https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/memory-subsystem-and-bandwidth-optimization-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Computing Architecture
Memory Subsystem and Bandwidth Optimization Patents
  • Filings have cooled from a 2022 peak of 168 to single digits in the latest partial year — publication lag explains part of that drop, but the multi-year decline preceding it does not.
  • The United States receives more filings than the next four offices combined 792 of 1,300 records, with Europe and WIPO a distant second tier.
  • Every tracked assignee's momentum is flat or sharply negative year-on-year including double-digit percentage drops at the largest DRAM and processor vendors.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,300
Published Records
68%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-32%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (143 records) with 2024 (97) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,300 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families filed against memory subsystem architecture and bandwidth optimization — specifically DRAM scheduling, latency hiding, channel interleaving, refresh management and high bandwidth memory — restricted to IPC classes covering digital data processing, static and digital memories, and input/output data transfer. It spans filings from 2015 through the mid-2026 data cut-off, giving a decade-plus view of how memory controller and subsystem claims have been staked out.

The corpus is dominated by digital data processing and static/digital memory classifications, with smaller but consistent overlap into semiconductor devices, AI-model computing and display control — evidence that memory bandwidth claims increasingly touch adjacent domains rather than staying siloed in classic controller design.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1INTEL CORP304
  2. 2SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD304
  3. 3ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC181
  4. 4MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC67
  5. 5GOOGLE LLC31
  6. 6SK HYNIX INC28
  7. 7QUALCOMM INC24
  8. 8SUNRISE MEMORY CORP19
  9. 9INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION18
  10. 10CONVERSANT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC17
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Memory Subsystem and Bandwidth Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology mix

Two views of the same 1,300-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A decade of rise, peak and retreat

Filings ran at 91 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 168 in 2022, and have fallen back to single digits by the most recent partial year. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be — but the decline from the 2022 peak predates that lag and points to a genuine slowdown in new memory-subsystem filing activity, not just a reporting artifact.

A decade of rise, peak and retreat0501001502009120172018201920202021168202220232024202592026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentration in two core classes

G06F (electric digital data processing) and G11C (static and digital memories) together account for the large majority of records, with G06T, H01L, H04L, G06N, G09G and H03M each contributing a modest secondary share — signalling that most contested claim territory sits squarely in controller logic and memory cell architecture, with imaging, semiconductor fabrication and AI-adjacent filings as satellite activity.

Concentration in two core classesG06F · Electric digital data processi…1,10585.0%G11C · Static & digital memories57844.5%G06T · Image data processing & genera…574.4%H01L · Semiconductor devices524.0%H04L · Digital information transmissi…423.2%G06N · Computing based on AI models342.6%G09G · Display control circuits342.6%H03M · Coding & code conversion272.1%Other775.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,300 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Memory Subsystem and Bandwidth Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Memory Subsystem and Bandwidth Optimization with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about memory subsystem and bandwidth optimization and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited prior art and a recent representative filing

Representative Recent Filing
US20260141940A12026-05-21

US20260141940A1 — Memory system, memory controller and memory device

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

A memory system includes a memory device, a control circuit, and a memory controller. The memory device includes a plurality of memory regions, a candidate register set storing a plurality of candidate parameter sets corresponding to temperature ranges, respectively, a mode register set storing a temperature range and a refresh management parameter set. The control circuit stores, based on the temperature range, a first candidate parameter set of the plurality of candidate parameter sets as the refresh management parameter set in the mode register set. The memory controller obtains the refresh management parameter set from the memory device, based on an updated temperature range, counts actiAbstract text truncated as published.

US20260141940A1 — patent drawing 1US20260141940A1 — patent drawing 2
View filing details
Highest-citation records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20150325272A1In-memory lightweight coherency462
2US6510503B2High bandwidth memory interface446
3US20150324290A1Hybrid memory cube system interconnect directory-based cache coherence methodology436
4US6877076B1Memory controller with programmable configuration295
5US6104417AUnified memory computer architecture with dynamic graphics memory allocation269
6US20010047450A1High bandwidth memory interface211
7US20080028137A1Method and Apparatus For Refresh Management of Memory Modules199
8US6625685B1Memory controller with programmable configuration193
9US20080028136A1Method and apparatus for refresh management of memory modules176
10US20080109597A1Method and apparatus for refresh management of memory modules162

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this searched corpus — read them as a measure of influence on subsequent filers, not as a signal of which patents matter most today.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Memory Subsystem and Bandwidth Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once volume, geography and citation depth are read together.

