Book a demo

MEMS Accelerometer Functional Safety Patent Snapshot

MEMS Accelerometer Functional Safety Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
MEMS Accelerometer Functional Safety Patent Snapshot in 2026

The MEMS accelerometer functional safety patent space is extremely narrow, with a single filer, InvenSense, holding all 8 patent families in scope and activity concentrated in a brief 2020–2022 window. The field has eased from that peak, leaving both the competitive and technical landscapes largely open for new entrants.

8
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

InvenSense holds every ranked position in a highly concentrated niche

InvenSense is the sole ranked applicant, accounting for all 8 patent families in scope. No other organization appears in the top-100 applicant list, making this one of the most concentrated patent niches observable.

With a top-five share of 100% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, there is no measurable tier gap — the entire known corpus sits with one entity. Any new entrant would immediately become the second-largest filer.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1InvenSense Inc.8
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

InvenSense’s position implies it has defined the baseline intellectual property in MEMS accelerometer self-test and functional-safety diagnostics, but the small absolute volume and post-2022 silence suggest the space remains technically immature rather than strategically locked.

Filings from 2024 onward are subject to publication lag and should be treated as under-counted; the apparent zero activity in those years may not reflect actual filing behavior. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A short 2020–2022 burst defines the filing history; velocity and MEMS structure dominate the technology mix

The annual filing trend shows a narrow, concentrated period of activity followed by silence, while the technology composition chart reveals that signal-measurement and microstructural patents account for the entire corpus.

Annual filing trend

All filing activity occurred between 2020 and 2022, peaking in 2021. The zero counts before 2020 and from 2023 onward indicate this is an emergent niche that has not yet attracted sustained industry engagement. Filings in 2024–2026 remain subject to publication lag.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 4 in 2021.02017020180201922020420212202202023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G01P (velocity and acceleration measurement) is visible in the IPC mix, reflecting the sensor-signal and self-test core of functional-safety claims. B81B (microstructural MEMS devices) and B81C (MEMS manufacturing) appear as secondary branches, indicating that structural design and fabrication aspects have also been addressed but to a lesser degree.

Technology compositionG01P · Velocity & acceleration leads with 8; B81B · Microstructural devices (MEMS) 3.G01P · Velocity & accele…8B81B · Microstructural d…3B81C · MEMS manufacturing3↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2021236492A1Published 2021-11-25

Real-time isolation of self-test and linear accele…

INVENSENSE, INC.

A MEMS accelerometer includes proof masses that move in-phase in response to a sensed linear acceleration. Self-test drive circuitry imparts an out-of-phase movement onto the proof masses. The motion of the proof masses in response to the linear acceleration and the self-test movement is sensed as a sense signal on common sense electrodes. Processing… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Real-time isolation of self-test and linear accele… — patent drawingReal-time isolation of self-test and linear accele… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Real-time isolation of self-test and linear accele…8
2Real-time isolation of self-test and linear accele…5

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · InvenSense

InvenSense

InvenSense holds all 8 patent families in scope, with technology emphasis concentrated in G01P 21 (testing/calibrating velocity and acceleration instruments, 8 families), G01P 15 (accelerometers, 7 families), and B81B 7 (microstructural MEMS devices, 3 families). The most-cited work addresses real-time isolation of self-test signals from linear acceleration — the technical core of functional-safety diagnostics for MEMS accelerometers. Recent momentum is flagged as a new entrant pattern in the evidence, consistent with the burst of filings in 20202022.

patent families: 8
Challenger · evidence pending

No challenger identified

No second-ranked applicant appears in the evidence. Any organization filing even a single patent family in this space would immediately become the sole challenger. The absence of a challenger tier is itself a strategic signal: the field’s IP boundary is currently defined by one entity’s claim set.

patent families: 0
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
InvenSenseAdditional filers: evidence pending+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.