https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/metal-organic-framework-miniaturization-and-integration-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Chemical & Process Engineering
Metal-Organic Framework Miniaturization and Integration Patents
  • Flat, not rising. filings peaked at 4 in 2020 and show no sustained climb through the most recent full year, despite continued academic output.
  • No dominant assignee. co-assignee pairs number just two across the whole dataset, and every tracked filer shows zero activity in the latest year — this is still an open, fragmented field.
  • Separation and catalysis carry the claim load. B01D and B01J each tie at 18 records, while coating, capacitor and biomedical integration routes sit at 1-2 records apiece.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
33
Published Records
85%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-100%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families combining metal-organic framework or porous coordination polymer chemistry with miniaturization and integration language — thin films, membrane integration, MOF-on-chip and miniaturized MOF devices — narrowed to IPC classes covering adsorption, organo-metallic compounds and membrane separation. It captures 33 published families filed between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, drawn from a search string that deliberately excludes bulk MOF synthesis claims with no integration or device framing.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend line understate real filing activity. Read the 2020 peak and the flat years since as the reliable signal, and treat the tail end of the chart as incomplete rather than declining.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)19
  2. 2Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)4
  3. 3Dartmouth College2
  4. 4The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois2
  5. 5Jiangsu Ocean University1
  6. 6National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC1
  7. 7Amorepacific Corporation1
  8. 8Dongduk Women's University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation1
  9. 9Indian Institute of Technology Bombay1
  10. 103D Corporation1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metal-Organic Framework Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 33 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A flat trend with a single peak

Filings sat at zero in 2017, rose to a peak of 4 in 2020, and had fallen back to 2 by the midpoint year of 2022 — a pattern consistent with a niche technical area that has not yet attracted a scaling wave of filing, rather than one in decline from a mature base.

A flat trend with a single peak012340201720182019420202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Separation and catalysis dominate, everything else is thin

B01D (separation processes) and B01J (chemical/physical processes and catalysis) each account for 18 of the 33 records, with C07F (organo-metallic compounds) close behind at 13. Coating processes, polymer processing, capacitor integration and medicinal preparations each register only 1-2 records — these are the branches where claim space remains largely open.

Separation and catalysis dominate, everything else is thinB01D · Separation processes (filtrati…1854.5%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …1854.5%C07F · Organo-metallic & non-carbon c…1339.4%B05D · Coating processes26.1%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions26.1%G01N · Material analysis & testing26.1%H01G · Capacitors26.1%A61K · Medicinal preparations13.0%Other1030.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 33 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metal-Organic Framework Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Metal-Organic Framework Miniaturization and Integration with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about metal-organic framework miniaturization and integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited filings in this corpus

Representative filing
US10441924B22019-10-15

Fabrication of highly CO2 selective metal-organic framework membrane using liquid phase epitaxy approach

KING ABDULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Embodiments include a method of making a metal-organic framework membrane by contacting a substrate with a metal-ion solution and an organic-ligand solution, sufficient to form one or more MOF layers on that substrate. The claimed membrane is defect-free, comprises MSiF6(pyz)2, has a thickness under 1,000 micrometres, and carries a growth orientation along the [110] plane relative to the substrate.Filed by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, published 2019-10-15.

US10441924B2 — patent drawing 1US10441924B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Ranked by citation count
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20150367294A1Process for the preparation of mofs-porous polymeric membrane composites77
2US20170246615A1Fabrication of metal organic framework materials using a layer-by-layer spin coating approach16
3WO2021090103A1Mxene-derived metal-organic frameworks and method14
4US20220387970A1MXene-DERIVED METAL-ORGANIC FRAMEWORKS AND METHOD6
5US10675608B2Fabrication of metal organic framework materials using a layer-by-layer spin coating approach6
6US20160296883A1Zeolite-like metal-organic framework membrane6
7US9346831B1Tunable electrical conductivity in metal-organic framework thin film devices6
8CN116459687A一种高性能MOF薄膜复合纳滤膜的制备方法5
9US20220404308A1Metal-organic frameworks as ion capture compositions5
10US20210402369A1Surface-treated inorganic particles, manufacturing method of the same, dispersion solution of the same, and c…3

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations — read this as a signal of influence on the field's early framing, not of current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metal-Organic Framework Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about this field

Three findings that shape where to file, cite and watch.

