Book a demo

Metallic Glass Corrosion Resistance Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Metallic Glass Corrosion Resistance Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/metallic-glass-corrosion-resistance-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Advanced Materials & Metallurgy
Metallic Glass Corrosion Resistance Patents
  • Filing has cooled since 2019. Annual filings peaked at 202 in 2019 and have declined toward 10 by 2026 (partial year), pointing to a maturing claim space rather than a growing one.
  • Alloy composition, not coating, dominates. C22C alloy claims (3,852 records) outnumber surface-coating claims under C23C (1,169) by more than 3 to 1, showing where corrosion resistance is actually being engineered.
  • The oldest, most-cited patents still frame the field. The five most-cited records date to the 1980s and 1990s beryllium- and zirconium-based glass chemistries, a sign that foundational composition claims remain the reference point new filings must design around.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
8,527
Published Records
15%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-34%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (157 records) with 2024 (103) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 8,527 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Metallic glass — also filed as amorphous alloy or bulk metallic glass — resists corrosion because it lacks the grain boundaries and crystalline defects that give conventional alloys their weak points for pitting and localized attack. Patent activity in this space spans alloy composition, surface coating, powder and casting processing, and heat treatment, with corrosion resistance and passivation behavior claimed as a property rather than a single fixed application.

The 8,527 records analysed here span receiving offices from the United States and Japan through Europe, China, the WIPO PCT route and Canada, reflecting a technology that was commercialized and defended across multiple jurisdictions well before the current filing slowdown.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1PROTERIAL LTD285
  2. 2CRUCIBLE INTPROP LLC251
  3. 3CANON KK246
  4. 4APPLE INC239
  5. 5HITACHI LTD234
  6. 6KK TOSHIBA226
  7. 7CALIFORNIA INST OF TECH225
  8. 8YKK CORP219
  9. 9NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION197
  10. 10SONY GROUP CORP180
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Corrosion Resistance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 8,527-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

A field past its filing peak

Annual filings ran from 169 in 2017 to a peak of 202 in 2019, then declined toward roughly 138 at the 2022 midpoint and down to 10 in 2026 (a partial year, understated by publication lag of roughly 18 months). The shape reads as consolidation around established chemistries rather than an emerging technology still gathering filers.

A field past its filing peak063125188250169201720182022019202020212022202320242025102026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Alloys and information storage lead the classification mix

C22C alloy claims lead by a wide margin at 3,852 records, followed by H01F magnetics and inductor applications at 1,868 and G11B information storage media at 1,519 — a reminder that metallic glass corrosion resistance is frequently claimed as a supporting property inside magnetic recording and inductor hardware, not only as a standalone metallurgy claim. Coating (C23C, 1,169), powder metallurgy (B22F, 761), casting (B22D, 702), heat treatment (C21D, 517) and laminates (B32B, 412) form a long tail of processing-route claims.

Alloys and information storage lead the classification mixC22C · Alloys3,85245.2%H01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…1,86821.9%G11B · Information storage (magnetic/…1,51917.8%C23C · Coating & surface deposition1,16913.7%B22F · Powder metallurgy7618.9%B22D · Metal casting7028.2%C21D · Heat treatment of metals5176.1%B32B · Layered products & laminates4124.8%Other6,03670.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 8,527 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Corrosion Resistance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Metallic Glass Corrosion Resistance with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about metallic glass corrosion resistance and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The records that anchor the field

Representative filing
US20060076089A12006-04-13

Zirconium-rich bulk metallic glass alloys (US20060076089A1)

WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION

Zirconium-rich bulk metallic glass alloys include quinary alloys containing zirconium, aluminum, titanium, copper and nickel. The bulk metallic glass alloys may be provided as completely amorphous pieces having cross-sectional diameters of at least about 5 mm or even greater.Filed by Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation; number, assignee and date are drawn directly from the filing record.

US20060076089A1 — patent drawing 1US20060076089A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5288344ABerylllium bearing amorphous metallic alloys formed by low cooling rates760
2US5735975AQuinary metallic glass alloys575
3US5368659AMethod of forming berryllium bearing metallic glass540
4US4737379APlasma deposited coatings, and low temperature plasma method of making same527
5US5618359AMetallic glass alloys of Zr, Ti, Cu and Ni476
6US6325868B1Nickel-based amorphous alloy compositions404
7US3856513ANovel amorphous metals and amorphous metal articles394
8US20170027168A1Methods, products, and systems relating to making, providing, and using nanocrystalline (NC) products compris…302
9US6226197B1Magnetic thin film memory, method of writing information in it, and me287
10US8921473B1Image making medium272

Citation counts favor older filings inside a searched corpus and should be read as influence, not current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Corrosion Resistance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting new claims in this space.

