Book a demo

Memory Semantic Interconnect Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Memory Semantic Interconnect Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
Data to 2026-07-31

Memory Semantic Interconnect Patents: Who Holds the Coherency Layer

75.1% of all 3,238 records sit with just five assignees, with one leading filer alone holding 1,811 records — this field is a concentrated-ownership market, not a fragmented one. Filings rose from 116 in 2017 to a peak of 495 in 2022. Volume then held roughly flat, moving from 370 in 2021 to 373 in 2024 — a +1% change over that three-year span — before the 2025-2026 figures, which are still being backfilled by publication lag.

Filing activity climbed then plateaued
Complete Incomplete
Filing activity climbed then plateaued0125250375500116201720182019202020214952022202320242025372026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.
3,238
Published Records
75%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+1%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Top filers · published records
  1. 1INTEL CORP1,811
  2. 2SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD328
  3. 3ARM LTD110
  4. 4SILVEBROOK KIA100
  5. 5SANDISK TECHNOLOGIES LLC84
Published by Patsnap Research·

See the full memory semantic interconnect analysis in Eureka

  • The complete ranking, not just the top five
  • Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
  • The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Read more about this analysis in Eureka
FAQ

Common questions about memory semantic interconnect patents

What is a memory semantic interconnect in patent terms?+

In this dataset it refers to hardware and protocol architectures that let processors, accelerators and memory expansion devices share memory coherently across a fabric, rather than through traditional load/store-only buses. Claims typically cover coherency protocols, address translation, page migration and memory pooling or expansion devices. The search scope combines cache-coherent interconnect and memory-pooling terms with access-latency, coherency-protocol and disaggregation terms, which is why the corpus skews heavily toward G06F digital-data-processing claims (81.9% of the 3,238 records in scope).

Who are the leading patent holders in memory semantic interconnect technology?+

Filing is highly concentrated: the top five assignees together account for 75.1% of all 3,238 records in scope, and the top ten reach 84.3%. A single leading assignee alone accounts for 1,811 records, with the count falling off sharply after fifth place (84 records) and tenth place (34 records). That pattern — one dominant holder plus a long tail of much smaller filers — is a stronger signal than any single company name, since the ranked list itself only covers 100 companies rather than the whole field.

Is patent filing in this space still growing?+

Growth has flattened rather than continuing its earlier climb. Filings rose from 116 in 2017 to a peak of 495 in 2022, then moved only from 370 in 2021 to 373 in 2024, a +1% change over that span. Numbers for 2025 and 2026 appear lower still, but that reflects the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication rather than an actual drop in activity, so those most recent years should not be read as a decline.

Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.

Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Memory Semantic Interconnect covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.