Filing momentum
Peak 4 in 2020
highest single year on record

Growth has not sustained past its 2020 peak

The trend climbed from zero in 2017 to a peak of 4 families in 2020, then eased to 2 by 2022. That is a pattern of exploratory filing by a small number of labs and companies, not the steepening curve you would expect if MOF integration had moved into a scale-up phase.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Technology split
18 / 18 / 13
B01D / B01J / C07F record counts

Claim density concentrates in separation and catalysis

Separation processes and catalysis-related chemical processing each carry 18 of the 33 records, with organo-metallic compound claims at 13. Coating, polymer processing, capacitor and biomedical integration routes are each represented by only one or two filings.

IPC subclass distribution
Assignee concentration
2 co-assignee pairs
across the entire dataset

No single entity has consolidated the field

Only two co-assignee pairings appear across all 33 families, and every tracked assignee shows zero filings in the latest year. That points to a field still populated by independent academic and single-company filers rather than one being rolled up by a leader.

Co-assignee and momentum data
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to metal-organic framework miniaturization and integration, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metal-Organic Framework Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The assignee base spans universities and national research bodies more than commercial scale-up players, with receiving-office data pointing to the United States as the primary filing venue.

Filing venue
20 of 33
records filed at the USPTO

The United States is the dominant receiving office

Twenty of the 33 records were filed with the USPTO, well ahead of the EPO at 5 and WIPO/PCT filings at 4. India, Canada and China each register only one or two filings, suggesting international filing strategy in this niche is still immature.

Receiving office breakdown
Assignee base
0 in latest year
for every tracked assignee

Academic and research-institute filers, not scaled commercial ones

The most active named assignees are universities and national research councils rather than device manufacturers, and none show filings in the most recent tracked year. That is consistent with a technology still moving from lab demonstration toward integration-ready claims.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Collaboration
2 pairs total
co-assignee pairings in the corpus

Collaboration is rare and localized

The two co-assignee pairs identified both link a single university to a single named inventor or a second institution, rather than reflecting broader consortium filing. This is a field of independent efforts more than joint ventures.

Co-assignee pairs
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth watching
Sub-areas where filing density is thin relative to the core separation and catalysis claims
MOF-on-chip capacitor integrationspin-coating layer-by-layer film depositionMOF thin-film biomedical deliverypolymer-composite MOF coatingsMXene-derived MOF hybrids
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)0
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)0
Dartmouth College0
The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois0
Jiangsu Ocean University0
National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC0
Amorepacific Corporation0
Dongduk Women's University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metal-Organic Framework Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, competitive tracking or identifying a filing opportunity.

Check freedom-to-operate against the most-cited filings

The highest-cited records in this corpus, including the layer-by-layer spin-coating and liquid-phase epitaxy membrane patents, define the claim boundaries most likely to constrain a new filing in membrane or thin-film fabrication routes.

Explore claim scope in Eureka

Track assignee momentum before committing R&D

With every tracked assignee at zero filings in the latest year, a renewed filing push from any one of them would be an early signal worth monitoring before allocating scarce R&D budget to the same sub-area.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Scope a first claim in an under-claimed branch

Coating processes, capacitor integration and biomedical delivery routes each carry only one or two filings against 33 total — a narrower technical search can confirm whether a specific claim there is genuinely open.

Run a white-space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metal-Organic Framework Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metal-Organic Framework Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Metal-Organic Framework Miniaturization and Integration in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole metal-organic framework miniaturization and integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.