Metalens Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
Metalens and Diffractive Optical Element Patents: Filing Trends and Who Holds the Claims
34.3% concentration. The top 5 of 100 ranked assignees hold 8,356 of 24,382 records in scope — dense at the top, with a long tail below. Annual filings climbed from 1,530 in 2017 to a peak of 1,700 in 2020, then declined to 1,086 by 2024 — a 31% drop from the 2021 level of 1,582. The 2025-2026 figures are not yet complete and should not be read as a continuation of that decline.
- 1MAGIC LEAP INC21.1%
- 2META PLATFORMS TECHNOLOGIES LLC4.5%
- 3SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD3.4%
- 4MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC2.7%
- 5CANON KK2.5%
See the full metalens and diffractive optical elements analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about metalens patents
Who holds the most metalens and diffractive optical element patents?
Filing activity in this dataset is concentrated at the top: the leading assignee alone holds 5,149 of the 24,382 records in scope, and the top 5 of 100 ranked assignees together hold 34.3% of all records. Below the top 5, the count drops sharply — fifth place sits at 619 records and tenth place at 209 — so most of the field sits in a long tail of companies with far smaller filing counts. This pattern is typical of a technology that had an early land-grab phase around a small number of core applications, in this case augmented- and virtual-reality waveguide optics.
Is metalens patent filing activity still growing?
Filings peaked at 1,700 in 2020 and have since declined to 1,086 by 2024, a 31% drop over that three-year window. That said, publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 figures in any chart are still incomplete and should not be read as evidence the technology itself has plateaued. Recent-year momentum data shows steep year-over-year declines across nearly every major assignee, which points to a cooling filing cycle among the current leaders rather than new entrants failing to appear.
What technology areas dominate metalens patent claims?
G02B, covering optical elements and systems, appears in 47.9% of all 24,382 records in scope, making it by far the largest IPC subclass in this dataset. Image data processing (G06T), pictorial communication (H04N) and digital data processing (G06F) each cover roughly 10-12% of records, while lighting, positioning and measurement classes each sit around 5-7%. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100%, and the overlap indicates that many metalens claims extend beyond the optical element itself into system-level image or display functions.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metalens and Diffractive Optical Elements covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.