Filing trend
202 → 10
peak (2019) to latest partial year

The composition space is well-occupied

Filings peaked in 2019 and have declined every year since, including through the 2022 midpoint of 138. That decline pattern usually means the core alloy chemistries (Zr, Cu, Ni, Ti-based systems) are already claimed densely enough that new entrants are filing narrower, more specific improvements rather than broad composition claims.

Read against the 18-month publication lag, the true 2025–2026 filing rate is understated.
Citation concentration
760 citations
top-cited record, US5288344A

Foundational chemistry patents still anchor prior art searches

The most-cited records in this corpus are beryllium- and zirconium-bearing amorphous alloy patents from the late 1980s and 1990s. Any freedom-to-operate review in this field still has to clear those foundational compositions before evaluating newer coating or processing claims.

High citation count signals influence on later filings, not present-day commercial weight.
IPC spread
3,852 records
C22C alloy claims

Coating routes are comparatively open

C23C surface coating and deposition claims sit at 1,169 records versus 3,852 for bulk alloy composition — roughly a third the density. Corrosion-resistant coating and passivation-layer approaches applied to existing amorphous substrates carry less prior art congestion than new bulk chemistries.

Processing routes (B22F powder, B22D casting, C21D heat treatment) show a similar lighter footprint.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to metallic glass corrosion resistance, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Corrosion Resistance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where filing has stopped

Assignee activity in this corpus is concentrated among a small group of Japanese electronics, materials and research institutions, several of which show zero filings in the most recent year — a signal to check whether that reflects portfolio maturity or a shift away from the technology.

Co-filing pattern
44 shared families
strongest co-assignee pair

Corporate-research pairings dominate collaboration

The strongest co-assignee links pair a parent company with its materials subsidiary or a named individual inventor, rather than cross-company joint ventures. That pattern suggests most collaborative filing here is internal R&D structuring, not industry consortia.

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the full 8,527-family corpus.
Recent momentum
0 in latest year
across several long-standing filers

Several established filers have gone quiet

Multiple assignees with substantial historical portfolios in this corpus show zero filings in the latest tracked year. That could reflect a mature, defended position, a shift in R&D priorities, or simply publication lag masking filings not yet disclosed.

Confirm against each assignee's broader portfolio before reading this as exit from the technology.
Jurisdiction mix
2,424 US filings
leading receiving office

Filing follows US and Japan first

United States (2,424) and Japan (2,286) lead receiving offices, with Europe (1,500) a clear third and China (484) and the WIPO PCT route (400) trailing. A defensive filing strategy built only around China or PCT alone would miss most of the disclosed prior art in this field.

Canada (217) rounds out the tracked offices.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches with comparatively thin density relative to the core alloy-composition claims
Passivation-layer coatings on amorphous substratesPitting-resistant laminate structures (B32B)Heat-treatment routes for corrosion control (C21D)Powder-metallurgy corrosion-resistant amorphous compositesCasting-process passivation behavior claims
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Bomeilicheng Co., Ltd.0
Toshiba Corporation0
Hitachi, Ltd.0
Canon Inc.0
California Institute of Technology0
YKK Corporation0
TDK Corporation0
Sony Group Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Corrosion Resistance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to a mature core and a thinner periphery. Two directions are worth a closer look before committing drafting resources.

Map the coating and processing white space in detail

With C23C, B22F, B22D and C21D all running well below C22C's density, a claim-by-claim review of passivation and processing approaches on existing amorphous alloy substrates is likely to surface open ground faster than a new bulk-composition filing.

Explore white space in Eureka

Check the foundational chemistry patents against your formulation

Before drafting new alloy composition claims, clear the highest-cited beryllium- and zirconium-based records in this corpus; they anchor a large share of the prior art that examiners and competitors will cite back.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Corrosion Resistance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Metallic Glass Corrosion Resistance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Metallic Glass Corrosion Resistance in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole metallic glass corrosion resistance corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.