Book a demo

Membrane & Separation Polymer Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Membrane & Separation Polymer Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/membranes-and-separation-polymers-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Polymers & Composites
Membranes and separation polymers: mapping who holds the claims and where filings are heading
  • Filing is fragmented at the top. the leading assignee holds 155 records and the ranked leaders' top 5 combined account for just 7.8% of the 7,314 records in scope.
  • Growth has cooled from its peak. filings ran from 241 in 2021 to 185 in 2024, a 23% decline over that span, after peaking at 363 in 2017.
  • Battery-adjacent classes now rival separation itself. H01M batteries and cells appear in 26.8% of records, close behind B01D separation processes at 40.4%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
7,314
Published Records
8%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-23%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (241 records) with 2024 (185) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 7,314 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape covers 7,314 published records filed or published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, drawn from filings that combine polymer membrane or separation-polymer language with process and structural terms such as surface layer, particle morphology, mechanical strength, fibre interface and melt processing. The scope spans classic separation hardware alongside the polymer chemistries and processing routes that make the membranes work, so a single record can sit in both a filtration class and a polymer-composition class at once.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend line will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be; treat 2025 and 2026 figures as still filling in rather than as a genuine drop-off.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1UOP LLC155
  2. 2CALIFORNIA INST OF TECH115
  3. 3MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY & RESEARCH INC105
  4. 4BECTON DICKINSON & CO100
  5. 5AIR PROD & CHEM INC92
  6. 6CELGARD LLC88
  7. 7GEORGIA TECH RES CORP88
  8. 8BASF SE82
  9. 9BOARD OF RGT THE UNIV OF TEXAS SYST81
  10. 10MITSUBISHI CHEM CORP73
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membranes & Separation Polymers Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 7,314-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filings rose to a 2017 peak, then eased back

Annual filings peaked at 363 in 2017 and had fallen to 185 by 2024, a 23% decline from the 241 filed in 2021 — the last three-year window the data can support without leaning on the still-incomplete 2025 and 2026 counts.

Filings rose to a 2017 peak, then eased back0100200300400363201720182019202020212022202320242025192026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Separation and battery classes dominate, polymer chemistry classes trail

B01D (separation processes) touches 40.4% of records and H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells) 26.8%, well ahead of the polymer-specific classes C08J, C08G, C08L and C08F, each in the 7-17% range — since a record can carry several classes, these shares add up to more than 100% of the 7,314 records in scope.

Separation and battery classes dominate, polymer chemistry classes trailB01D · Separation processes (filtrati…2,95640.4%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells1,96326.8%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions1,26017.2%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …5958.1%C08G · Condensation polymers5828.0%C08L · Polymer compositions5727.8%C08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)5237.2%A61K · Medicinal preparations5177.1%Other6,94695.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 7,314 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membranes & Separation Polymers Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Membranes & Separation Polymers Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about membranes & separation polymers patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative filing
US20130323496A12013-12-05

Perfluorinated sulfonic acid polymer membrane having porous surface layer and method for preparing the same

KOREA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Provided are a perfluorinated sulfonic acid polymer membrane having a porous surface layer, which includes a surface layer and a bottom layer present at the bottom of the surface layer, wherein the surface layer is a porous layer, and the bottom layer is non-porous dense layer, and a method for preparing the same through a solvent evaporation process.Filed by Korea Institute of Science and Technology; the dual-layer surface/bottom-layer structure is the kind of claim shape worth checking before drafting anything with a porous surface over a dense support layer.

US20130323496A1 — patent drawing 1US20130323496A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US3797494ABandage for the administration of drug by controlled metering through microporous materials1,086
2US20160045841A1New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials860
3US5408999AFiber-optic probe for the measurement of fluid parameters763
4WO2015031691A1Massively parallel single cell analysis676
5US5599638AAqueous liquid feed organic fuel cell using solid polymer electrolyte membrane557
6US9727810B2Spatially addressable molecular barcoding537
7US20150299784A1Massively parallel single cell analysis536
8EP0458745A1Polymeric gas or air filled microballoons usable as suspensions in liquid carriers for ultrasonic echography526
9US5897955AMaterials and methods for the immobilization of bioactive species onto polymeric substrates524
10US20130157729A1Energy harvesting computer device in association with a communication device configured with apparatus for bo…501

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations inside this corpus; they signal influence on the field, not current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membranes & Separation Polymers Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Four read-outs from the concentration, trend and classification data above, aimed at where to file next rather than where filings already sit.

