Book a demo

Magnetic Components for Power Conversion Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Magnetic Components for Power Conversion Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/magnetic-components-for-power-conversion-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Power Electronics
Magnetic Components for Power Conversion: Patents Behind Power Inductors and Transformers
  • Filing peaked in 2017 at 35 families and has since declined to a handful a year, suggesting the core claim space around power inductor and transformer construction is largely staked out rather than still opening up.
  • H01F dominates at 306 of 363 records with H02M power-conversion claims a distant second at 69, showing most protected value sits in the magnetic component itself, not the converter topology around it.
  • No tracked assignee filed in the latest year across the leading names in this dataset, recent-year momentum reads zero — a signal that active prosecution has moved elsewhere or slowed industry-wide.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
363
Published Records
45%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-50%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (18 records) with 2024 (9) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 363 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families claiming power inductors, high-frequency transformers and related magnetic components for power converters, filtered to documents that address core loss, winding loss, saturation behaviour, planar magnetics or thermal rise. The scope sits at the intersection of magnetic component design (H01F) and power conversion circuitry (H02M), with smaller but present activity in powder metallurgy, alloys and coating classes that feed core material development.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend line will understate actual filing activity and should be read as provisional.

Filing activity by year, 2015-2026
  1. 1MODA INNOCHIPS CO LTD73
  2. 2SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS CO LTD26
  3. 3MARVELL ASIA PTE LTD26
  4. 4MARVELL WORLD TRADE LTD24
  5. 5MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC13
  6. 6EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD13
  7. 7SHENZHEN MICROGATE TECH11
  8. 8TELEDYNE UK LTD9
  9. 9CERATECH8
  10. 10MURATA MFG CO LTD7
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnetic Components for Power Conversion covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 363-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how that volume splits across IPC subclasses.

A 2017 peak followed by sustained decline

Filings rose to 35 in 2017, the high point of the tracked window, then fell through the following years to just 3 by 2022 and effectively zero by the most recent year. That trajectory reads as flat-to-declining rather than a market still ramping filings, though the final one to two years are undercounted due to publication lag.

A 2017 peak followed by sustained decline0102030403520172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

H01F carries the claim weight

306 of 363 records sit in H01F (magnets, inductors and transformers), versus 69 in H02M (power conversion circuitry). Powder metallurgy (B22F, 21 records), alloys (C22C, 7) and coating (C23C, 6) appear as smaller clusters tied to core and winding material work, while amplifier (H03F) and PCB/assembly (H05K) classes each contribute 9 records at the component-integration edge.

H01F carries the claim weightH01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…30684.3%H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)6919.0%B22F · Powder metallurgy215.8%H03F · Amplifiers92.5%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies92.5%C22C · Alloys71.9%G05F · Electric/magnetic variable con…71.9%C23C · Coating & surface deposition61.7%Other7721.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 363 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnetic Components for Power Conversion covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Magnetic Components for Power Conversion with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about magnetic components for power conversion and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this space

Representative Filing
US10120037B22018-11-06

Power inductor evaluation apparatus and power inductor evaluation program

MURATA MANUFACTURING CO., LTD.

A power inductor evaluation apparatus stores a DC-DC converter simulation model built around the equivalent circuit of a power inductor, parameterised by a DC superimposition characteristics slope and a saturation current. The determination unit runs the simulation with those parameters and decides whether a given power inductor is usable in the target converter based on the simulation outcome, rather than requiring physical prototyping.Filed by Murata Manufacturing, published 2018-11-06 as US10120037B2.

US10120037B2 — patent drawing 1US10120037B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4047138APower inductor and transformer with low acoustic noise air gap120
2US4845606AHigh frequency matrix transformer109
3US20140167897A1Power inductor and method of manufacturing the same89
4US20140184374A1Power inductor and method of manufacturing the same88
5US20060158297A1Power inductor with reduced DC current saturation57
6US20190189338A1Power inductor51
7US20170178794A1Modular integrated multi-phase, non-coupled winding power inductor and methods of manufacture49
8US20140313003A1High current power inductor47
9US20180308612A1Power inductor41
10US20170256353A1Power inductor and method for manufacturing same41

Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — treat them as markers of influence on subsequent filings, not as a ranking of current technical relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnetic Components for Power Conversion covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about the state of the field

Three patterns stand out once filing volume, IPC composition and citation concentration are read together.

