Book a demo

MEMS Accelerometer AI/ML Patent Landscape 2026

MEMS Accelerometer AI/ML Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
MEMS Accelerometer AI/ML Patent Landscape in 2026

The intersection of MEMS inertial sensing and machine learning is in sustained growth, with 663 patent families on record and annual filings rising sharply since 2017. Samsung Electronics holds the lead position, but the field remains fragmented across consumer electronics, academia, and industrial players, signalling an open competitive window.

663
Patent families in scope
17%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+80%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Samsung leads a fragmented field with no dominant bloc

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. holds the top position with 24 patent families, followed by Google LLC at 14 and Wuhan University at 13. The top five filers—Samsung, Google, Wuhan University, Lovely Professional University, and Qualcomm—together account for 17% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, signalling a genuinely fragmented competitive landscape.

No single player commands a decisive share. The gap between first and second place (24 vs. 14 patent families) is meaningful but not entrenching; challengers including Qualcomm, Southeast University, and Honeywell International each hold 9–10 patent families, placing them within striking distance of the top tier.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.24
2Google LLC14
3Wuhan University13
4Lovely Professional University10
5Qualcomm Incorporated10
6Southeast University10
7Honeywell International Inc.9
8PROCTER & GAMBLE CO8
9Tsinghua University8
10KOREA UNIV RES & BUSINESS FOUND8
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Braun GmbH7
12Chongqing University OF POSTS & TELECOMM7
13Beihang University7
14Meta Platforms Technologies LLC6
15MEI Micro Inc.6
16UNIV OF SCI & TECH OF CHINA6
17Starkey Laboratories Inc.6
18TRX Systems6
19Robert Bosch GmbH5
20Omnibus157 Pty Ltd5
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The presence of Chinese universities—Wuhan, Southeast, Tsinghua, Beihang, and Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications—alongside consumer-electronics and industrial incumbents indicates that academic institutions are active innovators and potential licensing or collaboration partners, not merely observers.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are subject to publication lag and will appear understated until grants and publications catch up; the 20252026 data should be treated as a floor, not a ceiling. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Rapid growth since 2018, anchored by AI computing and navigation branches

Annual filing volume and the technology branch mix together show a field that is broadening in both pace and application scope, with AI computing as the clear structural backbone and navigation, medical, and vision branches growing in importance.

Annual filing trend

Filings rose from 11 in 2017 to a recorded peak of 152 in 2025, representing 80% growth in the recent window. The steep climb from 2021 onward reflects accelerating adoption of ML inference on inertial data. The 2025–2026 bars are understated due to publication lag and will revise upward as patents publish.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 152 in 2025.112017262018522019562020542021752022104202311320241522025202026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G06N (AI/ML computing models) dominates with 544 records, confirming that algorithmic innovation is the primary driver. G06F (digital data processing, 275 records) and G01C (navigation and gyroscopes, 212 records) are the next largest branches, reflecting strong overlap with positioning and sensor-fusion applications. G01P (velocity and acceleration measurement, 141 records) represents the core MEMS hardware interface, while A61B (medical diagnosis, 113 records) and G06V (image/video recognition, 122 records) signal active application-layer expansion into health and computer vision.

Technology compositionG06N · Computing based on AI models leads with 544; G06F · Electric digital data processing 275.G06N · Computing based o…544G06F · Electric digital …275G01C · Distance, navigat…212G01P · Velocity & accele…141G06V · Image/video recog…122A61B · Diagnosis & surgery113G06T · Image data proces…100G01S · Radar, sonar & po…73↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20230375593A1Published 2023-11-23

Inertial sensor error modeling and compensation, a…

Honeywell International INC.

A method for inertial sensor error modeling and compensation comprises obtaining multiple bias drift datasets for an elapsed time period for one or more gyroscopes; generating a 3D bias drift data plot using the multiple bias drift datasets; generating a partial bias drift data image based on the 3D bias drift data plot; and inputting the partial bias drift… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Inertial sensor error modeling and compensation, a… — patent drawingInertial sensor error modeling and compensation, a… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Program Setting Adjustments Based on Activity Iden…202
2Method and apparatus for sensing a rollover162
3Eyewear having human activity monitoring device108
4Body movement tracking85
5Systems and methods for deep localization and segm…82
6Detection of physical abuse or neglect using data…62
7Systems and methods for formulating a performance …61
8一种面向动态场景的单目视觉惯性SLAM方法53

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of a growth-stage lifecycle, low concentration, active academic participation, and. China-heavy geographic filing creates a distinctive risk-opportunity profile for new entrants and incumbents alike.

Growth

Growth stage with sustained upward trajectory

The lifecycle evidence places this field firmly in the Growth stage: annual filings have risen continuously from 11 in 2017 to 152 in 2025, and the 80% recent-window growth rate has not yet eased from its peak. For R&D planners, this means foundational positions are still being established and early movers retain a meaningful advantage over late entrants. Patent thickets are not yet dense enough to block new technical approaches.

Growth stage
Concentration

Low concentration creates entry opportunities

The top five filers hold only 17% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output, and no applicant exceeds 24 patent families. This low Herfindahl profile means no single player can exercise blocking leverage across the full technology space. A focused portfolio of 15–20 well-placed patent families could realistically place a new entrant within the top five.

