Book a demo

Metal AM Residual-Stress Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Metal AM Residual-Stress Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
Data to 2026-07-31

Residual-Stress Mitigation Patents in Metal Additive Manufacturing

One assignee holds 21 of the 29 records in scope, while five other filers each hold as few as one — a concentrated core with a thin tail rather than a broad competitive field. Filing rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 10 records in 2020, held near that level into 2021, then declined to 6 by 2024 — a 40% drop over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in under the publication lag and should not be read as continued decline.

Filing trend: a 2020 peak, then a measured pull-back
Complete Incomplete
Filing trend: a 2020 peak, then a measured pull-back0358100201720182019102020102021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.
29
Published Records
-40%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
6
Active Filers Ranked
Top filers · published records
  1. 1挪威钛公司21
  2. 2戴弗根特技术有限公司4
  3. 3KVA TECH2
  4. 4DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY1
  5. 5ASANSOL ENGINEERING COLLEGE1
Published by Patsnap Research·

See the full metal additive manufacturing — additive residual-stress mitigation patent landscape analysis in Eureka

  • The complete ranking, not just the top five
  • Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
  • The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Read more about this analysis in Eureka
FAQ

Questions practitioners ask about this space

How concentrated is the patent landscape for residual-stress mitigation in metal additive manufacturing?+

It is heavily concentrated at the top: one assignee holds 21 of the 29 records in the ranked set, while the fifth-ranked filer holds only 1. The ranking itself covers just 6 companies, so this is a narrow field rather than a broad competitive landscape. A new entrant should assume the dominant filer’s specific mechanisms — distortion mitigation in directed energy deposition and powder-bed re-coater heat management — are already claimed, and plan a design-around rather than a head-on filing.

Is patent filing activity in this space growing or shrinking?+

Filing peaked at 10 records in 2020, and the most recent span that can be treated as complete shows a decline from 10 records in 2021 to 6 in 2024, a 40% drop. Filings from 2025 onward are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so it is too early to call this a permanent slowdown. The honest read is a pull-back from a 2020 peak, not a confirmed exit from the field.

What does US20210154771A1 actually cover, and does it block new filings?+

US20210154771A1 covers a powder bed fusion re-coater with an integrated heat source that pre-heats each deposited powder layer during leveling and can reheat the bed after selective laser or beam fusing, aimed at reducing cracks and dimensional flaws from thermal gradients. It is cited 9 times in this dataset and was filed by Divergent Technologies, Inc. Anyone building a re-coater with in-line pre-heating or post-fusion reheating should review its claims closely for overlap; alternatives that manage stress via alloy composition or post-process treatment rather than in-line re-coater heating sit further from this claim’s core.

Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.

Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metal Additive Manufacturing — Additive Residual-Stress Mitigation Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.