Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This dataset tracks patent families combining metal-organic framework or porous coordination polymer chemistry with miniaturization and integration language — thin films, membrane integration, MOF-on-chip and miniaturized MOF devices — narrowed to IPC classes covering adsorption, organo-metallic compounds and membrane separation. It captures 33 published families filed between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, drawn from a search string that deliberately excludes bulk MOF synthesis claims with no integration or device framing.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend line understate real filing activity. Read the 2020 peak and the flat years since as the reliable signal, and treat the tail end of the chart as incomplete rather than declining.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 33 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Filings sat at zero in 2017, rose to a peak of 4 in 2020, and had fallen back to 2 by the midpoint year of 2022 — a pattern consistent with a niche technical area that has not yet attracted a scaling wave of filing, rather than one in decline from a mature base.
B01D (separation processes) and B01J (chemical/physical processes and catalysis) each account for 18 of the 33 records, with C07F (organo-metallic compounds) close behind at 13. Coating processes, polymer processing, capacitor integration and medicinal preparations each register only 1-2 records — these are the branches where claim space remains largely open.
Shares are the percentage of the 33 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about metal-organic framework miniaturization and integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaEmbodiments include a method of making a metal-organic framework membrane by contacting a substrate with a metal-ion solution and an organic-ligand solution, sufficient to form one or more MOF layers on that substrate. The claimed membrane is defect-free, comprises MSiF6(pyz)2, has a thickness under 1,000 micrometres, and carries a growth orientation along the [110] plane relative to the substrate.Filed by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, published 2019-10-15.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20150367294A1 | Process for the preparation of mofs-porous polymeric membrane composites | 77 |
| 2 | US20170246615A1 | Fabrication of metal organic framework materials using a layer-by-layer spin coating approach | 16 |
| 3 | WO2021090103A1 | Mxene-derived metal-organic frameworks and method | 14 |
| 4 | US20220387970A1 | MXene-DERIVED METAL-ORGANIC FRAMEWORKS AND METHOD | 6 |
| 5 | US10675608B2 | Fabrication of metal organic framework materials using a layer-by-layer spin coating approach | 6 |
| 6 | US20160296883A1 | Zeolite-like metal-organic framework membrane | 6 |
| 7 | US9346831B1 | Tunable electrical conductivity in metal-organic framework thin film devices | 6 |
| 8 | CN116459687A | 一种高性能MOF薄膜复合纳滤膜的制备方法 | 5 |
| 9 | US20220404308A1 | Metal-organic frameworks as ion capture compositions | 5 |
| 10 | US20210402369A1 | Surface-treated inorganic particles, manufacturing method of the same, dispersion solution of the same, and c… | 3 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations — read this as a signal of influence on the field's early framing, not of current commercial importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three findings that shape where to file, cite and watch.
The trend climbed from zero in 2017 to a peak of 4 families in 2020, then eased to 2 by 2022. That is a pattern of exploratory filing by a small number of labs and companies, not the steepening curve you would expect if MOF integration had moved into a scale-up phase.
Separation processes and catalysis-related chemical processing each carry 18 of the 33 records, with organo-metallic compound claims at 13. Coating, polymer processing, capacitor and biomedical integration routes are each represented by only one or two filings.
Only two co-assignee pairings appear across all 33 families, and every tracked assignee shows zero filings in the latest year. That points to a field still populated by independent academic and single-company filers rather than one being rolled up by a leader.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to metal-organic framework miniaturization and integration, with the prior art for and against each one.
The assignee base spans universities and national research bodies more than commercial scale-up players, with receiving-office data pointing to the United States as the primary filing venue.
Twenty of the 33 records were filed with the USPTO, well ahead of the EPO at 5 and WIPO/PCT filings at 4. India, Canada and China each register only one or two filings, suggesting international filing strategy in this niche is still immature.
The most active named assignees are universities and national research councils rather than device manufacturers, and none show filings in the most recent tracked year. That is consistent with a technology still moving from lab demonstration toward integration-ready claims.
The two co-assignee pairs identified both link a single university to a single named inventor or a second institution, rather than reflecting broader consortium filing. This is a field of independent efforts more than joint ventures.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) | 0 | — |
| Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) | 0 | — |
| Dartmouth College | 0 | — |
| The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois | 0 | — |
| Jiangsu Ocean University | 0 | — |
| National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC | 0 | — |
| Amorepacific Corporation | 0 | — |
| Dongduk Women's University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, competitive tracking or identifying a filing opportunity.
The highest-cited records in this corpus, including the layer-by-layer spin-coating and liquid-phase epitaxy membrane patents, define the claim boundaries most likely to constrain a new filing in membrane or thin-film fabrication routes.
Explore claim scope in EurekaWith every tracked assignee at zero filings in the latest year, a renewed filing push from any one of them would be an early signal worth monitoring before allocating scarce R&D budget to the same sub-area.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaCoating processes, capacitor integration and biomedical delivery routes each carry only one or two filings against 33 total — a narrower technical search can confirm whether a specific claim there is genuinely open.
Run a white-space search in EurekaThis landscape identifies 33 published patent families filed between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off that combine metal-organic framework or porous coordination polymer chemistry with miniaturization or integration claims, such as thin films, membrane integration or MOF-on-chip devices. That count reflects a deliberately narrow search combining chemistry terms with integration-specific language, so it excludes the much larger body of general MOF synthesis patents. Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, the true number of filed applications for the most recent one or two years is likely higher than currently published.
The assignee base is dominated by universities and national research institutions rather than commercial manufacturers, and the dataset shows no assignee with sustained filing momentum into the latest tracked year. Co-assignee collaboration is rare, with only two pairings identified across all 33 families, indicating that most work here has proceeded as independent institutional research rather than joint industry ventures. Anyone assessing competitive position in this space should look at citation counts and filing venue alongside raw filing counts, since no single filer has consolidated the field.
Filing activity in this dataset peaked at 4 families in 2020 and had eased to 2 by the 2022 midpoint, which is a flat-to-declining pattern rather than sustained growth. This does not necessarily mean commercial interest is fading; publication lag means the last one to two years of any patent trend are systematically undercounted. The more reliable read is that this remains a niche, exploratory filing area that has not yet seen the acceleration typical of a technology entering commercial scale-up.
US10441924B2, assigned to King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, claims a method for fabricating a defect-free MOF membrane using a liquid-phase epitaxy approach, specifying a membrane composition of MSiF6(pyz)2, a thickness under 1,000 micrometres, and a [110] growth orientation relative to the substrate. Anyone working on liquid-phase epitaxial MOF membrane fabrication with this specific composition and orientation should review the claim scope carefully before filing. It does not, however, cover MOF membranes made by other deposition routes, other metal-ligand compositions, or other growth orientations, which leaves considerable room for a differently specified membrane claim.
The clearest gaps sit in branches with only one or two filings against the corpus total of 33: coating processes, polymer-composite processing, capacitor-integrated MOF devices and biomedical delivery applications. Separation processes and catalysis-related chemical processing, by contrast, each carry 18 records and represent denser prior art. A first claim targeting MOF-on-chip capacitor integration or a specific biomedical thin-film delivery mechanism is more likely to find open claim space than one targeting general membrane separation.
Go past this page: query the whole metal-organic framework miniaturization and integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.