Book a demo

Memory Test and Repair Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Memory Test and Repair Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/memory-test-and-repair-technology-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Memory Test & Repair
Memory Test and Repair Patents: Who Holds the Core Claims
  • Filing has cooled since 2020. the 22-filing peak that year has not been matched, and by 2022 the annual count had halved to 12 — this is a maturing claim space, not a growing one.
  • G11C dominates the IPC mix. 490 of 557 records sit in static and digital memory classification, with G01R measurement claims and G06F data-processing claims layered on top rather than standing alone.
  • The most-cited art is old. the top-cited record, on embedded core testing for system-on-chip, dates back years and still leads citations — a sign the foundational claims were staked out early and rarely re-opened since.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
557
Published Records
25%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+54%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (13 records) with 2024 (20) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 557 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Memory test and repair patents cover the circuits and methods that find and fix faults in memory arrays before and after they leave the fab: built-in self-test engines, redundancy allocation logic, at-speed test modes and post-package repair mechanisms that swap in spare rows or columns after a device is already sealed. The 557 families tracked here span filings from 2017 through the partial 2026 year, concentrated in G11C memory circuitry with substantial overlap into G01R measurement and G06F data-processing classifications.

Filing activity is not a start-up field. It rose to a peak in 2020 and has since drifted down, which points to a technology area where the core architectural claims are already staked and later filings are increasingly incremental refinements rather than new territory.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD53
  2. 2CHANGXIN MEMORY TECH INC24
  3. 3ADVANTEST CORP22
  4. 4MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC19
  5. 5SOCIONEXT INC19
  6. 6TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC19
  7. 7KK TOSHIBA17
  8. 8RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORP16
  9. 9FUJITSU LTD15
  10. 10SK HYNIX INC15
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Memory Test and Repair Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology mix

Two views of the same 557-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how the classification codes split across the underlying circuit and measurement disciplines.

A field past its filing peak

Filings ran from 13 in 2017 up to a peak of 22 in 2020, then eased back to 12 by the 2022 midpoint before continuing to soften toward the present partial year. Remember that publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the final one or two years will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be — but the multi-year decline from the 2020 peak predates that lag effect.

A field past its filing peak06131925132017201820192220202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Memory circuitry carries the claim load

G11C static and digital memory classification appears in 490 of the 557 records, making it the base classification for nearly all filings in this set. G01R electric and magnetic measurement (191) and G06F data processing (164) show substantial overlap with G11C, reflecting that most inventions combine a memory-specific fault mechanism with a generic test or compute method. Semiconductor device classifications (H01L, H10D, H10B) and control systems (G05B) appear only at the margins, suggesting device-level and system-level integration claims remain a smaller share of the activity than circuit-level test logic itself.

Memory circuitry carries the claim loadG11C · Static & digital memories49088.0%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement19134.3%G06F · Electric digital data processi…16429.4%H01L · Semiconductor devices447.9%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)81.4%H10B · Memory device manufacture61.1%G05B · Control & regulating systems50.9%H03K · Pulse technique & logic circui…50.9%Other61.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 557 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Memory Test and Repair Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Memory Test and Repair Technology with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about memory test and repair technology and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The art that shapes freedom to operate

Representative recent filing
US20250174291A12025-05-29

Memory apparatus having at-speed test mechanism and memory test method of the same

REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

The disclosure describes a memory apparatus with an at-speed test mechanism built from an output function circuit block and a signal feeding circuit block. The feeding circuit combines a flip-flop, a logic circuit and a multiplexer so that, in at-speed test mode, a test pattern is written to the memory circuit and the resulting output is compared under real operating-speed timing conditions rather than a slower functional-test clock.Filed by Realtek Semiconductor; published 2025-05-29.

