Memory Test and Repair Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
- Filing has cooled since 2020. the 22-filing peak that year has not been matched, and by 2022 the annual count had halved to 12 — this is a maturing claim space, not a growing one.
- G11C dominates the IPC mix. 490 of 557 records sit in static and digital memory classification, with G01R measurement claims and G06F data-processing claims layered on top rather than standing alone.
- The most-cited art is old. the top-cited record, on embedded core testing for system-on-chip, dates back years and still leads citations — a sign the foundational claims were staked out early and rarely re-opened since.
Filing growth compares 2021 (13 records) with 2024 (20) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 557 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Memory test and repair patents cover the circuits and methods that find and fix faults in memory arrays before and after they leave the fab: built-in self-test engines, redundancy allocation logic, at-speed test modes and post-package repair mechanisms that swap in spare rows or columns after a device is already sealed. The 557 families tracked here span filings from 2017 through the partial 2026 year, concentrated in G11C memory circuitry with substantial overlap into G01R measurement and G06F data-processing classifications.
Filing activity is not a start-up field. It rose to a peak in 2020 and has since drifted down, which points to a technology area where the core architectural claims are already staked and later filings are increasingly incremental refinements rather than new territory.
Filing trend and technology mix
Two views of the same 557-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how the classification codes split across the underlying circuit and measurement disciplines.
A field past its filing peak
Filings ran from 13 in 2017 up to a peak of 22 in 2020, then eased back to 12 by the 2022 midpoint before continuing to soften toward the present partial year. Remember that publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the final one or two years will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be — but the multi-year decline from the 2020 peak predates that lag effect.
Memory circuitry carries the claim load
G11C static and digital memory classification appears in 490 of the 557 records, making it the base classification for nearly all filings in this set. G01R electric and magnetic measurement (191) and G06F data processing (164) show substantial overlap with G11C, reflecting that most inventions combine a memory-specific fault mechanism with a generic test or compute method. Semiconductor device classifications (H01L, H10D, H10B) and control systems (G05B) appear only at the margins, suggesting device-level and system-level integration claims remain a smaller share of the activity than circuit-level test logic itself.
Shares are the percentage of the 557 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Memory Test and Repair Technology with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about memory test and repair technology and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe art that shapes freedom to operate
Memory apparatus having at-speed test mechanism and memory test method of the same
The disclosure describes a memory apparatus with an at-speed test mechanism built from an output function circuit block and a signal feeding circuit block. The feeding circuit combines a flip-flop, a logic circuit and a multiplexer so that, in at-speed test mode, a test pattern is written to the memory circuit and the resulting output is compared under real operating-speed timing conditions rather than a slower functional-test clock.Filed by Realtek Semiconductor; published 2025-05-29.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6249893B1 | Method and structure for testing embedded cores based system-on-a-chip | 207 |
| 2 | US6011734A | Fuseless memory repair system and method of operation | 146 |
| 3 | US20040083412A1 | Testing logic and embedded memory in parallel | 90 |
| 4 | US6658611B1 | Programmable built-in self-test system for semiconductor memory device | 90 |
| 5 | US20080065929A1 | Method and apparatus for storing and distributing memory repair information | 86 |
| 6 | US4481627A | Embedded memory testing method and apparatus | 79 |
| 7 | US6668347B1 | Built-in self-testing for embedded memory | 73 |
| 8 | US7757135B2 | Method and apparatus for storing and distributing memory repair information | 72 |
| 9 | US5970013A | Adaptive addressable circuit redundancy method and apparatus with broadcast write | 72 |
| 10 | US20040111553A1 | Zone boundary adjustment for defects in non-volatile memories | 71 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more years to accumulate references — treat these as markers of influence on how the field developed, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three read-outs from the trend and citation data that matter more than the raw counts on their own.
Volume has halved since the peak
Annual filings ran to 22 in 2020 and had fallen to 12 by 2022, with the decline continuing into the most recent full years. That pattern is consistent with a field where the core built-in self-test and redundancy architectures are already patented and later work is defensive or incremental.
Claim space is concentrated, not diversified
Nearly nine in ten records carry a G11C memory-circuit classification, with G01R and G06F layered on top rather than forming independent clusters. A filer entering with a pure measurement-method claim, absent a memory-specific mechanism, is filing into thinner prior art than one competing head-on in G11C.