Fragmented
Collaboration

Samsung–Korea University pairing is the standout co-filing relationship

The most active co-applicant pair is Samsung Electronics and Korea University Research & Business Foundation, with 8 jointly filed patent families. Samsung also co-filed once with Beijing Samsung Communications Technology Research. Wuhan University co-filed once with OPPO (Guangdong Mobile Communications). These relationships suggest that university-industry co-development is the primary collaboration model, and that aligning with a research institution can accelerate Samsung-tier output.

University-industry
Geography

China is the primary filing jurisdiction; US and India are secondary

China accounts for 343 patent records filed, the United States for 150, and India for 75—together covering the vast majority of activity. WIPO PCT filings (42 records) and EPO (34 records) suggest a subset of filers pursuing international protection, but global coverage remains thin. Applicants seeking protection outside their home market should prioritise PCT and EPO routes given the current gap.

China-led
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.Korea University Research & Business Foundation8
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.Beijing Samsung Communications Technology Research Co. Ltd.1
Wuhan UniversityOPPO (Guangdong Mobile Communications Co. Ltd.)1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, collaboration, lifecycle, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Samsung and Google lead on AI computing; Honeywell and Qualcomm anchor navigation

The top two filers are consumer and platform-technology majors with broad AI/ML portfolios, while mid-tier players carve out distinct niches in navigation, sensor hardware, and medical applications.

Leader · Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.

Samsung holds 24 patent families, the largest position in the ranking, with recent filings (18 in the recent period) classified as a new entrant trajectory—indicating its MEMS AI portfolio is a newly established and rapidly expanding focus area. Technology emphasis is concentrated in G06N3 (AI/neural-network computing, 18 filings), G06F3 (digital data processing, 10), and G06T19 (image data processing, 8), pointing to a strategy centred on on-device inference and augmented-reality interaction. Its co-development relationship with Korea University Research & Business Foundation (8 jointly filed families) reinforces an academic pipeline.

patent families: 24
Challenger · Google LLC

Google LLC

Google holds 14 patent families, also classified as a new entrant in momentum terms, with 12 filed in the recent period. Its technology mix spans G06N3 (AI/neural-network computing, 9), G06F3 (digital data processing, 8), and G01P15 (velocity and acceleration measurement, 5)—the last being notable as it connects AI inference directly to raw accelerometer signal processing, a lower-level technical position than most competitors occupy. This suggests Google is pursuing sensor-model co-optimisation, not solely application-layer AI.

patent families: 14
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top filers including Qualcomm, Honeywell, Wuhan University, and Southeast University.
Qualcomm Inc.Honeywell International Inc.+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.18▲ new entrant
Google LLC12▲ new entrant
Wuhan University6▲ new entrant
Qualcomm Incorporated6▲ new entrant
Lovely Professional University7▲ new entrant
Southeast University4▲ new entrant
Honeywell International Inc.2▲ new entrant
Korea University Research & Business Foundation4▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent family counts from the applicant ranking; technology emphasis is drawn from IPC-level filing data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in velocity measurement, medical sensing, and radar-inertial fusion

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant G06N computing core carry meaningful patent activity but remain sparsely populated relative to the overall corpus, suggesting areas where focused work could differentiate a portfolio.

G01P · Velocity & acceleration measurement

With 141 patent records and a 7% share of the corpus, G01P sits at the hardware-algorithm interface: innovations here address how raw accelerometer signals are conditioned, calibrated, or interpreted before being passed to ML models. This branch is technically foundational yet under-populated relative to the dominant AI-computing branch, and entry requires sensor hardware expertise combined with signal-processing IP—a combination most pure software filers lack. Organisations with MEMS design capability are best positioned to build here.

Search this in Eureka →

A61B · Medical diagnosis and surgery

A61B carries 113 patent records (5% share), spanning fall detection, rehabilitation monitoring, and surgical guidance—all areas where MEMS accelerometers combined with ML classifiers are increasingly viable alternatives to clinical-grade instruments. The branch is adjacent to the core AI stack but requires regulatory and clinical validation expertise that most electronics filers do not possess, creating a structural gap. Medical-device companies or digital-health startups with existing FDA/CE pathways represent the most realistic entrants.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all five identified adjacent branches, including G06V (image/video recognition), G06T (image data processing), and G01S (radar and positioning fusion).
G06V · Image/video recognitionG01S · Radar, sonar & positioning+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch share figures are computed against patent records in the corpus; branches can appear in multiple IPC classes simultaneously.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route across AI, navigation, and hardware branches

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerG06N 3 · Computing based on AI modelsG01C 21 · Distance, navigation & gyroscopesG06F 18 · Electric digital data processingG01P 15 · Velocity & accelerationA61B 5 · Diagnosis & surgery
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.Strong · 18AbsentAbsentModerate · 6Emerging · 3
Wuhan UniversityStrong · 12Moderate · 4Moderate · 6AbsentAbsent
Southeast UniversityStrong · 10Strong · 6Emerging · 2AbsentAbsent
Qualcomm IncorporatedStrong · 10Strong · 6AbsentAbsentAbsent
Honeywell International Inc.Strong · 9Strong · 7AbsentAbsentAbsent
Beihang UniversityStrong · 7Moderate · 3Strong · 5AbsentAbsent
Google LLCStrong · 9AbsentAbsentStrong · 5Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own MEMS AI patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.