Book a demo

Metalens Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Metalens Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/metalens-lens-and-optics-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Photonics & Optics · Patent Landscape
Metalens and flat imaging optics patents: filing trends and where claim space is still open
  • Filing peaked in 2020 at 34 families, then flattened through 2022 rather than continuing to climb — this is not a technology still accelerating on the page.
  • G02B carries 161 of 196 records, but B82Y nanotechnology (32) and H04N imaging (23) show the field spilling into device integration, not just optics.
  • United States dominates filing venue at 84 records, more than double WIPO's 32 and EPO's 24 — a US-first filing strategy is the norm here, not the exception.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
196
Published Records
34%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-36%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the metalens patent record actually shows

Metalens patenting sits at the intersection of nanofabrication and conventional optics: a metasurface replaces curved glass with a flat array of sub-wavelength structures, and the achromatic problem — correcting chromatic dispersion across the visible band without a stack of lens elements — is the recurring claim target across the corpus. The 196 families tracked here span 2015 through mid-2026, with G02B (optical elements) as the dominant classification and B82Y (nanotechnology) and H04N (imaging/video) as the two branches showing the technology’s pull toward camera modules and consumer imaging hardware.

Filing activity rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2020, and has not resumed that pace since — a pattern more consistent with an early wave of foundational claims settling than with a market still in acquisition mode. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 figures understate real filing activity; treat the tail of the trend as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 110644137 CANADA INC14
  2. 2AVALON HOLOGRAPHICS INC14
  3. 3RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA14
  4. 4PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE13
  5. 5APPLIED MATERIALS INC12
  6. 6LG ELECTRONICS INC10
  7. 7ACAD SINICA9
  8. 8NITTO DENKO CORP8
  9. 9INTERDIGITAL CE PATENT HOLDINGS SAS7
  10. 10SEIKO EPSON CORP6
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metalens Lens and Optics covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 196-family dataset: annual filing volume by publication year, and the IPC subclasses those filings cluster in.

A 2020 peak, not a steady climb

Filings rose from 4 in 2017 to a peak of 34 in 2020, sat at 29 by the 2022 midpoint, and have not exceeded that peak since — flat-to-declining momentum rather than compounding growth.

A 2020 peak, not a steady climb01020304042017201820193420202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Optics-first, with nanotech and imaging as the two growth edges

G02B (161 records) confirms this is fundamentally an optical-elements dataset. B82Y (32) and H04N (23) mark where metalens claims meet nanofabrication process and imaging-system integration respectively — the two directions most likely to generate new claim activity going forward.

Optics-first, with nanotech and imaging as the two growth edgesG02B · Optical elements & systems16182.1%B82Y · Nanotechnology applications3216.3%H04N · Pictorial communication (video…2311.7%G02F · Optical control & modulation126.1%G01N · Material analysis & testing115.6%H04B · Transmission (general)105.1%G03H · Holography84.1%G06T · Image data processing & genera…84.1%Other7940.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 196 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metalens Lens and Optics covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Metalens Lens and Optics with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about metalens lens and optics and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records in this dataset

Representative recent filing
US20250155703A12025-05-15

Determination method for achromatic metalens, achromatic metalens, and application assembly thereof

HANGZHOU NAJING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD

Filed by Hangzhou Najing Technology, this 2025 application describes a determination method for building an achromatic metalens from a nano-structure parameter library: a forward propagation model simulates how incident light passes through candidate metasurface designs, and the resulting propagation data sets the phase-plane arrangement of the metasurface against a preset evaluation target.Filed 2025-05-15 — illustrates the current claim style: computational design method plus resulting structure, rather than a novel physical mechanism.

US20250155703A1 — patent drawing 1US20250155703A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20120328240A1Metamaterial-based optical lenses107
2US20200225386A1Metalens for light field imaging103
3US20190196068A1Broadband achromatic metalens in the visible spectrum78
4US20180216797A1Achromatic metalens and metalens with reverse chromatic dispersion69
5CN109799611A一种消色差超构透镜的设计方法及其消色差超构透镜61
6WO2018142339A1Multilayer optical element for controlling light54
7US20200284960A1Multilayer optical element for controlling light45
8US9151891B2Metamaterial-based optical lenses41
9US10408416B2Achromatic metalens and metalens with reverse chromatic dispersion38
10US20190025464A1Ultrathin, polarization-independent, achromatic metalens for focusing visible light33

Citation counts are drawn from a searched corpus and skew toward older filings that have simply had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on the field's early framing, not of current commercial weight.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metalens Lens and Optics covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the trend, classification and citation data, aimed at where to file and where to wait.

