https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/magnesium-alloy-joining-and-welding-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Advanced Materials & Metallurgy
Magnesium Alloy Joining and Welding Patents
  • Filings peaked in 2024 at 22 and have since flattened, suggesting the core friction-stir and laser-welding claim space is filling up rather than expanding.
  • China receives 124 of 280 families, more than three times the next-largest office (United States, 40), making it the default first-filing jurisdiction to watch.
  • Co-assignment is rare — only 8 pairs across 280 families, and the strongest link (6 shared filings) sits between a single Japanese vehicle-body maker and a university, not a broad industry consortium.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
280
Published Records
21%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+69%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (13 records) with 2024 (22) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 280 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine magnesium alloy compositions with joining techniques — chiefly friction stir welding, laser welding, and dissimilar joining — plus general weldability claims. The search string pairs alloy-specific text terms with process language and anchors the result set against the welding, alloy and metal-treatment IPC classes (B23K20/12, B23K26, C22C23/00) to exclude unrelated magnesium chemistry or unrelated welding filings.

280 families is a modest but focused corpus: it is concentrated enough that a handful of assignees and a handful of IPC subclasses account for most of the activity, which makes both the leaders and the gaps easier to see than in a sprawling field. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 counts in the trend chart understate real filing activity for those years.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1KOREA INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY19
  2. 2EMK CO LTD12
  3. 3MAGNESIUM ELEKTRON LTD12
  4. 4CHONGQING UNIV9
  5. 5BAOSHAN IRON & STEEL CO LTD8
  6. 6GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC8
  7. 7JAPAN TRANSPORT ENGINEERING CO8
  8. 8NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD7
  9. 9HARBIN INST OF TECH7
  10. 10BRUHNKE ULRICH7
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Joining and Welding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 280 families: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A flat-to-declining trend after a 2024 peak

Filings rose from 9 in 2017 to a peak of 22 in 2024, with the 2022 midpoint at 12. That trajectory is closer to a plateau than to sustained growth — the recent partial-year count of 4 is not yet a signal of decline given the 18-month publication lag, but it is not evidence of acceleration either.

A flat-to-declining trend after a 2024 peak0613192592017201820192020202120222023222024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Welding and alloy classes dominate; casting and coating are secondary

B23K (welding, soldering, brazing) covers 197 of the 280 records and C22C (alloys) covers 113, confirming this is primarily a process-and-composition field rather than a coatings or casting one. C22F (metal treatment), B22D (casting) and B32B (laminates) appear as secondary classes, each present in a minority of families, which is where dissimilar-joining and post-weld treatment claims tend to cluster.

Welding and alloy classes dominate; casting and coating are secondaryB23K · Welding, soldering & brazing19770.4%C22C · Alloys11340.4%C22F · Non-ferrous metal treatment3512.5%B22D · Metal casting217.5%B32B · Layered products & laminates145.0%C23C · Coating & surface deposition124.3%B21D · Sheet-metal working113.9%B21C · Metal extrusion & drawing93.2%Other5318.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 280 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Joining and Welding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Magnesium Alloy Joining and Welding with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about magnesium alloy joining and welding and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records in this space

Representative filing
GB2438063A2007-11-14

GB2438063A — Friction stir welding process for dissimilar metal alloys (Honda Motor Co., Ltd., 2007)

HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD.

The process joins two overlapping members of different shearing strengths by inserting a rotating pin into the overlap from the surface of the weaker-facing member, with the lower-shear-strength member positioned furthest from the welding tool. The claimed structure is a friction stir welded joint produced by this specific member arrangement and pin-insertion sequence.Abstract trimmed for length; see the full-text record for complete claim language.

GB2438063A — patent drawing 1GB2438063A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited families
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20100089977A1Friction stir welding of dissimilar metals86
2US20100089976A1Friction stir welding of dissimilar metals71
3EP2298944A1Magnesium master alloy, manufacturing method thereof, metal alloy using the same, and method of manufacturing…30
4JP2004210023AVehicular frame and vehicle30
5CN103008875A一种异种金属焊接接头及其焊接方法29
6CN1526507A镁合金激光-TIG焊接方法29
7US20070169859A1High strength and high toughness metal and method of producing the same25
8US4239535AMagnesium alloys25
9CN101722358A不同金属的摩擦搅拌焊接23
10CN115091022A一种基于搅拌摩擦焊的裂纹修复及微增材方法22

Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings — treat them as a measure of influence on later filers, not of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Joining and Welding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers indicate

Three read-throughs from the filing, geography and citation data.

