Book a demo

MBR Membrane Filtration Patent Landscape 2026

MBR Membrane Filtration Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
MBR Membrane Filtration Patent Landscape in 2026

The MBR membrane filtration patent space is a moderately concentrated, maturing field where a small cohort of established water-technology firms holds the leading positions, with BL Technology Inc commanding the top rank. Filing volumes peaked in 2017 and have eased since, signaling that foundational process IP is largely staked while adjacent biological and catalytic branches remain comparatively sparse.

912
Patent families in scope
21%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-21%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

BL Technology Inc leads a field where the top five account for one-fifth of the hundred largest filers’ combined output

BL Technology Inc holds the top position with 41 patent families, followed closely by Jiangxi JDL Environmental Protection Co Ltd (32), Fibracast Ltd (30), Evoqua Water Technologies LLC (27), and Nalco Co (25). The top five filers together represent 21% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, indicating moderate rather than extreme concentration.

A clear first tier of four to five players is distinguishable, but the gap between the leader and the fifth-ranked applicant is only 16 patent families, suggesting no single firm has achieved decisive lock-in. The field below the top five is populated by numerous mid-tier and niche filers, including Chinese environmental-technology specialists and academic institutions.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1BL Technology Inc41
2Jiangxi JDL Environmental Protection Co Ltd32
3Fibracast Ltd30
4Evoqua Water Technologies LLC27
5Nalco Co25
6Siemens Industry Inc18
7General Electric Co18
8DOOSAN HEAVY IND & CONSTR CO LTD18
9Zenon Environmental Inc17
10Suntar Membrane Technology (Xiamen) Co Ltd14
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation14
12Tongji University13
13Beijing Origin Water Film Tech12
14Siemens Water Technologies Corp12
15Blue Array LLC10
16Zenon Tech Partnership10
17SUZHOU SUKE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SCI & TECH CO…10
18Tianjin Bishuiyuan Membrane Material Co Ltd10
19Suzhou Sujing New Materials in Environmental Protection Co Ltd10
20Degremont SA9
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions imply broad portfolio coverage across both wastewater-treatment chemistry (C02F) and membrane-separation hardware (B01D), making freedom-to-operate on foundational MBR process configurations genuinely challenging for new entrants without differentiated technical approaches.

Filing counts for 20242026 are subject to publication lag and likely understate actual recent activity; the apparent drop in those years should not be read as a structural collapse in R&D interest. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Annual volume eased from a 2017 peak; wastewater treatment and membrane separation dominate the technology mix

The filing trend and technology-composition charts together reveal a field past its growth inflection, concentrated heavily in two IPC branches, with a long tail of adjacent classes representing underexplored territory.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings peaked at 134 patent families in 2017 and have trended downward since, with 2022 (85) and 2024 (81) marking the lowest recent readings. Years 2024–2026 are affected by publication lag and almost certainly undercount actual filings; the apparent sharp drop to 36 in 2025 and 5 in 2026 should be treated as an artifact of lag, not a real-world collapse.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 134 in 2017.13420171132018125201910620201172021852022110202381202436202552026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C02F (Water and wastewater treatment) and B01D (Separation processes including filtration) together account for the overwhelming majority of records, confirming that core MBR process and membrane-module IP drives the field. Biological apparatus (C12M), catalytic processes (B01J), mixing (B01F), and microbiology (C12N) each register very low counts, marking them as adjacent but currently underserved branches.

Technology compositionC02F · Water & wastewater treatment leads with 1,495; B01D · Separation processes (filtration etc.) 875.C02F · Water & wastewate…1,495B01D · Separation proces…875C12M · Bioreactors & enz…50B01J · Chemical/physical…19B01F · Mixing & stirring17C12N · Microorganisms & …15C10M · Lubricants13B08B · Cleaning (general)8↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US9434629B2Published 2016-09-06

Membrane module and membrane bioreactor, water tre…

Beijing Ecojoy Water Technology CO., LTD.

A hollow fiber membrane module includes a hollow fiber membrane bundle consisted of a plurality of hollow fiber membrane filaments, end part(s) at one end or both ends of the hollow fiber membrane bundle, an air inlet pipe and a produced water pipe. An air distributing device having air distributing holes is disposed at an end surface of at least one of the… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Membrane module and membrane bioreactor, water tre… — patent drawingMembrane module and membrane bioreactor, water tre… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Modular shipboard membrane bioreactor system for c…165
2Apparatus for mass transfer involving biological/p…158
3Filtration apparatus comprising a membrane bioreac…155
4Submerged membrane bioreactor for treatment of nit…142
5Organic slurry treatment process138
6Organic slurry treatment process134
7Membrane bioreactor, process and aerator102
8Membrane bioreactor, process and aerator98

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for MBR R&D strategy

Four structural dimensions — maturity, concentration, ecosystem collaboration, and geography — shape where new investment is likely to gain traction and where it faces the steepest prior-art headwinds.

Decline

Declining phase: foundational IP is staked, incremental innovation dominates

The lifecycle evidence places MBR membrane filtration in Decline, with annual filings easing back from the 2017 peak of 134 patent families. Core process configurations and membrane-module architectures are broadly covered; new entrants are more likely to find value in system integration, process control, or application-specific adaptations than in re-staking process fundamentals.

Past-peak field
Concentration

Moderate concentration with no single dominant lock-in

The top five filers account for 21% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, and the spread between first (41 patent families) and fifth (25 patent families) is narrow enough that no single firm enjoys structural dominance. A challenger with focused, technically differentiated IP in membrane materials or biological process optimization could realistically close the gap with sustained filing.

