adjacent classes
167 records
C22F non-ferrous treatment overlap

Composition claims travel with treatment claims

Nearly two in five records also carry a C22F treatment classification, showing that alloy-composition protection is frequently bundled with a specific heat-treatment or ageing step rather than claimed alone.

IPC composition
Collaboration pattern
10 pairs
Co-assignee pairings

Collaboration is limited and concentrated

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, with the strongest pairings tied to specific research-institute and OEM relationships rather than broad industry consortia.

Co-assignee network
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to magnesium alloy alloy composition, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Alloy Composition covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where the gate is thin

The assignee ranking shows a mix of research institutes, OEMs and materials producers, several of them linked through repeated co-filing. None of the leading names in the recent-year momentum table added a new filing in the latest year, consistent with both publication lag and a maturing core claim space.

Momentum check
0
Latest-year filings, leading assignees

Leaders have gone quiet in the most recent year

Every assignee in the recent-year momentum ranking, including established research institutes and automakers, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. This is likely partly a publication-lag artefact, but it also reflects a slowdown from the 2019 peak.

Recent-year momentum
Collaboration signal
11
Strongest co-assignee pair count

A handful of tight research-industry pairings

The strongest co-assignee links — a Korean research institute paired with an industrial partner, and a Dead Sea magnesium producer paired with a major automaker — point to applied-research partnerships rather than broad cross-licensing networks.

Co-assignee pairs
Geographic base
China 127
vs. EPO 76, US 76

Filing base skews toward China

With China nearly double the next-largest receiving office, competitive monitoring for this space should treat Chinese-language filings as a primary rather than secondary source of new composition claims.

Receiving offices
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Composition space around the following branches carries fewer overlapping claims relative to the core Mg-Al-Zn and rare-earth systems.
Bi-Al ternary systems for extrusionbiodegradable implant-grade compositionshigh-speed extrusion process windowslow rare-earth-content heat-resistant alloyscasting-compatible composition variants
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH)0
Biotronik AG0
Meotec GmbH0
Toyota Industries Corporation0
Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (Baosteel)0
Dead Sea Magnesium Ltd.0
Volkswagen AG0
U&I Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Alloy Composition covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a crowded core and a thinner periphery. The next step is usually to test a specific composition or process idea against the claims that are actually blocking, not just the ranking.

Map a specific composition against the crowded core

Run the alloy system you are evaluating — element ranges, weight percentages, processing pairing — against the highest-citation records to see how close your composition sits to claimed ranges.

Explore in Eureka

Check the under-claimed branches for freedom to operate

The biomedical and high-speed extrusion branches show fewer overlapping claims than core structural alloys; a focused search there can surface genuine white space faster than a broad landscape read.

Explore in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Alloy Composition covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about magnesium alloy composition patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Alloy Composition covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Magnesium Alloy Alloy Composition in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole magnesium alloy alloy composition corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.