Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (13 records) with 2024 (22) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 280 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This dataset tracks patent families filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine magnesium alloy compositions with joining techniques — chiefly friction stir welding, laser welding, and dissimilar joining — plus general weldability claims. The search string pairs alloy-specific text terms with process language and anchors the result set against the welding, alloy and metal-treatment IPC classes (B23K20/12, B23K26, C22C23/00) to exclude unrelated magnesium chemistry or unrelated welding filings.
280 families is a modest but focused corpus: it is concentrated enough that a handful of assignees and a handful of IPC subclasses account for most of the activity, which makes both the leaders and the gaps easier to see than in a sprawling field. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 counts in the trend chart understate real filing activity for those years.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 280 families: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filings rose from 9 in 2017 to a peak of 22 in 2024, with the 2022 midpoint at 12. That trajectory is closer to a plateau than to sustained growth — the recent partial-year count of 4 is not yet a signal of decline given the 18-month publication lag, but it is not evidence of acceleration either.
B23K (welding, soldering, brazing) covers 197 of the 280 records and C22C (alloys) covers 113, confirming this is primarily a process-and-composition field rather than a coatings or casting one. C22F (metal treatment), B22D (casting) and B32B (laminates) appear as secondary classes, each present in a minority of families, which is where dissimilar-joining and post-weld treatment claims tend to cluster.
Shares are the percentage of the 280 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about magnesium alloy joining and welding and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe process joins two overlapping members of different shearing strengths by inserting a rotating pin into the overlap from the surface of the weaker-facing member, with the lower-shear-strength member positioned furthest from the welding tool. The claimed structure is a friction stir welded joint produced by this specific member arrangement and pin-insertion sequence.Abstract trimmed for length; see the full-text record for complete claim language.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20100089977A1 | Friction stir welding of dissimilar metals | 86 |
| 2 | US20100089976A1 | Friction stir welding of dissimilar metals | 71 |
| 3 | EP2298944A1 | Magnesium master alloy, manufacturing method thereof, metal alloy using the same, and method of manufacturing… | 30 |
| 4 | JP2004210023A | Vehicular frame and vehicle | 30 |
| 5 | CN103008875A | 一种异种金属焊接接头及其焊接方法 | 29 |
| 6 | CN1526507A | 镁合金激光-TIG焊接方法 | 29 |
| 7 | US20070169859A1 | High strength and high toughness metal and method of producing the same | 25 |
| 8 | US4239535A | Magnesium alloys | 25 |
| 9 | CN101722358A | 不同金属的摩擦搅拌焊接 | 23 |
| 10 | CN115091022A | 一种基于搅拌摩擦焊的裂纹修复及微增材方法 | 22 |
Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings — treat them as a measure of influence on later filers, not of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-throughs from the filing, geography and citation data.
The 2017–2024 climb from 9 to 22 filings looks like steady growth until you notice the 2022 midpoint of 12 sits almost exactly halfway — the increase was not linear, and the most recent full years show no further acceleration. Read this as a maturing process-claim space, not a shrinking one.
China accounts for 124 of the 280 families, more than the United States (40), EPO (24) and Japan (24) combined. Anyone assessing freedom to operate in this field needs a China-first search strategy, not a US- or EU-centric one.
Only 8 co-assignee pairs appear across 280 families, and the strongest (6 shared filings) links a single vehicle-body manufacturer to one university rather than pointing to an industry-wide consortium. Most filers in this space are working alone.
The two most-cited records both cover friction stir welding of dissimilar metals and predate most of the corpus. Later filers are building on that foundation rather than displacing it, which is typical of a citation count skewed toward older art.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to magnesium alloy joining and welding, with the prior art for and against each one.
Recent-year momentum data shows a striking pattern: several of the named assignees with meaningful historical filing show zero activity in the latest tracked year, including one with a -100% year-on-year drop. That is consistent with a field where individual players filed in bursts around specific vehicle or rail programmes rather than maintaining continuous R&D pipelines.
