Book a demo

Membrane Bioreactor Miniaturization Patent Landscape 2026

Membrane Bioreactor Miniaturization Patent Landscape 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/membrane-bioreactor-miniaturization-and-integration-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Water & Environmental · Patent Landscape
Membrane Bioreactor Miniaturization and Integration Patent Landscape 2026
  • One record carries 165 citations — an order of magnitude above the rest, concentrating influence in shipboard/combined-stream MBR rather than spreading across the field.
  • Filing peaked at 5 in 2017 and the 2022 midpoint sits at zero, with every tracked assignee showing no activity in the latest year — this is a stalled, not accelerating, field.
  • B01F and B63B each carry just one record against 20 in core wastewater IPC C02F, leaving mixing/aeration hardware and non-shipboard mobile units thinly claimed.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
20
Published Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
27
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

A narrow niche built around one dominant claim

Membrane bioreactor miniaturization covers systems that shrink or modularize the core MBR process — combining biological treatment and membrane filtration in a footprint small enough for a ship, a shipping container, or a household — rather than the large fixed-tank MBR plants that dominate municipal wastewater treatment. The searched corpus of 20 patent families spans 2015 through mid-2026 and sits almost entirely inside IPC C02F (water and wastewater treatment), with thin extensions into filtration hardware, mixing equipment, and marine vessel integration.

The shape of the data is unusual for a technology area: one record — a modular shipboard MBR system for combined wastewater streams — carries far more citations than everything else combined, while overall filing activity peaked in 2017 and has not rebounded since. That combination points to a field where one architecture set an early reference point and subsequent filers have not displaced it.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1BLUE ARRAY LLC10
  2. 2LIST LUXEMBOURG INST OF SCI & TECH2
  3. 3CENT BELGE DETUD & DE DOCUMENTATION DE LEAU EN ABREGE CEBEDEAU ASBL2
  4. 4COCKERILL MAINTENANCE & INGIE SA2
  5. 5HANGZHOU CREFLUX MEMBRANE TECH1
  6. 6JINGZHEN LUO1
  7. 7YANG YUXI MISS1
  8. 8MIAO WENLUE MR1
  9. 9RUIZE WU1
  10. 10Tianjin Wande Gaoke Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Bioreactor Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Twenty published families across 2015-2026 show a single sharp peak and no sustained follow-through — read the shape before the ranking table.

A 2017 peak with no rebound

Filings hit 5 in 2017, the high point for the whole window, then fall away; the 2022 midpoint sits at zero and nothing in the listed assignees shows latest-year activity. Publication lag means the final 12-18 months are always undercounted, but a flat or declining midpoint on top of an already-small population is a genuine signal, not just a reporting gap.

A 2017 peak with no rebound01345520172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in C02F, thin everywhere else

All 20 records touch C02F (water and wastewater treatment); 5 also carry B01D (separation/filtration), and B01F (mixing) and B63B (marine vessels) each carry exactly one. That lopsided spread means claim space outside core wastewater-treatment processing is barely staked.

Concentrated in C02F, thin everywhere elseC02F · Water & wastewater treatment20100.0%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…525.0%B01F · Mixing & stirring15.0%B63B · Ships & marine vessels15.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 20 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Bioreactor Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Membrane Bioreactor Miniaturization and Integration with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about membrane bioreactor miniaturization and integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative Filing

The claim shaping this niche

Representative Patent
US9321666B12016-04-26

US9321666B1 — Wastewater treatment with modular membrane bioreactor cartridges

LIBERTY EVANS, LLC

Embodiments of the invention describe an apparatus, method, and system of wastewater treatment using modular membrane bioreactor (MBR) cartridges. In one embodiment, said method of wastewater treatment includes adjusting the number of activated modular MBR cartridges in a container and adjusting the wastewater processing rate of the container to dynamically change the throughput of a fixed-size wastewater processing container. According to one embodiment, said method can include utilizing modular MBR cartridges to provide for a fault-tolerant wastewater treatment container.Granted to LIBERTY EVANS, LLC on 2016-04-26 — assignee and date rendered separately above.

US9321666B1 — patent drawing 1US9321666B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5254253AModular shipboard membrane bioreactor system for combined wastewater streams165
2US9321666B1Wastewater treatment with modular membrane bioreactor cartridges13
3US20160200610A1Cost Optimized System for WWTP Using Lagoons and In-Situ Membrane Bio Reactor Modules7
4US9828267B1MBR frame6
5AU2020102464A4A miniaturized air-lift membrane bioreactor for decentralized sewage treatment5
6AU2020100706A4A membrane bioreactor system for rural decentralized wastewater5
7US10099951B2Wastewater treatment with modular membrane bioreactor cartridges3
8US20170121193A1Wastewater treatment with modular membrane bioreactor cartridges3
9US20220411298A1Process and plant for treating wastewater containing micropollutants of pharmaceutical origin2
10US20180141839A1MBR frame2

Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older filings accumulate citations by default, so read this as influence within the dataset, not as a current importance score.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Bioreactor Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Check

What the filing pattern actually tells you

Three readings of the same small corpus — citation concentration, timing, and technology spread — each point the same direction: a narrow, stalled field with one dominant claim cluster.

