Magnetocaloric Cooling Heat Exchanger Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
- Filings peaked in 2020 at 50 and have declined since, with the 2022 midpoint at 15 — the field is consolidating rather than expanding.
- F25B dominates the IPC mix at 402 of 402 records, but H01F (67) and C22C (24) show the alloy and magnet-assembly side is a distinct, separately claimed layer.
- The US receives more filings than any other office (113), with Europe (92) and China (84) close behind — this is a three-region contest, not a single-country one.
Filing growth compares 2021 (10 records) with 2024 (13) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 402 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Magnetocaloric cooling replaces a vapour-compression cycle with a solid-state refrigerant — a magnetocaloric material bed whose temperature shifts as a magnetic field is applied and removed. The engineering problem that generates most of the patenting activity here is not the material itself but the heat exchanger and regenerator design around it: how heat transfer fluid moves through the bed, how microchannel geometry is arranged, and how the hot- and cold-side exchangers are staged across a rotating or reciprocating magnet assembly. This dataset isolates that layer specifically, filtering for regenerator design, heat exchanger and heat transfer fluid claims within the magnetic refrigeration IPC classes.
Filing filed under F25B (refrigeration and heat pumps) accounts for every record in the set, confirming the search is correctly centred; the presence of H01F (magnets and inductors) and C22C (alloys) in a large minority of records shows how often a single family bundles the fluidic/mechanical claim with a materials or magnet-circuit claim in the same filing.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 402-family dataset: filing activity by year, and how records distribute across the IPC subclasses that make up the magnetocaloric heat exchanger stack.
Filing trend, 2017–2026
Filings rose from 16 in 2017 to a peak of 50 in 2020, then eased back toward 15 at the 2022 midpoint. The most recent year is partial and will revise upward as publication catches up with filing — publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025-2026 figures understate actual activity.
IPC subclass distribution
F25B covers the full set by construction of the search. Beyond that, H01F (magnets, inductors, transformers) and C22C (alloys) are the two largest adjacent classes, followed by smaller pockets in F25J (gas liquefaction), F28D (heat-exchange apparatus), B22F (powder metallurgy), F25D (refrigerators) and C09K (misc. materials).
Shares are the percentage of the 402 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Magnetocaloric Cooling Heat Exchanger with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about magnetocaloric cooling heat exchanger and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe prior art anchoring this field
Magnetic refrigeration system with unequal blows
A magnetic refrigeration apparatus includes one or more beds of magnetocaloric material, each having a hot side and a cold side. The apparatus also includes a magnet to apply a time-varying magnetic field to the one or more beds of magnetocaloric material, a heat transfer fluid, a means to circulate the heat transfer fluid, a hot side heat exchanger (HHEX), a cold side heat exchanger (CHEX), and a controller to control the flow of heat transfer fluid from the cold side of the one or more beds to the hot side of the one or more beds when the magnetic field on the one or more beds is high at an average flow rate for a set duration.Filed by Astronautics Corporation of America, published 2016-03-17.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6526759B2 | Rotating bed magnetic refrigeration apparatus | 175 |
| 2 | US6668560B2 | Rotating magnet magnetic refrigerator | 168 |
| 3 | US4107935A | High temperature refrigerator | 157 |
| 4 | US20040182086A1 | Magnetocaloric refrigeration device | 141 |
| 5 | US4642994A | Magnetic refrigeration apparatus with heat pipes | 129 |
| 6 | US6467274B2 | Apparatus and methods for cooling and liquefying a fluid using magnetic refrigeration | 118 |
| 7 | US20100071383A1 | Magnetic refrigeration device | 116 |
| 8 | US6446441B1 | Magnetic refrigerator | 115 |
| 9 | US20070220901A1 | Magnetic refrigeration material and magnetic refrigeration device | 110 |
| 10 | US20140165595A1 | Use of unidirectional flow modes of magnetic cooling systems | 104 |
Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers say about where this field stands
Four read-throughs from the filing trend, IPC mix and office distribution — useful for deciding where to file, litigate or design around.
Growth has flattened, not accelerated
The field grew through the late 2010s, peaked in 2020, and has been declining since. That pattern is consistent with a technology whose core mechanical architecture — bed, magnet, hot/cold exchanger pair — is largely settled, with remaining activity concentrated on refinement rather than new entrants staking fresh ground.
The refrigeration-cycle claim layer is fully occupied
Every record in this set carries an F25B classification, confirming that regenerator and heat exchanger claims are consistently filed as refrigeration-apparatus claims rather than as standalone heat-exchanger art. New filers should expect to draft around this layer, not into open space within it.
