Book a demo

Medical AI Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Medical AI Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/medical-ai-and-clinical-analytics-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Medical AI & Clinical Analytics
Medical AI and clinical analytics patents: who is filing, and where the field is still open
  • Filings nearly tripled from 2021 to 2024 (+200%), with 2025 posting the highest count so far at 95 published records — though the most recent years are still filling in.
  • The top 5 assignees hold just 22.6% of all 221 records, and the top 10 combine for only 33.0% — a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants dominates this field.
  • G06N and G16H cover the majority of records (65.6% and 58.4%), but control-systems class G05B appears in only 3.6% of filings, marking a thin edge of the landscape.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
221
Published Records
23%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+200%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
IN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (10 records) with 2024 (30) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 221 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks 221 published patent records filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine Medical AI claim language with clinical-analytics elements such as training datasets, model parameters, feature vectors, model inference, patient records, or clinical decision logic. The scope spans diagnostic support, image-based analysis and healthcare informatics systems rather than AI methods generically. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 figures in this dataset are undercounts of the eventual totals.

Filing activity is concentrated in India and the United States as receiving offices, with a smaller volume routed through the WIPO PCT system and single-digit counts in China, Australia and Hong Kong. That distribution reflects where applicants are choosing to establish priority and file nationally, not where the underlying research originates.

Filing activity by year, 2017–2026
  1. 1VELLORE INSITUTE OF TECH14
  2. 2SR UNIVERSITY13
  3. 3NEC LAB EURO GMBH8
  4. 4QURE AI TECH PTE LTD8
  5. 5TRAN BAO7
  6. 6EKO AI PTE LTD6
  7. 7QOMPLX INC5
  8. 8GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC5
  9. 9KONERU LAKSHMAIAH EDUCATION FOUNDATION4
  10. 10HARRISON AI PTY LTD3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Medical AI & Clinical Analytics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 221-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing trend: a sharp climb through 2024, with early 2025-26 data still incomplete

Volume moved from zero in 2017 to a peak of 95 in 2025, with growth from 2021 (10 records) to 2024 (30 records) representing a +200% increase over that three-year span — the last span the dataset can treat as complete.

Filing trend: a sharp climb through 2024, with early 2025-26 data still incomplete0255075100020172018201920202021202220232024952025522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition: AI computing and healthcare informatics dominate

G06N (AI models) and G16H (healthcare informatics) each cover more than half of all 221 records, while A61B, G06T, G06F and G06V form a substantial second tier. Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100% and should be read as claim-coverage overlap, not as mutually exclusive segments.

Technology composition: AI computing and healthcare informatics dominateG06N · Computing based on AI models14565.6%G16H · Healthcare informatics12958.4%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery6629.9%G06T · Image data processing & genera…5725.8%G06F · Electric digital data processi…4118.6%G06V · Image/video recognition4118.6%H04L · Digital information transmissi…135.9%G05B · Control & regulating systems83.6%Other6629.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 221 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Medical AI & Clinical Analytics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Medical AI & Clinical Analytics Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about medical ai & clinical analytics patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited records

Representative record
US20260188495A12026-07-02

AI clinical decision support system using connectivity model analysis

UNIVERSITY OF SHARJAH

The present disclosure provides an AI-based clinical decision support system comprising an input module configured to receive clinical information comprising brain scan data, an analysis module configured to parse the clinical information using statistical measures from functional connectivity analysis with counterfactual explanations to identify brain connectivity patterns associated with brain disorders, and an output module configured to present a recommended diagnosis and explanation comprising attribution information identifying connectivity features contributing to the diagnosis.Filed by University of Sharjah, published 2026-07-02. Covers fMRI and EEG-based connectivity analysis with counterfactual explanation of the diagnosis output.

US20260188495A1 — patent drawing 1
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20200268260A1Hearing and monitoring system109
2US20210256160A1Method and system for automated text anonymisation63
3US20250259041A1Ai agent decision platform with deontic reasoning62
4US20200117897A1Adaptive Artificial Intelligence Training Data Acquisition and Plant Monitoring System58
5US20250259082A1Ai agent decision platform with deontic reasoning and quantum-inspired token management49
6US20210052252A1Clinical workflow to diagnose heart disease based on cardiac biomarker measurements and ai recognition of 2d …37
7US20210259664A1Artificial intelligence (AI) recognition of echocardiogram images to enhance a mobile ultrasound device33
8US20210201190A1Machine learning model development and optimization process that ensures performance validation and data suff…24
9US20210264238A1Artificial intelligence (AI)-based guidance for an ultrasound device to improve capture of echo image views17
10US20220237898A1Machine learning system and method, integration server, information processing apparatus, program, and infere…15

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of present-day importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Medical AI & Clinical Analytics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

The dataset shows a field with high claim density in a few technology classes but no single assignee controlling the space, and momentum still building rather than settling.

