Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (23 records) with 2024 (20) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 336 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This dataset tracks 336 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 at the intersection of metal forming, sheet metal stamping and hot stamping, filtered to documents whose title or claim text engages directly with springback, forming limit diagrams, die wear, lubrication or tailored blank techniques. The IPC scope is deliberately narrow — B21D22 (forming), B21D37 (auxiliary operations) and C21D1 (heat treatment) — so the set captures process and metallurgy claims rather than generic stamping hardware.
Filing activity peaked in 2017 and has since plateaued around the low twenties per year, with the most recent year understated by the usual lag between filing and publication. Receiving-office data shows the United States and Europe carrying the largest share of filings, with China, Canada and India forming a secondary tier and WIPO PCT filings marking the smallest but most internationally hedged slice.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 336 families: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across the IPC subclasses that define the field.
Filings ran at 24 in 2017, the peak so far, and sat at 21 by the 2022 midpoint — a decline-or-flat pattern rather than sustained growth. Readers should treat the final one or two years as undercounts, since publication typically trails filing by around 18 months.
B21D sheet-metal working appears in 291 of 336 families, confirming this as the core classification, but C21D heat treatment (127) and C22C alloys (117) are large enough to show that hot-stamping performance is now being claimed through material and thermal treatment as much as through die geometry. C23C coatings (70) and B32B laminates (26) point to tailored-blank and multi-layer sheet work sitting adjacent to the core.
Shares are the percentage of the 336 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about metal forming and sheet stamping and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA tailored blank for hot stamping includes a welded portion formed by butt-welding a first aluminum-plated steel sheet and a second aluminum-plated steel sheet, an average Al concentration of a weld metal in the welded portion is in a range of 0.3 mass % to 1.5 mass %, an Ac3 point of the weld metal is 1250 degrees C or lower, and an aluminum layer formed during the butt-welding is present on a surface of the welded portion.Filed by Nippon Steel Corporation; granted 2018-02-27.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5546784A | Adjustable form die | 149 |
| 2 | US6550302B1 | Sheet metal stamping die design for warm forming | 85 |
| 3 | US3974673A | Titanium parts manufacturing | 78 |
| 4 | CN101786128A | 热冲压与超塑气胀复合成形工艺 | 75 |
| 5 | US5467626A | Integral forming die system for superplastic metal forming | 62 |
| 6 | US5379227A | Method for aiding sheet metal forming tooling design | 55 |
| 7 | US5419791A | Method of heat assisted sheet metal forming in 360 degree shapes | 52 |
| 8 | US6050121A | Hybrid methods of metal forming using electromagnetic forming | 51 |
| 9 | US5390127A | Method and apparatus for predicting post-buckling deformation of sheet metal | 46 |
| 10 | US20020186007A1 | Real-time draw-in sensors and methods of fabrication | 39 |
Citation counts reward older filings simply for having been visible longer; treat this table as a map of influence, not of current commercial priority.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns worth acting on before drafting claims in this space.
A peak in 2017 followed by a flat-to-declining midpoint suggests the core stamping and forming mechanics are largely claimed. New entrants are more likely to find open ground in adjacent metallurgy than in forming geometry itself.
With heat treatment and alloy classifications each present in over a third of the corpus, claims that combine forming steps with specific thermal or compositional parameters are where recent differentiation is happening.
China's 40 filings and Canada's 31 are meaningful but secondary to the US-Europe axis, which matters for where enforcement risk and freedom-to-operate checks should concentrate first.
Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest year. That is consistent with publication lag rather than a genuine industry-wide halt, but it is worth re-checking against fresher data before concluding the field has stalled.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to metal forming and sheet stamping, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Ford Global Technologies, LLC | The Pennsylvania State Research Foundation | 2 |
| NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP | Nippon Steel Corporation | 1 |
| Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | MOORE WILLIAM R | 1 |
| Chongqing Hagong Yicheng Forming Steel Technology Co., Ltd. | Volkswagen AG | 1 |
| Yucaitang (Suzhou) Material Technology Co., Ltd. | Jiangsu Yucaitang Body Technology Co., Ltd. | 1 |
| Yucaitang (Suzhou) Material Technology Co., Ltd. | Northeastern University (China) | 1 |
Only 6 co-assignee pairs appear across the corpus, the strongest being a two-family link between a major automaker's technology arm and a university research foundation — most work here is filed by a single assignee rather than jointly developed.
