Book a demo

Metallic Glass Coating Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Metallic Glass Coating Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/metallic-glass-coating-and-surface-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Advanced Materials & Metallurgy · Patent Landscape
Metallic Glass Coating and Surface Patents: Filing Trends and White Space
  • Filing activity peaked in 2018 at 31 records and has not returned to that level since — the trend line is flat-to-declining rather than building toward a current wave.
  • Powder metallurgy (B22F) and alloys (C22C) dominate the IPC mix at 73 and 56 records respectively, with additive manufacturing (B33Y, 55) close behind — three routes competing for the same claim space.
  • The United States receives 86 filings nearly triple the next-largest office (EPO, 25), meaning defensive and freedom-to-operate work should start with the US filing corpus.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
183
Published Records
57%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-86%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Metallic glass coating and surface technology sits at the intersection of amorphous alloy metallurgy and applied surface engineering: thermal spray, electroplating and additive manufacturing routes used to lay down amorphous metallic coatings for wear resistance. The dataset behind this page spans 183 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, pulled from a search string combining bulk metallic glass and amorphous alloy terminology with coating-specific language.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent filing years in this dataset are understated and should not be read as a sign the field has gone quiet — only that the record is incomplete for those years. The picture that does hold up across the full window is a field with a clear historical peak, a concentrated set of IPC classes, and filing activity heavily weighted toward the United States.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1DESKTOP METAL INC66
  2. 2TOHOKU TECHNO ARCH CO LTD10
  3. 3UNIV OF VIRGINIA PATENT FOUND10
  4. 4DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC10
  5. 5TEKNOLOGIAN TUTKIMUSKESKUS VTT OY8
  6. 6CRUCIBLE INTPROP LLC7
  7. 7CALIFORNIA INST OF TECH6
  8. 8BELASHCHENKO VLADIMIR E5
  9. 9HONDA MOTOR CO LTD4
  10. 10YOSHIDA KOGYO KK4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Coating and Surface covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 183-family dataset: filings over time, and where those filings sit across the IPC classification system. Read together they show a field that built quickly, peaked, and has since spread across adjacent classes rather than deepening in any one of them.

A peak year that has not been repeated

Filings rose from 14 in 2017 to a peak of 31 in 2018, then fell back toward zero by the 2022 midpoint. That shape — a sharp rise followed by a sustained pullback rather than a plateau — points to a technology that had a defined burst of claim-staking activity rather than one still accelerating. Treat the final one or two years as undercounted rather than genuinely empty.

A peak year that has not been repeated010203040142017312018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Powder metallurgy and alloys anchor the field

B22F (powder metallurgy) leads at 73 records, with C22C (alloys) at 56 and B33Y (additive manufacturing) at 55 close behind. C23C (coating and surface deposition) sits at 53 and B29C (plastics shaping) at 52 — five classes clustered within a narrow band, which suggests the underlying inventions routinely straddle powder processing, alloy composition and deposition method rather than sitting cleanly in one bucket. B32B, C25D and C09D trail well behind, each under 20 records.

Powder metallurgy and alloys anchor the fieldB22F · Powder metallurgy7339.9%C22C · Alloys5630.6%B33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D pri…5530.1%C23C · Coating & surface deposition5329.0%B29C · Shaping of plastics5228.4%B32B · Layered products & laminates1910.4%C25D · Electroplating & electroforming147.7%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks137.1%Other17696.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 183 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Coating and Surface covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Metallic Glass Coating and Surface with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about metallic glass coating and surface and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative filing

A representative claim in this space

Representative record
US11920668B22024-03-05

Systems and methods for implementing bulk metallic glass-based macroscale gears

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

The patent covers fabricating a bulk metallic glass-based macroscale gear — defined by a thickness above 3 mm or a diameter above 9 mm — by selecting a bulk metallic glass composition based on design parameters, where that composition is characterised by resistance to standard wear modes and resistance to brittle fracture.Filed by California Institute of Technology; granted 2024-03-05.

US11920668B2 — patent drawing 1US11920668B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20180297113A1Calibration of 3D printer via computer vision89
2US20180162048A1Decomposing polymer binders for additive manufacturing feedstock75
3US20180297272A1High density 3D printing73
4US20130167965A1Coating compositions, applications thereof, and methods of forming73
5US20180297114A1Printed object correction via computer vision70
6US20070243335A1Deposition System, Method And Materials For Composite Coatings70
7US20180307209A1Adaptive 3D printing63
8US20180304540A1System And Method For Controlling Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Using Measured Processing Effects57
9US4673468ACommercial nickel phosphorus electroplating56
10US20130171367A1Coating compositions, applications thereof, and methods of forming48

Citation counts favour older records in any searched corpus — treat this table as a signal of historical influence, not of which patents matter most today.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Coating and Surface covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data indicates

Three patterns stand out once filing volume, IPC spread and receiving office data are viewed together.

