https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/medical-imaging-mri-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Biomedical Devices
Medical Imaging MRI Patents: Who Leads and Where Filing Is Slowing
  • 12,342 patent families span the 2015-2026 window, with filing peaking at 670 in 2019 and declining to 492 by 2022 — the technology is well-established, not accelerating.
  • G01R and A61B dominate at 10,752 and 7,403 records respectively, while AI-linked computing (G06N, 326) and material analysis (G01N, 321) remain thin, under-claimed branches.
  • Ownership is consolidated the Toshiba and Toshiba Medical Systems co-assignee pairing alone links 575 shared families, and recent-year momentum shows major filers like Philips down 96% YoY.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
12.3K
Published Records
33%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-40%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (522 records) with 2024 (311) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 12,342 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Landscape Overview

How the MRI patent landscape is structured

The dataset covers 12,342 patent families published between 2015 and 2026 across image reconstruction, gradient coil, RF coil array, accelerated acquisition and pulse sequence filings within G01R33/48, G01R33/56 and A61B5/055. Filing activity peaked in 2019 at 670 records and has since declined, with the 2022 midpoint already down to 492 — a pattern consistent with a mature rather than emerging field.

Receiving-office data shows the United States carrying the largest share of filings at 6,100, followed by Europe (EPO) at 2,307 and the WIPO PCT route at 1,177, with Japan, China and India trailing. That distribution points to the US and Europe as the primary contested jurisdictions, with PCT filings indicating deliberate multi-market strategies among the larger assignees.

Filing volume and jurisdiction split, 2015-2026
  1. 1KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV1,805
  2. 2TOSHIBA MEDICAL SYST CORP717
  3. 3GENERAL ELECTRIC CO545
  4. 4SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG523
  5. 5CANON MEDICAL SYST CORP512
  6. 6GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC399
  7. 7SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD385
  8. 8GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY CO LLC374
  9. 9FUJIFILM CORP358
  10. 10KK TOSHIBA347
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Medical Imaging MRI Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Publication counts by year and by IPC subclass show where MRI-related filing activity concentrates and how it has moved since 2017.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings peaked at 670 in 2019 and have declined since, reaching 623 in 2017 and falling to 26 by 2026; the midpoint year 2022 sat at 492, confirming a flat-to-declining trajectory. The final two years are undercounted because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months.

Filing trend, 2017-20260200400600800623201720186702019202020212022202320242025262026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

G01R (electric and magnetic measurement) and A61B (diagnosis and surgery) dominate with 10,752 and 7,403 records respectively, dwarfing image processing (G06T, 1,093), geophysics-adjacent filings (G01V, 631), electrotherapy (A61N, 472), magnet hardware (H01F, 404), AI computing (G06N, 326) and material analysis (G01N, 321).

Technology composition by IPC subclassG01R · Electric & magnetic measurement10,75287.1%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery7,40360.0%G06T · Image data processing & genera…1,0938.9%G01V · Geophysics & gravity surveying6315.1%A61N · Electrotherapy & radiation the…4723.8%H01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…4043.3%G06N · Computing based on AI models3262.6%G01N · Material analysis & testing3212.6%Other1,62513.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 12,342 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Medical Imaging MRI Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Medical Imaging MRI Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about medical imaging mri landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative Filing

A representative claim in the current landscape

Representative Record
US10921401B22021-02-16

Anterior RF coil array for MRI systems

GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC

Various methods and systems are provided for a flexible, lightweight, low-cost radio frequency (RF) coil array of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system. In one example, a RF coil array for a MRI system includes a plurality of RF coils, each RF coil comprising an integrated capacitor coil loop; a plurality of coupling electronics units each coupled to a respective coil loop; and a plurality of wires coupling each coupling electronics unit to an interface board configured to couple to a cable of the MRI system. The RF coil array is a high density (referring to the number of coil elements) anterior array (HDAA) or a high definition (referring to image resolution) anterior array.Filed by GE Precision Healthcare LLC; granted 2021-02-16.

US10921401B2 — patent drawing 1US10921401B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6701176B1Magnetic-resonance-guided imaging, electrophysiology, and ablation530
2US20050054910A1Optical image-based position tracking for magnetic resonance imaging applications447
3US5560360AImage neurography and diffusion anisotropy imaging420
4US6198957B1Radiotherapy machine including magnetic resonance imaging system405
5US6628980B2Apparatus, systems, and methods for in vivo magnetic resonance imaging403
6US8812077B2System and method for image guidance during medical procedures343
7US20140364720A1Systems and methods for interactive magnetic resonance imaging310
8US6246896B1MRI guided ablation system297
9US20130063143A1Local SAR Constrained Parallel Transmission RF Pulse in Magnetic Resonance Imaging287
10US5752515AMethods and apparatus for image-guided ultrasound delivery of compounds through the blood-brain barrier271

Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older records tend to rank higher because they have had more time to accumulate citations.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Medical Imaging MRI Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Check

What the filing pattern indicates

Volume, citation and momentum data together describe a technology area that is heavily claimed at its core and slowing in fresh activity, with a few narrow branches still open.

