Book a demo

Manganese-Rich Battery Cell Design Patent Landscape 2026

Manganese-Rich Battery Cell Design Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Manganese-Rich Battery Cell Design Patent Landscape in 2026

The manganese-rich battery cell design space is a growth-stage field still expanding on a multi-year basis, though annual volume eased from its 2023 peak; LG Energy Solution holds a commanding lead with the largest single-applicant position. The competitive structure is highly concentrated, with China as the dominant filing jurisdiction and activity dominated by a small set of battery manufacturers and research institutions.

31
Patent families in scope
53%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+2400%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

LG Energy Solution leads a concentrated field anchored in China

LG Energy Solution Ltd ranks first among all applicants, with 9 patent families, followed by Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd with 4 patent families. The top five filers account for 53% of the combined total of the hundred largest filers, signalling a strongly concentrated competitive structure.

A clear tier gap separates the top two players from the remaining applicants, who each hold a single patent family. This steep drop-off indicates that the field is driven by a handful of well-resourced incumbents rather than a broad, distributed innovator base.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1LG Energy Solution Ltd9
2Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd4
3Guangdong Jusheng Technology Co.2
4Jiangsu Haiji New Energy Co. Ltd1
5Xiamen Ampace Technology Ltd1
6CIC energiGUNE Foundation (Cooperative Research Centre on Alternative Energies)1
7Beijing Normal University1
8Henan Kelong New Energy Co. Ltd1
9Shenzhen Hongtai Battery Technology Co.1
10Xiamen Ampace Technology Ltd1
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Guangdong Gonghe New Energy Technology Co.1
12CALB Group Co. Ltd1
13Great Power Battery Zhuhai1
14Beijing University of Chemical Technology1
15Zhengzhou Zhongke Emerging Industry Technology Research Institute1
16Dongguan Yama Electronics Co.1
17JIANGSU SHENZHOU NEW ENERGY&ELECTRICITY CO LTD1
18Shandong Paizhi New Energy Technology Co.1
19Ford Global Technologies LLC1
20Qingdao University1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

LG Energy Solution’s position — more than double the next-largest filer — suggests it has established prior art depth that will be difficult for challengers to navigate without differentiated technical approaches. CATL’s presence as a close second signals that the leading Chinese battery manufacturer is moving rapidly into this chemistry.

Filing counts for the most recent 18–24 months are likely understated due to standard patent publication lag; the apparent levelling in 20242025 should not be read as a slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Rapid multi-year growth peaking in 2023, with electrochemistry dominating the technology mix

The filing trend reveals a field that accelerated sharply from 2022 onward, while the technology composition confirms near-total focus on battery cell electrochemistry with sparse activity in adjacent material science branches.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings were negligible through 2021, then jumped to 6 families in 2022 and peaked at 12 in 2023. The 2024 and 2025 counts appear lower but are affected by publication lag and should not be interpreted as a structural decline. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, with the recent three-year window well above the prior three-year window.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 12 in 2023.020172201802019020201202162022122023720243202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01M (Batteries, cells and fuel cells) accounts for the overwhelming majority of classified records, confirming that activity is concentrated in cell-level electrochemistry. C01G (Compounds of other metals), B23K (Welding, soldering and brazing), B82Y (Nanotechnology applications), and C01F (Alkaline-earth, aluminium and rare-earth compounds) each appear sparsely, indicating that upstream material synthesis and advanced fabrication techniques remain under-developed relative to the core cell design domain.

Technology compositionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells leads with 32; C01G · Compounds of other metals 3.H01M · Batteries, cells …32C01G · Compounds of othe…3B23K · Welding, solderin…1B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…1C01F · Alkaline-earth, A…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240413404A1Published 2024-12-12

Method for Manufacturing Lithium Secondary Battery…

Lg Energy SOLUTION, LTD.

A method for manufacturing a lithium secondary battery includes preparing a battery cell, charging and discharging the battery cell under pressurization to activate the battery, and then charging is performed in a constant voltage mode. The battery cell includes a positive electrode, a negative electrode and an electrolyte, with the positive electrode… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Method for Manufacturing Lithium Secondary Battery… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1一种富锂锰基的高能量密度锂离子电池及其制备方法16
2一种Sr掺杂的纳米纤维富锂锰基固溶体正极材料的制备方法和应用8
3一种长寿命镍钴锰酸锂圆柱锂离子电池制作方法7
4正极极片、电池以及用电设备6
5Method for manufacturing lithium secondary battery…4
6富锂锰基固态锂电池及其制备方法3
7Method for Manufacturing Lithium Secondary Battery…3
8一种圆柱电池3

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D strategy

The combination of growth-stage dynamics, high concentration, limited cross-applicant collaboration, and. China-heavy jurisdictional coverage shapes specific strategic considerations for teams evaluating entry or expansion.

Growth

Growth stage with annual volume eased from 2023 peak

The lifecycle evidence classifies this field as Growth: the recent three-year filing window sits well above the prior three-year window, reflecting a 2,400% growth rate on that basis. Annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak, and the most recent years are further understated by publication lag. Teams entering now face a field where the technical frontier is still being defined, but the window before dominant design consolidation may be narrowing.

Growth stage
Concentration

Top two players control the field; long tail of single-family filers

LG Energy Solution and CATL together represent the dominant filing positions, with every other ranked applicant holding only a single patent family. This structure means that broad freedom-to-operate analysis must focus on the top two, while the long tail of Chinese SMEs and universities represents potential licensing partners or acquisition targets rather than primary blocking risk. New entrants should design around LG Energy Solution’s 9-family position first.