Filing trajectory
35 → 0
peak (2017) to latest year

A closed rather than opening window

Filing volume climbed to 35 families in 2017 and has fallen in most years since, reaching 3 at the 2022 midpoint and effectively nothing in the latest tracked year. New entrants filing broad claims on core power inductor or transformer structures now face a denser prior-art base than they would have a decade ago.

Based on year-by-year family counts, 2015-2026.
Claim concentration
306 of 363
records in H01F

Value sits in the component, not the circuit

H01F accounts for the large majority of records, with H02M power-conversion claims a distant second at 69. Filers protecting converter-level topology innovations are working in a comparatively less crowded IPC class than those protecting the magnetic component itself.

IPC subclass counts across 363 families.
Prior art influence
120 citations
top-cited record

Old filings still anchor the field

The most-cited record in this dataset, US4047138A on low-acoustic-noise air gap design, predates the 2015 coverage window and still draws the heaviest citation count tracked here. Several of the next most-cited records address power inductor saturation and DC current handling, indicating those specific mechanisms remain reference points for newer filings.

Citation counts within the searched corpus only.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to magnetic components for power conversion, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnetic Components for Power Conversion covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

Assignee landscape and where activity has gone quiet

Filing activity concentrates among a set of established electronics and component manufacturers, several of which co-file with named individual inventors on overlapping applications.

Filing pattern
10 pairs
co-assignee pairings tracked

Concentrated inventor teams at the top filer

The strongest co-assignee pairings in the dataset all involve the same corporate assignee filing repeatedly alongside a small set of named inventors, each pairing appearing four times. That pattern points to a stable internal R&D team producing incremental filings rather than broad cross-company collaboration.

Co-assignee pair frequency across the tracked families.
Momentum
0 in latest year
across leading assignees

Recent-year activity has gone flat across the board

Every one of the assignees with the deepest filing history in this dataset shows zero families in the latest tracked year. Given the 18-month publication lag, some of this is an artefact of timing, but the multi-year decline visible in the trend line suggests genuine slowing rather than a reporting gap alone.

Latest-year family counts by assignee.
Geographic filing
147 US filings
largest receiving office

US and EPO lead, China a close third

The United States receives the largest share of filings at 147, ahead of the EPO at 64 and China at 54. Japan, Taiwan and WIPO/PCT each account for smaller but non-trivial shares, indicating this technology is prosecuted across multiple major jurisdictions rather than concentrated in one.

Receiving office counts, all tracked families.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas show thinner representation relative to the core H01F cluster and may carry more room for a defensible first claim.
Powder-core alloy composition for saturation controlPlanar magnetics thermal rise managementCoating-based winding loss reductionAmplifier-integrated magnetic component designPCB-embedded transformer structures
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Moda-Innochips Co., Ltd.0
Marvell International Trading Ltd.0
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.0
Cooper Technologies Company0
Microchip Technology Incorporated0
Shenzhen Sunlord Electronics Co., Ltd.0
General Electric Company0
e2v Technologies (UK) Limited0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnetic Components for Power Conversion covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy or identifying open claim space.

Map freedom-to-operate against the top-cited prior art

Before filing on power inductor or transformer core structures, check claim scope against the highest-cited records in this dataset, several of which address saturation and air-gap design mechanisms still referenced by newer filings.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Track the material-science adjacent classes

B22F, C22C and C23C activity is smaller in volume but ties directly into core and winding material development, an area where the main H01F cluster has not fully claimed the space.

Explore adjacent IPC activity in Eureka

Watch for renewed filing activity

With every leading assignee showing zero filings in the latest year, a resumption of filing from any of them would be a meaningful signal worth monitoring given the current flat trend.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnetic Components for Power Conversion covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnetic Components for Power Conversion covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Magnetic Components for Power Conversion in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole magnetic components for power conversion corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.