https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/magnesium-alloy-scale-up-and-mass-production-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Advanced Materials & Metallurgy
Magnesium Alloy Scale-Up and Mass Production Patents
  • Filing has cooled since its 2018 peak. 165 families span 2015-2026, with the peak year at 7 filings in 2018 and the midpoint year 2022 sitting below that level — a flat-to-declining curve, not a growth story.
  • Casting and alloy composition dominate the claim space. C22C (alloys) and B22D (metal casting) cover the large majority of records, while extrusion (B21C) and powder metallurgy (B22F) show far fewer filings.
  • Ownership is fragmented around individual inventors, not a single dominant corporate filer. The strongest co-filing pairs centre on named inventors such as Oishi Yukihiro and Kawabe Nozomu rather than one company holding a clear lead.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
165
Published Records
46%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-33%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families addressing the transition of magnesium alloy processing from lab-scale demonstration to repeatable, high-volume manufacturing. The search combines alloy composition language with process terms — high-pressure die casting, twin-roll casting, extrusion scale-up and mass production — against the IPC classes that cover alloy formulation, casting equipment and metal forming. The result is a corpus centred on how magnesium sheet, coil and cast parts get made at production volumes, not on end-use applications.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the middle of 2026. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one to two years of activity will read lower than they eventually settle once pending applications publish.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015-2026
  1. 1SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES LTD51
  2. 2NTN CORP7
  3. 3COMMONWEALTH SCI & IND RES ORG6
  4. 4AISIN TAKAOKA CO LTD6
  5. 5BIOTRONIK AG6
  6. 6MATERION BRUSH INC6
  7. 7BAOSTEEL METAL CO LTD5
  8. 8TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK4
  9. 9DEAD SEA MAGNESIUM4
  10. 10HEFEI NOVA ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

The trend line and the IPC breakdown together show where effort has gone and where it has not: heavy concentration in alloy chemistry and casting, thin coverage in extrusion and powder routes.

A flat-to-declining filing curve

Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 7 in 2018, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 4. There is no sustained upward trend visible in the record; 2026 is a partial year and should not be read as a drop-off.

A flat-to-declining filing curve024682201772018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Casting and alloy treatment carry the weight

C22C (alloys) appears in 141 of 165 records and B22D (metal casting) in 81, confirming that most activity sits at the alloy-and-casting intersection. Rolling (B21B, 29) and extrusion (B21C, 19) trail well behind, and powder metallurgy (B22F, 12) is a minor branch.

Casting and alloy treatment carry the weightC22C · Alloys14185.5%B22D · Metal casting8149.1%C22F · Non-ferrous metal treatment5633.9%B21B · Metal rolling2917.6%B21C · Metal extrusion & drawing1911.5%B22F · Powder metallurgy127.3%F16C · Shafts, bearings & couplings74.2%B22C · Foundry moulding63.6%Other4728.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 165 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Magnesium Alloy Scale-Up and Mass Production with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about magnesium alloy scale-up and mass production and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative filing
US9604267B22017-03-28

Method for producing magnesium alloy sheet and magnesium alloy coil stock (US9604267B2)

SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, LTD.

The patent describes a continuous process for producing magnesium alloy sheet: a raw material sheet is preheated to 280°C or less, then rolled with a reduction roll held between 230°C and 290°C, with preheating, rolling and coiling repeated in a continuous cycle to produce long coiled sheet stock with good press formability.Filed by Sumitomo Electric Industries, published 2017-03-28.

US9604267B2 — patent drawing 1US9604267B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5552110AHeat resistant magnesium alloy38
2US5855697AMagnesium alloy having superior elevated-temperature properties and die castability35
3JP2003226929ACold press forming method for magnesium alloy34
4US20080311423A1Producing Method for Magnesium Alloy Material28
5US5336466AHeat resistant magnesium alloy27
6JP2004238678AMagnesium alloy26
7US20050269856A1Seat back frame and method of manufacturing the same23
8JP1990047237AHigh-damping material of mg alloy and its production21
9US20110189480A1Magnesium Fastener Manufacturing Method and A Magnesium Fastener Member Produced Thereby20
10EP0524644A1Heat resistant magnesium alloy20

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of historical importance rather than current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the trend and classification data are read together.

Filing momentum
Peak 7 (2018) vs 4 (2022)
families per year

The wave has already passed its crest

Filing peaked in 2018 and has not returned to that level since. A flat-to-declining curve in a 165-family corpus suggests the core alloy and casting parameter space has already attracted the bulk of the filing activity that is going to happen under this search definition.

Trend data, 2017-2026
Claim density
141 of 165 records
classified under C22C

Alloy composition is the crowded core

Nearly all records touch alloy chemistry (C22C), and most also touch casting (B22D) or thermal treatment (C22F). New composition claims in this space will need to differentiate against a dense prior-art base rather than an open field.

IPC composition
Process coverage gap
19 vs 141
B21C extrusion records vs C22C alloy records

Extrusion and powder routes are thin

Extrusion scale-up (B21C, 19 records) and powder metallurgy (B22F, 12 records) are each covered by a fraction of the filings seen in alloy and casting classes, despite both terms appearing in the search itself. That imbalance is a filing-strategy signal, not a technical judgement on feasibility.

IPC composition
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to magnesium alloy scale-up and mass production, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and how concentrated is ownership

No single corporate assignee dominates this corpus. The strongest collaboration signals are between named individual inventors rather than between companies, and recent-year activity across the most active parties in the ranking has gone quiet.

Co-filing cluster
7 shared families
Oishi Yukihiro + Kawabe Nozomu

The densest collaboration pair in the dataset

The strongest co-assignee link, at 7 shared families, sits between two named inventors rather than two companies, with related pairings (5 families each) extending to two further individuals. This points to a tight, individual-led development group rather than a corporate joint venture.

Co-assignee pairs, n=10
Receiving offices
US 39 · EPO 36 · CN 34
top three jurisdictions

Filing spread is genuinely global, not US-led

The United States, Europe and China sit within a few filings of each other, with Canada, Australia and Japan following at lower but still meaningful volumes. A design-around review needs to clear all three lead jurisdictions, not just one.

Receiving office counts
Recent momentum
0 in latest year
across leading named assignees

Activity among top-ranked filers has paused

Every assignee shown with recent-year momentum data recorded zero filings in the latest year, including established organisations and the most active individual inventors. Given the 18-month publication lag, this understates true current activity, but it still marks a visible slowdown against the 2018 peak.

Recent-year momentum
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches carry far fewer records relative to the core alloy-and-casting claim space.
Extrusion scale-up parametersTwin-roll casting process controlMagnesium powder metallurgy consolidationContinuous coil coiling thermal profilesFoundry moulding for Mg parts
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.0
Brahmi Wellman AG0
OISHI YUKIHIRO0
KAWABE NOZOMU0
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)0
Biotronik AG0
Aisin Takaoka Co., Ltd.0
Casting Center Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace identification, or competitive tracking.

Run a design-around check on the top-cited claims

The five most-cited records, several from the 1990s and 2000s, still anchor heat-resistance and die-castability claims that later filings build on. Any new composition claim should be checked against these before drafting.

Explore citation chains in Eureka

Model the extrusion and powder-metallurgy gap

With extrusion and powder routes each covered by a small fraction of the alloy-class filings, a targeted claim in either branch has more room to stand on its own prior art rather than competing with a dense composition literature.

Map white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnesium Alloy Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Magnesium Alloy Scale-Up and Mass Production in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole magnesium alloy scale-up and mass production corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.