Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (3 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.
This landscape tracks patent families addressing cation-exchange membrane adsorbers used in protein purification and biopharmaceutical downstream processing, filtered to exclude water-treatment and analytical-assay uses that share the same membrane hardware but not the same claim intent. The scope spans 111 published records from 2015 through the mid-2026 data cut-off, indexed by IPC codes covering separation processes, chemical/physical treatment, and peptide and protein chemistry. Publication lag of roughly 18 months means the 2025-26 filing counts are understated and should not be read as a slowdown.
The dataset sits at the intersection of membrane engineering and protein purification chemistry, where a small number of assignees hold most of the ranked filings and the surrounding claim space — virus clearance, ligand chemistry, module geometry — remains comparatively open.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 111-record set: filings by year, and the IPC subclasses those filings carry.
Filings peaked at 43 in 2017. The evidence tracks a further contraction from 3 filings in 2021 to 0 in 2024, a -100% span over those three years; 2025 and 2026 counts are partial due to publication lag and should not be treated as a continuation of that trend.
Every record in scope carries a C07K peptide/protein classification (100.0% of the 111 records). Separation-process claims under B01D appear on 11.7%, chemical/physical processing under B01J on 5.4%, therapeutic-activity claims under A61P on 3.6%, and food-protein claims under A23J on 0.9% — shares sum past 100% because records can carry more than one class.
Shares are the percentage of the 111 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about membrane chromatography — cation-exchange membrane adsorbers patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaFiled by F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG and published 2026-07-08, this record sits in the same virus-clearance line as the field's most-cited document, WO2011031397A1 (cited 35 times), which addresses improving virus removal during protein purification using membrane-based steps.Abstract paraphrased from the published record; consult the original filing for exact claim language.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2011031397A1 | Method to improve virus removal in protein purification | 35 |
| 2 | WO2017140881A1 | Protein purification | 20 |
| 3 | WO2019016154A1 | chromatography | 13 |
| 4 | US20200331960A1 | chromatography | 6 |
| 5 | US20190153028A1 | Method for protein purification | 4 |
| 6 | EP3730511A1 | Protein purification | 2 |
| 7 | AU2017220675A1 | Protein purification | 2 |
| 8 | EP2462158A1 | Method to improve virus removal in protein purification | 2 |
| 9 | US10662237B2 | Method to improve virus filtration capacity | 2 |
| 10 | US20220306726A1 | Method to improve virus filtration capacity | 1 |
Citation counts favour older records simply by virtue of being searchable longer; treat them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not of current commercial weight.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Four read-outs from the filing, citation and classification data that matter for a filing or licensing decision.
The leading assignee accounts for 75 records in a five-company ranking whose fifth place holds just 1. That is a steep drop from first to the rest of the ranked list, though the ranking itself covers only five companies and is not a top-50 or top-100 view.
The tracked -100% change from 2021 (3 filings) to 2024 (0) is the last span the data can support with confidence. Years after 2024 are subject to publication lag and are not evidence of a continued decline.
Every record in scope touches C07K peptide and protein chemistry, but only 11.7% also carry a B01D separation-process classification. That gap suggests most filers claim the biochemistry around the membrane rather than the membrane separation mechanics themselves.
Only three co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest link — three shared filings — sits between two of the largest ranked assignees. Most other activity in the ranking is filed solo.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to membrane chromatography — cation-exchange membrane adsorbers patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The assignee ranking returned by this dataset covers five companies; it is not a top-50 or top-100 list, and the gap between first and the rest is large enough to shape any freedom-to-operate check.
The top-ranked assignee's 75 records dwarf the rest of the ranking, whose fifth-place entrant holds a single record. Recent-year momentum for this assignee, like the rest of the ranking, sits at zero in the latest tracked year — consistent with publication lag rather than withdrawal from the space.
The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset — three shared filings — connects two of the larger ranked assignees, both active in the virus-clearance and protein-purification claim space that also produced the field's most-cited record.
Below the leading assignees, filing counts drop quickly to single digits. That pattern is typical of a technology where a handful of incumbents built an early claim position and later entrants have filed narrowly rather than broadly.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| UCB Biopharma SRL | 0 | — |
| Genentech, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG | 0 | — |
| YUSB BIOFARMA SRL | 0 | — |
| MEHTA AMIT | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a concentrated leader, a thin co-filing network, and claim space that sits mostly in protein chemistry rather than membrane mechanics.
With one assignee holding 75 of 111 ranked records, any new filing in this space should be checked against that portfolio first, particularly around the virus-clearance claims that also produced the field's most-cited record.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaOnly 11.7% of records carry a B01D separation-process classification alongside the near-universal C07K protein chemistry claims, pointing to open claim space in module geometry and flow mechanics.
Explore white space in EurekaPublication lag means the apparent drop to zero filings by 2024 is not the end of activity in this field; re-run this landscape in a year to see which assignees resume filing once the lag clears.
Track filing trends in EurekaOne assignee leads the ranked list with 75 of the 111 records tracked in this dataset, well ahead of the other four ranked companies, the smallest of which holds a single record. This is a five-company ranking returned by the data endpoint, not a top-50 or top-100 view, so it should not be read as covering every filer in the field. The concentration at the top suggests a freedom-to-operate review should start with that leading assignee's portfolio before looking elsewhere.
The tracked data shows filings falling from 3 in 2021 to 0 in 2024, a -100% change over that span, and the peak year so far was 2017 at 43. However, patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the 2025-26 figures in this dataset are still incomplete and should not be read as evidence of a continued decline. A fairer read is that the field had its most active filing period around 2017 and current activity cannot yet be confirmed either way.
EP3309168B1, filed by F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG and published 2026-07-08, addresses methods for improved virus removal during protein purification — the same technical thread as the field's most-cited record, WO2011031397A1, cited 35 times for a related virus-removal method. Anyone designing a purification process with a membrane-based virus-clearance step should review this claim family specifically, since Roche's related filings account for a meaningful share of the ranked assignee activity. A full claim-by-claim comparison against your process design is the only reliable way to confirm whether a specific implementation falls inside its scope.
The clearest gap in this dataset is between claims on protein and peptide chemistry (C07K, covering all 111 records) and claims on the separation-process mechanics of the membrane itself (B01D, covering only 11.7% of records). That gap points to under-claimed territory in module geometry, ligand density engineering, and multi-modal chemistries that pair cation-exchange with other separation mechanisms. A first filing targeting the membrane-mechanics side of the process, rather than the biochemistry around it, would sit in comparatively less-crowded claim space based on this evidence.
In this dataset, Israel leads with 16 filings, followed by the European Patent Office and the United States at 13 each, then Australia at 6, and Canada and Germany at 5 each. That spread suggests filers are pursuing a mix of major biopharmaceutical markets rather than concentrating on a single jurisdiction, which is typical for a purification technology tied to global drug manufacturing supply chains.
Go past this page: query the whole membrane chromatography — cation-exchange membrane adsorbers patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.