Book a demo

MEMS Accelerometer Wafer Mass Production Patent Snapshot

MEMS Accelerometer Wafer Mass Production Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
MEMS Accelerometer Wafer Mass Production Patent Snapshot in 2026

The indexed corpus for MEMS accelerometer wafer mass production is extremely small, with a highly concentrated applicant field dominated by Delco Electronics Corporation. Filing activity is effectively dormant across the observed window, suggesting this precise intersection of wafer-level mass production and MEMS accelerometry remains a narrow, under-patented niche.

1
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Delco Electronics leads a heavily concentrated, minimal-volume niche

Delco Electronics Corporation holds the top-ranked position with 2 patent records, ahead of a group of individual inventors and Delphi Technologies Inc., each credited with 1 patent record. The field is unusually thin for an active manufacturing domain.

The top five filers account for 86% of the combined total among the ranked applicants visible in this query, an extreme concentration ratio that reflects the near-absence of broad competitive filing rather than true market dominance in the commercial sense.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Delco Electronics Corporation2
2Deng Ken Kan1
3S Sundar1
4Delphi Technologies Inc.1
5Thangadurai N1
6K Gopalakrishna1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The positions of Delco Electronics Corporation and Delphi Technologies Inc. — two historically related automotive electronics entities — suggest that early patent activity in this intersection was largely driven by automotive inertial sensing programs rather than dedicated semiconductor foundry players.

The corpus is very small, and any interpretation should account for the possibility that relevant filings are indexed under related but distinct query terms not captured here. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Filing activity is dormant; MEMS device and sensing classes dominate the technology mix

The annual trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field with a single year of recorded activity and a technology mix anchored in core MEMS device and acceleration-sensing classes.

Annual filing trend

All recorded filing activity falls in 2018, with zero records in every other year from 2017 through 2026. The most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag, but the extended run of zero filings prior to that window indicates genuine dormancy rather than a data artifact.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1 in 2018.02017120180201902020020210202202023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B81B (Microstructural devices / MEMS) and G01P (Velocity and acceleration measurement) each carry 4 patent records, making them co-visible branches. H05K (Printed circuits and assemblies) follows with 3 records. B81C (MEMS manufacturing) and B82Y (Nanotechnology applications) each appear in only 1 record, flagging them as the sparsest branches within this scope.

Technology compositionB81B · Microstructural devices (MEMS) leads with 4; G01P · Velocity & acceleration 4.B81B · Microstructural d…4G01P · Velocity & accele…4H05K · Printed circuits …3B81C · MEMS manufacturing1B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20040020292A1Published 2004-02-05

Single chip piezoelectric triaxial MEMS accelerome…

DENG, Ken Kan

The present invention is directed to a sensing structure comprising four components: a central block proof mass, a continuous belt-shaped membrane (or one having another suitable shape), a piezoelectric sensing layer placed on top of the membrane, and a fixed mounting frame. Electrodes are attached to the top and the underside of the piezoelectric sensing… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Single chip piezoelectric triaxial MEMS accelerome… — patent drawingSingle chip piezoelectric triaxial MEMS accelerome… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Hybrid accelerometer assembly56
2Accelerometer assembly with evaluation circuit26
3Single chip piezoelectric triaxial MEMS accelerome…22

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Delco Electronics Corporation

Delco Electronics Corporation

Delco Electronics Corporation holds 2 patent records, the highest count in this scope. Its technology emphasis spans B81B (Microstructural devices / MEMS), G01P (Velocity and acceleration), covering both the device structure and sensing performance dimensions of MEMS accelerometry. No momentum data is available for this applicant in the evidence, so trajectory cannot be quantified.

patent records: 2
Challenger · Delphi Technologies Inc.

Delphi Technologies Inc.

Delphi Technologies Inc. holds 1 patent record in this scope. Given its historical relationship with Delco Electronics Corporation in the automotive electronics supply chain, its presence reinforces the automotive-heritage character of the corpus. No applicant momentum data is available in the evidence.

patent records: 1
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
THANGADURAI NDENG KEN KAN+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.