Book a demo

Micro-Supercapacitor Current Collector Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Micro-Supercapacitor Current Collector Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/micro-supercapacitor-current-collector-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Batteries & Energy Storage
Micro-Supercapacitor Current Collector Patents: Who's Filing and Where the Gaps Sit

A data-backed look at micro-supercapacitor current collector patents: filing trends through 2026, leading assignees, technology composition and where claim white space remains open.

36
Published Records
50%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+300%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (1 records) → 2024 (4); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 36 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this patent landscape covers

Micro-supercapacitor current collectors are the conductive structures — printed metal wires, patterned foils, or coated films — that connect a miniaturised supercapacitor’s electrode material to the outside circuit. This landscape covers 36 patent records filed between 2015 and the partial 2026 filing year, drawn from documents classified under capacitor art (H01G) and battery electrode art (H01M4) that specifically address current collector structures or fabrication for micro-supercapacitors. Every record in scope carries the H01G capacitor classification, with a smaller share touching welding, additive manufacturing, polymer processing or printed-circuit classes — evidence that fabrication process is where the newest claim activity concentrates, not electrode chemistry alone.

Filing is led by a small group of universities and public research institutes, mostly based in South Korea and China, with the ranking showing gradual concentration rather than a single dominant player. Growth accelerated into 2024, though the most recent one to two years understate real activity because patent publication lags filing by roughly 18 months.

Records in scope by filing year and IPC subclass
  1. 1CHUNG ANG UNIV IND ACADEMIC COOP FOUND5
  2. 2CARNEGIE MELLON UNIV4
  3. 3KOREA INST OF ENERGY RES4
  4. 4GACHON UNIV OF IND ACADEMIC COOPERATION FOUND3
  5. 5Shandong Zhenghe Industrial Big Data Technology Research Institute2
  6. 6XIDIAN UNIV2
  7. 7KOREA ADVANCED INST OF SCI & TECH2
  8. 8WUHAN UNIV OF TECH2
  9. 9TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY2
  10. 10GUANGZHOU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOY XIDIAN UNIVERSITY2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Micro-Supercapacitor Current Collector Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The 36 records in scope span 2015 through the partial 2026 filing year, concentrated almost entirely in capacitor classifications with a scattering of adjacent process arts.

Filing activity climbed into 2024 before the recent-year lag sets in

Filings rose from 2021's single record to 4 in 2024, a +300% jump across that three-year span; 2025 and 2026 counts will keep rising as publications catch up to filing dates, so the current dip is a lag artefact, not a slowdown.

Filing activity climbed into 2024 before the recent-year lag sets in0134542017520182019202020215202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Every record sits in H01G, with welding and additive-manufacturing arts trailing behind

All 36 records carry the H01G capacitor classification; the next largest overlaps are welding and brazing (B23K, 11.1%) and additive manufacturing (B33Y, 8.3%), pointing to fabrication process as the main area of cross-class innovation.

Every record sits in H01G, with welding and additive-manufacturing arts trailing behindH01G · Capacitors36100.0%B23K · Welding, soldering & brazing411.1%B33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D pri…38.3%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions25.6%C08K · Use of additives in polymers25.6%C08L · Polymer compositions25.6%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies25.6%B22F · Powder metallurgy12.8%Other25.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 36 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Micro-Supercapacitor Current Collector Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Micro-Supercapacitor Current Collector Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about micro-supercapacitor current collector patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Filings

The records other filers keep citing

Representative Filing · 2024
US20240335878A12024-10-10

US20240335878A1 — Micro 3D current collector via laser direct energy deposition

CHUNG ANG UNIVERSITY INDUSTRY ACADEMIC COOPERATION FOUNDATION

The present disclosure relates to a manufacturing method of a micro 3D current collector using laser direct energy deposition and a manufacturing method of a 3D electrode for a supercapacitor. Micro-metallic structures are directly printed onto a substrate using a laser-based direct energy deposition process, then used as the current collectors of the micro-supercapacitors. The printed micro-metallic wires give the collector high electric conductivity, a high aspect ratio and a larger effective surface area than conventional deposited-film collectors.Filed by Chung Ang University Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, published 2024-10-10.

