Metallic Glass Corrosion Resistance Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
- Filing has cooled since 2019. Annual filings peaked at 202 in 2019 and have declined toward 10 by 2026 (partial year), pointing to a maturing claim space rather than a growing one.
- Alloy composition, not coating, dominates. C22C alloy claims (3,852 records) outnumber surface-coating claims under C23C (1,169) by more than 3 to 1, showing where corrosion resistance is actually being engineered.
- The oldest, most-cited patents still frame the field. The five most-cited records date to the 1980s and 1990s beryllium- and zirconium-based glass chemistries, a sign that foundational composition claims remain the reference point new filings must design around.
Filing growth compares 2021 (157 records) with 2024 (103) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 8,527 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Metallic glass — also filed as amorphous alloy or bulk metallic glass — resists corrosion because it lacks the grain boundaries and crystalline defects that give conventional alloys their weak points for pitting and localized attack. Patent activity in this space spans alloy composition, surface coating, powder and casting processing, and heat treatment, with corrosion resistance and passivation behavior claimed as a property rather than a single fixed application.
The 8,527 records analysed here span receiving offices from the United States and Japan through Europe, China, the WIPO PCT route and Canada, reflecting a technology that was commercialized and defended across multiple jurisdictions well before the current filing slowdown.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 8,527-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.
A field past its filing peak
Annual filings ran from 169 in 2017 to a peak of 202 in 2019, then declined toward roughly 138 at the 2022 midpoint and down to 10 in 2026 (a partial year, understated by publication lag of roughly 18 months). The shape reads as consolidation around established chemistries rather than an emerging technology still gathering filers.
Alloys and information storage lead the classification mix
C22C alloy claims lead by a wide margin at 3,852 records, followed by H01F magnetics and inductor applications at 1,868 and G11B information storage media at 1,519 — a reminder that metallic glass corrosion resistance is frequently claimed as a supporting property inside magnetic recording and inductor hardware, not only as a standalone metallurgy claim. Coating (C23C, 1,169), powder metallurgy (B22F, 761), casting (B22D, 702), heat treatment (C21D, 517) and laminates (B32B, 412) form a long tail of processing-route claims.
Shares are the percentage of the 8,527 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Metallic Glass Corrosion Resistance with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about metallic glass corrosion resistance and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe records that anchor the field
Zirconium-rich bulk metallic glass alloys (US20060076089A1)
Zirconium-rich bulk metallic glass alloys include quinary alloys containing zirconium, aluminum, titanium, copper and nickel. The bulk metallic glass alloys may be provided as completely amorphous pieces having cross-sectional diameters of at least about 5 mm or even greater.Filed by Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation; number, assignee and date are drawn directly from the filing record.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5288344A | Berylllium bearing amorphous metallic alloys formed by low cooling rates | 760 |
| 2 | US5735975A | Quinary metallic glass alloys | 575 |
| 3 | US5368659A | Method of forming berryllium bearing metallic glass | 540 |
| 4 | US4737379A | Plasma deposited coatings, and low temperature plasma method of making same | 527 |
| 5 | US5618359A | Metallic glass alloys of Zr, Ti, Cu and Ni | 476 |
| 6 | US6325868B1 | Nickel-based amorphous alloy compositions | 404 |
| 7 | US3856513A | Novel amorphous metals and amorphous metal articles | 394 |
| 8 | US20170027168A1 | Methods, products, and systems relating to making, providing, and using nanocrystalline (NC) products compris… | 302 |
| 9 | US6226197B1 | Magnetic thin film memory, method of writing information in it, and me | 287 |
| 10 | US8921473B1 | Image making medium | 272 |
Citation counts favor older filings inside a searched corpus and should be read as influence, not current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns worth acting on before drafting new claims in this space.
The composition space is well-occupied
Filings peaked in 2019 and have declined every year since, including through the 2022 midpoint of 138. That decline pattern usually means the core alloy chemistries (Zr, Cu, Ni, Ti-based systems) are already claimed densely enough that new entrants are filing narrower, more specific improvements rather than broad composition claims.
Foundational chemistry patents still anchor prior art searches
The most-cited records in this corpus are beryllium- and zirconium-bearing amorphous alloy patents from the late 1980s and 1990s. Any freedom-to-operate review in this field still has to clear those foundational compositions before evaluating newer coating or processing claims.