Foundational art is old and heavily cited
The most-cited record in the set, on testing embedded cores in system-on-chip designs, and the next-ranked record on fuseless memory repair, both predate the recent filing window by years. New entrants should expect freedom-to-operate review to run through this older foundational layer, not just recent filings.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to memory test and repair technology, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is active, and where the gaps sit
Recent-year filing counts show a field with no single assignee currently pulling ahead — most tracked players show flat or declining activity in the latest year, which is itself informative.
Micron holds steady rather than accelerating
Micron shows a single filing in the latest tracked year with flat year-over-year movement, making it the only assignee in the momentum data with any recent-year activity at all rather than a drop to zero.
Several established filers show zero in the latest year
Samsung Electronics, Fujitsu, ChangXin Memory Technologies, Advantest and Texas Instruments all register zero filings in the latest tracked year. For a mature field with an 18-month publication lag, this understates true recent activity, but the multi-year softening from the 2020 peak is a separate and longer-running signal.
Collaboration is intra-group, not cross-company
The strongest co-assignee pairs link a parent and its own subsidiary — Fujitsu with Fujitsu Semiconductor, Advantest with NTT, Hitachi with its ULSI systems affiliate — rather than joint filings between unrelated competitors. Cross-company co-invention is effectively absent from this dataset.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Micron Technology, Inc. | 1 | 0% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea) | 0 | -100% |
| Fujitsu Limited | 0 | — |
| ChangXin Memory Technologies, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Advantest Corporation | 0 | — |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | 0 | — |
| Hitachi, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Toshiba Corporation | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The trend and classification data point to a field with settled core claims and a thinning filing rate — the open questions now sit at the edges.
Map freedom to operate against the older foundational patents
The highest-cited records predate most of the recent filing window, so a clearance review needs to reach back past the 2017-2026 window this dataset tracks rather than stopping at recent filings.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaWatch the under-claimed branches for early movers
Post-package repair signalling and redundancy allocation for stacked memory show thinner density than the G11C/G01R core — a new entrant here is filing against less crowded art.
Explore white space in EurekaTrack momentum shifts as 2025-2026 filings publish
Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, the apparent drop to zero for several major assignees in the latest year will fill in over the next reporting cycles.
Set up a monitoring alert in EurekaCommon questions on memory test and repair patents
It covers the circuits and methods used to detect and correct faults in memory arrays, including built-in self-test (BIST) engines, redundancy allocation logic that decides which spare rows or columns to substitute, at-speed test modes that check timing under real operating conditions, and post-package repair mechanisms that fix defects after a chip is sealed. In this dataset the search combined those terms with IPC classifications G11C29, G01R31 and G06F11, which is why the results skew heavily toward memory circuitry (G11C) with measurement and data-processing methods layered on top. Most patents in the space combine at least two of these elements rather than claiming a single mechanism in isolation.
The recent-year momentum data shows Micron with a single filing and flat year-over-year movement, making it the only assignee tracked with any activity in the latest year; established filers including Samsung Electronics, Fujitsu, ChangXin Memory Technologies, Advantest and Texas Instruments all show zero filings in that same window. That does not mean those companies have exited the field — publication lag of roughly 18 months means recent filings from all of them are likely still working through the pipeline. A ranking based on the full 557-family set, rather than just the latest year, gives a steadier picture of who holds the deepest portfolios.
Filing volume peaked at 22 in 2020 and had fallen to 12 by the 2022 midpoint, with continued softening since. That pattern typically means the foundational architectural claims — core BIST structures, basic redundancy allocation schemes, standard at-speed test methods — were staked out earlier, and later filers are working incrementally around already-occupied claim space rather than opening new ground. It does not mean the underlying technology has stopped mattering commercially; dense prior art and reduced new filing can coexist with a technology that remains in active production use.
Post-package repair refers to mechanisms that let a memory device be repaired after it has already been assembled and sealed, typically by reconfiguring redundancy so a spare row or column takes over from a faulty one detected during final test or even in the field. It appears throughout this landscape because it sits at the intersection of the search terms used to build the dataset — redundancy allocation, test time and fault models all connect to it — and because it is one of the few sub-areas the classification data suggests is less densely claimed than the core G11C memory-circuit filings, making it worth a closer look for anyone assessing white space.
Citation counts are useful for identifying which patents shaped the field's early development, but they structurally favour older records simply because they have had more years to accumulate references from later filings. In this dataset the most-cited record, on testing embedded cores in system-on-chip designs, and the next most-cited, on fuseless memory repair, both predate the bulk of the 2017-2026 filing window tracked here. Use citation rank as a signal of historical influence and a freedom-to-operate starting point, not as a measure of which patents are commercially significant today.
Research Memory Test and Repair Technology in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole memory test and repair technology corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.