Book a demo

Massive MIMO Antenna Array Patent Landscape 2026

Massive MIMO Antenna Array Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Massive MIMO Antenna Array Patent Landscape in 2026

The massive MIMO antenna array field holds 341 patent families distributed across a moderately concentrated group of telecom OEMs, network operators, and academic institutions, with Ericsson holding the largest single share. Annual filing volume has eased from its 2019 peak, and the field is in a post-peak phase with China and the United States as the dominant prosecution jurisdictions.

341
Patent families in scope
28%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-15%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Ericsson leads a moderately concentrated field with strong academic participation

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) ranks first with 27 patent families, followed closely by Southeast University (22), Jio Platforms Ltd (21), and Samsung Electronics (20), indicating that the top tier spans incumbent telecom OEMs, a major Indian operator, and a leading Chinese research university.

The top five filers account for 28% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers — a moderate concentration level, suggesting no single player has achieved lock-in dominance and that challengers have meaningful room to accumulate positions.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)27
2Southeast University22
3Jio Platforms Ltd.21
4Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.20
5InnoPhase Inc.14
6John Mezzalingua Associates LLC12
7Parallel Wireless Inc.12
8VIAVI Solutions Licensing LLC9
9Comba Telecom Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.9
10AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P8
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Sony Group Corporation7
12Charter Communications Operating LLC6
13LG Electronics Inc.6
14CommScope Technologies LLC6
15Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Ltd.5
16Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics5
17WiSig Networks Pte. Ltd.5
18China Mobile Communications Group Co., Ltd.5
19Wuhan Hongxin Telecommunication Technology Co., Ltd.5
20Nokia Technologies Oy5
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Ericsson’s lead rests on transmission and antenna system fundamentals, while the proximity of Southeast University and Jio Platforms to the top signals active academic and operator-driven innovation pipelines that could yield licensing or standards leverage over the medium term.

Patent publications from the most recent 18–24 months are typically under-counted due to publication lag; recent-period figures should be treated as provisional lower bounds. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on PatSnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Post-peak activity concentrated in transmission and antenna design branches

Annual filing volumes peaked in 2019 and have since eased; the technology mix is dominated by transmission fundamentals and antenna hardware, with a sparse tail of adjacent branches. Both dynamics are relevant for identifying where incremental investment would face the least prior-art density.

Annual filing trend

Filings peaked at 64 families in 2019 and have trended lower since. The 2024–2026 bars should be read as provisional due to publication lag; the apparent low values for 2025–2026 reflect incomplete publication rather than a confirmed further decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 64 in 2019.44201737201864201949202017202140202236202334202419202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H04B (Transmission, general) and H01Q (Antennas) dominate the IPC mix, reflecting a field focused on beamforming and physical-layer signal management. H04W (Wireless networks) and H04L (Digital information transmission) form a secondary cluster. Branches such as G06N (AI models), H01P (Waveguides), G01S (Radar/positioning), and H04J (Multiplex communication) each account for a small share, marking them as adjacent and under-served.

Technology compositionH04B · Transmission (general) leads with 284; H01Q · Antennas 168.H04B · Transmission (gen…284H01Q · Antennas168H04W · Wireless communic…112H04L · Digital informati…87G06F · Electric digital …6G06N · Computing based o…6H01P · Waveguides & micr…6H04J · Multiplex communi…6↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240340098A1Published 2024-10-10

Method for calculating spatial non-stationary wire…

Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation

A method for calculating the spatial non-stationary wireless channel capacity for large-scale antenna array communications, includes the following steps: first, constructing a spatial non-stationary channel model with a large-scale antenna array having the mutual coupling effect; building a channel measurement system for the large-scale antenna array, and… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Method for calculating spatial non-stationary wire… — patent drawingMethod for calculating spatial non-stationary wire… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1一种大规模MIMO系统中智能反射面相移矩阵自适应设计方法83
2Massive MIMO array testing using a programmable ph…41
3Antenna arrangement for distributed massive MIMO39
4一种5G大规模阵列天线38
5Massive MIMO (mMIMO) antenna with phase shifter an…34
6Over the air testing for massive MIMO arrays31
7超宽带印刷天线29
8Calibrating a programmable phase matrix and channe…28

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The field’s post-peak lifecycle, moderate concentration, and active collaboration among component suppliers and operators together shape where new entrants and incumbents can most efficiently deploy patent resources.

Decline

Post-peak — core claims are largely staked

The lifecycle stage is Decline, with annual filings easing back from the 2019 peak of 64 families. The foundational transmission and antenna design space is densely covered by Ericsson, Samsung, and several universities. New entrants are better positioned in adjacent or application-layer branches where prior-art density is low.

Post-peak / 2019 peak
Concentration

Moderate — top tier is close-packed, no runaway leader

The top five filers hold 28% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output, and the gap between ranks 1 through 4 is narrow (27, 22, 21, 20 patent families respectively). This means a focused filing campaign of 15–20 families in an under-served branch could bring a new entrant into the visible competitive tier within two to three years.

