Book a demo

Membrane Separations Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Membrane Separations Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/membrane-separations-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Membrane Separations
Membrane Separations Patents: Who Holds the Ground and Where It's Still Open
  • Concentration is modest at the top. the leader holds 950 records but the top 5 combined account for just 10.7% of all 31,985 records in scope — this field is not owned by a handful of firms.
  • Filing has cooled from its 2019 peak of 850. 2021's 834 filings fell to 626 by 2024, a -25% move over that span, though 2025-26 counts are still filling in under the usual publication lag.
  • Separation hardware dominates the classification mix. B01D covers 22.5% of records, more than double the next-largest class, while fermentation and microorganism classes sit under 6% each — a sign of where claim space is thin.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
32K
Published Records
11%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-25%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (834 records) with 2024 (626) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 31,985 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Membrane separations patents in this dataset span process streams, mass transfer and phase separation claims filed against a broad chemical and process engineering base — from refinery gas separation to water treatment to bioconversion. The search combines membrane-separation terminology with process-stream and control language, which pulls in both dedicated membrane-hardware claims and process patents that use a membrane step as one stage of a larger separation train. That breadth explains why the IPC composition below spreads across separation processes, catalysis, hydrocarbon refining and fermentation rather than sitting in a single class.

31,985 records fall inside the 2015 to 2026 window used here, with the most recent year understated because publication trails filing by roughly eighteen months. Family-level counts, not raw document counts, drive the assignee ranking, which keeps continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction duplicates from inflating any single company's position.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ BV950
  2. 2SHELL OIL CO860
  3. 3EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO636
  4. 4EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC535
  5. 5UOP LLC447
  6. 6TORAY INDUSTRIES INC431
  7. 7AIR PROD & CHEM INC400
  8. 8DOW TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS LLC386
  9. 9SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO352
  10. 10EASTMAN CHEM CO312
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Separations Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 31,985-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A post-2019 pullback, not a collapse

Filings ran from 696 in 2017 to a peak of 850 in 2019, then eased to 834 by 2021 and 626 by 2024 — a -25% move over that three-year span. Treat 2025 and 2026 as incomplete rather than as evidence the field is shrinking further; publication lag means those years will keep rising as later filings publish.

A post-2019 pullback, not a collapse02505007501,000696201720188502019202020212022202320242025412026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Hardware and refining lead, biology trails

B01D (separation processes) alone touches 22.5% of the 31,985 records, with C07C and B01J each above 9%. Water treatment (C02F), fermentation (C12P) and microorganism engineering (C12N) each sit at or below 5.6%, which is a useful signal of where membrane-separation claims are less crowded relative to the classical hydrocarbon and separation-hardware core.

Hardware and refining lead, biology trailsB01D · Separation processes (filtrati…7,21222.5%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds3,63411.4%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …3,0079.4%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…2,3897.5%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining2,1776.8%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment1,7985.6%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…1,6615.2%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…1,0503.3%Other17,28754.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 31,985 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Separations Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Membrane Separations Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about membrane separations patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative Filing
US20120121497A12012-05-17

Process For Recovering Hydrogen And Carbon Dioxide

L'AIR LIQUIDE SOCIETE ANONYME POUR L'ETUDE ET L'EXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE

The process recovers hydrogen and carbon dioxide from a process stream containing carbon dioxide, hydrogen and methane. The stream is optionally compressed, cooled to −10°C or below in a heat exchanger, then separated and purified in a carbon dioxide separation unit to yield a carbon dioxide-rich liquid stream and a carbon dioxide-lean non-condensable stream.Filed by L'Air Liquide (Société Anonyme pour l'Étude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude), published 2012-05-17.

US20120121497A1 — patent drawing 1US20120121497A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1EP0887379A1Process and apparatus for preparing propylene homopolymers and copolymers2,305
2US5200051AWholly microfabricated biosensors and process for the manufacture and use thereof1,498
3US5063081AMethod of manufacturing a plurality of uniform microfabricated sensing devices having an immobilized ligand r…1,323
4US5531878ASensor devices1,200
5US5821111ABioconversion of waste biomass to useful products1,079
6US20160045841A1New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials860
7US4370983AComputer-control medical care system847
8US5708151ACationic imidazole azo dyes747
9US5554339AProcess for the manufacture of wholly microfabricated biosensors706
10US6175409B1Flow-injection analysis and variable-flow light-scattering methods and apparatus for characterizing polymers677

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — read them as markers of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Separations Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Check

What the data actually tells you

Four read-outs from the filing, citation and classification data that matter more for a filing decision than the headline counts.

