https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/metallic-glass-alloy-composition-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Advanced Materials & Metallurgy
Metallic Glass Alloy Composition Patents: Who Holds the Core Claims
  • Filing has cooled sharply since its peak. Annual filings ran at 62 in 2017 and had fallen to a single-digit midpoint by 2022, suggesting the core composition space filed early and hard, then went quiet rather than continuing to expand.
  • Citations concentrate on a handful of 1990s foundational patents. The most-cited records in this corpus are beryllium-bearing amorphous alloy patents from the mid-1990s, still pulling citation counts in the hundreds — a strong signal that later filers are working around, not past, that prior art.
  • Casting and powder metallurgy carry the claim density, not electronics. C22C alloy claims and B22D casting claims dominate the IPC mix, while battery (H01M) and data-storage (G11B) applications sit far behind — an indicator of where composition claims are thin, not where the market interest is.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,118
Published Records
50%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-30%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (10 records) with 2024 (7) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,118 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Metallic glass, also filed under amorphous alloy or bulk metallic glass, is claimed here through composition design and glass-forming ability rather than through a single end-use. The corpus spans 1,118 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from a search string that ties alloy composition terms to glass-forming-ability and amorphous-composition language, which keeps the set anchored to material composition claims rather than downstream device claims.

Publication in this dataset lags actual filing by roughly eighteen months, so the 2025 and 2026 figures in the trend chart are undercounts, not a genuine drop-off in research. The receiving-office split, weighted toward the United States, EPO and WIPO PCT filings, points to a field that has historically been prosecuted for broad multi-jurisdiction coverage rather than filed defensively in a single home market.

Filing activity and IPC distribution, 2017-2026
  1. 1APPLE INC219
  2. 2CRUCIBLE INTPROP LLC164
  3. 3CALIFORNIA INST OF TECH104
  4. 4THE SWATCH GRP RES & DEVELONMENT LTD39
  5. 5DESKTOP METAL INC35
  6. 6STANDARD OIL CO35
  7. 7GLASSIMETAL TECH27
  8. 8THE JAPAN SCI & TECH AGENCY26
  9. 9SMITH & NEPHEW INC21
  10. 10TOKIN CORP21
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Alloy Composition covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,118 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and where those families sit across the IPC classification system.

Filings peaked in 2017 and have not recovered

Annual filings hit 62 in 2017, the high point of the tracked period, then declined toward a midpoint of 8 by 2022. That trajectory reads as an early land-grab on composition space followed by a pull-back, rather than a market still being built out. Because publication lags filing by around eighteen months, the final one or two years of the chart will revise upward as more records post, but the multi-year decline predates that lag effect.

Filings peaked in 2017 and have not recovered0204060806220172018201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

C22C alloy claims dominate; batteries and storage are thin

C22C (Alloys) accounts for 732 of the 1,118 records, more than five times the next largest class, B22D metal casting at 201. Powder metallurgy (B22F, 123) and coating/surface deposition (C23C, 116) form a second tier tied to processing routes rather than composition per se. H01M battery applications (50) and G11B data-storage applications (49) are comparatively undercalimed, which is notable given how often metallic glass is discussed as a candidate material for both.

C22C alloy claims dominate; batteries and storage are thinC22C · Alloys73265.5%B22D · Metal casting20118.0%H01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…14112.6%B22F · Powder metallurgy12311.0%C23C · Coating & surface deposition11610.4%C22F · Non-ferrous metal treatment817.2%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells504.5%G11B · Information storage (magnetic/…494.4%Other77369.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,118 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Alloy Composition covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Metallic Glass Alloy Composition with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about metallic glass alloy composition and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The prior art still doing the work

Representative Filing
US20080099175A12008-05-01

US20080099175A1 — Method for in-gas micro/nanoimprinting of bulk metallic glass

CHU, JINN P.

A method for in-gas micro/nanoimprinting of bulk metallic glass includes steps of preparing a die, heating the bulk metallic glass and in-gas micro/nanoimprinting of the bulk metallic glass. In the step of preparing a die, the die has a micro/nano structure having multiple depressions and a flow channel connected to the depressions. In the step of heating the bulk metallic glass, the bulk metallic glass is heated to a temperature between a glass transition temperature and a crystallization temperature of the bulk metallic glass. In the step of in-gas micro/nanoimprinting, the bulk metallic glass is forced into the die in presence of gas to imprint a complementing micro/nano structure.Filed by CHU, JINN P., published 2008-05-01. Process claim on a forming method rather than an alloy composition, which narrows its blocking effect on composition-only filings.