28% top-5 share
Collaboration

InnoPhase and Parallel Wireless lead co-filing activity

The most active co-filing pair is InnoPhase Inc. and Parallel Wireless Inc. with 8 joint patent families, suggesting a hardware-software integration partnership in open RAN or small-cell contexts. Comba Telecom Technology (Guangzhou) co-files with multiple affiliated entities (6 families each with Tianjin Comba and Comba Telecom Systems Guangzhou), reflecting internal portfolio consolidation. Ericsson AB and Ericsson (China) Communication Company share 3 joint families, while Southeast University and NEC (China) have 1 joint filing.

6 active co-filing pairs
Geography

China and US dominate; India is an emerging jurisdiction

China (135 records) and the United States (125 records) are the two primary prosecution destinations, confirming where enforcement and licensing activity is most likely. Europe (EPO, 45) and WIPO PCT (37) cover international protection. India (32 records) stands out as an emerging jurisdiction, consistent with Jio Platforms’ rank-3 position and India’s accelerating 5G rollout.

China #1 · India emerging
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
InnoPhase Inc.Parallel Wireless Inc.8
Comba Telecom Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.Tianjin Comba Telecom Systems Co., Ltd.6
Comba Telecom Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.Comba Telecom Systems (Guangzhou) Ltd.6
Comba Telecom Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.Comba Network Systems Co., Ltd.6
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)Ericsson (China) Communication Company Ltd.3
Southeast UniversityNEC (China) Co., Ltd.1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Cards are grounded in applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Ericsson anchors transmission fundamentals; Jio and Samsung are new-entrant challengers

The top four applicants are separated by only seven patent families, making the ranking fluid. Momentum data show Ericsson’s recent filing rate declining sharply while Jio, Samsung, and Southeast University have each entered recently with concentrated portfolios.

Leader · Ericsson

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)

Ericsson leads with 27 patent families, concentrated in H04B7 (beamforming and transmission, 27 families), H01Q1, and H01Q21 (antenna arrays). Recent momentum is declining (▼ −50% vs. prior period), suggesting the company is harvesting rather than expanding its core position. The portfolio’s depth in transmission fundamentals makes it the key prior-art reference for any new beamforming work.

families: 27
Challenger · Jio Platforms Ltd

Jio Platforms Ltd

Jio Platforms ranks third with 21 patent families and is classified as a new entrant, meaning its entire visible portfolio was filed within the recent window. Its focus spans H04B7 (transmission), H04W88 (wireless network equipment), and H04B1 (receiver/transmitter fundamentals) — consistent with an operator building system-level IP to support indigenous 5G infrastructure. The combination of operator scale and greenfield IP strategy makes Jio a fast-rising challenger.

families: 21
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore all ranked applicants, their technology focus, and filing momentum in PatSnap Eureka.
Samsung Electronics Co LtdSoutheast University+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)5▼ -50%
Southeast University3▲ new entrant
Jio Platforms Ltd.21▲ new entrant
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.10▲ new entrant
John Mezzalingua Associates LLC11▲ new entrant
Parallel Wireless Inc.2▼ -80%
CommScope Technologies LLC1▼ -90%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Trajectory is based on recent-vs-prior filing momentum; technology emphasis is based on top IPC subclass counts per applicant.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant transmission core

Several IPC branches appear at low density in the massive MIMO corpus. These are observations of relative sparsity; the two below also have plausible technical linkage to massive MIMO and realistic entry paths.

G06N · AI-driven beamforming and channel estimation

Only 6 patent records in scope touch G06N (Computing based on AI models), representing roughly 1% of the technology mix. Machine-learning approaches to channel estimation, precoding, and beam management are active in academic literature but sparsely protected here. An entrant with signal-processing and ML capability could build a defensible position in AI-native massive MIMO without facing dense prior-art coverage, and could link directly to the dominant H04B7 core via method claims.

Search this in Eureka →

G01S · Integrated sensing and communication (ISAC)

G01S (Radar, sonar, and positioning) accounts for only 4 patent records, making it the sparsest technically relevant branch in the corpus. Massive MIMO arrays are increasingly explored as dual-function sensing and communication platforms under ISAC frameworks, a key 6G research direction. Entry here is technically adjacent — beamforming hardware is shared — and the low prior-art density means early filings could establish foundational claims before the branch densifies.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all sparse IPC branches, entry-path analysis, and filing-gap heatmaps in PatSnap Eureka.
H01P · Waveguides & microwave elementsH04J · Multiplex communication+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; low counts indicate relative sparsity, not absence of prior art.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route across transmission, antenna, and network branches

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH04B 7 · Transmission (general)H01Q 1 · AntennasH01Q 21 · AntennasH04L 5 · Digital information transmissionH04L 25 · Digital information transmission
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)Strong · 27Moderate · 12Moderate · 8AbsentAbsent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 14Strong · 10Strong · 8Moderate · 6Absent
Southeast UniversityStrong · 22AbsentAbsentAbsentEmerging · 2
Parallel Wireless Inc.Strong · 10Strong · 7Moderate · 4Moderate · 3Absent
AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.Strong · 8AbsentAbsentStrong · 8Strong · 7
Jio Platforms Ltd.Strong · 21AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
John Mezzalingua Associates LLCStrong · 7AbsentStrong · 11AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on PatSnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.