Contested leadership
Collaboration

Zenon Environmental Inc is the most active co-filer; GE and BL Technology also collaborated

The most active co-filing pair by joint patent count is Zenon Environmental Inc with OTV Omnium de Traitements et de Valorisation SA (4 joint patents), followed by General Electric Co with BL Technology Inc (2), Zenon Environmental Inc with OTV SA (2), Jiangxi JDL Environmental Protection with Shenzhen Jindalai Investment Management (2), and Evoqua Water Technologies with Siemens Industry Inc (2). Collaboration activity is modest overall, suggesting that most IP is generated within individual organizations rather than through broad consortium arrangements.

Limited ecosystem
Geography

China dominates filings; the US and EPO are the key secondary markets

China is the leading filing jurisdiction by a wide margin, followed by the United States and the European Patent Office. South Korea, Australia, Canada, and India represent meaningful secondary markets. The disparity between the Chinese filing volume and all other jurisdictions suggests that much Chinese-origin IP has not been extended internationally — a potential freedom-to-operate advantage for non-Chinese markets if validated by a freedom-to-operate search.

China-heavy geography
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Zenon Environmental IncOTV OMNIUM DE TRAITEMENTS & DE VALORISATION SA4
General Electric CoBL Technology Inc2
Zenon Environmental IncOTV SA2
Jiangxi JDL Environmental Protection Co LtdShenzhen Jindalai Investment Management Co Ltd2
Evoqua Water Technologies LLCSiemens Industry Inc2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; a family filed in multiple offices is counted under each.Explore insights →
Leaders

BL Technology Inc leads on volume; Fibracast Ltd differentiates through membrane-module hardware

The top two players illustrate divergent strategies: BL Technology Inc spans the full process chain from biological treatment to filtration, while Fibracast Ltd concentrates heavily on membrane-module and membrane-maintenance engineering.

Leader · BL Technology Inc

BL Technology Inc

BL Technology Inc holds the top rank with 41 patent families, with its technology emphasis concentrated in biological wastewater treatment (C02F3), filtration separation (B01D61), and water treatment chemistry (C02F1). Momentum data indicate recent filing activity is very low, with a ‘new entrant’ trend signal likely reflecting a base transition after a period of high output — suggesting the core portfolio may be mature.

Families: 41
Challenger · Fibracast Ltd

Fibracast Ltd

Fibracast Ltd ranks third with 30 patent families and shows a sharply differentiated focus on membrane-module geometry (B01D63) and membrane maintenance and fouling control (B01D65), alongside water treatment chemistry (C02F1). Recent momentum has declined sharply (down 80% versus its prior three-year period), indicating that its foundational membrane-fabrication portfolio has been largely established and new filing activity has slowed.

Families: 30
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore rankings, technology emphasis, and momentum signals for all top-100 filers in MBR membrane filtration.
Evoqua Water Technologies LLCNalco Co+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Fibracast Ltd5▼ -80%
BL Technology Inc1▲ new entrant
Beijing Origin Water Film Tech1▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player counts are at the patent-family level as used in the applicant ranking.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches in biological apparatus and catalytic process integration

Against the backdrop of saturated core C02F and B01D coverage, several IPC classes show very low record counts — making them observable as sparsely covered adjacent areas with plausible technical relevance to next-generation MBR systems.

C12M · Bioreactors and enzyme apparatus

With only 50 records against the dominant C02F and B01D volumes, bioreactor apparatus engineering is sparsely covered in the MBR context. As MBR systems increasingly incorporate advanced biological processes — including enzymatic degradation of micropollutants and sidestream anaerobic stages — purpose-built bioreactor apparatus IP could offer a differentiated entry point. Organizations with fermentation or bioprocess engineering backgrounds could translate existing C12M competence into MBR-specific claims.

Search this in Eureka →

B01J · Chemical and physical processes including catalysis

B01J covers catalytic and adsorptive process steps that could be integrated into MBR trains for micropollutant removal or advanced oxidation. With only 19 records in this corpus, the combination of catalytic chemistry with membrane bioreactor operation is an observed gap. Entry requires both MBR process knowledge and heterogeneous catalysis or adsorption expertise, but the sparse prior art may make claim differentiation more achievable than in the saturated core classes.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access coverage analysis across all adjacent IPC branches identified in the MBR membrane filtration corpus.
B01F · Mixing and stirring in MBR systemsC12N · Microorganisms and genetic engineering for MBR+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. White-space branches are identified by low record counts relative to the dominant classes; they are observations of relative sparsity, not validated commercial opportunities.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route across biological treatment and membrane-separation branches

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerC02F 3 · Water & wastewater treatmentB01D 65 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)C02F 1 · Water & wastewater treatmentB01D 63 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)B01D 61 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)
Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co LtdStrong · 21Strong · 22Strong · 14Strong · 25Moderate · 7
Fibracast LtdStrong · 17Strong · 21Strong · 21Strong · 26Absent
Nalco CoStrong · 27AbsentStrong · 26AbsentStrong · 25
Siemens Water Technologies CorpStrong · 14Strong · 14Moderate · 9Strong · 21Strong · 12
General Electric CoStrong · 36AbsentStrong · 19AbsentModerate · 13
Zenon Environmental IncStrong · 26AbsentStrong · 22AbsentModerate · 7
BL Technology IncStrong · 23AbsentStrong · 15AbsentStrong · 15
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own MBR membrane filtration landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.