Steel producers and automakers dominate the assignee list, with hot-stamping and tailored-blank specialists forming a smaller but technically focused tier beneath them.
Large integrated steel producers hold the deepest positions, reflecting that tailored blanks and hot-stamped steel grades are as much a materials-supply business as a stamping-technology one.
Automotive assignees appear both as sole filers and in the corpus's rare co-assignee pairs, including a link to a university research foundation, suggesting some forming and springback work is developed through sponsored academic research.
Several China-based entities, including university and specialty-materials filers, appear in the assignee list, pointing to a regional cluster developing hot-stamping and forming IP somewhat independently of the established steel majors.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP | 0 | — |
| Nippon Steel Corporation | 0 | — |
| Kobe Steel, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| JFE Steel Corporation | 0 | — |
| ArcelorMittal | 0 | — |
| Chongqing Hagong Yicheng Forming Steel Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Yucaitang (Suzhou) Material Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a mature core with unresolved edges. These are the directions worth pursuing with Patsnap Eureka.
Cross-reference the C21D and C22C families against the core B21D set to see how many forming patents already embed specific alloy or heat-treatment claims, and where that combination is still open.
Explore the IPC overlap in EurekaThe most-cited records date back decades in some cases; confirm current legal status and geographic coverage before assuming they still block a given jurisdiction.
Run a status check in EurekaEvery leading assignee shows zero filings in the latest year — re-pull the trend in a few months to see whether that holds once publication catches up.
Track filing momentum in EurekaThe corpus of 336 patent families is led by large integrated steel producers and major automakers, reflecting that tailored blanks and hot-stamped steel grades sit at the intersection of materials supply and forming technology. No single assignee dominates the way a monopolist would; instead filings concentrate among a handful of steel and automotive groups with a long tail of single-filing entrants. Checking the current assignee ranking table alongside recent-year momentum is the fastest way to see who is still active versus who filed heavily in the past and has since gone quiet.
No — filing peaked in 2017 at 24 families and had fallen to 21 by the 2022 midpoint, indicating a flat-to-declining trend rather than growth. The most recent one to two years will look artificially low because publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so a genuine slowdown cannot be confirmed until later data arrives. Taken together, the pattern is consistent with a technology area where the core forming mechanics are well claimed and new activity is shifting toward adjacent metallurgy and coatings.
US9901969B2, assigned to Nippon Steel Corporation and granted in February 2018, covers a tailored blank for hot stamping made by butt-welding two aluminum-plated steel sheets, with the weld metal's average aluminum concentration constrained to between 0.3 and 1.5 mass percent and its Ac3 point held at or below 1250 degrees Celsius. The claim also requires an aluminum layer formed during welding to remain present on the welded portion's surface. This is a narrow, parameter-specific claim around weld chemistry in aluminum-coated tailored blanks, not a broad claim over tailored blanks or hot stamping generally.
Filing density is thin relative to the core B21D and C21D classifications in areas such as in-die lubrication monitoring, die wear sensing integrated with press operation, and forming limit diagram prediction tuned to high-strength steel grades. These branches sit adjacent to heavily claimed forming and heat-treatment territory but have not attracted the same volume of dedicated filings. A first claim in these areas would likely combine a sensing or predictive method with a specific forming or hot-stamping step, rather than claiming the sensor or the forming step alone.
The United States leads receiving-office filings at 116, followed by Europe through the EPO at 85, then China at 40, Canada at 31, India at 17 and WIPO PCT filings at 12. This distribution suggests the US and Europe are the primary markets where applicants seek protection and where freedom-to-operate risk is most concentrated. China's growing but still secondary share, alongside a distinct China-based assignee tier, indicates a regional cluster worth tracking separately from the established US-Europe filing base.
Go past this page: query the whole metal forming and sheet stamping corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.