Concentration
10.7%
of all records held by top 5

No single owner dominates

The leading assignee holds 950 records against a 31,985-record field, and even the top 5 combined reach only 10.7% of all records in scope. Tenth place sits at 312. This is a fragmented field with a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants below the ranked leaders.

Basis: 100 ranked assignees, family-level counts.
Momentum
-25%
2021 → 2024 filing change

Post-peak cooling, not a cliff

Filings peaked at 850 in 2019, held near that level through 2021 at 834, then dropped to 626 by 2024 — a -25% move. Several of the largest historical filers show flat or declining latest-year counts, while at least one mid-tier filer shows a year-over-year increase, suggesting share is redistributing rather than the field contracting outright.

2025-26 figures excluded from this comparison due to publication lag.
Classification spread
22.5%
of records tagged B01D

Separation hardware is the densest zone

B01D claims sit in nearly a quarter of all 31,985 records, well ahead of C07C at 11.4% and B01J at 9.4%. Fermentation (C12P, 5.2%) and microorganism engineering (C12N, 3.3%) are comparatively open, which matters for anyone drafting bio-based separation claims.

Shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple IPC classes.
Jurisdiction
8,552
US-filed records

US filing leads by a wide margin

The United States receives 8,552 of the tracked filings, roughly 2.3 times the EPO's 3,661 and well ahead of WIPO PCT filings at 3,048. Canada, Australia and Singapore each show four-figure or sub-thousand counts, useful markers for where enforcement exposure concentrates.

Receiving-office counts, not family counts.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to membrane separations patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Separations Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Assignee Landscape

Who is filing, and where the gate sits

The ranked leaders come from oil majors, refining-technology licensors and specialty chemical firms, but the concentration numbers show this is not a two-player field. Recent-year momentum data also shows some of the largest historical filers going quiet while smaller players tick upward.

Leader position
950
records, current leader

A lead, not a lock

The top assignee's 950 records give it the largest single share of the 31,985-record field, but that share alone does not clear even a tenth of the total — there is room for a well-drafted filing to sit beside, not behind, the leader.

Family-level count.
Top 10 share
16.6%
of all records

Long tail below the ranked leaders

The top 10 assignees combined hold 5,309 records, 16.6% of the 31,985 in scope. The remaining 90 ranked assignees and the unranked tail account for the rest, meaning most of this field's claim space was built by companies without a dominant blocking position.

Basis: 100 ranked assignees, all counted in records.
Recent momentum
+100% YoY
Eastman Chemical, latest year

Momentum is shifting between firms

Several of the historically largest filers show zero or declining latest-year activity, while a mid-tier filer posted a year-over-year increase off a small base. Co-assignee data also shows one legacy group's internal filing network (parent company plus named inventors) as the strongest linked pair in the dataset, a marker of a long-running internal filing program rather than new entrants.

Momentum figures are latest full year versus prior year, small base sizes.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where IPC density is comparatively thin relative to the separation-hardware and refining core.
Enzymatic membrane bioreactor integrationSelective gas-liquid phase separation control loopsMicroorganism-tolerant membrane fouling resistanceFermentation broth continuous membrane harvestingWastewater membrane process-control feedback claims
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Eastman Chemical Company6+100%
Dow Technology Investments LLC2-33%
UOP LLC1-75%
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V.0
Shell Oil Company0
ExxonMobil Technology & Engineering Company0
ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc.0
Toray Industries, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Separations Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a fragmented ownership structure with specific thin spots in bio-based and process-control claims — the next step is turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate position.

Map a freedom-to-operate position

Run the specific membrane chemistry, module geometry or process-control loop you plan to claim against the ranked leaders' portfolios before drafting, rather than against the field average.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Stress-test a white-space claim

Under-claimed branches like enzymatic membrane bioreactor integration still sit inside a dense parent field; verify novelty against the full B01D and C12P overlap before committing drafting resources.

Search prior art in Eureka

Track momentum, not just rank

A leader with zero latest-year filings and a smaller filer growing year over year point to different competitive risks than the raw ranking shows.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Separations Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on membrane separations patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membrane Separations Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Membrane Separations Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole membrane separations patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.