Book a demo

Magnesium-Ion Battery Patent Landscape 2026

Magnesium-Ion Battery Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Magnesium-Ion Battery Patent Landscape in 2026

The magnesium-ion battery patent field is highly concentrated, with the CATL corporate family commanding a dominant position among the hundred largest filers. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2022 peak and the most recent years remain understated by publication lag.

4,854
Patent families in scope
65%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+62%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

CATL entities lead a heavily consolidated field

Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited ranks first among all applicants, followed by its affiliate Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd in second place and Toyota Motor Corporation in third — the top three together account for a commanding share of activity among the leading filers.

The top five filers’ combined share of the hundred largest filers stands at 65%, signaling a field where a single corporate family and one major automotive incumbent have built structural barriers. The gap between the first-ranked entity and the rest of the ranking is unusually wide, indicating a two-tier market: one dominant cluster and a long tail of smaller, specialized players.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited2,141
2Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.741
3Toyota Motor Corporation345
4Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.157
5Jiangsu Contemporary Amperex Technology Limited119
6Hydro-Québec76
7Sionic Energy, Inc.75
8Pellion Technologies, Inc.66
9NOHMS Technologies, Inc.62
10Ningde Amperex Technology Limited59
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11American Lithium Energy Corporation57
12Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.57
13Shanghai Jiao Tong University56
14LG Energy Solution, Ltd.49
15GRST Singapore Pte. Ltd.47
16Honeycomb Battery Company45
17FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation44
18UChicago Argonne LLC39
19Chongqing University36
20Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.33
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The CATL family’s scale suggests deep vertical integration of magnesium-ion research within its broader battery IP strategy, while Toyota’s third-place position reflects sustained automotive-grade interest. Smaller entrants such as Hydro-Québec, Sionic Energy, and Pellion Technologies occupy niche positions in electrolyte and electrode chemistry, preserving some competitive openness in those sub-domains.

The most recent 18–24 months of data are under-counted due to patent publication lag; apparent softening in 20242026 filing figures should not be interpreted as reduced activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year growth with a 2022 volume peak and a battery-cell core

Two charts together reveal a field that scaled rapidly from 2017 to 2022 and whose technology mix remains anchored in battery cell chemistry, with smaller adjacent branches representing potential diversification vectors.

Annual filing trend

Filings grew from 170 in 2017 to a peak of 934 in 2022, representing a multi-year expansion confirmed by the 62% recent-window growth figure. The subsequent easing to 883 in 2023 and lower counts in 2024–2026 reflects both natural moderation from a high base and known publication lag; no genuine decline should be inferred from the most recent two years.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 934 in 2022.170201723920184232019407202068620219342022883202363320244382025412026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01M (Batteries, cells and fuel cells) dominates the branch mix by a wide margin, confirming that core electrochemical cell design is the field’s primary focus. Adjacent branches — including H01G (Capacitors), C01G (Compounds of other metals), B60L (Electric vehicle propulsion), and C01B (Non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds) — each account for 3% or less of records, pointing to relatively sparse coverage in hybrid energy storage, precursor chemistry, and automotive integration.

Technology compositionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells leads with 5,856; H01G · Capacitors 267.H01M · Batteries, cells …5,856H01G · Capacitors267C01G · Compounds of othe…204B60L · Electric vehicle …161C01B · Non-metallic elem…150C07F · Organo-metallic &…120H02J · Power supply & gr…117B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…66↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20120328935A1Published 2012-12-27

Active material for rechargeable battery

Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha

A magnesium battery includes a first electrode including an active material and a second electrode. An electrolyte is disposed between the first electrode and the second electrode. The electrolyte includes a magnesium compound. The active material includes an inter-metallic compound of magnesium and antimony. The active material also includes antimony or an… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Active material for rechargeable battery — patent drawingActive material for rechargeable battery — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Battery thermal management system and method149
2Non-aqueous electrolytes for electrochemical cells149
3Chemical-Free Production of Graphene-Encapsulated …148
4Stable electrolyte counteranions for electrochemic…130
5Battery electrode or separator surface protective …126
6Rechargeable magnesium-ion cell having a high-capa…115
7Composite, method of preparing the composite, elec…107
8Three-dimensional porous-structured current collet…105

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of a concentrated applicant base, a clear lifecycle stage, active cross-sector co-filing, and broad jurisdictional coverage shapes the strategic options available to new and existing participants.

Growth

Growth stage, easing from a 2022 peak

The field carries a Growth lifecycle designation: the recent three-year filing window sits well above the prior three-year window, confirming net expansion. However, annual volume has eased from its 2022 peak of 934 filings, suggesting the phase of explosive ramp is transitioning toward more selective, higher-quality filing strategies. Entrants should expect established players to deepen claim scope rather than broaden volume.

Lifecycle · Growth
Concentration

One corporate family holds structural dominance

The top five filers account for 65% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, and the CATL family alone spans three separately ranked entities (Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited at rank 1, Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd at rank 2, and Jiangsu Contemporary Amperex Tech Ltd at rank 5). This concentration means that freedom-to-operate analysis must account for a broad, interconnected portfolio rather than discrete competitors. The second tier — Toyota, Murata, Hydro-Québec, Sionic Energy, Pellion Technologies — offers more targeted IP exposure.

Concentration · High
Collaboration

Murata–Hydro-Québec leads; Toyota co-files with universities

The most active co-filing pair is Murata Manufacturing and Hydro-Québec with 37 joint filings, reflecting a materials-chemistry partnership. CATL Co Ltd co-files frequently with its affiliate Jiangsu Contemporary Amperex Tech Ltd (18 filings) and Shenzhen affiliate (12 filings), indicating intra-group IP coordination. Toyota co-files with Shanghai Jiao Tong University (12 filings), the National Institute for Materials Science (10 filings), and its North American manufacturing arm (4 filings), signaling an open-innovation approach to advanced materials and cell design. NOHMS Technologies and Sionic Energy share 6 joint filings, an unusual startup-to-startup collaboration in electrolyte chemistry.

