Book a demo

MEMS-ASIC / IMU Integration Patent Snapshot 2026

MEMS-ASIC / IMU Integration Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
MEMS-ASIC / IMU Integration Patent Snapshot in 2026

The MEMS-ASIC/IMU integration patent space is small and highly concentrated, with a single firm, Versana Micro, holding the dominant share of disclosed patent activity. Filing volume peaked in 2021 and has since eased, placing the field in a post-peak phase where foundational structural positions have been staked but adjacent technical branches remain lightly covered.

14
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Versana Micro leads a sharply concentrated field

Versana Micro holds the top-ranked position with 15 patent records, well ahead of every other filer. Texas Instruments ranks second with 3 patent records, and American GNC Corp, Hunan Tianyi Linghang Technology, and the No. 43 Research Institute of CETC each hold 2 patent records.

The top five filers together account for 96% of the combined total across the ranked applicants visible in this query — an unusually tight concentration that signals a field where a handful of actors have defined the primary structural positions. The gap between Versana Micro and the second-ranked filer is substantial, reinforcing a two-tier structure.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Versana Micro Inc15
2Texas Instruments Inc3
3American GNC Corp2
4Hunan Tianyi Linghang Technology Co., Ltd.2
5No. 43 Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation (CETC)2
6Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Versana Micro’s commanding lead, concentrated in MEMS device and solid-state device classes, suggests it has built a broad foundational portfolio. For any entrant or challenger, freedom-to-operate analysis against Versana Micro’s holdings is an early-stage priority.

Patent records published in roughly the last 18–24 months are typically under-counted due to publication lag; the 20242026 data should be treated as a floor rather than a ceiling. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Activity peaked in 2021; MEMS device classes dominate the technology mix

Two charts capture the temporal and technical shape of the field: the annual filing trend and the IPC class distribution across patent records.

Annual filing trend

Filings rose from 2 per year in 2017–2018 to a peak of 5 in 2021, then dropped sharply. Years 2022–2025 show zero recorded filings, and 2026 shows 1; however, the recent stretch is affected by publication lag and should not be read as zero real activity. The 2021 peak marks the high-water mark for disclosed activity in this corpus.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 5 in 2021.22017220183201912020520210202202023020240202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B81B (microstructural MEMS devices) leads the IPC mix with 17 patent records, followed closely by H10N (other solid-state devices) at 15 and H01L (semiconductor devices) and H05K (printed circuits and assemblies) at 13 each. Navigation and gyroscope coverage (G01C) sits at 11 records, while velocity and acceleration sensing (G01P) is materially sparser at 5 records, pointing to relative under-coverage in the sensing-output functional layer.

Technology compositionB81B · Microstructural devices (MEMS) leads with 17; H10N · Other electric solid-state devices 15.B81B · Microstructural d…17H10N · Other electric so…15H01L · Semiconductor dev…13H05K · Printed circuits …13G01C · Distance, navigat…11H10P10G01P · Velocity & accele…5H10D · Semiconductor dev…5↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20120191345A1Published 2012-07-26

Tightly-coupled GNSS/IMU integration filter speed …

Texas Instruments Incorporated

Embodiments of the invention provide methods to calibrate a tightly-coupled integration filter for inertial sensor-assisted GNSS (global navigation satellite system) receiver. The inertial measurement unit (IMU) contains inertial sensors such as accelerometer, magnetometer, and/or gyroscopes. Embodiments include creating a coordinate transformation matrix… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Tightly-coupled GNSS/IMU integration filter speed … — patent drawingTightly-coupled GNSS/IMU integration filter speed … — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Filtering mechanization method of integrating glob…237
2Enhanced integrated positioning method and system …148
3Loosely-coupled integration of global navigation s…31
4Monolithically integrated multi-sensor device on a…16
5Tightly-coupled GNSS/IMU integration filter speed …15
6Monolithically integrated multi-sensor device on a…13
7Monolithically integrated multi-sensor device on a…12
8Monolithically integrated multi-sensor device on a…7

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Versana Micro Inc

Versana Micro Inc

Versana Micro holds 15 patent records, all concentrated in B81B 7 (MEMS microstructural devices), H10N 19, and H10N 30 (other solid-state devices) — each class carrying 15 records, indicating a tightly integrated, device-level portfolio. No applicant momentum data is available for trend direction, but the breadth of class coverage relative to the corpus signals a deliberate effort to stake the structural layer of MEMS-ASIC integration.

patent records: 15
Challenger · Texas Instruments Inc

Texas Instruments Inc

Texas Instruments ranks second with 3 patent records, focused on G01C 21 (navigation and gyroscopes) and G01S 19 (radar, sonar and positioning). This emphasis on navigation-functional classes, rather than device-structural classes, positions Texas Instruments as a systems-layer challenger rather than a direct structural competitor to Versana Micro. No applicant momentum data is available in the evidence.

patent records: 3
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
American GNC CorpHunan Tianyi Linghang Technology+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.