Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (14 records) with 2024 (10) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,123 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape tracks patent families combining metallic glass, amorphous alloy and bulk metallic glass compositions with structural relaxation annealing, sub-Tg annealing and general thermal treatment claims, filed between 2015 and mid-2026. The corpus spans 1,123 published families, concentrated heavily in magnetic-component applications rather than treatment process claims in isolation.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 counts in the trend chart understate real filing activity; the decline visible through 2022-2024 is the more reliable signal of where the field is heading.
Annual filings and IPC distribution across the 1,123 families in this corpus, drawn from records filed 2015 through mid-2026.
Filings ran from 43 in 2017 down toward zero in the most recent (partial) year, with the 2022 midpoint at 15 — consistent with a technology that saw a filing burst and has not sustained it, rather than one still building toward a plateau.
H01F (magnets, inductors, transformers) leads with 441 records and C22C (alloys) follows with 343, together dwarfing C21D (heat treatment of metals proper) at 128. G11B, B22F, H01L, B32B and C23C each contribute smaller but non-trivial slices, showing that most claims wrap the annealing step inside a downstream component or coating application rather than treating it as the invention itself.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,123 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about metallic glass heat treatment and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaDescribes continuous in-line annealing of a ferromagnetic amorphous alloy ribbon in a curved path, heating and cooling at rates greater than 10^3 degrees C per second while applying mechanical constraints, aimed at improving magnetic properties without embrittling the ribbon at high feed rates.Abstract trimmed to the claimed process steps; see the full record for tensioning and constraint details.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20160064814A1 | Composite sheet for shielding magnetic field and electromagnetic wave, and antenna module comprising same | 173 |
| 2 | US20150123604A1 | Magnetic field shielding sheet for a wireless charger, method for manufacturing same, and receiving apparatus… | 167 |
| 3 | US4067732A | Amorphous alloys which include iron group elements and boron | 166 |
| 4 | US20090027812A1 | Magnetic signal reproduction system and magnetic signal reproduction method | 150 |
| 5 | US20050043761A1 | MRI-compatible implantable device | 144 |
| 6 | US20080297950A1 | Magnetic signal reproduction system and magnetic signal reproduction method | 138 |
| 7 | US20150290771A1 | Abrasive article and method for making the same | 119 |
| 8 | US6567246B1 | Magnetoresistance effect element and method for producing the same, and magnetoresistance effect type head, m… | 117 |
| 9 | US5796323A | Connector using a material with microwave absorbing properties | 112 |
| 10 | US20180067003A1 | Conduction-path-equipped member, method for patterning conduction path, and method for measuring changes in m… | 107 |
Citation counts favour older records within the searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the trend, geography and citation data are read together.
With the 2022 midpoint at 15 and the trend still falling, this is a declining filing curve rather than a technology approaching saturation from continued growth. New entrants face a shrinking pool of active competitors, but also a claim landscape that was built during a much busier period.
H01F magnetic-component filings outnumber C21D heat-treatment filings by more than 3:1. Process-only annealing claims are comparatively rare — most inventors claim the annealed ribbon or shielding sheet as part of a finished magnetic or electromagnetic component.
The United States receives the largest share of filings, but Japan and the EPO together account for a comparable volume, meaning freedom-to-operate work needs to cover all three jurisdictions rather than the US alone.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to metallic glass heat treatment, with the prior art for and against each one.
Filing activity clusters around a small group of assignees with historical depth in amorphous alloy ribbon production and magnetic components, several of whom co-file with affiliated entities.
Every assignee in the recent-momentum data shows zero filings in the latest year, including Metglas, Hydro-Quebec and Toshiba-affiliated entities. This reflects the broader decline in the trend chart rather than any single company exiting the field.
The strongest co-assignee pairing links Toshiba with Toshiba Materials, and a second links Metglas with Hitachi Metals affiliates, indicating that R&D and IP filing are often split between a parent and a materials-focused subsidiary.
US4067732A, covering amorphous alloys with iron group elements and boron, remains among the most-cited records in the corpus, underlining how much later magnetic-shielding and ribbon-treatment work builds on decades-old alloy composition claims.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Metglas, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Proterial, Ltd. (formerly Hitachi Metals) | 0 | — |
| Toshiba Corporation | 0 | — |
| Amosense Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Vacuumschmelze GmbH & Co. KG | 0 | — |
| Hydro-Quebec | 0 | — |
| Hitachi, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Panasonic Corporation (Japan) | 0 | — |
The trend and assignee data point to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate or new filing strategy.
Because most filings wrap annealing inside a magnetic or coating claim, isolating the smaller pool of pure heat-treatment-of-metals filings can reveal process claims that are easier to design around than the component-level ones.
Explore C21D filings in EurekaThe strongest co-assignee pairs suggest coordinated parent-subsidiary filing; tracing which entity holds which claims matters for licensing conversations.
Trace assignee families in EurekaGiven the 18-month publication lag, the apparent drop to zero in the latest year is not yet confirmed as a real stop in filing activity and is worth rechecking as later records publish.
Set a filing alert in EurekaIn this corpus it means patent families that combine a metallic glass, amorphous alloy or bulk metallic glass composition with a thermal processing step described as structural relaxation annealing, sub-Tg annealing or general thermal treatment. Most of these filings do not claim the heat treatment alone; they claim it as part of a finished product, most often a magnetic shielding sheet, transformer core or data-storage component. That is why the IPC breakdown shows more H01F and C22C records than C21D records specific to metal heat treatment.
The trend data shows filings peaking at 43 in 2017 and falling to 15 by the 2022 midpoint, continuing downward toward the most recent partial year. This pattern is consistent with a technology area where the core annealing and ribbon-processing methods were claimed early and heavily, leaving less unclaimed ground for new filings. It does not necessarily mean commercial interest has disappeared, since publication lag means the last one to two years of data are still incomplete.
The assignee data shows activity concentrated among a handful of companies with long histories in amorphous alloy ribbon production and magnetic components, including Metglas, Hitachi Metals affiliates, Toshiba and its materials subsidiary, and Hydro-Quebec. Notably, every one of these tracked assignees shows zero filings in the latest year, reflecting the broader industry-wide slowdown rather than one company's retreat. Co-assignee pairs, particularly between parent companies and materials-focused subsidiaries, are common in this space.
US20130139929A1, assigned to Hydro-Quebec, describes a system and method for continuously annealing a ferromagnetic amorphous alloy ribbon in-line, in a curved path, using heating and cooling rates greater than 10^3 degrees Celsius per second while applying mechanical constraints. Its purpose is to improve the ribbon's magnetic properties without making it brittle, even at high feed rates. Anyone building continuous ribbon-annealing equipment for magnetic amorphous alloys should review its specific claims on feed rate, curvature and constraint sequencing before finalising a process design.
The IPC composition shows relatively thin filing in sub-Tg annealing kinetics control, coating-integrated thermal treatment that overlaps with C23C, and powder-metallurgy consolidation annealing under B22F, compared with the dense H01F and C22C application claims. These branches sit adjacent to the core magnetic-component filings but have not attracted the same claim density. A first claim in one of these areas would likely need to tie a specific annealing parameter window to a measurable property change, such as coercivity or ductility retention, to distinguish it from the older foundational alloy patents.
The United States receives the largest share of filings in this corpus at 365 records, but Japan (194) and the EPO (169) together represent a comparable volume, so a US-only search would miss a substantial portion of the relevant art. WIPO PCT filings (84) also matter as an early indicator of where applicants intend broader coverage. A thorough freedom-to-operate review should cover all three major venues rather than relying on US filings alone.
Go past this page: query the whole metallic glass heat treatment corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page