Filing Momentum
168 → 9
peak (2022) vs latest year

The peak has passed, and the retreat looks structural

Filing volume roughly doubled between 2017 and its 2022 peak, then fell sharply enough that the decline outruns what publication lag alone would explain. Combined with negative year-on-year momentum across every tracked assignee, this reads as a maturing claim space rather than a temporary dip.

Trend section
Geographic Concentration
792 of 1,300
filed at the USPTO

The US is the primary battleground, by a wide margin

The United States receives more filings than Europe, WIPO, India, China and Taiwan combined. Litigation and licensing exposure for memory subsystem claims is concentrated there; freedom-to-operate work that only checks EPO or CNIPA coverage will miss most of the contested territory.

Receiving offices
Citation Depth
462 citations
top-cited record

Foundational coherence and interface patents still anchor the field

The most-cited records concern in-memory coherency, high bandwidth memory interfaces and hybrid memory cube interconnects — architectural building blocks that later refresh-management and scheduling filings build directly on top of.

Most-cited records
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairings

Cross-filing is rare and mostly academic-industrial

Co-assignee activity is thin relative to total volume, and the strongest pairings link a manufacturer to a university research foundation rather than to another manufacturer — suggesting most competitive advantage here is built through solo filing, not joint development.

Co-assignee pairs
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to memory subsystem and bandwidth optimization, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Memory Subsystem and Bandwidth Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and who has stopped

Assignee activity across this corpus is not a story of a rising challenger — it is a story of an entire field slowing down together.

Momentum Leader (relative)
-33% YoY
still filing, but slower

Intel Corporation

Two filings in the latest year against a 33% year-on-year decline — the smallest drop among major assignees tracked, which in this dataset counts as relative resilience rather than strength.

Recent-year momentum
Sharp Pullback
-93% YoY
two filings, steep decline

三星电子株式会社 (Samsung Electronics)

Samsung remains active with two filings in the latest year, including the representative refresh-management filing in this dataset, but that volume sits 93% below its prior-year pace.

Recent-year momentum
Zero Recent Activity
-100% YoY
three assignees at zero

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), Micron Technology, Inc., SK hynix Inc.

AMD, Micron and SK hynix each show zero filings in the latest tracked year, a full stop rather than a slowdown. Whether that reflects a strategic pause, a shift to trade secrecy, or simply publication lag will only become clear once later filing years fully populate.

Recent-year momentum
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches where filing density is thin relative to the core controller and memory-cell claims
temperature-adaptive refresh parameter setsAI-workload-aware channel interleavingdisplay-controller bandwidth arbitrationcoded transmission for memory interfacescross-domain HBM-to-imaging bandwidth sharing
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Intel Corporation2-33%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.2-93%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD)0-100%
Micron Technology, Inc.0-100%
SK hynix Inc.0-100%
Google LLC0
Qualcomm Incorporated0-100%
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Memory Subsystem and Bandwidth Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and assignee data point to a field past its filing peak but still anchored by a handful of foundational patents. Two directions make sense from here.

Track the assignees still filing, not just the largest holders

Momentum data matters more than cumulative share in a declining field — an assignee filing steadily at low volume may be staking out the remaining open ground while larger holders pull back.

Explore assignee momentum in Eureka

Stress-test freedom-to-operate against the top-cited architectural patents

New scheduling and refresh-management claims tend to sit downstream of the coherency and interface patents with the deepest citation counts in this corpus; checking against those first narrows the search fast.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Memory Subsystem and Bandwidth Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Memory Subsystem and Bandwidth Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Memory Subsystem and Bandwidth Optimization in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole memory subsystem and bandwidth optimization corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.