US20250174291A1 — patent drawing 1US20250174291A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6249893B1Method and structure for testing embedded cores based system-on-a-chip207
2US6011734AFuseless memory repair system and method of operation146
3US20040083412A1Testing logic and embedded memory in parallel90
4US6658611B1Programmable built-in self-test system for semiconductor memory device90
5US20080065929A1Method and apparatus for storing and distributing memory repair information86
6US4481627AEmbedded memory testing method and apparatus79
7US6668347B1Built-in self-testing for embedded memory73
8US7757135B2Method and apparatus for storing and distributing memory repair information72
9US5970013AAdaptive addressable circuit redundancy method and apparatus with broadcast write72
10US20040111553A1Zone boundary adjustment for defects in non-volatile memories71

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more years to accumulate references — treat these as markers of influence on how the field developed, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Memory Test and Repair Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the trend and citation data that matter more than the raw counts on their own.

Filing momentum
22 → 12
peak (2020) vs. 2022 midpoint

Volume has halved since the peak

Annual filings ran to 22 in 2020 and had fallen to 12 by 2022, with the decline continuing into the most recent full years. That pattern is consistent with a field where the core built-in self-test and redundancy architectures are already patented and later work is defensive or incremental.

Trend data, 2017-2026
Classification density
490 of 557
records classified under G11C

Claim space is concentrated, not diversified

Nearly nine in ten records carry a G11C memory-circuit classification, with G01R and G06F layered on top rather than forming independent clusters. A filer entering with a pure measurement-method claim, absent a memory-specific mechanism, is filing into thinner prior art than one competing head-on in G11C.

IPC composition
Citation concentration
207 citations
top-cited record (embedded core test)

Foundational art is old and heavily cited

The most-cited record in the set, on testing embedded cores in system-on-chip designs, and the next-ranked record on fuseless memory repair, both predate the recent filing window by years. New entrants should expect freedom-to-operate review to run through this older foundational layer, not just recent filings.

Most-cited records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to memory test and repair technology, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Memory Test and Repair Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is active, and where the gaps sit

Recent-year filing counts show a field with no single assignee currently pulling ahead — most tracked players show flat or declining activity in the latest year, which is itself informative.

Momentum leader (flat)
1 filing
latest year, 0% YoY

Micron holds steady rather than accelerating

Micron shows a single filing in the latest tracked year with flat year-over-year movement, making it the only assignee in the momentum data with any recent-year activity at all rather than a drop to zero.

Recent-year momentum
Momentum decline
-100% YoY
Samsung Electronics (Korea)

Several established filers show zero in the latest year

Samsung Electronics, Fujitsu, ChangXin Memory Technologies, Advantest and Texas Instruments all register zero filings in the latest tracked year. For a mature field with an 18-month publication lag, this understates true recent activity, but the multi-year softening from the 2020 peak is a separate and longer-running signal.

Recent-year momentum
Collaboration pattern
9 pairs
co-assignee pairings identified

Collaboration is intra-group, not cross-company

The strongest co-assignee pairs link a parent and its own subsidiary — Fujitsu with Fujitsu Semiconductor, Advantest with NTT, Hitachi with its ULSI systems affiliate — rather than joint filings between unrelated competitors. Cross-company co-invention is effectively absent from this dataset.

Co-assignee pairs
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density thins out relative to the core G11C/G01R overlap, based on the classification and citation pattern above.
Post-package repair signalling protocolsAt-speed test clock-domain crossingRedundancy allocation for 3D-stacked memoryFault-model calibration for embedded coresControl-system integration (G05B) of test flows
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Micron Technology, Inc.10%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea)0-100%
Fujitsu Limited0
ChangXin Memory Technologies, Inc.0
Advantest Corporation0
Texas Instruments Incorporated0
Hitachi, Ltd.0
Toshiba Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Memory Test and Repair Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and classification data point to a field with settled core claims and a thinning filing rate — the open questions now sit at the edges.

Map freedom to operate against the older foundational patents

The highest-cited records predate most of the recent filing window, so a clearance review needs to reach back past the 2017-2026 window this dataset tracks rather than stopping at recent filings.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Watch the under-claimed branches for early movers

Post-package repair signalling and redundancy allocation for stacked memory show thinner density than the G11C/G01R core — a new entrant here is filing against less crowded art.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track momentum shifts as 2025-2026 filings publish

Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, the apparent drop to zero for several major assignees in the latest year will fill in over the next reporting cycles.

Set up a monitoring alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Memory Test and Repair Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on memory test and repair patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Memory Test and Repair Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Memory Test and Repair Technology in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole memory test and repair technology corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.