Magnet-circuit claims are a distinct bundling pattern
A substantial minority of families pair a heat exchanger or regenerator claim with a magnet-assembly claim under H01F. That bundling pattern matters for freedom-to-operate reviews: clearing the fluidic claim alone is not sufficient if the same family also blocks the magnet-circuit route.
No single office dominates
The United States leads but by a modest margin over Europe and China. Filers building a defensible position need coverage across all three jurisdictions rather than treating one as a proxy for global protection.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to magnetocaloric cooling heat exchanger, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where activity has stalled
Recent-year momentum figures show the tracked assignees at zero new filings in the latest year — consistent with the overall decline from the 2020 peak. That does not mean these organisations have exited the field; it more likely reflects the publication lag against a still-partial latest year plus a broader slowdown in new filing after 2020.
Chinese national research institutes anchor the strongest collaboration
The strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset links a rare-earth research institute with a national engineering research centre for rare-earth metallurgy, at 10 shared filings — the densest single collaboration in the set.
A US aerospace-university pairing runs close behind
A general engineering and research entity paired with a university board of regents at 9 shared filings, pointing to a sustained applied-research partnership rather than a one-off joint filing.
Major appliance and electronics names show no latest-year activity
Aerospace, electronics and appliance manufacturers tracked in this set — spanning both US and Japanese and Chinese entities — all show zero filings in the latest tracked year, in line with the post-2020 slowdown across the dataset as a whole.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Astronautics Corporation of America | 0 | — |
| Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | 0 | — |
| Toshiba Corporation | 0 | — |
| Daikin Industries, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Baotou Research Institute of Rare Earths | 0 | — |
| Gree Electric Appliances, Inc. of Zhuhai | 0 | — |
| Hitachi, Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a mature core claim layer with narrower openings at its edges. Two directions are worth pursuing before committing a filing or freedom-to-operate budget.
Map the H01F/C22C overlap in detail
Families that bundle a heat exchanger claim with a magnet-assembly or alloy claim need clearing on both fronts. A targeted overlap search against the top-cited families will show which magnet-circuit patents actually extend into the fluidic claim.
Explore overlap in EurekaTrack whether the 2020 peak repeats
With 2025-2026 data still partial, it is too early to call the post-2020 decline permanent. Revisit the trend once publication catches up to see whether filing has genuinely flattened or is set to rebound.
Monitor filing trends in EurekaCommon questions about magnetocaloric heat exchanger patents
A magnetocaloric heat exchanger moves heat transfer fluid through a bed of magnetocaloric material whose temperature rises and falls as a magnetic field is cycled on and off, rather than relying on a compressed-refrigerant phase change. The regenerator design — the channel geometry, fluid flow control, and staging of hot- and cold-side exchangers around the magnet assembly — does most of the engineering work, because the magnetocaloric effect itself is a materials property. That is why this patent set filters specifically for regenerator design, heat exchanger and heat transfer fluid claims within the magnetic refrigeration IPC classes, rather than for magnetocaloric materials broadly.
Filings peaked at 50 in 2020 and dropped to around 15 by the 2022 midpoint, a pattern consistent with a technology whose core mechanical architecture has largely settled. Some of the apparent decline in the most recent years is an artefact of publication lag, since publication typically trails filing by around 18 months and the latest year in this dataset is still partial. Taken together, the trend suggests consolidation around known architectures rather than continued expansion into new claim space.
The United States leads with 113 records in this dataset, followed by the European Patent Office at 92 and China at 84, with Japan, the WIPO PCT route and South Korea further behind. The relatively close spread across the top three offices means a filing strategy anchored on just one jurisdiction will miss a meaningful share of the competitive landscape. Organisations building freedom-to-operate positions in this space typically need to clear all three regions rather than treating one as globally representative.
The IPC composition shows F25B (refrigeration and heat pumps) fully saturated across every record, while adjacent classes such as F25J (gas liquefaction integration), B22F (powder-metallurgy bed fabrication) and C09K (functional cooling media) carry far fewer filings. Microchannel regenerator geometry and heat transfer fluid formulation specifically are areas where filing density sits well below the F25B core. These lower-density branches are the more realistic targets for a new claim, rather than the crowded core refrigeration-cycle architecture.
The dataset's co-assignee data shows the strongest collaboration is between a Chinese rare-earth research institute and a national rare-earth metallurgy engineering research centre, sharing 10 filings, with a US aerospace-and-university research pairing close behind at 9. Beyond these collaborations, a mix of aerospace, electronics and appliance manufacturers appear as individual assignees, though all six tracked in the recent-momentum data show zero filings in the latest year. That flat recent momentum lines up with the broader post-2020 slowdown seen across the whole 402-family set.
Research Magnetocaloric Cooling Heat Exchanger in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole magnetocaloric cooling heat exchanger corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.