Book a demo

Magnetic Field Shielding Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Magnetic Field Shielding Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/magnetic-field-shielding-at-low-frequency-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Shielding & Absorbing Materials
Magnetic Field Shielding at Low Frequency: Patents, Leaders and Open Claim Space
  • 53.0% of all 83 records in scope sit with the five most active filers, and 77.1% sit with the ten most active — a field where a handful of assignees have staked out most of the claim space.
  • Filings fell 67% from 2021 (6) to 2024 (2) the last three complete years, after 2021 stood as the peak filing year for the dataset.
  • G01R measurement claims cover 36.1% of records far ahead of printed-circuit assemblies (18.1%) and EV propulsion (14.5%), showing where the densest prior art actually sits.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
83
Published Records
53%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-67%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (6 records) with 2024 (2) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 83 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review tracks patent activity at the intersection of low-frequency magnetic field shielding and the calculation and geometry work that makes a shield practical: shielding-factor calculation, high-permeability sheet design, active compensation coils, field mapping, shield geometry and saturation limits. The scope spans 83 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from a search string that pairs shielding-material terms with the engineering methods used to size and validate a shield.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real filing activity; treat 2024 as the last complete year for growth comparisons and read 2025-2026 as still filling in.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1KLATT FREDERICK WILLIAM12
  2. 2MOJO MOBILITY INC10
  3. 3SKOPE MAGNETIC RESONANCE TECH AG8
  4. 4SEESCAN INC7
  5. 5MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC7
  6. 6HI LLC6
  7. 7QINETIQ LTD4
  8. 8THE PENN STATE RES FOUND INC4
  9. 9EASTMAN KODAK CO3
  10. 10PHILCO3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnetic Field Shielding at Low Frequency covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 83 records: how filing volume moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing trend: a 2021 peak, then a documented pullback

Filings ran at 4 in 2017 and reached a peak of 6 in 2021, the high point for the dataset. Across the three complete years that follow, filings fell from 6 in 2021 to 2 in 2024, a 67% decline over that span. 2025 and 2026 show lower counts still, but those years are not comparable yet given publication lag.

Filing trend: a 2021 peak, then a documented pullback023564201720182019202062021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition: measurement dominates, application areas trail

G01R (electric and magnetic measurement) appears on 36.1% of the 83 records in scope, well ahead of H05K printed-circuit assemblies at 18.1% and B60L electric-vehicle propulsion at 14.5%. H02J power supply, H02K motors and generators, A61B diagnosis and surgery, G01V geophysics, and H01L semiconductors each sit near 10-12%, indicating shielding claims are spread thinly across several application domains rather than concentrated in one. Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares add to more than 100% of the record total.

Technology composition: measurement dominates, application areas trailG01R · Electric & magnetic measurement3036.1%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies1518.1%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion1214.5%H02J · Power supply & grid systems1012.0%H02K · Electric motors & generators1012.0%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery910.8%G01V · Geophysics & gravity surveying910.8%H01L · Semiconductor devices910.8%Other4857.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 83 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnetic Field Shielding at Low Frequency covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Magnetic Field Shielding at Low Frequency with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about magnetic field shielding at low frequency and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Representative and most-cited records

Representative record
US5757183A1998-05-26

US5757183A — Device to shield a magnetic field in a given plane

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY

The claim describes a magnetic field shielding structure built from a series of concentric annular rings, each formed from high-permeability, magnetically soft ferromagnetic material, separated by nonmagnetic spacer layers. The ring count, diameters, thickness and spacer distance are all specified as design variables, giving the structure a defined geometric family rather than a single fixed design.Filed by Eastman Kodak, granted 1998 — one of the earliest geometry-defining claims still active in citation terms within this dataset.

US5757183A — patent drawing 1US5757183A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20140132210A1System and method for charging or powering devices, such as robots, electric vehicles, or other mobile device…454
2US7443154B1Multi-sensor mapping omnidirectional sonde and line locator344
3US7336078B1Multi-sensor mapping omnidirectional sonde and line locators340
4US7733077B1Multi-sensor mapping omnidirectional sonde and line locators and transmitter used therewith180
5US8106660B1Sonde array for use with buried line locators158
6US9703002B1Utility locator systems and methods108
7US20130096825A1Electromechanical magnetometer and applications thereof59
8US9411066B1Sondes and methods for use with buried line locator systems54
9US9383208B2Electromechanical magnetometer and applications thereof45
10US9722447B2System and method for charging or powering devices, such as robots, electric vehicles, or other mobile device…44

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus; read them as a signal of influence, not of current commercial weight.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnetic Field Shielding at Low Frequency covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about this field

Three readings of the dataset that matter for a filing or freedom-to-operate decision.