US20240335878A1 — patent drawing 1US20240335878A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN101504889A应用于微系统的微型超级电容器及其制备方法15
2KR101582768B1High performance micro-supercapacitor with air stable gel type organic electrolyte13
3CN109216035A一种全固态平面非对称微型超级电容器及其制备方法12
4CN113130215A可拉伸平面微型超级电容器及其制备方法10
5JP2013165267AFilm-type supercapacitor and manufacturing method thereof10
6CN107393724A一种基于石墨烯/碳纳米管气凝胶的微型超级电容器制作方法7
7CN110136996A基于石墨烯纳晶碳膜电极的微型超级电容器的制造方法6
8CN103219167A膜式超级电容器及其制造方法6
9CN114843120A一种微纳多孔石墨烯基平面微型超级电容器及其制备方法5
10US20190333716A1High-capacity micro-supercapacitor, method of manufacturing high-capacity micro-supercapacitor, and method of…5

Citation counts are drawn from the searched corpus and favour older filings; read them as a signal of technical influence, not of current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Micro-Supercapacitor Current Collector Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Check

What the numbers actually tell a filer

Four figures from this dataset carry the most weight for anyone deciding where to file next or who to watch.

Concentration
50.0% / 77.8%
share held by top 5 / top 10 of 36 records

Filing sits with a small group, not one dominant player

No single assignee holds a runaway share; the leader has 5 records out of 36. Concentration builds gradually across the top 10 rather than dropping off a cliff, which points to a competitive but not monopolised field.

Based on the 21-company assignee ranking in this dataset.
Growth
+300%
filings, 2021 to 2024

Filing activity is accelerating, not plateauing

The jump from 1 filing in 2021 to 4 in 2024 is the clearest complete-year growth signal available. Treat 2025-2026 figures as still filling in due to publication lag rather than reading them as a reversal.

2018 remains the single highest year recorded so far, at 5 filings.
Technology mix
100% / 11.1%
records in H01G / B23K

Fabrication process classes trail the core capacitor class closely

Every record carries the H01G capacitor classification, but welding/laser processing (B23K) and additive manufacturing (B33Y) appear often enough to signal that how the collector is built, not just what it is made of, is where fresh claims are landing.

Shares are of all 36 records; a record can carry multiple IPC classes.
Geography
16 / 9 / 6
filings at China / South Korea / WIPO

Filing is anchored in Asia with a PCT bridge to global protection

China and South Korea together account for the bulk of receiving-office filings, with WIPO PCT applications suggesting some filers are already planning multi-jurisdiction coverage beyond their home office.

United States (4) and Japan (1) trail as receiving offices in this dataset.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to micro-supercapacitor current collector patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Two small co-filing clusters, otherwise independent work
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Gachon University Industry Academic Cooperation FoundationKorea Electronics Technology Institute2
Guangzhou Institute of Technology, Xidian UniversityXidian University2

Only two co-assignee pairs appear in this dataset, each linking a university with an affiliated research body, which suggests most of the work recorded here is being filed by single institutions rather than joint ventures or industry consortia.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Micro-Supercapacitor Current Collector Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

This landscape identifies the concentration, growth pattern and technology mix in the dataset. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going deeper on specific claims and specific assignees.

Check claim scope before filing near the leaders

The top 10 assignees hold 77.8% of the 36 records in scope. Before drafting near their claim language, map exactly what the highest-cited filings actually cover versus what they merely reference.

Run a claim chart in Eureka

Track the white-space branches as they fill in

Powder-metallurgy and polymer-composite collector classes each carry only one or two records today. Revisit this technology mix periodically to see whether that gap is closing or staying open.

Monitor technology classes in Eureka

Watch for 2025-2026 publications catching up

Filing activity in the most recent years is understated because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months. Set alerts rather than relying on a single snapshot.

Set filing alerts in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Micro-Supercapacitor Current Collector Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Micro-Supercapacitor Current Collector Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Micro-Supercapacitor Current Collector Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole micro-supercapacitor current collector patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.