https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/membrane-chromatography-cation-exchange-membrane-adsorbers-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Membrane Chromatography
Cation-Exchange Membrane Adsorber Patents: Filing Trends and Open Claim Space
  • One assignee dominates the ranking. the leader holds 75 of the records tracked across the five ranked assignees, against a single-digit tail below it.
  • Filings peaked in 2017 at 43 and have since fallen to zero by 2024. the most recent years are still filling in under publication lag, so treat 2025-26 as incomplete rather than as a real drop-off.
  • Claim activity concentrates almost entirely in C07K. peptide and protein chemistry covers all 111 records, while separation-process claims under B01D sit far behind at 11.7%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
111
Published Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
IL
Leading Jurisdiction
5
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (3 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families addressing cation-exchange membrane adsorbers used in protein purification and biopharmaceutical downstream processing, filtered to exclude water-treatment and analytical-assay uses that share the same membrane hardware but not the same claim intent. The scope spans 111 published records from 2015 through the mid-2026 data cut-off, indexed by IPC codes covering separation processes, chemical/physical treatment, and peptide and protein chemistry. Publication lag of roughly 18 months means the 2025-26 filing counts are understated and should not be read as a slowdown.

The dataset sits at the intersection of membrane engineering and protein purification chemistry, where a small number of assignees hold most of the ranked filings and the surrounding claim space — virus clearance, ligand chemistry, module geometry — remains comparatively open.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1UCB Biopharma SRL75
  2. 2Genentech, Inc.21
  3. 3F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG16
  4. 4YUSB BIOFARMA SRL2
  5. 5MEHTA AMIT1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Chromatography — Cation-Exchange Membrane Adsorbers Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 111-record set: filings by year, and the IPC subclasses those filings carry.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings peaked at 43 in 2017. The evidence tracks a further contraction from 3 filings in 2021 to 0 in 2024, a -100% span over those three years; 2025 and 2026 counts are partial due to publication lag and should not be treated as a continuation of that trend.

Filing trend, 2017-20260132538504320172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

Every record in scope carries a C07K peptide/protein classification (100.0% of the 111 records). Separation-process claims under B01D appear on 11.7%, chemical/physical processing under B01J on 5.4%, therapeutic-activity claims under A61P on 3.6%, and food-protein claims under A23J on 0.9% — shares sum past 100% because records can carry more than one class.

IPC subclass compositionC07K · Peptides & proteins111100.0%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…1311.7%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …65.4%A61P · Therapeutic activity of compou…43.6%A23J · Proteins & food peptides10.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 111 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Chromatography — Cation-Exchange Membrane Adsorbers Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Membrane Chromatography — Cation-Exchange Membrane Adsorbers Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about membrane chromatography — cation-exchange membrane adsorbers patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited records in the field

Representative record
EP3309168B12026-07-08

EP3309168B1 — Method for improved virus removal in protein purification

F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG

Filed by F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG and published 2026-07-08, this record sits in the same virus-clearance line as the field's most-cited document, WO2011031397A1 (cited 35 times), which addresses improving virus removal during protein purification using membrane-based steps.Abstract paraphrased from the published record; consult the original filing for exact claim language.

EP3309168B1 — patent drawing 1EP3309168B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2011031397A1Method to improve virus removal in protein purification35
2WO2017140881A1Protein purification20
3WO2019016154A1chromatography13
4US20200331960A1chromatography6
5US20190153028A1Method for protein purification4
6EP3730511A1Protein purification2
7AU2017220675A1Protein purification2
8EP2462158A1Method to improve virus removal in protein purification2
9US10662237B2Method to improve virus filtration capacity2
10US20220306726A1Method to improve virus filtration capacity1

Citation counts favour older records simply by virtue of being searchable longer; treat them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not of current commercial weight.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Chromatography — Cation-Exchange Membrane Adsorbers Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say

Four read-outs from the filing, citation and classification data that matter for a filing or licensing decision.

