Magnetic and Air Bearings Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
- Filing has cooled since its 2017 peak of 40. the midpoint year 2022 sits at 26, and the trend line since then is flat to declining rather than growing.
- F16C dominates at 753 of 830 records. H02K (325) and F04D (185) show the technology is filed mainly as a bearing mechanism, with motor and pump integration as secondary claim territory.
- Recent-year momentum has gone quiet across the field's biggest names. several established assignees, including Daikin and Ebara, show zero filings in the latest year, which points to a maturing core rather than an active filing race.
Filing growth compares 2021 (29 records) with 2024 (24) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 830 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What the patent record shows
Magnetic and air bearing patents cluster tightly around rotor support mechanics rather than any single end application. Of 830 patent families published between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, 753 carry an F16C classification for shafts, bearings and couplings, with electric motor integration (H02K, 325 records) and pump systems (F04D, 185 records) as the largest adjacent claim areas. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the apparent decline into 2026 understates how much has actually been filed in the last two years.
Filing activity peaked in 2017 at 40 records and has not returned to that level since; the 2022 midpoint of 26 confirms a flat-to-declining trajectory rather than a technology still in a growth phase. Receiving-office data shows the United States (281) and Europe (203) ahead of Japan (151), with WIPO PCT filings (51) indicating a smaller share of applicants pursuing broad international protection.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
The filing curve and IPC mix together describe a field that built its core claim positions early and has since consolidated around a stable set of mechanical and control-loop configurations.
A peak behind us, not ahead
From a 2017 high of 40 filings, volume declined toward the 2022 midpoint of 26 and continues on a flat-to-declining path into the most recent, partial year. This pattern is consistent with a technology whose foundational claims were staked out in the early-to-mid 2010s, leaving later entrants to file around narrower control-loop and touchdown-bearing refinements.
Bearing mechanics lead, motor and pump integration follow
F16C accounts for 753 of 830 records, confirming that most applicants claim the bearing structure itself. H02K (325) and F04D (185) show where bearing claims most often attach to a driven system, while smaller counts in F16F, F01D, F25B, G01B and H02J mark thinner, more specialised filing activity in vibration damping, turbine integration, refrigeration compressors, sensing and power electronics.
Shares are the percentage of the 830 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Magnetic and Air Bearings with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about magnetic and air bearings and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe patents everyone else cites
Method for compensating a low-frequency disturbance force of a rotor using active magnetic bearings
A method for compensating at least one low-frequency mechanical disturbance oscillation, caused in a rotor of an active magnetic bearing by a disturbance force, where the oscillation frequency sits below the rotor's rotational frequency. The method analyses the disturbance, determines a compensation force, and applies that force to the rotor through a compensation control circuit.Filed by Siemens Aktiengesellschaft; granted 2018-06-26.

| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6710489B1 | Axially free flywheel system | 184 |
| 2 | US6758593B1 | Pumping or mixing system using a levitating magnetic element, related system components, and related methods | 128 |
| 3 | US6353273B1 | Hybrid foil-magnetic bearing | 124 |
| 4 | US5347190A | Magnetic bearing systems | 124 |
| 5 | US4732353A | Three axis attitude control system | 123 |
| 6 | US6262505B1 | Flywheel power supply having axial magnetic bearing for frictionless rotation | 112 |
| 7 | US5998899A | Magnetic bearing system including a control system for a flywheel and method for operating same | 106 |
| 8 | US6630761B1 | Combination mechanical and magnetic support for a flywheel power supply | 104 |
| 9 | US5818137A | Integrated magnetic levitation and rotation system | 103 |
| 10 | US20100327687A1 | Systems, Devices, and/or Methods for Managing Magnetic Bearings | 98 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more years to accumulate citations; treat this table as a map of foundational influence, not current filing activity.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Reading the numbers
Three patterns stand out once the filing trend, IPC split and citation table are put side by side.
The core claim space was staked early
A 2017 peak of 40 filings followed by a decline through the 2022 midpoint of 26 suggests the foundational rotor-support and control-loop configurations were claimed in the early filing years, with later applicants working around a narrower set of open positions.
Bearing mechanics, not applications, anchor the field
F16C's dominance over H02K and F04D shows applicants file primarily on the bearing structure and control approach, then extend into motor or pump integration as a secondary claim layer rather than the other way round.
A small set of foundational patents still anchors the art
The most-cited records date to the 1990s and early 2000s, including hybrid foil-magnetic bearing and flywheel system patents. Their citation counts reflect decades of accumulation, so they mark influence on later filings rather than current freedom-to-operate risk.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to magnetic and air bearings, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Ebara Corporation | Ebara Densan, Ltd. | 6 |
| Ebara Corporation | Aurora Co., Ltd. | 5 |
| JTEKT Corporation | BOC Edwards | 2 |
| SKF Magnetic Mechatronics | OLIVIER LEMARCHAND | 1 |
| SKF Magnetic Mechatronics | JOAQUIM DASILVA | 1 |
| Ebara Corporation | Ebara Research Co., Ltd. | 1 |
| Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. | Seiko Epson Corporation | 1 |
| Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. | Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. | 1 |
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the corpus, and the strongest is between two related Ebara entities, with a smaller Ebara-Aurora pairing and a JTEKT-BOC Edwards pairing following at low counts. Co-assignment is not a common filing strategy in this field.
