Membrane Reactor Durability Patents: Who Leads, Filing Trends 2026
- Filing has cooled since its 2022 peak. 43 filings that year against 26 in 2017 and just 3 in 2026 so far, though the latest years are always undercounted by publication lag.
- The technology sits across biology and process engineering. C12N microorganism claims (426 records) and B01D separation claims (420) nearly tie for the largest share, ahead of catalysis-focused B01J at 251.
- Filing activity has gone flat across the named leaders. Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest year, including two firms down 100% year-on-year.
Filing growth compares 2021 (9 records) with 2024 (21) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,280 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Membrane reactor environmental durability sits at the intersection of separation engineering and catalytic process design: claims that combine a membrane reactor or catalytic membrane reactor with language addressing fouling resistance, thermal stability or chemical durability. The dataset spans 1,280 published patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from filings at the USPTO, EPO, WIPO, and offices in Canada, Australia and India.
The IPC composition shows this is not a single-discipline field. Microorganism and fermentation classes (C12N, C12P) sit alongside separation-process class B01D and catalysis class B01J at comparable volumes, which means durability claims here often protect a biological or enzymatic process running inside a membrane system rather than the membrane hardware alone. Readers coming from a pure materials-science angle should expect prior art from fermentation and enzyme engineering to be directly relevant.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 1,280-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year on year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Filings rose to a 2022 peak, then declined
Annual filings climbed from 26 in 2017 to a peak of 43 in 2022, then fell off toward single digits by 2026. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years understate true filing activity and should be read as provisional rather than a confirmed decline.
Claim density spans biology and separation engineering
C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering) and B01D (separation processes) each account for roughly a third of records, with C12P (fermentation and enzymatic synthesis), B01J (catalysis) and C01B (inorganic compounds) close behind. Smaller pockets in C07C, H01M and A23L indicate durability claims reaching into fuel-cell membranes and food-processing applications.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,280 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Membrane Reactor Environmental Durability with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about membrane reactor environmental durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA representative early claim
US6214757B1 — Solid state oxygen anion and electron mediating membrane and catalytic membrane reactors
A process for production of synthesis gas employing a catalytic membrane reactor wherein the membrane comprises a mixed metal oxide material.Filed by Eltron Research, Inc.; granted 2001-04-10. One of the earliest catalytic membrane reactor filings in this dataset built around a mixed metal oxide membrane material.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2009061380A2 | VARIANTS OF BACILLUS sup. TS-23 ALPHA-AMYLASE WITH ALTERED PROPERTIES | 1,066 |
| 2 | WO2008153815A2 | Variants of an alpha-amylase with improved production levels in fermentation processes | 794 |
| 3 | WO2010115021A2 | Compositions and methods comprising alpha-amylase variants with altered properties | 446 |
| 4 | WO2013022989A2 | Recombinant production of steviol glycosides | 401 |
| 5 | US5288619A | Enzymatic method for preparing transesterified oils | 362 |
| 6 | WO2004113551A1 | Process for the hydrolysis of starch | 314 |
| 7 | WO2009100102A2 | TS23 alpha-amylase variants with altered properties | 303 |
| 8 | US6114400A | Synthesis gas production by mixed conducting membranes with integrated conversion into liquid products | 284 |
| 9 | WO2009149419A2 | Variant alpha-amylases from bacillus subtilis and methods of use, thereof | 231 |
| 10 | WO2008112459A2 | Alkaliphilic bacillus species a-amylase variants, compositions comprising a-amylase variants, and methods of … | 229 |
Citation counts favour older, foundational filings within the searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence rather than of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns stand out once family counts, IPC spread and momentum are read together.
Dense but not concentrated in one class
With 1,280 families split across eight IPC subclasses at meaningfully different volumes, no single class dominates the way a narrower materials field would. A filing here has to clear prior art in both biological process claims and separation-hardware claims.
Growth has flattened since the 2022 peak
Annual filings roughly doubled from 2017 to the 2022 peak before falling back. Given the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication, the 2026 figure is an undercount, but the multi-year decline before that point is a real signal, not an artefact.