Filing pattern
31 in 2018
peak year filings

A single burst, not sustained growth

The climb from 14 filings in 2017 to 31 in 2018 followed by a decline toward zero at the 2022 midpoint indicates a concentrated period of claim-staking rather than an ongoing wave. New entrants filing today face a corpus that was mostly built five to eight years ago.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Technology mix
5 IPC classes within 20 records of each other
B22F to B29C

No single dominant claim route

B22F, C22C, B33Y, C23C and B29C all sit between 52 and 73 records. That spread means powder metallurgy, alloy composition, additive manufacturing and deposition claims overlap heavily — a filer in one class should expect prior art from the adjacent four.

IPC composition
Jurisdiction
86 US filings
vs 25 at EPO

Filing is US-centred

The United States receives more than three times the filings of the next office (EPO, 25), with WIPO PCT filings (24) close behind. Japan, China and the UK each sit in single digits to low teens, meaning the deepest prior-art search obligation sits with the US corpus.

Receiving offices
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to metallic glass coating and surface, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-assignee activity
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Dumet Industries Co., Ltd.Tohoku University (Japan)8
Dumet Industries Co., Ltd.INOUE5
Tohoku University (Japan)INOUE5
MASUMOTO TSUYOSHIYoshida Kogyo Co., Ltd.5
MASUMOTO TSUYOSHIHonda Motor Co., Ltd.4
MASUMOTO TSUYOSHITPR Co., Ltd.4
INOUEMASUMOTO TSUYOSHI3
University of Virginia Patent FoundationSHIFLET GARY J2

Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest links running through joint filings between Dumet Industries, Tohoku University (Japan) and Inoue — a recurring research-industry pairing rather than a broad collaboration network.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Coating and Surface covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who is filing

Assignee landscape

Filing activity in this dataset is spread across a small set of named organisations plus a long tail, with no assignee showing filings in the latest tracked year — consistent with the overall decline from the 2018 peak.

Momentum
0 in latest year
across all tracked assignees

No active filer in the most recent window

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum — including Dumet Industries, Detrex Industrial, the University of Virginia Patent Foundation, and Tohoku University (Japan) — shows zero filings in the latest year. Combined with the broader decline after 2018, this points to a corpus that is largely settled rather than one with an active current filer to watch.

Recent-year momentum
Collaboration
8 joint filings
strongest co-assignee pair

Research-industry pairing anchors the network

The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset runs between Dumet Industries and Tohoku University (Japan), with Inoue appearing as a secondary partner to both. This is a research-into-industry transfer pattern rather than a broad multi-party consortium.

Co-assignee pairs
Representative filer
1 macroscale-gear grant
California Institute of Technology

Academic assignees hold structurally distinct claims

California Institute of Technology's granted patent on bulk metallic glass macroscale gears illustrates a claim style distinct from the coating-process filings that dominate the rest of the corpus — it protects a specific mechanical application rather than a deposition or alloy-composition method.

Representative record
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches where filing density is thin relative to the core IPC classes, based on the composition data above.
Electroplated amorphous coatings (C25D)Paint/ink-format metallic glass formulations (C09D)Laminated metallic glass layer structures (B32B)Amorphous coating adhesion to plastic substrates (B29C overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Detrex Industrial0
Detrex Industrial Corporation0
University of Virginia Patent Foundation0
Dumet Industries Co., Ltd.0
Tohoku University (Japan)0
INOUE0
MASUMOTO TSUYOSHI0
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Coating and Surface covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next steps

Where to take this

This landscape identifies the shape of the field; deciding where to file, challenge or license requires drilling into the specific claims behind these numbers.

Run a freedom-to-operate check

With 86 of 183 families sitting in the US and IPC classes clustered tightly across powder metallurgy, alloys and additive manufacturing, a targeted FTO search should cover all five overlapping classes rather than just the primary one for your process.

Explore Patsnap Eureka

Map the white space branches

Thin coverage in electroplated amorphous coatings and paint/ink-format formulations suggests underclaimed claim territory worth a closer prior-art pull before drafting.

Explore Patsnap Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Coating and Surface covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Coating and Surface covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Metallic Glass Coating and Surface in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole metallic glass coating and surface corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.