Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This landscape tracks patent families addressing the transition of magnesium alloy processing from lab-scale demonstration to repeatable, high-volume manufacturing. The search combines alloy composition language with process terms — high-pressure die casting, twin-roll casting, extrusion scale-up and mass production — against the IPC classes that cover alloy formulation, casting equipment and metal forming. The result is a corpus centred on how magnesium sheet, coil and cast parts get made at production volumes, not on end-use applications.
Coverage runs from 2015 through the middle of 2026. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one to two years of activity will read lower than they eventually settle once pending applications publish.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
The trend line and the IPC breakdown together show where effort has gone and where it has not: heavy concentration in alloy chemistry and casting, thin coverage in extrusion and powder routes.
Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 7 in 2018, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 4. There is no sustained upward trend visible in the record; 2026 is a partial year and should not be read as a drop-off.
C22C (alloys) appears in 141 of 165 records and B22D (metal casting) in 81, confirming that most activity sits at the alloy-and-casting intersection. Rolling (B21B, 29) and extrusion (B21C, 19) trail well behind, and powder metallurgy (B22F, 12) is a minor branch.
Shares are the percentage of the 165 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about magnesium alloy scale-up and mass production and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe patent describes a continuous process for producing magnesium alloy sheet: a raw material sheet is preheated to 280°C or less, then rolled with a reduction roll held between 230°C and 290°C, with preheating, rolling and coiling repeated in a continuous cycle to produce long coiled sheet stock with good press formability.Filed by Sumitomo Electric Industries, published 2017-03-28.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5552110A | Heat resistant magnesium alloy | 38 |
| 2 | US5855697A | Magnesium alloy having superior elevated-temperature properties and die castability | 35 |
| 3 | JP2003226929A | Cold press forming method for magnesium alloy | 34 |
| 4 | US20080311423A1 | Producing Method for Magnesium Alloy Material | 28 |
| 5 | US5336466A | Heat resistant magnesium alloy | 27 |
| 6 | JP2004238678A | Magnesium alloy | 26 |
| 7 | US20050269856A1 | Seat back frame and method of manufacturing the same | 23 |
| 8 | JP1990047237A | High-damping material of mg alloy and its production | 21 |
| 9 | US20110189480A1 | Magnesium Fastener Manufacturing Method and A Magnesium Fastener Member Produced Thereby | 20 |
| 10 | EP0524644A1 | Heat resistant magnesium alloy | 20 |
Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of historical importance rather than current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the trend and classification data are read together.
Filing peaked in 2018 and has not returned to that level since. A flat-to-declining curve in a 165-family corpus suggests the core alloy and casting parameter space has already attracted the bulk of the filing activity that is going to happen under this search definition.
Nearly all records touch alloy chemistry (C22C), and most also touch casting (B22D) or thermal treatment (C22F). New composition claims in this space will need to differentiate against a dense prior-art base rather than an open field.
Extrusion scale-up (B21C, 19 records) and powder metallurgy (B22F, 12 records) are each covered by a fraction of the filings seen in alloy and casting classes, despite both terms appearing in the search itself. That imbalance is a filing-strategy signal, not a technical judgement on feasibility.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to magnesium alloy scale-up and mass production, with the prior art for and against each one.
No single corporate assignee dominates this corpus. The strongest collaboration signals are between named individual inventors rather than between companies, and recent-year activity across the most active parties in the ranking has gone quiet.
The strongest co-assignee link, at 7 shared families, sits between two named inventors rather than two companies, with related pairings (5 families each) extending to two further individuals. This points to a tight, individual-led development group rather than a corporate joint venture.
The United States, Europe and China sit within a few filings of each other, with Canada, Australia and Japan following at lower but still meaningful volumes. A design-around review needs to clear all three lead jurisdictions, not just one.
Every assignee shown with recent-year momentum data recorded zero filings in the latest year, including established organisations and the most active individual inventors. Given the 18-month publication lag, this understates true current activity, but it still marks a visible slowdown against the 2018 peak.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Brahmi Wellman AG | 0 | — |
| OISHI YUKIHIRO | 0 | — |
| KAWABE NOZOMU | 0 | — |
| Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) | 0 | — |
| Biotronik AG | 0 | — |
| Aisin Takaoka Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Casting Center Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace identification, or competitive tracking.
The five most-cited records, several from the 1990s and 2000s, still anchor heat-resistance and die-castability claims that later filings build on. Any new composition claim should be checked against these before drafting.
Explore citation chains in EurekaWith extrusion and powder routes each covered by a small fraction of the alloy-class filings, a targeted claim in either branch has more room to stand on its own prior art rather than competing with a dense composition literature.
Map white space in EurekaOwnership in this 165-family corpus is fragmented rather than concentrated under one dominant company. The clearest collaboration signal is between named individual inventors, with Oishi Yukihiro and Kawabe Nozomu sharing 7 families and two further pairings each sharing 5. Organisations such as Sumitomo Electric Industries appear with representative filings, but no single assignee holds a commanding share of the ranking, which favours a competitive rather than blocked field for new entrants.
Filing activity peaked at 7 families in 2018 and has not returned to that level since, with the 2022 midpoint sitting at 4. That is a flat-to-declining curve across the 2015-2026 window covered here, not sustained growth. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the final one to two years in the data will understate true activity, so the apparent recent slowdown should be treated cautiously rather than read as a hard stop.
Alloy composition (IPC class C22C) and metal casting (B22D) carry the bulk of the filing activity, appearing in 141 and 81 of the 165 records respectively. Thermal treatment of non-ferrous metals (C22F) is also well represented. Rolling, extrusion and powder metallurgy each show meaningfully fewer records, which signals where the claim space is thinner rather than where the technology is necessarily less mature.
The clearest gaps sit in extrusion scale-up and powder metallurgy consolidation, each covered by roughly a tenth of the record count seen in alloy composition claims, despite both appearing directly in the search terms. Twin-roll casting process control and continuous coiling thermal profiles are narrower branches within the casting and rolling classes that also show thinner coverage relative to the core alloy space. These are starting points for a freedom-to-operate search, not a guarantee that no relevant prior art exists.
US9604267B2, assigned to Sumitomo Electric Industries and published in 2017, claims a continuous process for producing magnesium alloy coil stock: preheating a raw sheet to 280°C or less, rolling it with a reduction roll held between 230°C and 290°C, and repeating the preheat-roll-coil cycle continuously. It constrains that specific temperature window and continuous-cycle approach for coil production, but it does not cover magnesium processing generally. A process using a different temperature range, a batch rather than continuous cycle, or a different forming method would need its own freedom-to-operate review rather than relying on this one patent as a blanket block.
Go past this page: query the whole magnesium alloy scale-up and mass production corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.