Book a demo

Membrane Reactor Materials Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026

Membrane Reactor Materials Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/membrane-reactor-advanced-materials-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Chemical & Process Engineering · Patent Landscape
Membrane Reactor Advanced Materials Patents: Who's Filing and Where the Gaps Sit
  • Filing has plateaued since 2022, peaking at 12 families that year and holding roughly flat through the latest full year, not accelerating.
  • Separation and catalysis IPC classes dominate, with B01D and B01J each appearing in over 100 of the 136 tracked families.
  • Electrolytic and refining integration is thinly claimed, with C25B, B01B and C10G each holding only a handful of records against the dense core classes.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
136
Published Records
65%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+1000%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 136 patent families filed against membrane reactor systems that specify a particular advanced material — palladium membranes, zeolite membranes, mixed ionic-electronic conductors, or defined ceramic membrane compositions — rather than membrane reactors in general. The search combines reactor-level terminology with material-specific claim language and three core IPC classes covering separation membranes, catalytic processes, and reactor apparatus.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, with the most recent year necessarily undercounted because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. Filing offices span the United States, Europe, Japan, Australia, Canada and the WIPO PCT system, reflecting a field where multi-jurisdiction protection is common rather than exceptional.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1NGK INSULATORS LTD53
  2. 2NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY11
  3. 3INTELLIGENT ENERGY INC9
  4. 4NORITAKE CO LTD9
  5. 5CUF – QUIMICOS INDIS7
  6. 6ENTE PER LE NUOVE TECH LENERGIA E LAMBIENTE (ENEA)7
  7. 7NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD6
  8. 8MITSUBISHI CHEM ENG CORP4
  9. 9KUSAKABE KATSUKI4
  10. 10MITSUBISHI CHEM CORP4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Reactor Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing Activity

Filing trends and technology composition

The 136 families in this dataset span eight IPC subclasses and six major receiving offices, with filing activity that has plateaued rather than accelerated since its 2022 peak.

A flat filing curve since the 2022 peak

Annual filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 12 in 2022, then held roughly flat through the most recent full year. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years in this trend will read lower than actual filing activity once later disclosures publish.

A flat filing curve since the 2022 peak03691222017201820192020202112202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Separation and catalysis dominate the IPC mix

B01D (separation processes) and B01J (catalytic processes) each appear in over 100 of the 136 records, confirming this is fundamentally a separation-and-catalysis field. C01B (inorganic compounds) sits close behind at 86, while H01M (batteries and fuel cells) and the smaller C25B, B01B and C10G subclasses mark where membrane reactor claims extend into adjacent process industries.

Separation and catalysis dominate the IPC mixB01D · Separation processes (filtrati…10677.9%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …10577.2%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…8663.2%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds3425.0%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells2115.4%B01B · Boiling & evaporating64.4%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining64.4%C25B · Electrolytic production of com…53.7%Other1712.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 136 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Reactor Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Membrane Reactor Advanced Materials with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about membrane reactor advanced materials and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative filing
US20220047995A12022-02-17

US20220047995A1 — Zeolite membrane complex, method of producing zeolite membrane complex, separator, membrane reactor, and separation method

NGK INSULATORS, LTD.

A zeolite membrane complex includes a porous support and a zeolite membrane formed on the support. The zeolite membrane contains Al, P, and a tetravalent element, with compositional molar ratios defined within specific numeric windows measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and a zeolite crystal accessible volume of 450 cubic angstroms or greater.Filed by NGK Insulators, Ltd., published 2022-02-17.