Citation Concentration
165 vs 13
top record vs. runner-up citations

Influence sits almost entirely with one architecture

The shipboard combined-wastewater-stream record's 165 citations dwarf the next entrant's 13, meaning most of what the field cites as foundational traces to a single integrated design rather than a broad base of prior art.

Read this as concentration risk for anyone filing near that claim, not as general field maturity.
Filing Timing
5 → 0
2017 peak to 2022 midpoint

No rebound after the 2017 peak

Filing hit its high point in 2017 and the 2022 midpoint shows zero activity; publication lag understates the last year or two, but a flat middle of the window on a 20-family base is a real signal of cooling interest.

Treat any 'growth' narrative for this niche with caution until fresh filings appear.
Technology Spread
1 record each
B01F and B63B vs. 20 in C02F

Adjacent hardware classes are barely touched

Mixing/stirring (B01F) and marine vessels (B63B) each appear once, against near-universal coverage of core water-treatment IPC C02F, showing claim activity has stayed inside processing method territory.

That gap is where a first, well-drafted claim would face the least prior art.
Collaboration Pattern
3 pairs at strength 2
co-assignee pairs

A small cooperative cluster, separate from the solo filers

Cockerill Maintenance & Ingenierie (CMI), LIST Luxembourg and CEBEDEAU co-file with each other at equal strength, forming a triangle distinct from the individually-assigned shipboard and cartridge patents.

Their joint work looks oriented toward a different technical thread than the most-cited records.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to membrane bioreactor miniaturization and integration, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Cooperative filing is limited to one cluster
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Cockerill Maintenance & Ingenierie (CMI)LIST LUXEMBOURG INST OF SCI & TECH2
Cockerill Maintenance & Ingenierie (CMI)CENT BELGE DETUD & DE DOCUMENTATION DE LEAU EN ABREGE CEBEDEAU ASBL2
LIST LUXEMBOURG INST OF SCI & TECHCENT BELGE DETUD & DE DOCUMENTATION DE LEAU EN ABREGE CEBEDEAU ASBL2
Zhejiang Kaichuang Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.Hangzhou Qiushi Membrane Technology Co., Ltd.1

Only 4 co-assignee pairs exist in this 20-family set, and three of them link the same three organisations to each other at equal strength — there is no broader collaboration network to speak of here.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Bioreactor Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Assignee Landscape

Who holds ground, and where it is thin

No assignee in this set shows filings in the latest tracked year, and the collaboration network is limited to one three-way cluster — a landscape better described as staked-but-stalled than actively contested.

Solo Filer
US9321666B1
representative patent

LIBERTY EVANS, LLC

Holds the representative record in this dataset, covering dynamic throughput control via modular cartridge activation inside a fixed-size container — a process claim that reaches beyond one specific housing design.

No latest-year filings recorded for this assignee in the tracked set.
Cooperative Cluster
2 co-filings each
pairwise strength

Cockerill Maintenance & Ingenierie (CMI) + LIST Luxembourg + CEBEDEAU

These three organisations co-file with each other at equal pairwise strength, forming the only meaningful collaboration network in the dataset, distinct from the individually-filed shipboard and cartridge patents.

All three show zero filings in the most recent tracked year.
Named Individual Filer
20 total families
tracked assignee set

Xue Tonglai and other single-name filers

Individual and small-entity filers, including Xue Tonglai, appear alongside larger organisations in this compact 20-family set, reflecting how a niche this size can be moved by a handful of independent inventors as easily as by established players.

Filing density across the whole tracked group has not produced a latest-year filing from any assignee.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
IPC spread inside this corpus shows near-total concentration in core wastewater processing, leaving these adjacent areas thin:
compact-shell mixing/aeration subassembliesnon-shipboard mobile treatment unitsair-lift flux control for household-scale systemsdosing control tied to fixed-footprint throughput
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year momentum: flat across the board
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
BLUE ARRAY LLC0
Cockerill Maintenance & Ingenierie (CMI)0
LIST LUXEMBOURG INST OF SCI & TECH0
CENT BELGE DETUD & DE DOCUMENTATION DE LEAU EN ABREGE CEBEDEAU ASBL0
Zenon Environmental Inc.0
Xue Tonglai0
Zhejiang Kaichuang Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.0
Hangzhou Qiushi Membrane Technology Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Bioreactor Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this landscape next

The filing pattern here is narrow enough that a targeted freedom-to-operate check and a claim-scope comparison are more useful next moves than a broader field scan.

Check freedom-to-operate against US9321666B1

Before committing to a cartridge-based modular design, map your control logic against the dynamic-throughput and fault-tolerance limitations in this claim specifically, since it is the most structurally significant record in the set.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Stress-test a claim in the under-claimed sub-areas

Mixing/aeration hardware and non-shipboard mobile units show almost no filing density in this corpus; drafting and searching around a claim there before the field fills in is the clearer opportunity.

Draft and search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Bioreactor Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Practitioner FAQ

Common questions on MBR miniaturization patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Bioreactor Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Membrane Bioreactor Miniaturization and Integration in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole membrane bioreactor miniaturization and integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.