US20080099175A1 — patent drawing 1US20080099175A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5288344ABerylllium bearing amorphous metallic alloys formed by low cooling rates760
2US5735975AQuinary metallic glass alloys575
3US5368659AMethod of forming berryllium bearing metallic glass540
4US20100084052A1Compositions of corrosion-resistant Fe-based amorphous metals suitable for producing thermal spray coatings209
5US20200257933A1Machine Learning to Accelerate Alloy Design186
6US20050084407A1Titanium group powder metallurgy183
7US4923770AAmorphous metal alloy compositions for reversible hydrogen storage and electrodes made therefrom160
8US4859413ACompositionally graded amorphous metal alloys and process for the synthesis of same141
9US4537624AAmorphous metal alloy powders and synthesis of same by solid state decomposition reactions123
10US6010580AComposite penetrator115

Citation counts inside a searched corpus skew toward older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations; treat this as a measure of influence on the field's vocabulary, not of present-day importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Alloy Composition covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are read against each other: where prior art is thickest, where filing has cooled, and where the classification data suggests claim space is still open.

Foundational Art
760 citations
US5288344A

Beryllium-bearing compositions are the reference point

The three most-cited records in this corpus are all beryllium-bearing or quinary amorphous alloy patents from the mid-1990s, led by US5288344A at 760 citations. Their persistence at the top of the citation table after three decades means new composition claims in this family are almost always assessed against them first.

Citation data, most-cited table
Filing Momentum
62 → 8
2017 to 2022 filings

The core composition space filed early and has since gone quiet

Annual filings fell from a peak of 62 in 2017 to a midpoint of 8 in 2022, with no sign of recovery in the years since. That pattern is consistent with a technology where the obvious composition territory was staked out quickly, leaving later entrants to compete over narrower variations.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Classification Skew
732 of 1,118
records in C22C

Alloy claims dwarf every adjacent application class

C22C alone accounts for roughly two-thirds of the corpus, more than five times B22D casting in second place. Application-specific classes tied to batteries and data storage sit under 50 records each, a gap that is wide enough to be structural rather than incidental.

IPC composition table
Collaboration Density
91 shared families
Poole + Prest

A small set of co-filing pairs anchors one filing cluster

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, but the strongest, Poole and Prest, share 91 families, with Poole-Scott and Prest-Scott each near 70. That concentration marks a single tightly-linked filing group rather than a broadly collaborative field.

Co-assignee pairs
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to metallic glass alloy composition, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Alloy Composition covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and who has gone quiet

Recent-year momentum across the named assignees in this corpus reads as flat: every one of the tracked organisations and individual inventors shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, reinforcing the broader decline visible in the filing trend.

Filing Cluster
91 shared families
top co-assignee pair

A linked inventor group drives one filing cluster

Poole, Prest and Scott appear together across the strongest co-assignee pairs in the dataset, with the top pair sharing 91 families. This points to a single well-organised filing programme rather than a broad base of independent inventors.

Co-assignee pairs
Institutional Filer
0 filings
latest tracked year

Academic and corporate assignees show no recent activity

Named institutional assignees in the momentum data, including a university research programme and a large consumer technology company, show zero filings in the most recent year tracked. Given the publication lag, this likely understates true recent activity, but it is consistent with the multi-year filing decline.

Recent-year momentum table
Receiving Office
548 filings
United States

US filings lead by a wide margin

The United States receives more than double the next largest office, EPO at 143, with WIPO PCT close behind at 124. That skew suggests the commercially important filings in this field have consistently sought US protection first.

Receiving office table
🔍
Under-claimed composition branches
Sub-areas where filing density is thin relative to stated commercial interest in metallic glass
Battery electrode amorphous alloysAmorphous alloy magnetic core materialsMachine-learning-guided alloy composition searchCorrosion-resistant Fe-based thermal spray coatingsAmorphous alloy data-storage substrates
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Crucible Intellectual Property, LLC0
California Institute of Technology0
POOLE JOSEPH C0
PREST CHRISTOPHER D0
Apple Inc.0
Glassimetal Technology, Inc.0
SCOTT MATTHEW S0
STRATTON DERMOT J0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Alloy Composition covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to two useful next steps: a closer read of the composition claims themselves, and a check of whether the under-claimed branches identified here are genuinely open or simply filed under different search terms.

Map the composition claim boundaries directly

Run the specific alloy composition ranges from the most-cited patents through a claim chart against any new formulation before filing, since the citation data shows later filers are consistently measured against the same 1990s beryllium-bearing patents.

Explore claims in Eureka

Check the H01M and G11B gap against parallel search terms

The thin battery and data-storage counts here may partly reflect this search string's composition-focused terms rather than a true absence of filings; a targeted search on device-specific vocabulary would confirm whether the gap is real.

Run a targeted search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Alloy Composition covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on metallic glass alloy composition patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Alloy Composition covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Metallic Glass Alloy Composition in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole metallic glass alloy composition corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.