Filing Trajectory
670 → 26
peak (2019) to latest year

Growth has flattened, not accelerated

Filings ran at 623 in 2017, peaked at 670 in 2019, and had already fallen to 492 by the 2022 midpoint. The drop to 26 by 2026 partly reflects publication lag, but the multi-year decline before that is a genuine slowdown in fresh filing.

Read alongside the 18-month publication lag caveat.
Technology Concentration
10,752 + 7,403
G01R + A61B records

Two subclasses hold most of the claim space

G01R (electric and magnetic measurement) and A61B (diagnosis and surgery) together account for the large majority of records, meaning most scanner hardware and diagnostic integration territory is already densely filed.

G06T image processing trails far behind at 1,093 records.
Citation Influence
530 citations
US6701176B1, top-cited record

The most influential patents are the oldest

The five most-cited records, including US6701176B1 on MR-guided ablation and US5560360A on diffusion anisotropy imaging, anchor much of the field's later filing. High citation counts here reflect foundational status within the corpus, not current relevance.

Citation counts favour older records by design.
Assignee Momentum
-96% YoY
Philips, latest year vs prior

Established filers are pulling back

Several long-standing assignees, including Philips and Shanghai United Imaging, show sharp year-over-year declines or zero filings in the latest year, consistent with the broader flattening trend rather than isolated to one company.

Momentum figures reflect the partial latest year.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to medical imaging mri landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Medical Imaging MRI Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who is filing, and where activity is slowing

Ownership in this dataset is concentrated among established medical imaging manufacturers, several of which file through linked parent-subsidiary structures, while recent-year momentum shows even the largest filers pulling back sharply.

Consolidated Ownership
575 shared families
Toshiba + Toshiba Medical Systems

Corporate structure shapes the ranking

The strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset links Toshiba and Toshiba Medical Systems across 575 shared families, far ahead of the next pairing, Philips and Philips Intellectual Property & Standards at 93. Treating parent and subsidiary as one filer changes the effective concentration at the top.

Ten co-assignee pairs identified in total.
Momentum Reversal
-96% YoY
Philips latest-year filing change

Even top filers are slowing sharply

Philips shows only 1 filing in the latest year, down 96% year-over-year, and Shanghai United Imaging shows a similar pattern at -75%. Toshiba, GE and Hitachi Medical show zero filings in the latest year in this cut, though the partial final year understates true activity.

Latest year is partial due to publication lag.
Academic-Industry Links
41 shared families
Samsung + KAIST pairing

Some filers pair with research institutions

The Samsung Electronics and Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) pairing, with 41 shared families, shows that not all consolidation is between corporate parent and subsidiary; some reflects sustained university-industry collaboration on MRI-related technology.

A smaller but distinct consolidation pattern.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking first
These branches sit well below the core G01R and A61B volumes and are where fresh claims are more likely to clear prior art.
In-situ material analysis during acquisitionGradient coil / magnet assembly integrationAI-based reconstruction pipelinesElectrotherapy-coupled MRI guidanceLow-field portable coil hardware
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Koninklijke Philips N.V. (Royal Philips)1-96%
Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd.1-75%
Toshiba Corporation0
Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation0
General Electric Company0
Hitachi Medical Corporation0
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.0
GE Medical Systems Global Technology Company, LLC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Medical Imaging MRI Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific follow-up questions depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white space identification, or competitive tracking.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top-cited records

The five most-cited patents, including US6701176B1 and US6198957B1, anchor much of the surrounding claim space. Any new RF coil, reconstruction or MR-guided system design should be checked against these specifically before broader searching.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Track momentum among consolidated filers

With Toshiba, Philips and Shanghai United Imaging all showing flat or declining recent-year activity, monitoring which assignee resumes filing first is a useful early signal of where competitive investment is shifting.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka

Explore the under-claimed branches directly

G01N, H01F and A61N carry a fraction of the volume of the core subclasses. A targeted prior-art search in these areas before drafting is likely to surface less entrenched positions than in G01R or A61B.

Search white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Medical Imaging MRI Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Medical Imaging MRI Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Medical Imaging MRI Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole medical imaging mri landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.