Concentration
53.0% / 77.1%
top 5 / top 10 share of 83 records

Claim space is held by a small group

The five most active assignees hold 53.0% of all 83 records in scope, and the ten most active hold 77.1%. A field this concentrated at the top, with a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants below tenth place, tells a new filer exactly where existing claim density is heaviest.

Based on the full 33-company assignee ranking.
Filing momentum
6 → 2
2021 peak to 2024 complete-year count

Activity peaked in 2021, then pulled back

Filings ran at their highest recorded level in 2021 before falling 67% by 2024, the last year that can be read as complete. That is a real pullback in the population of new filings, not a sign the underlying engineering problem is closed.

2025-2026 figures are still filling in due to publication lag.
Technology spread
36.1% G01R
share of records carrying measurement claims

Measurement and calculation claims lead application claims

G01R measurement claims sit on more than a third of the 83 records, ahead of any single application domain such as EV propulsion or power systems. That pattern suggests the core shielding-factor and field-mapping methods are more heavily claimed than any one downstream use of them.

Shares sum above 100% because records can carry multiple IPC classes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to magnetic field shielding at low frequency, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnetic Field Shielding at Low Frequency covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the openings sit

The ranking below covers all 33 companies the data endpoint returns for this scope — not a top-50 or top-100 cut. The leader holds 12 records; fifth place holds 7; tenth place holds 3, and the count thins quickly after that into a long tail of occasional filers.

Leader position
12 records
leading assignee

One filer holds a clear lead

The top-ranked assignee holds 12 of the 83 records in scope, well ahead of the field. That gap is worth checking claim-by-claim before filing adjacent geometry or measurement claims.

Ranking covers 33 companies total.
Mid-table drop-off
7 → 3
fifth place to tenth place

The middle of the ranking thins fast

Fifth place holds 7 records and tenth place holds only 3, meaning the gap between the leading handful and the rest of the ranked companies is steep rather than gradual.

77.1% of all records sit with the top 10 combined.
Citation anchors
5 records
shown in the most-cited table

Older sonde and locator patents anchor citation counts

The most-cited records in this scope include multi-sensor mapping and line-locator patents alongside the Eastman Kodak shielding-ring design, all filed well before the 2021 peak. High citation counts here reflect age and corpus visibility more than current filing activity.

Citation counts favour earlier filings within the searched corpus.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches that sit below the dominant measurement and EV-propulsion claim clusters, based on the IPC spread in this dataset.
Active compensation coil control loopsSaturation-limit modeling for thin high-permeability sheetsField-mapping sensor fusion for shield geometry validationShielding-factor calculation for non-planar geometriesSemiconductor-adjacent shielding for H01L packaging
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
KLATT FREDERICK WILLIAM0
Mojo Mobility Inc0
SKOPE Magnetic Resonance Technology AG0
Micron Technology Inc0
QinetiQ Ltd0
HI LLC0
SeeScan Inc0
OLSSON MARK S0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnetic Field Shielding at Low Frequency covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps rather than a single conclusion.

Check freedom to operate against the top 10

With 77.1% of all 83 records held by ten assignees, any new filing in shielding geometry or measurement should be checked claim-by-claim against that group before drafting.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Watch the under-claimed branches

Active compensation coils, non-planar shielding-factor calculation and saturation-limit modeling sit below the dominant G01R and H05K clusters and are worth a closer prior-art pull.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Re-check the 2025-2026 trend once it settles

Publication lag means the last one to two years of filings are undercounted; revisit the trend once those years are closer to complete before drawing conclusions about slowdown.

Set a filing alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnetic Field Shielding at Low Frequency covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Magnetic Field Shielding at Low Frequency covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Magnetic Field Shielding at Low Frequency in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole magnetic field shielding at low frequency corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.