Magnetic Field Shielding Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- 53.0% of all 83 records in scope sit with the five most active filers, and 77.1% sit with the ten most active — a field where a handful of assignees have staked out most of the claim space.
- Filings fell 67% from 2021 (6) to 2024 (2) the last three complete years, after 2021 stood as the peak filing year for the dataset.
- G01R measurement claims cover 36.1% of records far ahead of printed-circuit assemblies (18.1%) and EV propulsion (14.5%), showing where the densest prior art actually sits.
Filing growth compares 2021 (6 records) with 2024 (2) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 83 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This review tracks patent activity at the intersection of low-frequency magnetic field shielding and the calculation and geometry work that makes a shield practical: shielding-factor calculation, high-permeability sheet design, active compensation coils, field mapping, shield geometry and saturation limits. The scope spans 83 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from a search string that pairs shielding-material terms with the engineering methods used to size and validate a shield.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real filing activity; treat 2024 as the last complete year for growth comparisons and read 2025-2026 as still filling in.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 83 records: how filing volume moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Filing trend: a 2021 peak, then a documented pullback
Filings ran at 4 in 2017 and reached a peak of 6 in 2021, the high point for the dataset. Across the three complete years that follow, filings fell from 6 in 2021 to 2 in 2024, a 67% decline over that span. 2025 and 2026 show lower counts still, but those years are not comparable yet given publication lag.
Technology composition: measurement dominates, application areas trail
G01R (electric and magnetic measurement) appears on 36.1% of the 83 records in scope, well ahead of H05K printed-circuit assemblies at 18.1% and B60L electric-vehicle propulsion at 14.5%. H02J power supply, H02K motors and generators, A61B diagnosis and surgery, G01V geophysics, and H01L semiconductors each sit near 10-12%, indicating shielding claims are spread thinly across several application domains rather than concentrated in one. Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares add to more than 100% of the record total.
Shares are the percentage of the 83 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Magnetic Field Shielding at Low Frequency with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about magnetic field shielding at low frequency and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative and most-cited records
US5757183A — Device to shield a magnetic field in a given plane
The claim describes a magnetic field shielding structure built from a series of concentric annular rings, each formed from high-permeability, magnetically soft ferromagnetic material, separated by nonmagnetic spacer layers. The ring count, diameters, thickness and spacer distance are all specified as design variables, giving the structure a defined geometric family rather than a single fixed design.Filed by Eastman Kodak, granted 1998 — one of the earliest geometry-defining claims still active in citation terms within this dataset.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20140132210A1 | System and method for charging or powering devices, such as robots, electric vehicles, or other mobile device… | 454 |
| 2 | US7443154B1 | Multi-sensor mapping omnidirectional sonde and line locator | 344 |
| 3 | US7336078B1 | Multi-sensor mapping omnidirectional sonde and line locators | 340 |
| 4 | US7733077B1 | Multi-sensor mapping omnidirectional sonde and line locators and transmitter used therewith | 180 |
| 5 | US8106660B1 | Sonde array for use with buried line locators | 158 |
| 6 | US9703002B1 | Utility locator systems and methods | 108 |
| 7 | US20130096825A1 | Electromechanical magnetometer and applications thereof | 59 |
| 8 | US9411066B1 | Sondes and methods for use with buried line locator systems | 54 |
| 9 | US9383208B2 | Electromechanical magnetometer and applications thereof | 45 |
| 10 | US9722447B2 | System and method for charging or powering devices, such as robots, electric vehicles, or other mobile device… | 44 |
Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus; read them as a signal of influence, not of current commercial weight.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers say about this field
Three readings of the dataset that matter for a filing or freedom-to-operate decision.
Claim space is held by a small group
The five most active assignees hold 53.0% of all 83 records in scope, and the ten most active hold 77.1%. A field this concentrated at the top, with a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants below tenth place, tells a new filer exactly where existing claim density is heaviest.
Activity peaked in 2021, then pulled back
Filings ran at their highest recorded level in 2021 before falling 67% by 2024, the last year that can be read as complete. That is a real pullback in the population of new filings, not a sign the underlying engineering problem is closed.
