Book a demo

MEMS Accelerometer Quality Control Patent Snapshot

MEMS Accelerometer Quality Control Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
MEMS Accelerometer Quality Control Patent Snapshot in 2026

Texas Instruments dominates this compact, highly concentrated field, holding a commanding share among the handful of active filers. Filing activity has plateaued near its 2019–2022 peak, signalling a mature but stable technology domain with limited new entrants.

8
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Texas Instruments leads a tightly held, mature niche

Texas Instruments Inc ranks first among all filers, accounting for 8 patent records — the largest single-applicant position in this corpus. Delco Electronics Corporation, STMicroelectronics Int NV, and InvenSense Inc each hold 2 patent records, while Delphi Technologies Inc holds 1.

The top five filers together account for 100% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, indicating extreme concentration with no meaningful second tier. There is no observable challenger closing the gap with the leader.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Texas Instruments Inc8
2Delco Electronics Corporation2
3STMicroelectronics Int NV2
4InvenSense Inc2
5Delphi Technologies Inc1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Texas Instruments’ visible position, supported by a focus spanning navigation, acceleration measurement, and digital data processing, reflects long-standing, consolidated IP in sensor calibration and self-test methodologies. New entrants face a well-staked evidence snapshot with little room between the established players.

Patent publication typically lags filing by 18–24 months; the zero counts recorded for 20242026 reflect this lag rather than confirmed inactivity, and should not be read as a cessation of filing. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Filings have plateaued; sensor measurement classes dominate the technology mix

The annual filing trend and technology composition together reveal a field that grew to a modest plateau around 2019–2022 and is now showing the characteristics of a mature niche. The IPC class distribution highlights which technical problems have attracted the most patent activity.

Annual filing trend

Filings rose from zero in 2017–2018 to 2 patent records per active year across 2019, 2020, 2022, and 2023, with no recorded filings in 2021 or in 2024–2026. The 2024–2026 absence reflects publication lag and should not be interpreted as a confirmed drop. The overall pattern is consistent with a field that has plateaued near its peak rather than one in active growth.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2 in 2019.02017020182201922020020212202222023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G01P (Velocity & acceleration) is the visible IPC branch with 13 patent records, followed by G06F (Electric digital data processing) at 8 and G01C (Distance, navigation & gyroscopes) at 7. Foundational MEMS-specific classes — B81B (Microstructural devices) and B81C (MEMS manufacturing) — each carry only 3 and 2 patent records respectively, pointing to thin coverage at the device and process level relative to the measurement and data-processing layer.

Technology compositionG01P · Velocity & acceleration leads with 13; G06F · Electric digital data processing 8.G01P · Velocity & accele…13G06F · Electric digital …8G01C · Distance, navigat…7G01F · Flow, level & vol…4B81B · Microstructural d…3H05K · Printed circuits …3B81C · MEMS manufacturing2G01M · Testing machine &…2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US10330491B2Published 2019-06-25

Robust step detection using low cost MEMS accelero…

Texas Instruments Incorporated

A system (<b>10</b>) for pedestrian use includes an accelerometer (<b>110</b>) having multiple electronic sensors; an electronic circuit (<b>100</b>) operable to generate a signal stream representing magnitude of overall acceleration sensed by the accelerometer (<b>110</b>), and to electronically correlate a sliding window (<b>520</b>) of the signal stream… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Robust step detection using low cost MEMS accelero… — patent drawingRobust step detection using low cost MEMS accelero… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Robust step detection using low cost MEMS accelero…211
2Hybrid accelerometer assembly56
3Accelerometer assembly with evaluation circuit26
4Controlled pulse generation methods and apparatuse…11
5Robust step detection using low cost MEMS accelero…8
6Accelerometer sensitivity self-calibration with du…4
7Controlled pulse generation methods and apparatuse…3
8Robust step detection using low cost MEMS accelero…2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Texas Instruments Inc

Texas Instruments Inc

Texas Instruments holds 8 patent records — the largest position in this corpus. Its technology focus spans G01C 21 and G01C 22 (Distance, navigation & gyroscopes) and G01P 15 (Velocity & acceleration), indicating a strong orientation toward navigation integration and sensor measurement quality rather than device fabrication. No momentum trend data is available in the evidence.

patent records: 8
Challenger · Delco Electronics Corporation

Delco Electronics Corporation

Delco Electronics Corporation holds 2 patent records, with its technology emphasis concentrated in B81B 3 (Microstructural devices — MEMS), G01P 1, and G01P 15 (Velocity & acceleration). This device-level focus is technically complementary to — but structurally distinct from — Texas Instruments’ navigation and calibration orientation. No momentum trend data is available in the evidence.

patent records: 2
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
STMicroelectronics Int NVInvenSense Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.