Named leaders have gone quiet at once
Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, including two firms down 100% year-on-year, shows zero filings in the most recent year. That is consistent with a field where the core claim space was staked out earlier in the window rather than one still being actively contested.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to membrane reactor environmental durability, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Danisco US Inc. | KOLKMAN MARC | 14 |
| Danisco US Inc. | POWER SCOTT D | 11 |
| Danisco US Inc. | WEYLER WALTER | 10 |
| Danisco US Inc. | VROEMEN CASPER | 10 |
| Danisco US Inc. | JONES BRIAN E | 10 |
| Danisco US Inc. | CHANG CLAUDINE | 10 |
| Evolva SA | Danstar Ferment AG | 10 |
| Danisco US Inc. | SHAW ANDREW | 9 |
Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest links running through named individual inventors rather than joint ventures between companies, suggesting internal R&D teams rather than cross-company alliances.
Who holds the claim space
Filing activity clusters around a small set of industrial and enzyme-technology assignees, with academic and research institutes contributing a smaller but persistent share.
Enzyme and fermentation specialists lead co-filing
The strongest co-assignee pairs in the dataset link an enzyme-technology company to named individual inventors, repeated across several of its own filings rather than shared with outside partners.
Recent filing activity has stalled across the board
None of the named assignees tracked for momentum filed in the latest year, and at least two show a full year-on-year drop. That points to a maturing claim landscape rather than an emerging one.
Research institutes hold a persistent niche
Alongside the industrial filers, named research and academic institutions appear consistently in the assignee list, typically around catalytic membrane fundamentals rather than downstream fermentation applications.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Danisco US Inc. | 0 | — |
| Novozymes A/S | 0 | -100% |
| Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Evolva SA | 0 | — |
| UOP LLC | 0 | — |
| LanzaTech, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| California Institute of Technology | 0 | — |
| Novozymes North America, Inc. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The filing and IPC data point to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate or new filing strategy.
Check freedom-to-operate against the most-cited records
The five most-cited records in this dataset, several tied to alpha-amylase and steviol glycoside chemistry, still shape prior art searches even though they were filed years ago. Any new filing touching enzyme-based membrane processes should be checked against them directly.
Run a freedom-to-operate checkModel claim scope in the under-claimed branches
Fuel-cell membrane durability and food-grade chemical durability show thinner density than the core B01D and C12N claims. Drafting a first claim in either branch benefits from seeing exactly how existing claims are bounded.
Explore white space in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
In this dataset it means a patent family whose title, abstract or claims combine the term membrane reactor or catalytic membrane reactor with language addressing fouling resistance, thermal stability or chemical durability. That definition pulls in both hardware-focused separation claims and biological process claims run inside a membrane system, which is why the IPC spread here covers fermentation classes alongside separation-engineering classes. It does not capture every membrane patent, only the subset explicitly framed around durability under operating conditions.
Because a large share of catalytic membrane reactor applications run an enzymatic or fermentation process across the membrane, and durability claims in that context often describe the biological catalyst's stability alongside the membrane material's own resistance to fouling. The IPC data bears this out: C12N and C12P classes together outweigh the pure separation class B01D. Anyone searching this space purely from a materials-science angle should expect to find relevant prior art in enzyme engineering filings.
Filings grew from 26 in 2017 to a peak of 43 in 2022, then declined toward single digits by 2026. Because patent publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any such trend are undercounted and should not be read as a confirmed collapse. Taken together with the flat recent-year momentum across every tracked assignee, though, the multi-year decline before 2026 looks like a genuine slowdown rather than a data artefact.
The assignee ranking is led by enzyme and industrial gas technology companies, with the strongest co-filing relationships running through named individual inventors tied to a single enzyme-technology assignee. Research institutes also appear consistently, generally around catalytic membrane fundamentals rather than applied fermentation processes. None of the named leading assignees show any filings in the most recent tracked year, which is consistent with a claim landscape that has already been substantially staked out.
The thinner IPC pockets, C07C acyclic compound synthesis, H01M fuel-cell membranes and A23L food applications, carry far fewer records than the core C12N and B01D classes, which suggests less-crowded claim space around fuel-cell membrane durability under cyclic thermal load and food-grade chemical durability. A first claim in either branch should be drafted narrowly around the specific operating condition, such as cyclic thermal load or food-contact chemical exposure, rather than reusing the broad fouling-resistance language already dense in the core classes.
Research Membrane Reactor Environmental Durability in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole membrane reactor environmental durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.