Measurement and calculation claims lead application claims
G01R measurement claims sit on more than a third of the 83 records, ahead of any single application domain such as EV propulsion or power systems. That pattern suggests the core shielding-factor and field-mapping methods are more heavily claimed than any one downstream use of them.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to magnetic field shielding at low frequency, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the openings sit
The ranking below covers all 33 companies the data endpoint returns for this scope — not a top-50 or top-100 cut. The leader holds 12 records; fifth place holds 7; tenth place holds 3, and the count thins quickly after that into a long tail of occasional filers.
One filer holds a clear lead
The top-ranked assignee holds 12 of the 83 records in scope, well ahead of the field. That gap is worth checking claim-by-claim before filing adjacent geometry or measurement claims.
The middle of the ranking thins fast
Fifth place holds 7 records and tenth place holds only 3, meaning the gap between the leading handful and the rest of the ranked companies is steep rather than gradual.
Older sonde and locator patents anchor citation counts
The most-cited records in this scope include multi-sensor mapping and line-locator patents alongside the Eastman Kodak shielding-ring design, all filed well before the 2021 peak. High citation counts here reflect age and corpus visibility more than current filing activity.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| KLATT FREDERICK WILLIAM | 0 | — |
| Mojo Mobility Inc | 0 | — |
| SKOPE Magnetic Resonance Technology AG | 0 | — |
| Micron Technology Inc | 0 | — |
| QinetiQ Ltd | 0 | — |
| HI LLC | 0 | — |
| SeeScan Inc | 0 | — |
| OLSSON MARK S | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps rather than a single conclusion.
Check freedom to operate against the top 10
With 77.1% of all 83 records held by ten assignees, any new filing in shielding geometry or measurement should be checked claim-by-claim against that group before drafting.
Explore assignee claims in EurekaWatch the under-claimed branches
Active compensation coils, non-planar shielding-factor calculation and saturation-limit modeling sit below the dominant G01R and H05K clusters and are worth a closer prior-art pull.
Run a white-space search in EurekaRe-check the 2025-2026 trend once it settles
Publication lag means the last one to two years of filings are undercounted; revisit the trend once those years are closer to complete before drawing conclusions about slowdown.
Set a filing alert in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
It is concentrated at the top. The five most active assignees hold 53.0% of all 83 records in scope, and the ten most active hold 77.1%. Below that, the ranking runs to 33 companies total, with most holding only a handful of records each, so the field combines a dense top group with a long tail of occasional filers. Anyone entering this space should map their intended claims against that top-ten group first, since it accounts for more than three-quarters of the documented activity.
Filings peaked in 2021 at 6 for the year, then fell to 2 by 2024, a 67% decline across those three complete years. That is a genuine pullback in new filings over that period, though it does not by itself indicate the underlying engineering problem is resolved. The 2025 and 2026 counts in the dataset are lower still but should be read cautiously, since publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months and those years are not yet complete.
G01R, the electric and magnetic measurement classification, appears on 36.1% of the 83 records in scope, making it the single densest area. H05K printed-circuit assemblies (18.1%) and B60L electric vehicle propulsion (14.5%) follow, with power systems, motors and generators, medical diagnosis, geophysics and semiconductor devices each sitting near 10-12%. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these figures add to more than 100% of the record total, which is expected and reflects overlapping claim scope rather than double-counting error.
US5757183A, assigned to Eastman Kodak, claims a magnetic field shielding structure built from two or more concentric annular rings of high-permeability, magnetically soft ferromagnetic material, separated by nonmagnetic spacer layers, with ring diameter, thickness and spacer distance all specified as design variables. It defines a geometric family of concentric-ring shields rather than one fixed design, so it can read on later designs that follow the same ring-and-spacer arrangement even with different dimensions. It does not, on its own, block shielding approaches that use a fundamentally different geometry, such as active compensation coils or non-ring high-permeability sheet layouts.
Based on the IPC composition, the least-claimed branches relative to the dominant measurement and EV-propulsion clusters include active compensation coil control loops, saturation-limit modeling for thin high-permeability sheets, and shielding-factor calculation methods for non-planar geometries. These sit below the 10-12% range that the smaller application classes occupy, suggesting less claim density even though the underlying engineering need is documented across the dataset. A prior-art search focused specifically on those sub-areas, rather than on the broad G01R measurement class, is likely to surface fewer blocking references.
Research Magnetic Field Shielding at Low Frequency in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole magnetic field shielding at low frequency corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.