Concentration
22.6% of 221
held by top 5 assignees

No single filer dominates

The leading assignee holds 14 records and fifth place holds 7 — a gap, but not a moat. With the top 5 combining for only 22.6% of all 221 records and the top 10 for 33.0%, most of the field is held by entities with a handful of filings each, which means freedom-to-operate analysis has to look well beyond the named leaders.

Based on the 100-company ranked list
Growth
+200%
2021→2024 filings

Momentum is recent and real

Filings rose from 10 in 2021 to 30 in 2024, a +200% increase over three years, and 2025 posted the highest count in the dataset at 95 records. Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the true 2025-26 volume is still being reported and will likely revise upward.

2024 is the last year treated as complete
Composition
65.6% / 3.6%
G06N vs. G05B share

Claim density is lopsided

AI-model claims (G06N) and healthcare informatics (G16H) each touch a majority of records, while control-and-regulating claims (G05B) appear in only 3.6% of the 221 records. That gap is a proxy for where drafting effort has concentrated, not for where clinical need is greatest.

Shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple IPC classes
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to medical ai & clinical analytics patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Medical AI & Clinical Analytics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where momentum is shifting

The ranked list covers 100 companies across the 221 records in scope. Most sit far below the leader, and year-over-year momentum is moving fast for a few of them.

Momentum leader
+450% YoY
latest-year filings

A sharp recent acceleration

One university-affiliated filer moved to 11 records in the latest year, a +450% year-over-year jump, the fastest recent momentum in the ranked list. That kind of swing from a research-affiliated assignee is typical of a field still being explored rather than consolidated.

Momentum measured year over year on published records
Cooling filers
-83% YoY
pace pulled back sharply

Early movers are slowing

Several assignees that filed steadily in prior years show sharp pullbacks in the latest year, including drops of -83% and -67% year over year. That pattern is consistent with publication lag rather than an actual retreat from the technology, since the most recent year is always undercounted.

Compare against the +200% three-year filing growth figure
Long tail
33.0% of 221
held by top 10 combined

Room below the leaders

With the top 10 assignees combining for only 33.0% of all 221 records, roughly two-thirds of the dataset sits with entities outside the visible ranking. Any competitive read of this space needs to look past the named leaders to the tail of single- and few-filing entrants.

Ranking covers 100 companies, not a top-50 or top-100 cut
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches where filing density is thin relative to the size of the clinical problem they address
Counterfactual explanation for diagnosis outputMulti-modal fMRI/EEG connectivity fusionClosed-loop control of diagnostic AI (G05B overlap)Federated model training on patient recordsReal-time model inference on bedside devicesAnonymisation of clinical text at scale
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
SR UNIVERSITY11+450%
VELLORE INSITUTE OF TECH2-83%
KONERU LAKSHMAIAH EDUCATION FOUNDATION1-67%
NEC Laboratories Europe GmbH0-100%
QURE AI TECH PTE LTD0
TRAN BAO0
Eko AI Pte Ltd0
GE Precision Healthcare LLC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Medical AI & Clinical Analytics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The figures above set the boundaries of the field; the next step is testing a specific claim or a specific competitor against them.

Check freedom-to-operate on a specific claim

Run a targeted search against the most-cited records and the representative filing before drafting claims in connectivity analysis, counterfactual explanation, or bedside inference.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka

Track momentum by assignee

Year-over-year swings as large as +450% and -83% show this field is still reordering; set alerts on the fastest-moving assignees rather than relying on the static ranking.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka

Map the white space before filing

Thin classes like G05B and under-claimed branches such as federated training on patient records are where a first claim has more room to stand.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Medical AI & Clinical Analytics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Medical AI & Clinical Analytics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Medical AI & Clinical Analytics Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole medical ai & clinical analytics patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.