Who holds the ground, and who has gone quiet
Recent-year momentum data shows the field's most established names filing nothing in the latest year, which is a stronger signal of a mature, occupied claim space than the raw ranking alone.
Established assignees are not adding new claims
Daikin, SKF's magnetic machinery unit, Ebara, Edwards Japan, Koyo Seiko and Sychron Technology all show zero filings in the most recent year tracked. For a field with this filing history, that pattern points to portfolios being maintained rather than actively extended.
Related entities file together, competitors do not
The strongest co-assignee pairing links two Ebara group entities; the next strongest is also an Ebara pairing. Cross-company collaboration, such as the JTEKT-BOC Edwards pair, appears only at the lowest counts.
Protection concentrates in the US and Europe
The United States and the European Patent Office receive more filings than Japan (151), with PCT filings (51) trailing further behind, indicating that most applicants protect this technology regionally rather than pursuing broad multi-jurisdiction coverage upfront.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Daikin Industries, Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| SKF Magnetic Mechatronics | 0 | — |
| Ebara Corporation | 0 | — |
| Edwards Japan Limited | 0 | — |
| Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Sychron Technology | 0 | — |
| Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | 0 | — |
| JTEKT Corporation | 0 | — |
Where to take this next
The dataset points to specific follow-up questions depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing or new filing strategy.
Map freedom-to-operate against the most-cited patents
The five most-cited records, including the hybrid foil-magnetic bearing and flywheel system patents, still shape how later claims are drafted even though they are decades old. Checking new designs against their claim scope is a reasonable first filter.
Explore citation network in EurekaWatch for renewed filing from quiet assignees
Several major names show zero filings in the latest tracked year. A shift back to active filing from any of them would be an early signal of a new product cycle or a defensive filing push.
Track assignee activity in EurekaTest claim language in the under-claimed IPC branches
F16F, F01D, F25B, G01B and H02J each carry fewer than 35 records, well below the F16C core. Drafting around these smaller branches may face less crowded prior art than filing directly against core bearing mechanics.
Run a white space search in EurekaCommon questions on magnetic and air bearing patents
The assignee ranking is concentrated at the top, with a small group of established industrial names, including Ebara, Daikin, SKF's magnetic machinery unit, Edwards Japan, JTEKT and Siemens, holding the largest portfolios. Several of these same names show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, which suggests their positions were built earlier rather than through ongoing filing. Beyond that group, the ranking runs into a long tail of assignees with smaller, more specialised portfolios, so checking the fuller ranking table is worthwhile before assuming any one company dominates a specific sub-application.
No. Filing peaked in 2017 at 40 records for the year, and the 2022 midpoint sits at 26, confirming a flat-to-declining trend rather than growth. The most recent year in the dataset is partial and will rise somewhat as publications catch up, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, but the multi-year direction is clearly downward from the 2017 peak. This pattern is more consistent with a maturing field defending existing claim positions than one still in an expansion phase.
US10006489B2, assigned to Siemens, covers a method for compensating low-frequency mechanical disturbance oscillations in a rotor supported by active magnetic bearings, specifically oscillations below the rotor's rotational frequency, using a compensation control circuit that analyses, calculates and applies a counteracting force. It is a control-method claim rather than a claim on the bearing structure itself, so it constrains a specific low-frequency compensation approach rather than active magnetic bearing use generally. Designs using different disturbance-compensation logic, or targeting oscillations at or above rotational frequency, sit outside its narrowest claim scope, though a full claim chart review is needed before relying on that distinction.
The IPC composition shows F16C bearing mechanics heavily dominant at 753 of 830 records, while adjacent branches such as F16F vibration damping (31), F01D turbine integration (25), F25B refrigeration compressor applications (22), G01B measurement and sensing (18) and H02J power-grid integration (17) carry far fewer filings. These smaller counts indicate thinner prior art density in those specific integration contexts, making them reasonable areas to search before drafting new claims, particularly around touchdown-bearing wear sensing and grid-connected magnetic bearing control.
The United States leads with 281 records, followed by the European Patent Office at 203 and Japan at 151. WIPO PCT filings account for 51 records, with Canada and Austria further behind at 30 and 23 respectively. This distribution shows applicants favour direct regional filing in the US, Europe and Japan over broad PCT-first strategies, which is typical for a mechanically-focused technology with concentrated manufacturing bases in those regions.
Research Magnetic and Air Bearings in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole magnetic and air bearings corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.