Book a demo

Magnesium Alloy Durability Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026

Magnesium Alloy Durability Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/magnesium-alloy-environmental-durability-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Advanced Materials & Metallurgy
Magnesium Alloy Environmental Durability Patents: Who Holds the Corrosion-Resistance Claims
  • Filings have cooled, not grown. Annual publications fell from a 2018 peak of 76 to 10 in the most recent (partial) year, with the 2022 midpoint at 61 — a flat-to-declining trend, not an emerging one.
  • Coating and alloy composition run neck and neck. C22C alloy-composition filings (997) and C23C coating/surface-deposition filings (991) are almost tied, showing the field splits nearly evenly between bulk-metallurgy and surface-treatment routes to durability.
  • China dominates the filing venue, not necessarily the core IP. China receives 637 filings — more than Japan (279) and the US (263) combined-ish — while the most-cited foundational patents are decades-old US filings on alloy processing.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,847
Published Records
16%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+18%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families addressing magnesium alloy environmental durability — corrosion resistance, degradation control, protective barriers and related surface treatments — filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026. The corpus spans 1,847 patent families across metallurgy, coating chemistry and corrosion-testing disciplines, captured through IPC classes covering alloy composition (C22C), corrosion and metal removal (C23F) and chemical surface treatment (C23C).

Magnesium's low density makes it attractive for transport, electronics housings and biodegradable implants, but its electrochemical reactivity means every commercial use case eventually runs into a corrosion-control patent. The filings here split between changing the alloy itself — adding rare-earth or scandium content, refining microstructure — and treating its surface afterward with conversion coatings, anodising or polymer barriers. Because publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months, the low counts in the final year understate current filing activity rather than signalling an abrupt drop.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES LTD140
  2. 2NIHON PARKERIZING CO LTD63
  3. 3TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK37
  4. 4BIOTRONIK AG33
  5. 5ALONIM HLDG AGRI COOP SOC28
  6. 6INST OF METAL RESEARCH – CHINESE ACAD OF SCI27
  7. 7NISSHIN STEEL CO LTD26
  8. 8KOREA INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY25
  9. 9CHONGQING UNIV25
  10. 10POHANG IRON & STEEL CO LTD24
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,847-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across the IPC subclasses that define the field's two main technical routes.

A field past its filing peak

Publications rose to 76 in 2018, sat near that level through the early 2020s (61 at the 2022 midpoint), and have since declined toward 10 in the most recent partial year. Read the tail years cautiously — an eighteen-month publication lag means recent filings are still arriving — but the multi-year decline from peak predates that lag effect.

A field past its filing peak0204060807220177620182019202020212022202320242025102026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Alloy composition and coating chemistry dominate

C22C (alloys) and C23C (coating and surface deposition) each account for roughly half the corpus, with C22F (non-ferrous metal treatment), B22D (casting) and C25D (electroplating) forming a secondary tier. A61L (sterilising/disinfecting) appearing at 157 records signals a distinct biomedical-implant cluster layered on top of the structural-materials core.

Alloy composition and coating chemistry dominateC22C · Alloys99754.0%C23C · Coating & surface deposition99153.7%C22F · Non-ferrous metal treatment40421.9%B22D · Metal casting1769.5%C25D · Electroplating & electroforming1648.9%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting1578.5%C23F · Corrosion & metal removal1417.6%B05D · Coating processes1035.6%Other75340.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,847 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Magnesium Alloy Environmental Durability with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about magnesium alloy environmental durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited foundational filings

Representative recent filing
US10947609B22021-03-16

Magnesium alloy with scandium addition for improved corrosion resistance

KOREA INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE

The present invention is to provide a magnesium alloy comprising 0.001 parts by weight to 1.0 parts by weight of scandium and the balance of magnesium and unavoidable impurities, based on 100 parts by weight of a magnesium alloy, wherein the magnesium alloy has increased Fe solubility and reduced corrosion while providing excellent mechanical properties and corrosion resistance, and a method for producing the same. The magnesium alloy of the present invention can improve the corrosion resistance of the magnesium alloy by using scandium which can simultaneously prevent from microgalvanic corrosion between a substrate and impurities without deteriorating mechanical properties.Filed by Korea Institute of Materials Science; issued 2021.

US10947609B2 — patent drawing 1US10947609B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5073207AProcess for obtaining magnesium alloys by spray deposition121
2US4134759ALight metal matrix composite materials reinforced with silicon carbide fibers112
3US4997622AHigh mechanical strength magnesium alloys and process for obtaining these alloys by rapid solidification111
4US20080031765A1Magnesium alloy and the respective manufacturing method98
5US5494538AMagnesium alloy for hydrogen production97
6JP2008069418AHigh strength magnesium alloy with excellent corrosion resistance74
7US5143562ABroadly applicable phosphate conversion coating composition and process74
8US6139651AMagnesium alloy for high temperature applications67
9EP1857570A2Method for forming a nickel-based layered structure on a magnesium alloy substrate, a surface-treated magnesi…63
10JP2000080309ACorrosion resistant paint and corrosion resistant steel material coated with same63

Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older filings; treat this table as a map of foundational influence, not of current filing activity.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Reading filing volume, citation weight and geography together points to where claim space is genuinely occupied versus where it only looks that way.