Concentration
7.8%
of 7,314 records held by the top 5 assignees

No single company controls the field

The leading assignee holds 155 records out of 7,314, and the top 5 combined reach only 7.8% of all records in scope. That is a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants rather than a field locked up by two or three players.

Basis: assignee ranking, 100 companies
Momentum
-23%
filing change, 2021 to 2024

Volume has eased from its 2017 peak

Filings dropped from 241 in 2021 to 185 in 2024. Combined with a 2017 peak of 363, the pattern reads as a maturing claim space rather than an emerging one — dense prior art in the core separation classes, not a technology still in its land-grab phase.

2025-2026 figures are still incomplete and excluded from this comparison
Classification overlap
26.8%
of records also touch H01M battery classes

Separator chemistry is now a battery story too

More than a quarter of records carry an H01M battery/fuel-cell class alongside their separation-polymer claims. Drafting in this space increasingly means anticipating collision with battery-separator prior art, not just filtration prior art.

Basis: IPC subclass shares, 7,314 records
Geography
2,606
US-filed records, the largest single office

US and EPO carry the bulk of filing activity

The United States leads at 2,606 records, ahead of the EPO at 1,378 and WIPO/PCT filings at 987. Canada, Australia and India each sit in the low hundreds, suggesting freedom-to-operate work should prioritise US and European prior art first.

Basis: receiving office counts
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to membranes & separation polymers patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membranes & Separation Polymers Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked leaders span industrial gas, membrane specialists, academic research offices and diversified chemical companies — no single business model dominates the list.

Leader
155
records

Industrial gas and separation specialists lead by volume

The top-ranked assignee's 155 records reflect decades of filing around industrial separation processes; this is volume built on a broad base of incremental filtration and membrane-process claims rather than a single blocking patent family.

Basis: assignee ranking
Academic filers
36
co-filed records, strongest pairing

University-industry co-filing is concentrated in a few pairs

The strongest co-assignee pairing in this dataset appears 36 times, with a second pairing at 24 and a third at 21 — these recurring pairs point to specific long-running research collaborations rather than a broad pattern of joint filing across the field.

Basis: co-assignee pair counts
Momentum
1
latest-year filing, leading assignees

Recent-year activity has thinned even among established filers

Several of the historically largest assignees show only one filing, or none, in the latest tracked year. Given the 18-month publication lag, this likely understates true recent activity, but it still signals that no incumbent is currently pulling away from the pack.

Basis: recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where the surrounding claim density is lower relative to the core separation and battery classes
Porous surface/dense bottom-layer laminatesFibre-interface reinforcement in composite membranesMelt-processed separator morphology controlParticle-morphology tuning for fouling resistanceMedicinal-preparation-grade microporous membranes
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
UOP LLC1
BASF SE1
California Institute of Technology0
Membrane Technology & Research Inc0
Air Products & Chemicals Inc0
Celgard LLC0
3M Innovative Properties Company (US)0
Board of Regents, The University of Texas System0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membranes & Separation Polymers Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is drafting, freedom-to-operate review, or scouting collaboration partners.

Check claim scope before drafting near the surface-layer structure

The porous-surface/dense-bottom-layer design pattern recurs across multiple records; run a claim-scope check against it before filing anything with a comparable dual-layer architecture.

Explore claim scope in Eureka

Track the battery-separator overlap directly

With over a quarter of records also carrying an H01M class, treat separator chemistry filings as needing clearance against battery prior art, not just filtration prior art.

Run a battery-overlap search in Eureka

Watch the under-claimed branches for early movers

Fibre-interface reinforcement and melt-processed morphology control show comparatively thinner claim density; monitor these branches for new entrants before they fill in.

Set up white-space monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membranes & Separation Polymers Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Membranes & Separation Polymers Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Membranes & Separation Polymers Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole membranes & separation polymers patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.