Coating routes are comparatively open
C23C surface coating and deposition claims sit at 1,169 records versus 3,852 for bulk alloy composition — roughly a third the density. Corrosion-resistant coating and passivation-layer approaches applied to existing amorphous substrates carry less prior art congestion than new bulk chemistries.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to metallic glass corrosion resistance, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the ground, and where filing has stopped
Assignee activity in this corpus is concentrated among a small group of Japanese electronics, materials and research institutions, several of which show zero filings in the most recent year — a signal to check whether that reflects portfolio maturity or a shift away from the technology.
Corporate-research pairings dominate collaboration
The strongest co-assignee links pair a parent company with its materials subsidiary or a named individual inventor, rather than cross-company joint ventures. That pattern suggests most collaborative filing here is internal R&D structuring, not industry consortia.
Several established filers have gone quiet
Multiple assignees with substantial historical portfolios in this corpus show zero filings in the latest tracked year. That could reflect a mature, defended position, a shift in R&D priorities, or simply publication lag masking filings not yet disclosed.
Filing follows US and Japan first
United States (2,424) and Japan (2,286) lead receiving offices, with Europe (1,500) a clear third and China (484) and the WIPO PCT route (400) trailing. A defensive filing strategy built only around China or PCT alone would miss most of the disclosed prior art in this field.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Bomeilicheng Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Toshiba Corporation | 0 | — |
| Hitachi, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Canon Inc. | 0 | — |
| California Institute of Technology | 0 | — |
| YKK Corporation | 0 | — |
| TDK Corporation | 0 | — |
| Sony Group Corporation | 0 | — |
Where to take this next
The dataset points to a mature core and a thinner periphery. Two directions are worth a closer look before committing drafting resources.
Map the coating and processing white space in detail
With C23C, B22F, B22D and C21D all running well below C22C's density, a claim-by-claim review of passivation and processing approaches on existing amorphous alloy substrates is likely to surface open ground faster than a new bulk-composition filing.
Explore white space in EurekaCheck the foundational chemistry patents against your formulation
Before drafting new alloy composition claims, clear the highest-cited beryllium- and zirconium-based records in this corpus; they anchor a large share of the prior art that examiners and competitors will cite back.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
Metallic glass lacks the crystalline grain structure of conventional alloys, so it has no grain boundaries or dislocations for corrosive attack to concentrate on. This gives it more uniform passivation behavior and typically better pitting resistance. The patent record reflects this: the largest single category of claims (C22C, 3,852 records) targets alloy composition directly, because the corrosion benefit is largely a property of the amorphous structure itself rather than an added coating.
Filing activity in this corpus is concentrated among a group of Japanese electronics and materials companies alongside university and research institution filers, with co-assignee links typically connecting a parent company to its own materials subsidiary. Several of the most historically active filers show no filings in the latest tracked year, which is worth checking against their wider patent portfolios rather than assuming exit from the field. Ranking detail for specific assignees is shown in the tables on this page rather than repeated here.
No — filing peaked in 2019 at 202 records and has declined in most years since, reaching around 138 at the 2022 midpoint and continuing down toward the present. That decline pattern, combined with heavy concentration in C22C alloy composition claims, suggests the core chemistry space is well-occupied. Remember that the most recent one to two years are always understated in any patent trend because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months.
The clearest gaps sit in processing and coating routes rather than bulk alloy chemistry: C23C coating and deposition claims run at less than a third the volume of C22C alloy claims, and B22F powder metallurgy, B22D casting and C21D heat treatment routes are thinner still. A claim built around a passivation coating or a specific heat-treatment step applied to an existing amorphous substrate composition is likely to face less crowded prior art than a new bulk alloy chemistry claim.
Citation counts are useful for identifying which patents shaped later filings, but they structurally favor older records simply because they have had more years to accumulate citations. The top-cited record in this corpus, at 760 citations, dates to a 1990s beryllium-bearing alloy patent — influential, but not necessarily the most commercially relevant filing today. Use citation rank to find foundational prior art to clear, not as a proxy for current market importance.
Research Metallic Glass Corrosion Resistance in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole metallic glass corrosion resistance corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.