Filing momentum
22 in 2024
peak year

Growth has stalled after a single strong year

The 2017–2024 climb from 9 to 22 filings looks like steady growth until you notice the 2022 midpoint of 12 sits almost exactly halfway — the increase was not linear, and the most recent full years show no further acceleration. Read this as a maturing process-claim space, not a shrinking one.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Jurisdiction concentration
124 of 280
filed via China

China is the dominant first-filing office by a wide margin

China accounts for 124 of the 280 families, more than the United States (40), EPO (24) and Japan (24) combined. Anyone assessing freedom to operate in this field needs a China-first search strategy, not a US- or EU-centric one.

Receiving office breakdown
Collaboration pattern
8 pairs
co-assignee links

Very little cross-organisation filing

Only 8 co-assignee pairs appear across 280 families, and the strongest (6 shared filings) links a single vehicle-body manufacturer to one university rather than pointing to an industry-wide consortium. Most filers in this space are working alone.

Co-assignee network
Citation influence
86 citations
top-cited record

Influence concentrates in early dissimilar-metal FSW filings

The two most-cited records both cover friction stir welding of dissimilar metals and predate most of the corpus. Later filers are building on that foundation rather than displacing it, which is typical of a citation count skewed toward older art.

Most-cited records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to magnesium alloy joining and welding, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Joining and Welding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the activity has cooled

Recent-year momentum data shows a striking pattern: several of the named assignees with meaningful historical filing show zero activity in the latest tracked year, including one with a -100% year-on-year drop. That is consistent with a field where individual players filed in bursts around specific vehicle or rail programmes rather than maintaining continuous R&D pipelines.

Automotive OEM angle
0 in latest year
multiple named assignees

Vehicle-body and automotive filers have gone quiet recently

Assignees tied to vehicle frame and body work — including a Japanese rolling-stock/vehicle-body manufacturer and a global automotive group — show no filings in the most recent tracked year. Their historical activity concentrated on structural dissimilar joints rather than continuous process refinement.

Recent-year momentum
Research institute angle
6 shared filings
strongest co-assignee pair

University-institute pairing is the exception, not the rule

The one strong collaboration pattern in the dataset — six shared filings between a vehicle-body manufacturer and a university — stands out precisely because co-assignment is otherwise rare (8 pairs total across 280 families).

Co-assignee pairs
Geographic base
124 families
China receiving office

Chinese entities span universities, materials firms and rail equipment makers

Named Chinese-language assignees range from a university to specialist magnesium-alloy manufacturers to a rail locomotive maker, indicating the China filing volume is broad-based rather than driven by one dominant applicant.

Receiving office breakdown
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches with thin claim density relative to the core friction-stir and dissimilar-joining art.
Post-weld heat treatment of Mg-Al dissimilar jointsLaser-arc hybrid welding of wrought Mg alloysWeld-zone corrosion mitigation coatingsExtrusion-to-weld process integrationIn-situ weld quality monitoring for FSW
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH)0
Magnesium Elektron Ltd.0
Chongqing University0-100%
Hunan Automotive Engineering Vocational College0
GM Global Technology Operations LLC0
Sōgō Sharyo Co., Ltd.0
Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (Baosteel)0
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Joining and Welding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

The trend and assignee data point to specific next steps depending on what you need to decide.

Map the dissimilar-joining claim boundary

Friction stir welding of dissimilar metals carries the two highest citation counts in the corpus. Before filing near that boundary, get a claim-by-claim breakdown of what those foundational families actually cover versus what remains open.

Explore in Eureka →

Track China filings as the leading indicator

With 124 of 280 families routed through China, shifts in that jurisdiction's filing pace will show up before shifts elsewhere. Set up ongoing monitoring rather than a one-time search.

Set up monitoring in Eureka →

Test the under-claimed branches

Post-weld treatment, hybrid laser-arc processes and in-situ quality monitoring show thinner claim density than the core FSW space. Run a freedom-to-operate check before committing R&D budget there.

Run a search in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Joining and Welding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Joining and Welding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Magnesium Alloy Joining and Welding in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole magnesium alloy joining and welding corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.