Micro-Supercapacitor Current Collector Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
A data-backed look at micro-supercapacitor current collector patents: filing trends through 2026, leading assignees, technology composition and where claim white space remains open.
Filing growth = 2021 (1 records) → 2024 (4); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 36 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
What this patent landscape covers
Micro-supercapacitor current collectors are the conductive structures — printed metal wires, patterned foils, or coated films — that connect a miniaturised supercapacitor’s electrode material to the outside circuit. This landscape covers 36 patent records filed between 2015 and the partial 2026 filing year, drawn from documents classified under capacitor art (H01G) and battery electrode art (H01M4) that specifically address current collector structures or fabrication for micro-supercapacitors. Every record in scope carries the H01G capacitor classification, with a smaller share touching welding, additive manufacturing, polymer processing or printed-circuit classes — evidence that fabrication process is where the newest claim activity concentrates, not electrode chemistry alone.
Filing is led by a small group of universities and public research institutes, mostly based in South Korea and China, with the ranking showing gradual concentration rather than a single dominant player. Growth accelerated into 2024, though the most recent one to two years understate real activity because patent publication lags filing by roughly 18 months.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
The 36 records in scope span 2015 through the partial 2026 filing year, concentrated almost entirely in capacitor classifications with a scattering of adjacent process arts.
Filing activity climbed into 2024 before the recent-year lag sets in
Filings rose from 2021's single record to 4 in 2024, a +300% jump across that three-year span; 2025 and 2026 counts will keep rising as publications catch up to filing dates, so the current dip is a lag artefact, not a slowdown.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
Every record sits in H01G, with welding and additive-manufacturing arts trailing behind
All 36 records carry the H01G capacitor classification; the next largest overlaps are welding and brazing (B23K, 11.1%) and additive manufacturing (B33Y, 8.3%), pointing to fabrication process as the main area of cross-class innovation.
Shares are the percentage of the 36 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Micro-Supercapacitor Current Collector Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about micro-supercapacitor current collector patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe records other filers keep citing
US20240335878A1 — Micro 3D current collector via laser direct energy deposition
The present disclosure relates to a manufacturing method of a micro 3D current collector using laser direct energy deposition and a manufacturing method of a 3D electrode for a supercapacitor. Micro-metallic structures are directly printed onto a substrate using a laser-based direct energy deposition process, then used as the current collectors of the micro-supercapacitors. The printed micro-metallic wires give the collector high electric conductivity, a high aspect ratio and a larger effective surface area than conventional deposited-film collectors.Filed by Chung Ang University Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, published 2024-10-10.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CN101504889A | 应用于微系统的微型超级电容器及其制备方法 | 15 |
| 2 | KR101582768B1 | High performance micro-supercapacitor with air stable gel type organic electrolyte | 13 |
| 3 | CN109216035A | 一种全固态平面非对称微型超级电容器及其制备方法 | 12 |
| 4 | CN113130215A | 可拉伸平面微型超级电容器及其制备方法 | 10 |
| 5 | JP2013165267A | Film-type supercapacitor and manufacturing method thereof | 10 |
| 6 | CN107393724A | 一种基于石墨烯/碳纳米管气凝胶的微型超级电容器制作方法 | 7 |
| 7 | CN110136996A | 基于石墨烯纳晶碳膜电极的微型超级电容器的制造方法 | 6 |
| 8 | CN103219167A | 膜式超级电容器及其制造方法 | 6 |
| 9 | CN114843120A | 一种微纳多孔石墨烯基平面微型超级电容器及其制备方法 | 5 |
| 10 | US20190333716A1 | High-capacity micro-supercapacitor, method of manufacturing high-capacity micro-supercapacitor, and method of… | 5 |
Citation counts are drawn from the searched corpus and favour older filings; read them as a signal of technical influence, not of current commercial importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers actually tell a filer
Four figures from this dataset carry the most weight for anyone deciding where to file next or who to watch.
Filing sits with a small group, not one dominant player
No single assignee holds a runaway share; the leader has 5 records out of 36. Concentration builds gradually across the top 10 rather than dropping off a cliff, which points to a competitive but not monopolised field.
Filing activity is accelerating, not plateauing
The jump from 1 filing in 2021 to 4 in 2024 is the clearest complete-year growth signal available. Treat 2025-2026 figures as still filling in due to publication lag rather than reading them as a reversal.
