Book a demo

Micro-LED Mass Transfer Patent Landscape 2026

Micro-LED Mass Transfer Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Micro-LED Mass Transfer Patent Landscape in 2026

X Display Co Tech leads a moderately concentrated field in which the top five filers account for nearly a third of the hundred largest filers’ combined output, with semiconductor-device claims dominating the technical mix. The field expanded rapidly through 2021 but annual volume has since eased from that peak, signalling a maturing invention cycle rather than new entrant growth.

480
Patent families in scope
32%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-19%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

X Display Co Tech leads; a broad second tier of Chinese panel makers and US equipment firms follows

X Display Co Tech holds the largest portfolio among ranked applicants with 54 patent families, placing it well ahead of Applied Materials (34) and Intel (25), and more than double the next cluster of Chinese display companies.

The top five filers—X Display Co Tech, Applied Materials, Intel, Chongqing Konka, and BOE Technology Group—together account for 32% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, indicating moderate concentration: a clear leader exists but no single player commands an insurmountable share.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1X Display Co Tech Ltd54
2Applied Materials Inc34
3Intel Corporation25
4Chongqing Konka Photoelectric Technology Research Institute Co Ltd22
5BOE Technology Group Co Ltd21
6TCL China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co Ltd21
7Elux Inc19
8HUAZHONG UNIV OF SCI & TECH15
9Sakai Display Products Corporation13
10PlayNitride Display Co Ltd12
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co Ltd10
12Xiamen Sanan Optoelectronics Co Ltd8
13Samsung Electronics Co Ltd8
14Shenzhen China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Co Ltd7
15X Celeprint Limited6
16Wuhan University6
17General Interface Solution5
18Interface Optoelectronics (Shenzhen) Co Ltd5
19Lumileds Singapore Pte Ltd5
20Chengdu Vistar Optoelectronics Co Ltd5
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The presence of both US equipment and semiconductor firms (Applied Materials, Intel) alongside Chinese panel manufacturers and a Taiwanese display specialist suggests that IP strategy is bifurcating between process-equipment claims and end-product display integration, giving new entrants distinct entry vectors.

Filing counts for 2024 and 2025 are subject to publication lag and will rise as pending applications publish; the apparent decline in those years should not be read as a withdrawal of investment. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing volume peaked in 2021 and has eased; semiconductor-device claims dominate the technology mix

Two complementary views of the corpus reveal a field that built rapidly from 2017, crested around 2021, and is now consolidating, while the IPC composition shows H01L semiconductor-device claims as the overwhelming backbone with a long tail of adjacent branches.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings rose sharply from 22 in 2017 to a peak of 78 in 2021, then eased to 72 in 2022 and 60 in 2023; 2024 and 2025 figures are understated due to publication lag and will increase as applications publish. The multi-year arc confirms a growth-to-consolidation transition rather than an exit.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 78 in 2021.22201756201868201971202078202172202260202343202410202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01L semiconductor-device records account for the largest share of classified records by a wide margin, reflecting that mass-transfer innovation is primarily claimed as semiconductor assembly and packaging. Adjacent branches—optical control (G02F), lighting circuits (H05B), display control (G09G), and optical elements (G02B)—each contribute a far smaller share, pointing to secondary areas where coverage is thinner.

Technology compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices leads with 528; H10P 66.H01L · Semiconductor dev…528H10P66G02F · Optical control &…46H05B · Electric heating …36G09G · Display control c…35G02B · Optical elements …34H05K · Printed circuits …30G09F · Displaying, adver…23↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20210384050A1Published 2021-12-09

Micro light-emitting diode mass transfer apparatus…

Chongqing Konka Photoelectric Technology Research Institute CO., LTD.

The disclosure provides a micro light-emitting diode mass transfer apparatus and method. The micro light-emitting diode mass transfer apparatus includes a solution container, display backplanes, a solution drive assembly and a liquid level control assembly. The solution container contains a transfer solution, and micro light-emitting diodes to be… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Micro light-emitting diode mass transfer apparatus… — patent drawingMicro light-emitting diode mass transfer apparatus… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Micro assembled LED displays and lighting elements260
2Printable inorganic semiconductor structures143
3Display with micro-led front light128
4Full-color monolithic micro-led pixels119
5Micro assembled LED displays and lighting elements114
6Micro assembled LED displays and lighting elements112
7Micro assembled LED displays and lighting elements102
8Micro assembled LED displays and lighting elements100

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the IP structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of a post-peak filing trajectory, moderate leader concentration, an emerging Chinese-university research presence, and a US-dominant filing geography creates a differentiated opportunity map for incumbents and new entrants alike.

Decline

Post-peak consolidation: core claims largely staked

The lifecycle evidence places the field in decline from its 2021 peak, with annual filings easing back. Core semiconductor-assembly and pick-and-place transfer claims are now densely covered, making incremental improvements in well-trodden H01L subclasses increasingly hard to differentiate. R&D investment is better directed at adjacent process steps or integration with display circuitry where coverage is sparser.

Life-cycle: Decline
Concentration

Moderate concentration: a clear leader but no monopoly

The top five filers hold 32% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output, indicating that no single entity controls the space. X Display Co Tech’s 54-family lead is meaningful but not prohibitive: Applied Materials at 34 families and Intel at 25 maintain credible blocking positions in process-equipment and integration subclasses. Tier-two entrants from China—Konka, BOE, TCL China Star—cluster tightly between 21 and 22 families, suggesting their relative positioning may shift quickly.

