Metallic Glass Durability Patents: Who Leads, Filing Trends 2026
- Filing has cooled since 2018. The peak year was 2018 at 118 filings; by the 2022 midpoint volume had already dropped to 66, and the trend has stayed flat-to-declining since.
- Alloy composition claims dominate. C22C (alloys) covers 1,928 records, well ahead of H01F magnetics at 1,487 — durability claims are still fought mostly on bulk composition, not surface treatment.
- Recent momentum has almost stopped. Among the most active historical assignees, only one shows any filing at all in the latest year — a single family from Nippon Steel — while the rest show zero.
Filing growth compares 2021 (56 records) with 2024 (46) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 4,174 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Metallic glass environmental durability patents cover claims on amorphous alloy and bulk metallic glass compositions specifically tied to corrosion resistance, thermal stability, or oxidation resistance rather than to mechanical or magnetic performance alone. The search spans documents published between 2015 and mid-2026, drawing on 4,174 patent families across major receiving offices. Because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, the most recent year in any trend line understates true filing activity.
The corpus sits at the intersection of metallurgy and functional materials: alloy composition claims (C22C) are the largest single bucket, but a substantial share of records also fall under magnetics, information storage and semiconductor IPC classes — a reminder that much of the durability work in this space is filed to protect components (inductors, storage media, transformers) rather than the alloy chemistry in isolation.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 4,174-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Filing trend, 2017–2026
Filings ran at 97 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 118 in 2018, and had fallen to 66 by the 2022 midpoint. The 2026 figure of 4 is a partial year and should be read as an artefact of publication lag rather than a collapse in activity.
IPC subclass distribution
C22C (alloys) leads at 1,928 records, followed by H01F (magnets, inductors & transformers) at 1,487 and G11B (magnetic/optical storage) at 964. Coating and surface deposition (C23C, 299) and heat treatment (C21D, 261) are comparatively thin given how central surface chemistry is to corrosion performance — a gap worth checking before assuming the space is fully claimed.
Shares are the percentage of the 4,174 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Metallic Glass Environmental Durability with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about metallic glass environmental durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA representative claim and the most-cited prior art
US20130340897A1 — High thermal stability bulk metallic glass in the Zr-Nb-Cu-Ni-Al system
Discloses a bulk metallic glass alloy with structure Zr-Nb-Cu-Ni-Al where the ratio of Nb to Zr is held below about 0.040 and the ratio of Cu to Ni is held below 1.15. The claimed composition improves thermal stability and widens the super-cooled liquid region, allowing the alloy to be thermoplastically formed into a range of shapes and sizes.Filed by Crucible Intellectual Property, LLC — illustrates how durability claims in this space are frequently written as tight elemental ratio windows rather than broad compositional ranges.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4499557A | Programmable cell for use in programmable electronic arrays | 721 |
| 2 | US4599705A | Programmable cell for use in programmable electronic arrays | 585 |
| 3 | US3856513A | Novel amorphous metals and amorphous metal articles | 394 |
| 4 | US4959631A | Planar inductor | 364 |
| 5 | US20170027168A1 | Methods, products, and systems relating to making, providing, and using nanocrystalline (NC) products compris… | 302 |
| 6 | US6535824B1 | Sensor array-based system and method for rapid materials characterization | 278 |
| 7 | US8921473B1 | Image making medium | 272 |
| 8 | US20020032531A1 | Sensor array for rapid materials characterization | 269 |
| 9 | US20100084052A1 | Compositions of corrosion-resistant Fe-based amorphous metals suitable for producing thermal spray coatings | 209 |
| 10 | US7372665B1 | Magnetic recording head with resistive heating element located near the write coil | 204 |
High citation counts here reflect age and influence within the searched corpus, not current commercial relevance — several of the top-cited records predate 2000 and describe foundational amorphous-metal or programmable-cell concepts rather than durability-specific claims.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers say about this field
Three patterns stand out once filing volume, IPC spread and citation age are read together.
Volume has been declining since the 2018 peak
The midpoint year (2022) already sits at roughly half the 2018 peak, and the decline continues through the most recent full years of data. This is a maturing claim space, not a growing one — new entrants face dense prior art rather than open ground.
Composition claims still dominate over surface treatment
C22C outnumbers the next largest subclass, H01F, by roughly 450 records, and dwarfs coating-specific C23C (299) and heat-treatment C21D (261) filings. Durability is being claimed primarily through bulk alloy chemistry, leaving surface and post-processing routes comparatively lighter.
US and Japan anchor the filing map
The United States (1,404) and Japan (1,040) together account for well over half of receiving-office activity, ahead of Europe (677), WIPO/PCT (171), China (162) and Canada (108). Litigation and licensing exposure in this field concentrates in those two jurisdictions.