Fabrication process classes trail the core capacitor class closely
Every record carries the H01G capacitor classification, but welding/laser processing (B23K) and additive manufacturing (B33Y) appear often enough to signal that how the collector is built, not just what it is made of, is where fresh claims are landing.
Filing is anchored in Asia with a PCT bridge to global protection
China and South Korea together account for the bulk of receiving-office filings, with WIPO PCT applications suggesting some filers are already planning multi-jurisdiction coverage beyond their home office.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to micro-supercapacitor current collector patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Gachon University Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation | Korea Electronics Technology Institute | 2 |
| Guangzhou Institute of Technology, Xidian University | Xidian University | 2 |
Only two co-assignee pairs appear in this dataset, each linking a university with an affiliated research body, which suggests most of the work recorded here is being filed by single institutions rather than joint ventures or industry consortia.
Where to take this analysis
This landscape identifies the concentration, growth pattern and technology mix in the dataset. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going deeper on specific claims and specific assignees.
Check claim scope before filing near the leaders
The top 10 assignees hold 77.8% of the 36 records in scope. Before drafting near their claim language, map exactly what the highest-cited filings actually cover versus what they merely reference.
Run a claim chart in EurekaTrack the white-space branches as they fill in
Powder-metallurgy and polymer-composite collector classes each carry only one or two records today. Revisit this technology mix periodically to see whether that gap is closing or staying open.
Monitor technology classes in EurekaWatch for 2025-2026 publications catching up
Filing activity in the most recent years is understated because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months. Set alerts rather than relying on a single snapshot.
Set filing alerts in EurekaFrequently asked questions
A micro-supercapacitor current collector is the conductive structure — typically a metal film, printed wire mesh, or coated foil — that carries charge between the electrode material and the external circuit in a miniaturised supercapacitor cell. Because micro-supercapacitors are built at chip or microsystem scale, the collector's geometry and fabrication method directly determine achievable surface area, conductivity and integration compatibility with printed electronics. The patent activity in this dataset matters because it shows fabrication process, not just materials chemistry, is where most recent filing effort is going, particularly laser-based direct patterning and additive manufacturing.
The ranked assignee list in this dataset covers 21 companies and research institutions, with the leader holding 5 records and filing concentrated toward the top: the top 5 assignees account for 50.0% of all 36 records in scope, and the top 10 account for 77.8%. That leaves a long tail of single- or double-filing entrants below the leaders. The filers visible in this dataset are predominantly Korean and Chinese universities and government research institutes rather than established battery or capacitor manufacturers, which suggests the field is still largely at the academic-to-early-commercial stage.
Every record in this dataset is classified under H01G (capacitors), and the largest secondary classifications are welding, soldering and brazing (B23K, 11.1% of records) and additive manufacturing/3D printing (B33Y, 8.3% of records). This pattern indicates that laser-based and printed-structure fabrication methods are the most actively claimed process routes for building the collector itself, ahead of polymer-based or powder-metallurgy approaches, which each appear in only one or two records. Readers should treat this as where claim density already sits, not as a signal that other fabrication routes are technically inferior.
Filings grew from 1 in 2021 to 4 in 2024, a +300% increase over that three-year span, and 2018 remains the highest single year recorded so far at 5 filings. The apparent decline in 2025 and 2026 is not a real slowdown: patent publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any filing trend are always undercounted until later publications catch up. Anyone tracking this space should expect 2025 and 2026 figures to rise as more records publish, and should not read current-year dips as reduced R&D interest.
The thinnest branches in this dataset are powder-metallurgy-based collector fabrication (B22F, one record) and polymer-composite conductor systems spanning C08J, C08K and C08L (two records each), all of which sit as add-ons to the near-universal H01G capacitor classification rather than as a separate, crowded art base. Co-assignee clustering in this dataset is also limited to two institutional pairs, and neither sits in the polymer or powder-metallurgy branches, suggesting these areas have not yet drawn coordinated multi-institution filing. A new entrant targeting a structurally distinct collector design — rather than incremental improvements to the heavily-cited gel-electrolyte or planar-asymmetric designs — has more room to establish a defensible position there.
Research Micro-Supercapacitor Current Collector Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole micro-supercapacitor current collector patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.