Filing trend
76 → 10
peak (2018) to latest partial year

Volume has cooled from its 2018 high

The decline from a 2018 peak of 76 to a 2022 midpoint of 61 and down toward 10 in the most recent year suggests the core alloy-and-coating claim space filled up earlier in the window, with new entrants now filing into narrower, more specific niches rather than broad compositions.

Adjust for the ~18-month publication lag before reading the final year as a real drop.
Technology split
997 vs 991
C22C alloys vs C23C coatings

Two nearly equal routes to durability

Bulk alloy-composition changes (C22C) and surface coating/deposition treatments (C23C) are filed in almost identical volume, meaning neither approach has won out — a new filer needs freedom-to-operate analysis across both disciplines, not just one.

C22F non-ferrous treatment (404) sits as a secondary layer connecting the two.
Geography
637 filings
China receiving office

China leads filing venue by volume

China's 637 filings outpace Japan (279), the United States (263) and the EPO (219) individually, indicating that current commercial and defensive filing activity concentrates there even though the most historically cited foundational patents were filed in the US decades earlier.

South Korea (87) and PCT/WIPO (69) filings are comparatively modest but include the featured scandium-alloy record.
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairings identified

A tight cluster of Japanese automotive-and-surface-treatment co-filers

The strongest co-assignee pairs link a Japanese surface-treatment specialist with two Japanese automakers, each pairing appearing 11-12 times — a pattern consistent with joint development of corrosion-resistant magnesium components for vehicle parts rather than open licensing.

Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across the whole corpus, so most filers work independently.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to magnesium alloy environmental durability, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

Filing activity concentrates among a handful of Japanese, Korean and Chinese materials and automotive organisations, but recent-year momentum has gone quiet across the most active historical filers, and several technically adjacent sub-areas remain thinly claimed.

Automotive & surface-treatment cluster
12
strongest co-assignee pairing count

Japanese OEM-supplier pairings anchor the historical core

A Japanese surface-treatment specialist paired with two Japanese automakers forms the densest collaboration network in the dataset, reflecting sustained joint work on corrosion-resistant magnesium components for vehicle applications.

All three top pairings involve the same surface-treatment firm.
Momentum check
0
latest-year filings across leading assignees

Historical leaders show no filings in the most recent year

Every one of the assignees with the strongest historical presence — spanning Japanese, Korean and steel-industry filers — recorded zero filings in the latest year, consistent with the broader decline in publication volume rather than any single company exiting the field.

Treat this alongside the publication lag: some of these may simply not have cleared examination yet.
Biomedical branch
157
A61L sterilising/disinfecting records

A distinct implant-grade durability cluster

The presence of 157 A61L-classified records alongside a scandium-alloy example built for corrosion control shows a biomedical implant sub-field running in parallel to the structural-materials mainstream, with its own composition and biocompatibility constraints.

This cluster draws on different institutions than the automotive-supplier core.
🔍
Under-claimed technical branches
Sub-areas with comparatively thin filing density relative to the C22C/C23C core — worth a freedom-to-operate check before assuming they are occupied.
Rare-earth-free corrosion inhibitionGradient conversion coatingsBiodegradable implant degradation-rate tuningElectroplating pretreatment for Mg substratesSterilisation-compatible surface barriers
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.0
Nihon Parkerizing Co., Ltd.0
Toyota Motor Corporation0
Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd.0
POSCO0
Korea Institute of Industrial Technology0
Biotronik AG0
Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and composition data point to specific next steps depending on whether you are scouting freedom-to-operate, tracking a competitor, or scoping new R&D.

Check the under-claimed branches first

Before filing into the crowded C22C/C23C core, run a targeted search across the thinner sub-areas identified here, such as rare-earth-free inhibition or gradient conversion coatings, to see whether the low count reflects genuine white space or simply narrower classification.

Explore white space in Eureka

Verify the momentum drop isn't an artefact

Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, confirm whether the zero-filing latest year for leading assignees reflects a real slowdown or applications still in the examination pipeline.

Track assignee activity in Eureka

Map the co-filing network before approaching partners

With only 10 co-assignee pairings in the whole corpus, the automotive-surface-treatment cluster is a tight, identifiable group — useful context before proposing licensing or joint development conversations.

Trace collaboration patterns in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Magnesium Alloy Environmental Durability in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole magnesium alloy environmental durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.