Collaboration · Active
Geography

US and EPO lead; China and Japan are secondary filing destinations

The United States and EPO (Europe) are the two leading jurisdictions at the patent-record level, followed by China and Germany. WIPO PCT filings indicate active international prosecution strategies. Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia form a secondary ring of coverage. The relative under-filing in China — given that leading applicants are Chinese entities — may reflect strategic choices to prioritize Western markets or to rely on domestic utility-model routes not captured here.

Geography · US/EPO-led
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.Hydro-Québec37
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.Jiangsu Contemporary Amperex Technology Limited18
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.Shenzhen CATL Future Energy Technology Co., Ltd.12
Toyota Motor CorporationShanghai Jiao Tong University12
Toyota Motor CorporationNational Institute for Materials Science (NIMS)10
NOHMS Technologies, Inc.Sionic Energy, Inc.6
Hydro-QuébecBoard of Regents, The University of Texas System6
Toyota Motor CorporationToyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.4
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.CATL Future Energy (Shanghai) Research Institute Co., Ltd.3
Toyota Motor CorporationNagoya Institute of Technology3

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Collaboration data reflects co-applicant pairs on shared patent filings; jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level.Explore insights →
Leaders

CATL affiliates accelerate; Toyota retracts but retains deep cell expertise

The two dominant positions belong to CATL-family entities, with Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited holding a decisive lead. Toyota Motor Corporation remains the strongest non-CATL incumbent but has significantly reduced recent filing pace.

Leader · Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited

Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited

Ranked first with 2,141 patent families, this entity concentrates its portfolio overwhelmingly in H01M 10 (battery cells and systems), H01M 50 (battery components), and H01M 4 (electrodes). Its parent affiliate Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd (rank 2, 741 patent families) recorded a momentum of +128% in the most recent three-year window, and the Hong Kong entity itself achieved 4.1× versus its prior three-year period — both trajectories confirm aggressive and sustained portfolio expansion rather than plateau.

families: 2,141
Challenger · Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota Motor Corporation

Ranked third with 345 patent families, Toyota focuses on H01M 10 (battery cells), H01M 4 (electrodes), and H01M 50 (components), closely mirroring the CATL technology emphasis but at a fraction of the volume. Its recent three-year momentum trend is –76%, indicating a sharp reduction in new filings relative to the prior period — a retrenchment that may reflect portfolio maturation or a strategic pivot toward solid-state or hydrogen technologies. Co-filing partnerships with Shanghai Jiao Tong University and the National Institute for Materials Science suggest continued reliance on external academic capability for frontier research.

families: 345
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top filers including Murata Manufacturing, Hydro-Québec, Sionic Energy, and Pellion Technologies.
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.Hydro-Québec+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.1,289▲ +128%
Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited520▲ 4.1× vs prior 3-yr
Toyota Motor Corporation21▼ -76%
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.1▼ -93%
NOHMS Technologies, Inc.41▼ -9%
Jiangsu Contemporary Amperex Technology Limited45▼ -37%
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.24▼ -57%
Hydro-Québec23▼ -45%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Applicant momentum compares the most recent three-year filing window against the prior three-year window.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the battery-cell core

Several IPC branches appear at low relative share despite plausible technical and commercial linkage to magnesium-ion battery systems; these represent areas where the existing patent corpus is thin relative to potential application scope.

H01G · Capacitors and hybrid energy storage

With only 3% share of records relative to the dominant H01M branch, capacitor-related filings are sparse despite the known relevance of hybrid supercapacitor-battery architectures for magnesium-ion systems. The technical entry path involves pairing Mg-ion intercalation cathodes with capacitive anodes to improve power density — a route that NOHMS Technologies has partially explored (40 filings in H01G 11) but that remains open. New entrants with expertise in double-layer or pseudocapacitive materials could establish differentiated positions here.

Search this in Eureka →

B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion integration

Only 2% of records fall under B60L (electric vehicle propulsion), indicating that vehicle-level integration of magnesium-ion chemistry — including battery management, charging interfaces, and drivetrain coupling — is substantially under-patented relative to cell-chemistry work. Given that magnesium’s abundance and theoretical energy density make it attractive for EV applications, the absence of automotive-integration filings represents an observable gap. Players with EV systems expertise could file into this branch as cell chemistries approach commercialization readiness.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See sparse-filing analysis across all identified adjacent IPC branches including C01G, C01B, and C07F.
C01G · Compounds of other metals (precursor chemistry)C07F · Organo-metallic electrolyte compounds+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch share figures are relative to total patent records in the corpus; low share reflects relative sparsity, not absence of activity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH01M 10 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 4 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 50 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 6 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01G 11 · Capacitors
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.Strong · 1,761Moderate · 618Strong · 1,028Emerging · 18Absent
Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) LimitedStrong · 694Moderate · 227Strong · 389Emerging · 8Absent
Toyota Motor CorporationStrong · 164Strong · 121Emerging · 16AbsentAbsent
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.Strong · 134Strong · 118AbsentEmerging · 7Absent
NOHMS Technologies, Inc.Strong · 110Strong · 69Emerging · 19Emerging · 9Moderate · 40
Jiangsu Contemporary Amperex Technology LimitedStrong · 111AbsentStrong · 79Emerging · 7Absent
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.Strong · 87Strong · 67Moderate · 21AbsentModerate · 20
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own magnesium-ion battery patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.