Book a demo

Satellite Methane Quantification Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Satellite Methane Quantification Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/methane-detection-and-mitigation-satellite-methane-quantification-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Oil, Gas, Coal & Refining
Satellite methane quantification patents: who holds the cited art and where the field is still open
Get a prior-art report on your approach
16
Published Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
10
Active Filers Ranked
2023
Peak Filing Year

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A young, data-processing-heavy field

Satellite methane quantification sits at the intersection of remote sensing, atmospheric science and emissions accounting. The scope tracked here covers 16 published records from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with filing activity effectively absent until it climbed to a peak of 7 records in 2023. That timing lines up with tightening methane-reporting rules and the commercial availability of higher-resolution satellite imagery, both of which turned quantification from a research exercise into something worth claiming.

The technology composition leans toward computation rather than hardware: AI models, business/administrative data processing and image recognition each touch over a third of records, ahead of material analysis and testing. That pattern says the contested ground is increasingly the algorithm that turns a plume image into an emissions rate, not the sensor itself.

Filing activity by year, 2015–2026
  1. 1Landmark Graphics Corporation4
  2. 2FMC Technologies, Inc.4
  3. 3ZEROSIX LLC2
  4. 4KAYRROS2
  5. 5Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Mine Safety Service Support Center1
  6. 6Nanjing University1
  7. 7China University of Mining and Technology1
  8. 8SCI AVIATION INC1
  9. 9BURNS MICHAEL J1
  10. 10BROOKS MATTHEW N1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Methane Detection & Mitigation: Satellite Methane Quantification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology mix

Two views of the same 16-record dataset: how filing activity has moved over time, and which IPC subclasses the claims fall into.

Filing trend

Filings were flat at zero from 2017 before rising to a peak of 7 records in 2023. Because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent years in this chart understate actual filing activity and should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing trend024680201720182019202020212022720232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition

G06N (AI models), G06Q (business/admin data processing) and G06V (image/video recognition) each appear in 37.5% of the 16 records, with G01N (material analysis and testing) close behind at 31.3%. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these shares sum to more than 100% — the overlap itself shows that most inventions combine a sensing or data-analysis step with a computational one, rather than sitting in a single discipline.

Technology compositionG06N · Computing based on AI models637.5%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…637.5%G06V · Image/video recognition637.5%G01N · Material analysis & testing531.3%E21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)318.8%G01M · Testing machine & structure ba…212.5%G06T · Image data processing & genera…212.5%G06F · Electric digital data processi…16.3%Other16.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 16 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Methane Detection & Mitigation: Satellite Methane Quantification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Methane Detection & Mitigation: Satellite Methane Quantification Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about methane detection & mitigation: satellite methane quantification patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records in scope

Representative filing
US20220205964A12022-06-30

System and Method for a Remotely Deployable, Off-Grid System to Autonomously Detect, Quantify, and Automatically Report Emissions of Methane and Other Gases to the Atmosphere

SCIENTIFIC AVIATION, INC.

The filing describes an off-grid, remotely deployable system that autonomously detects and quantifies methane emissions using commercially available CH4 sensors, with accuracy maintained by correcting for interfering gases such as carbon monoxide and water vapor and for ambient temperature drift. Leak rate quantification is calculated automatically and reported without manual intervention.Filed by Scientific Aviation, Inc.; published 2022-06-30. It is the second most-cited record in this dataset.

US20220205964A1 — patent drawing 1US20220205964A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20230111401A1Automated detection and quantification of gas emissions14
2CN118278294A基于Sentinel-2识别甲烷点源逸散羽流及估算甲烷排放速率的方法9
3US20220205964A1System and Method for a Remotely Deployable, Off-Grid System to Autonomously Detect, Quantify, and Automatica…9
4CN118858185A基于地基高光谱成像的甲烷排放遥感检测方法5
5US20240281702A1Method and system for emissions-based asset integrity monitoring and maintenance4
6US20240119464A1System for managing decommissioned fossil fuel resources1

Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence on later work, not as a ranking of present-day importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (6 of 6 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Methane Detection & Mitigation: Satellite Methane Quantification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three findings that matter more than the raw counts on their own.

Concentration
Leader: 4 records
of the ranked assignees

A leader, then a long tail

The assignee ranking covers 10 companies. The leader holds 4 records, fifth place holds 1, and tenth place holds 1 — a steep drop-off rather than a gradual one. That shape favours a fast-follower strategy: a handful of white-space claims can still outflank the leader before the field consolidates.

Based on the 10 ranked assignees in scope.
Filing timing
Peak: 2023 (7 records)
of 16 total records

The field is recent and still accelerating

No activity is recorded before the ramp that produced a 2023 peak of 7 of the 16 records in scope. Publication lag means 2025-2026 figures are understated, so the true recent trend is likely stronger than the chart shows, not weaker.

Publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.
Claim focus
37.5% AI/data classes
of 16 records

Algorithms, not just sensors, are being claimed

G06N, G06Q and G06V each cover 37.5% of the 16 records, ahead of G01N material analysis at 31.3%. Claims are increasingly written around how plume imagery is processed and interpreted rather than around the sensor hardware alone, which changes where a freedom-to-operate search needs to look.

Shares sum above 100% because records can carry multiple IPC classes.
Geography
US: 7 of 16 receiving offices
of recorded receiving offices

Filing is concentrated in the US, with PCT and China as secondary routes

Of the receiving offices recorded, the United States accounts for 7, WIPO (PCT) for 3, and China for 2, with single filings in the UAE, Europe and the UK. That distribution suggests the US market is where enforcement risk is highest today, while PCT filings signal an intent to expand coverage later.

Counts reflect receiving office, not inventor nationality.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to methane detection & mitigation: satellite methane quantification patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Methane Detection & Mitigation: Satellite Methane Quantification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a young field with concentrated computational claims and a thin geographic footprint outside the US. The next steps depend on whether you are filing, licensing, or clearing a product.

Map freedom-to-operate against the AI-heavy classes

With G06N, G06Q and G06V each touching over a third of records, a clearance search limited to sensor-hardware classes like G01N will miss where the contested claims actually sit.

Run a claims search in Eureka

Watch the leader's filing cadence, not just its count

A leader with 4 records against a field of 10 ranked assignees can move quickly; tracking new publications from that assignee gives earlier warning than waiting for the next annual snapshot.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka

Treat 2025-2026 filing counts as a floor, not a ceiling

Publication lag of roughly 18 months means recent-year figures will keep rising as more applications publish; re-check the trend before concluding the field has cooled.

Explore the live trend in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Methane Detection & Mitigation: Satellite Methane Quantification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Methane Detection & Mitigation: Satellite Methane Quantification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Methane Detection & Mitigation: Satellite Methane Quantification Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole methane detection & mitigation: satellite methane quantification patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.