The most-cited prior art predates the durability framing
The highest citation counts belong to older, broader amorphous-metal and programmable-cell patents rather than to recent durability-specific filings. Citation rank here is a proxy for foundational influence, not for what is commercially active today.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to metallic glass environmental durability, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claims — and who has stopped filing
Assignee activity in this corpus is heavily weighted toward a small group of Japanese and US-based organisations, several of which have gone quiet in the most recent year even as their historical portfolios remain large.
Nippon Steel is the only assignee still actively filing
Among the most active historical assignees tracked for recent-year momentum, Nippon Steel is the sole one with any filing in the latest year — a single family. Toshiba, Hitachi, Alps Alpine, Panasonic and Metglas-affiliated filers all show zero.
Metglas ties are the strongest co-assignee link
The strongest co-assignee pair in the corpus links a Metglas-affiliated entity to a partner organisation at 65 shared families — well ahead of the next strongest pairs, which sit in the 20s and 30s. This points to a durable joint-filing relationship rather than a one-off collaboration.
Cross-filing is limited to a handful of relationships
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across the full corpus, and the counts drop off quickly after the top three. Most durability-related filing in this field is done by single assignees rather than through joint ventures or shared R&D filings.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon Steel Corporation | 1 | — |
| Toshiba Corporation | 0 | — |
| Bomei Lisheng Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Hitachi, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Alps Alpine Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Panasonic Corporation (Japan) | 0 | — |
| ALLIED CHEM CORP | 0 | — |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 0 | — |
Where to take this
The filing trend and IPC spread point to a field where bulk composition claims are dense but surface-treatment and post-processing routes are comparatively open.
Check freedom to operate on coating routes
C23C and C21D filing counts are a fraction of C22C — before filing a surface-treatment or heat-treatment claim, search these subclasses specifically rather than assuming the whole space is saturated.
Run a freedom-to-operate search in EurekaTrack the one active filer
With most historical leaders showing zero recent filings, Nippon Steel's continued activity is the clearest signal of where competitive filing might resume.
Monitor assignee activity in EurekaRe-read the foundational prior art before drafting
The most-cited records in this corpus are decades old and broad in scope; understanding what they actually claim is a faster way to spot open ground than reading only recent filings.
Pull citation chains in EurekaCommon questions about metallic glass durability patents
Filing peaked at 118 records in 2018 and had fallen to 66 by the 2022 midpoint, with the decline continuing through subsequent years. This pattern is typical of a claim space where the core compositional territory has already been staked out by early filers, leaving later entrants to pursue narrower ratio windows or component-specific applications rather than broad new chemistries. It does not mean research interest has disappeared, but that the easiest claims have already been filed. Publication lag also means the very latest year always looks thinner than it will eventually turn out to be.
The corpus is dominated by a small set of Japanese and US-based organisations, including Nippon Steel, Toshiba and its materials affiliate, Hitachi, Alps Alpine, Panasonic, and Metglas-linked entities. Nippon Steel stands out as the only one of these still filing in the most recent tracked year. Historical volume, however, does not equal current activity — several of the largest historical filers show no recent filings at all, so a ranking by total family count and a ranking by recent momentum tell different stories.
In practice the terms overlap heavily in this corpus and are usually treated as synonyms in search strategy, though "bulk metallic glass" typically signals a claim to a three-dimensional, thermoplastically formable alloy rather than a thin ribbon or coating. The representative filing in this dataset, for a Zr-Nb-Cu-Ni-Al bulk metallic glass, illustrates the pattern: claims are written as tight elemental ratio constraints rather than broad open-ended compositions. Distinguishing the two matters mainly when assessing whether a claim covers thin-film or ribbon forms as well as bulk components.
IPC concentration data shows alloy composition (C22C) claims heavily outnumber coating and surface-deposition claims (C23C) and heat-treatment claims (C21D), even though surface chemistry is central to real-world corrosion and oxidation performance. Sub-areas such as surface passivation layer chemistry, post-anneal oxidation barrier treatments, and corrosion-resistant amorphous coatings on crystalline substrates show comparatively thin filing density relative to bulk composition claims. Anyone drafting in this space should search these narrower branches specifically rather than relying on aggregate C22C search results, which will overstate how crowded the coating side actually is.
US20130340897A1, assigned to Crucible Intellectual Property, claims a Zr-Nb-Cu-Ni-Al bulk metallic glass where the Nb-to-Zr ratio stays below roughly 0.040 and the Cu-to-Ni ratio stays below 1.15, improving thermal stability and thermoplastic formability. This is a narrow elemental-ratio claim rather than a broad compositional one, so it blocks filings that fall inside those specific ratio windows within this five-element system but leaves alloys outside the ratios, or built on different element sets entirely, open. Anyone drafting a similar Zr-based system should check their ratios explicitly against this filing before assuming clearance.
Research Metallic Glass Environmental Durability in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole metallic glass environmental durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.