US20220047995A1 — patent drawing 1US20220047995A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing details
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5637259AProcess for producing syngas and hydrogen from natural gas using a membrane reactor128
2US5366712ACeramic catalytic membrane reactor for the separation of hydrogen and/or isotopes thereof from fluid feeds75
3JP2011016123AZeolite membrane, separation membrane module, and method for manufacturing the same62
4US20050281735A1Hydrogen generation apparatus and method for using same47
5WO2007119286A1Method of dehydration, dehydrating apparatus, and membrane reactor46
6JP1999137981ABase body to carry zeolite membrane31
7JP2005289735AZeolite membrane and its manufacturing method30
8US6165438AApparatus and method for simultaneous recovery of hydrogen from water and from hydrocarbons28
9US20040101720A1Fuel reforming system27
10WO2008024089A2Hydrogen generation apparatus and method for using same25

Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; citation counts favour older filings and should be read as a signal of influence, not current importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Reactor Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the filing data signals

Beyond raw counts, three patterns stand out in how membrane reactor material claims have been filed and cited over the past decade.

Citation weight
128 cites
US5637259A

Older process claims still anchor the field

The two most-cited records in this dataset, both covering hydrogen/syngas separation via membrane reactors, were filed well before the 2022 peak. High citation counts inside a bounded corpus favour older filings by construction, so treat this as a signal of foundational influence rather than current commercial dominance.

Citation ranking, most-cited records
Filing geography
33 US filings
leading receiving office

US, Europe and Japan lead filing volume

The United States leads with 33 filings, followed by Europe (24), Australia and Japan (20 each), and WIPO PCT filings (15). This spread across major offices, including a meaningful PCT share, indicates applicants are pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection rather than filing defensively in a single home market.

Receiving office counts
Filing momentum
12 in 2022
peak year

Growth has flattened, not accelerated

Annual filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 12 in 2022, then held flat rather than continuing to climb. Combined with the fact that most tracked assignees show zero filings in the latest year, this points to a field that has passed its most active filing period, at least based on published records to date.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to membrane reactor advanced materials, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Reactor Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and who has gone quiet

Recent-year momentum data shows a field where most historically active assignees have stopped filing, with one notable exception still adding to its portfolio.

Active filer
1 filing
latest year

NGK Insulators is the one assignee still filing

Against a field where most tracked assignees show zero filings in the most recent year, NGK Insulators recorded one, consistent with its representative filing on zeolite membrane composition. That makes it the clearest signal of ongoing R&D investment in this dataset.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Research institutes
4 co-filings
strongest pair

Japanese public research institutes anchor collaboration

The strongest co-assignee relationship in this dataset pairs a national research institute with Asahi Kasei, four joint filings, indicating institute-industry collaboration is a meaningful filing route in this field rather than an exception.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Individual inventors
3-4 co-filings
named-inventor pairs

Named individuals appear alongside corporate assignees

Pairings such as Noritake with Kusakabe Katsuki, and Kusakabe Katsuki with Morooka Shigeharu, show individual academic or technical inventors filing jointly with industrial assignees, a pattern more typical of foundational material science than of mature process engineering.

Co-assignee pair analysis
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches carry far fewer records than the core separation and catalysis classes:
Electrolytic cell membrane integration (C25B)Membrane-coupled evaporation and boiling (B01B)Refining-integrated membrane reactors (C10G)Mixed ionic-electronic conductor fuel-cell membranes
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
NGK Insulators, Ltd.1
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)0
Noritake Co., Limited0
Intelligent Energy Limited0
Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA)0
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.0
CUF – Químicos Industriais, S.A.0
KUSAKABE KATSUKI0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Reactor Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis next

The trends above point to a field with plateaued filing and clear thin spots, but they raise questions worth answering with the full underlying dataset.

Check freedom-to-operate against the oldest, most-cited claims

US5637259A and US5366712A carry the highest citation counts in this corpus and cover fundamental hydrogen/syngas membrane separation — any new filing in that space should be checked against them first.

Run an FTO search in Eureka

Track NGK Insulators' filing pattern

As the only assignee with activity in the latest tracked year, its filing direction is a leading indicator for where compositional zeolite membrane claims are heading next.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka

Model a first claim in the electrolytic integration gap

With only 5 records in C25B against over 100 in the core separation classes, a membrane reactor claim integrated with electrolytic cell architecture faces comparatively little prior art.

Draft and test claim language in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Reactor Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Reactor Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Membrane Reactor Advanced Materials in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole membrane reactor advanced materials corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.