Filing momentum
34 in 2020
peak year, families

The wave has already crested

Volume climbed from 4 families in 2017 to a peak of 34 in 2020, then held near 29 by 2022 without breaking above the peak again. New entrants are filing against an already-populated claim landscape rather than a greenfield one.

Trend, 2017-2022
Classification spread
161 of 196
records in G02B

Core optics claims are dense; adjacent branches are thinner

G02B alone accounts for 161 of 196 records. The much thinner counts in G03H (holography, 8) and G06T (image processing, 8) suggest those adjacent computational and reconstruction angles remain comparatively open.

IPC composition
Filing venue
84 US filings
vs. 32 PCT, 24 EPO

US filing leads by a wide margin

United States receipts (84) more than double the next-largest venue, WIPO's PCT route (32), with Europe (24), Japan (13), China (9) and Taiwan (7) trailing further. A metalens filing strategy built only around PCT or China risks missing where the bulk of prior art already sits.

Receiving offices
Citation concentration
107 citations
top-cited record

Early foundational claims still anchor the field

The most-cited record, a metamaterial-based optical lens filing, sits well ahead of others in citation count, with achromatic-metalens filings from the late 2010s close behind. These early claims on achromatic correction remain the reference point any new filing has to design around or build on.

Most-cited records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to metalens lens and optics, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metalens Lens and Optics covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space

Recent-year momentum across the tracked assignees shows a common pattern in this dataset: activity that was concentrated in the university and materials-science base has gone quiet in the most recent filing year, consistent with the broader 2020-peak trend rather than any single company pulling back.

Momentum
0 in latest year
across most tracked assignees

Recent-year filing has gone flat across the board

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, including the University of California and Harvard's president and fellows, shows zero filings in the latest year — several with a -100% YoY drop. This mirrors the overall trend rather than reflecting a company-specific exit.

Recent-year momentum
Institutional base
4 co-assignee pairs
total collaborations

Collaboration is limited and university-anchored

The strongest co-assignee link pairs Harvard's president and fellows with Boston University trustees, appearing twice; the remaining pairs are single instances tied to the University of California. This is a research-driven field with modest formal cross-institution filing.

Co-assignee pairs
Filing base
196 families
across the tracked assignee set

A mixed base of universities, materials firms and device makers

The assignee set spans research institutions, materials and semiconductor firms, and consumer electronics makers — a spread consistent with metalens technology's dependence on both nanofabrication process know-how and downstream imaging-system integration.

Assignee ranking
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Thinner IPC counts point to sub-areas where claim space is not yet crowded — worth a freedom-to-operate check before assuming prior art blocks the approach.
Metasurface holographic reconstruction (G03H overlap)Computational metalens design pipelines (G06T overlap)Metalens-based material sensing (G01N overlap)Metalens integration for wireless/RF transmission (H04B overlap)Active tunable metasurface modulation (G02F overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Avalon Holographics Inc.0-100%
The Regents of the University of California0
10644137 Canada Inc.0
President and Fellows of Harvard College0-100%
Applied Materials, Inc.0
LG Electronics Inc.0
Academia Sinica0
Nitto Denko Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metalens Lens and Optics covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field with settled core claims and thinner adjacent branches. Two directions make sense depending on what the reader needs to decide next.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on a specific claim angle

If a project touches achromatic correction or metasurface design methods, the top-cited records here are the ones to design around first — they anchor the densest part of the claim space.

Explore metalens prior art in Eureka

Track the adjacent branches before they fill in

G03H, G06T and G01N overlaps are thin today but sit directly adjacent to the core G02B claims — worth monitoring for new entrants before the space becomes as dense as the core.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metalens Lens and Optics covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about metalens patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metalens Lens and Optics covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Metalens Lens and Optics in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole metalens lens and optics corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.