Assignees tied to vehicle frame and body work — including a Japanese rolling-stock/vehicle-body manufacturer and a global automotive group — show no filings in the most recent tracked year. Their historical activity concentrated on structural dissimilar joints rather than continuous process refinement.
The one strong collaboration pattern in the dataset — six shared filings between a vehicle-body manufacturer and a university — stands out precisely because co-assignment is otherwise rare (8 pairs total across 280 families).
Named Chinese-language assignees range from a university to specialist magnesium-alloy manufacturers to a rail locomotive maker, indicating the China filing volume is broad-based rather than driven by one dominant applicant.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH) | 0 | — |
| Magnesium Elektron Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Chongqing University | 0 | -100% |
| Hunan Automotive Engineering Vocational College | 0 | — |
| GM Global Technology Operations LLC | 0 | — |
| Sōgō Sharyo Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (Baosteel) | 0 | — |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. | 0 | — |
The trend and assignee data point to specific next steps depending on what you need to decide.
Friction stir welding of dissimilar metals carries the two highest citation counts in the corpus. Before filing near that boundary, get a claim-by-claim breakdown of what those foundational families actually cover versus what remains open.
Explore in Eureka →With 124 of 280 families routed through China, shifts in that jurisdiction's filing pace will show up before shifts elsewhere. Set up ongoing monitoring rather than a one-time search.
Set up monitoring in Eureka →Post-weld treatment, hybrid laser-arc processes and in-situ quality monitoring show thinner claim density than the core FSW space. Run a freedom-to-operate check before committing R&D budget there.
Run a search in Eureka →The most-cited records in this space, including US20100089977A1 and US20100089976A1, cover friction stir welding of dissimilar metals broadly, with magnesium alloy joints as a key application. GB2438063A is a representative example specific to joining members of different shearing strengths using a controlled pin-insertion sequence. Because these foundational filings are heavily cited, new filers should check claim scope carefully before assuming a specific magnesium-to-aluminium or magnesium-to-steel joint configuration is open.
China receives by far the most filings in this dataset — 124 of 280 families, more than three times the United States total of 40. That concentration reflects where manufacturing and R&D activity for magnesium alloy components is heaviest, particularly in automotive and rail applications. It does not automatically mean China is the right first-filing choice for every applicant, but any competitive analysis or freedom-to-operate search that skips China will miss the majority of relevant art.
Filings climbed from 9 in 2017 to a peak of 22 in 2024, roughly doubling from the 2022 midpoint of 12. This pattern is consistent with a technology area where core process claims — friction stir welding parameters, dissimilar-joint configurations — were being staked out over several years before the pace levelled off. The apparent drop in the most recent year should be read cautiously, since publication typically lags filing by about 18 months and recent-year counts are always incomplete at the time of measurement.
The dataset shows a long tail rather than one dominant filer: activity spans automotive OEMs, rail equipment manufacturers, universities and specialist magnesium-alloy producers, several of them Chinese and Japanese entities. Co-assignment is uncommon, with only 8 co-assignee pairs across 280 families, and the strongest collaboration links a single vehicle-body manufacturer to one university. Several previously active assignees show no filings in the most recent tracked year, so current leadership should be checked against fresh filing data rather than historical volume alone.
IPC composition data shows the bulk of claim density sits in B23K (welding processes) and C22C (alloy composition), with secondary classes like C22F (metal treatment), B22D (casting) and coating-related C23C appearing far less often. That pattern suggests post-weld heat treatment, laser-arc hybrid processes, weld-zone corrosion mitigation and in-situ weld monitoring for friction stir welding remain comparatively under-claimed relative to the core joining process art. Any of these branches is a reasonable starting point for a novelty search before committing to a specific claim strategy.
Go past this page: query the whole magnesium alloy joining and welding corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.