High concentration
Collaboration

One recorded co-filing pair; ecosystem largely fragmented

Only one co-applicant collaboration is recorded in the evidence: Hunan Guotuo New Energy Technology Co. and Guangdong Jusheng Technology Co. filed jointly on one family. All other applicants appear to be filing independently. This fragmentation may reflect the early competitive sensitivity of the technology, but also indicates that consortium or open-innovation approaches remain largely unexploited and could offer differentiation for new entrants seeking to pool material synthesis and cell design expertise.

Low collaboration
Geography

China dominates; US and Korea offer secondary coverage

China accounts for the largest share of jurisdictional records, followed by the United States, South Korea, and Europe via the EPO. This distribution suggests that IP strategy in this space should prioritise China prosecution, but the presence of US and Korean records signals that the leading players — particularly LG Energy Solution — are seeking broader protection. European coverage is thin, representing a potential gap for applicants seeking to establish positions in that market.

China-led
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Hunan Guotuo New Energy Technology Co.Guangdong Jusheng Technology Co.1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are drawn from lifecycle, applicant momentum, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

LG Energy Solution and CATL lead on cell electrochemistry; all major filers are new entrants to this specific domain

Every tracked applicant with momentum data carries a ‘new entrant’ trend signal, confirming that manganese-rich battery cell design as a distinct filing category emerged very recently and that all current leaders established their positions within the past few years.

Leader · LG Energy Solution

LG Energy Solution

LG Energy Solution holds 9 patent families, the largest position in the field. Its technology emphasis spans H01M 10 (secondary batteries), H01M 4 (electrodes), and H01M 50 (cell structural components), indicating coverage across the full cell design stack rather than a narrow cathode-only focus. Its momentum is classified as a new entrant on a recent-vs-prior basis, reflecting that this filing activity is concentrated in the most recent window.

9 patent families
Challenger · CATL

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd

CATL holds 4 patent families and shows equivalent breadth across H01M 10, H01M 4, and H01M 50, mirroring LG Energy Solution’s cross-stack approach. As a new entrant by momentum classification, CATL’s activity is recent and signals that the world’s largest battery manufacturer is actively building IP in manganese-rich cell design, likely in parallel with its broader LMFP and high-manganese cathode programs.

4 patent families
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked data for all 20 applicants including Chinese SMEs, universities, and Ford Global Technologies.
Guangdong Jusheng Technology Co.CALB Group Co. Ltd+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
LG Energy Solution Ltd9▲ new entrant
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd4▲ new entrant
Qingdao University1▲ new entrant
Zhengzhou Zhongke Emerging Industry Technology Research Institute1▲ new entrant
Ford Global Technologies LLC1▲ new entrant
Great Power Battery Zhuhai1▲ new entrant
Henan Kelong New Energy Co. Ltd1▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards reflect applicant family counts and IPC technology focus from the evidence.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches in material synthesis and advanced fabrication

Four IPC branches adjacent to the dominant H01M class carry sparse patent-record counts, suggesting that the intersection of manganese-rich cell design with upstream material science and nanoscale fabrication remains relatively open.

C01G · Compounds of other metals (metal precursor synthesis)

C01G records in this corpus number only 3, representing an 8% share of classified records. This branch covers the synthesis of manganese and other transition-metal compounds directly relevant to cathode precursor production. Technical value is high because precursor chemistry determines the electrochemical performance ceiling of manganese-rich cathodes. A realistic entry path would involve filing on novel co-precipitation or sol-gel routes for high-manganese precursors, which sit upstream of the cell-level claims already filed by LG Energy Solution and CATL.

Search this in Eureka →

B82Y · Nanotechnology applications in batteries

B82Y carries only 1 record in this corpus, a 3% share, indicating that nanoscale engineering approaches — such as nanostructured manganese-rich cathode particles or nano-coating strategies to suppress voltage fade — are nearly absent from current filings. The technical rationale for nano-engineering in this chemistry is well-established in academic literature, making the sparse IP count an observation of potential under-development. An entry path would require demonstrating scalable nanostructure synthesis and linking it explicitly to cell-level performance metrics.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all four adjacent branches, their record counts, and recommended search strings for freedom-to-operate analysis.
B23K · Welding and cell assembly processesC01F · Alkaline-earth and rare-earth dopant compounds+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch sparsity is observed from IPC record counts and does not constitute a validated commercial opportunity without further FTO and market analysis.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ across technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH01M 10 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 4 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 50 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsC01G 53 · Compounds of other metalsC01G 45 · Compounds of other metals
LG Energy Solution LtdStrong · 9Strong · 7Emerging · 1AbsentAbsent
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. LtdStrong · 4Strong · 4Strong · 4Moderate · 1Moderate · 1
CIC energiGUNE Foundation (Cooperative Research Centre on Alternative Energies)Strong · 1Strong · 1Strong · 1Strong · 1Absent
Beijing University of Chemical TechnologyAbsentStrong · 1Strong · 1Strong · 1Strong · 1
CALB Group Co. LtdStrong · 1Strong · 1Strong · 1AbsentAbsent
Xiamen Ampace Technology LtdStrong · 1Strong · 1Strong · 1AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own manganese-rich battery patent landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.