Top-5 share: 32%
Collaboration

BOE subsidiary co-filing is the primary collaborative signal

The most active co-filing pairs identified are BOE Technology Group with Beijing BOE Display Technology (2 joint filings), BOE with Fuzhou BOE Optoelectronics, and BOE with Hefei BOE Optoelectronics (1 each). This pattern reflects intra-group IP consolidation within the BOE ecosystem rather than cross-industry collaboration, suggesting that external partnership opportunities with major players remain open for new entrants or research institutions.

Co-filer: BOE group
Geography

US leads filings; China is a strong second and rising in significance

The United States is the leading filing jurisdiction with 233 patent records, followed by China with 177. WIPO PCT filings (46) and Europe (33) indicate that leading applicants are pursuing international protection, but Taiwan (13), South Korea (8), and Japan (7) are notably lower, suggesting selective rather than blanket global coverage. Entrants should assess whether filing gaps in Korea and Japan represent prosecution strategy or genuine exposure.

Lead office: United States
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
BOE Technology Group Co LtdBeijing BOE Display Technology Co Ltd2
BOE Technology Group Co LtdFuzhou BOE Optoelectronics Co Ltd1
BOE Technology Group Co LtdHefei BOE Optoelectronics Co Ltd1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction and collaboration data are at the patent-record level.Explore insights →
Leaders

X Display Co Tech anchors semiconductor-device claims; Applied Materials emerges as the fastest-rising challenger

The leader and primary challenger differ sharply in trajectory: the incumbent built its position over multiple years across broad H01L subclasses, while the challenger has entered recently with concentrated recent-period activity.

Leader · X Display Co Tech

X Display Co Tech

X Display Co Tech holds 54 patent families—the largest portfolio in the ranking—with technical emphasis on H01L 33 (LED semiconductor devices), H01L 25 (multi-component semiconductor assemblies), and G02F 1 (optical modulation), reflecting a broad mass-transfer and integration strategy. Momentum data for this entity is not separately listed in the recent-period table, suggesting a stable rather than accelerating recent filing pace.

families: 54
Challenger · Applied Materials

Applied Materials

Applied Materials ranks second with 34 patent families and is flagged as a new entrant in the recent filing period, with 30 families filed in the most recent window—a trajectory that places it as the fastest-growing major filer by a wide margin. Its technical focus mirrors the leader’s (H01L 25 and H01L 33), but the concentration of recent activity suggests a deliberate move to establish process-equipment claims as mass-transfer manufacturing matures.

families: 34
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore all ranked applicants, their technology focus, and recent filing momentum in PatSnap Eureka.
Elux IncPlayNitride Display Co Ltd+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Applied Materials Inc30▲ new entrant
Intel Corporation1▼ -93%
Chongqing Konka Photoelectric Technology Research Institute Co Ltd1▼ -95%
BOE Technology Group Co Ltd1▼ -95%
TCL China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co Ltd2▲ new entrant
Elux Inc8▼ -27%
X Display Co Tech Ltd2▲ new entrant
Huazhong University of Science and Technology6▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Applicant momentum compares the most recent three-year period to the prior three-year period.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches: optical control, lighting circuits, and display control

Relative to the dominant H01L semiconductor-device branch, several adjacent IPC classes show notably lower coverage; these are observations of relative sparsity that may or may not represent actionable entry points depending on a filer’s technical roadmap.

G02F · Optical control & modulation

With 46 patent records against 528 for H01L, G02F is the most populated of the sparse adjacent branches but remains thin relative to the core. Mass-transfer processes that integrate active optical components—electro-optic modulators, liquid-crystal alignment layers, or waveguide coupling for micro-LED-based optical interconnects—are plausible technical entries. The branch already appears in X Display Co Tech’s and X Celeprint’s portfolios, confirming technical adjacency but also indicating that the earliest positions are being staked.

Search this in Eureka →

H05B · Electric heating & lighting circuits

H05B records (36) cover drive circuits, thermal management, and general lighting circuit architectures adjacent to micro-LED arrays. Coverage here is sparse relative to the device-level H01L claims, and no single applicant in the ranking list appears to concentrate explicitly in this branch. For teams working on driver-IC integration or thermal co-design during mass transfer, this branch represents a relatively open filing space, though commercial value depends on whether lighting-circuit claims can be meaningfully differentiated from display-driver IP.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
PatSnap Eureka maps all IPC branches against applicant activity to surface the lowest-competition entry points.
G09G · Display control circuitsG02B · Optical elements & systems+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are patent-record level; a family can appear in multiple branches.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ across technology routes

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH01L 33 · Semiconductor devicesH01L 25 · Semiconductor devicesH01L 21 · Semiconductor devicesH01L 27 · Semiconductor devicesH10P 72
X Celeprint LimitedStrong · 43Strong · 30Moderate · 9Moderate · 10Absent
Applied Materials IncStrong · 27Strong · 29Moderate · 8Moderate · 9Absent
Intel CorporationStrong · 21Strong · 17AbsentStrong · 18Absent
Chongqing Konka Photoelectric Technology Research Institute Co LtdStrong · 20Strong · 11Moderate · 10Moderate · 7Moderate · 8
BOE Technology Group Co LtdStrong · 21Strong · 12Moderate · 7Moderate · 7Moderate · 8
Elux IncStrong · 18Strong · 19Strong · 10AbsentModerate · 4
TCL China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co LtdStrong · 19Strong · 13Moderate · 4Strong · 10Moderate · 4
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own micro-LED mass transfer landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.