Concentration
75 of 111 records
leader's share of ranked filings

One assignee holds most of the ranked activity

The leading assignee accounts for 75 records in a five-company ranking whose fifth place holds just 1. That is a steep drop from first to the rest of the ranked list, though the ranking itself covers only five companies and is not a top-50 or top-100 view.

Assignee ranking, 5 companies
Filing momentum
43 → 0
peak year (2017) to 2026 count

Peak filing was 2017; recent years are still filling in

The tracked -100% change from 2021 (3 filings) to 2024 (0) is the last span the data can support with confidence. Years after 2024 are subject to publication lag and are not evidence of a continued decline.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Claim geography
100.0% vs 11.7%
C07K share vs B01D share of 111 records

Protein chemistry claims dominate; separation-process claims trail

Every record in scope touches C07K peptide and protein chemistry, but only 11.7% also carry a B01D separation-process classification. That gap suggests most filers claim the biochemistry around the membrane rather than the membrane separation mechanics themselves.

IPC composition, 111 records
Collaboration
3 co-assignee pairs
shared-filing links in the dataset

Co-filing is rare and concentrated in one pair

Only three co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest link — three shared filings — sits between two of the largest ranked assignees. Most other activity in the ranking is filed solo.

Co-assignee pairs, n=3
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to membrane chromatography — cation-exchange membrane adsorbers patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Chromatography — Cation-Exchange Membrane Adsorbers Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's filing

The ranked assignees and where they sit

The assignee ranking returned by this dataset covers five companies; it is not a top-50 or top-100 list, and the gap between first and the rest is large enough to shape any freedom-to-operate check.

Leader
75 records
of the ranked total

The dominant filer by a wide margin

The top-ranked assignee's 75 records dwarf the rest of the ranking, whose fifth-place entrant holds a single record. Recent-year momentum for this assignee, like the rest of the ranking, sits at zero in the latest tracked year — consistent with publication lag rather than withdrawal from the space.

Assignee ranking, position 1 of 5
Co-filing pair
3 shared filings
strongest co-assignee link

Two large filers share the most co-assignee activity

The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset — three shared filings — connects two of the larger ranked assignees, both active in the virus-clearance and protein-purification claim space that also produced the field's most-cited record.

Co-assignee pairs
Long tail
1 record
fifth-ranked assignee

A thin tail below the top filers

Below the leading assignees, filing counts drop quickly to single digits. That pattern is typical of a technology where a handful of incumbents built an early claim position and later entrants have filed narrowly rather than broadly.

Assignee ranking, position 5 of 5
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches where IPC and citation density are both comparatively thin in this dataset.
Virus-clearance validation protocolsLigand density optimisation on membrane supportsModule geometry for scaled-up flow-through polishingMulti-modal cation-exchange chemistriesSingle-use membrane adsorber cartridge design
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
UCB Biopharma SRL0
Genentech, Inc.0-100%
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG0
YUSB BIOFARMA SRL0
MEHTA AMIT0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Chromatography — Cation-Exchange Membrane Adsorbers Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a concentrated leader, a thin co-filing network, and claim space that sits mostly in protein chemistry rather than membrane mechanics.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leader's portfolio

With one assignee holding 75 of 111 ranked records, any new filing in this space should be checked against that portfolio first, particularly around the virus-clearance claims that also produced the field's most-cited record.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Draft around the membrane-mechanics gap

Only 11.7% of records carry a B01D separation-process classification alongside the near-universal C07K protein chemistry claims, pointing to open claim space in module geometry and flow mechanics.

Explore white space in Eureka

Watch for the 2025-26 filing catch-up

Publication lag means the apparent drop to zero filings by 2024 is not the end of activity in this field; re-run this landscape in a year to see which assignees resume filing once the lag clears.

Track filing trends in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Chromatography — Cation-Exchange Membrane Adsorbers Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Chromatography — Cation-Exchange Membrane Adsorbers Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Membrane Chromatography — Cation-Exchange Membrane Adsorbers Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole membrane chromatography — cation-exchange membrane adsorbers patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.