Book a demo

Microgrid Control for Building Energy Patent Landscape 2026

Microgrid Control for Building Energy Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Microgrid Control for Building Energy Patent Landscape in 2026

This is a narrow, highly concentrated space: 28 patent families on record, with a single firm — DMK Nano LLC — accounting for a dominant share of the corpus and the top five filers collectively holding 56% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total. The United States is the primary filing jurisdiction, and annual volume has plateaued near its peak, signalling a maturing but still active field with meaningful adjacent branches yet to be developed.

28
Patent families in scope
56%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
0%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

DMK Nano LLC leads a compact, US-centric field

DMK Nano LLC ranks first with 10 patent records, more than double the next-closest applicants. Span IO Inc, North Carolina State University, Innovation Asset Collective, Pila Energy Inc, and Robert Bosch (combined US and German entities) each hold three to four patent records, forming a thin second tier.

The top five filers account for 56% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, reflecting strong concentration for such a small corpus. The gap between the leader and the second tier is particularly pronounced, suggesting DMK Nano LLC has built a structurally defensible position relative to current rivals.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1DMK Nano LLC10
2Span IO Inc4
3North Carolina State University3
4Innovation Asset Collective3
5Pila Energy Inc3
6Robert Bosch Corp3
7Robert Bosch GmbH2
8Total Solar International2
9Honda Motor Co., Ltd.1
10Vidyavardhaka College of Engineering1
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Elexity Inc1
12Mr. M Murugan1
13Dr. D X Tittu George1
14Challoch Energy Ltd1
15Concentric Power Inc1
16Vardhaman College of Engineering1
17Total Solar International1
18Dr. S J Ben Christopher1
19University College Cardiff Consultants Ltd1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions imply that any new entrant seeking relevance would need either to design around DMK Nano LLC’s H02J and G06F-anchored claims or to target the sparser adjacent branches — such as EV integration (B60L) or grid-services data processing (G06Q) — where the leader is less active.

Patent publication typically lags filing by 18–24 months, so activity from 2024 onward is likely under-represented in the current corpus; the apparent plateau should be interpreted with that lag in mind. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Sporadic filing bursts and a power-system-dominant technology mix

The annual filing trend reveals two distinct bursts — in 2020 and again in 2024–2025 — separated by near-zero activity, while the technology composition is anchored by H02J (power supply and grid systems) with a long tail of digital and control branches.

Annual filing trend

Filings spiked to 7 in 2020, collapsed to near zero in 2021–2023, then recovered to 7–8 in 2024–2025. The lifecycle stage is assessed as maturity, with annual volume plateaued near its peak. The 2025–2026 data should be treated as preliminary given standard publication lag.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 8 in 2025.32017020180201972020120211202202023720248202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H02J (power supply and grid systems) is the dominant branch with 32 patent records, reflecting the core electrical-integration work. G06F (digital data processing) and G06Q (business and administrative data processing) follow at 10 and 6 respectively, showing growing software-layer activity. Branches such as B60L (electric vehicle propulsion), G05B (control and regulating systems), and H02S (photovoltaic/solar) each hold 2–5 patent records, indicating active but modest secondary fronts.

Technology compositionH02J · Power supply & grid systems leads with 32; G06F · Electric digital data processing 10.H02J · Power supply & gr…32G06F · Electric digital …10G06Q · Business, commerc…6B60L · Electric vehicle …5G06G · Analogue computers5G05B · Control & regulat…4H02B · Power switchboard…3G05F · Electric/magnetic…2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2022147299A1Published 2022-07-07

Adaptive power for ai/ML systems and methods in a …

Concentric POWER, INC.

A microgrid system including a first and second generating systems configured to generate electric energy, wherein the electric energy includes excess electric energy based on power parameters that include power amount, power duration, and/or power timing. The microgrid also includes an AI/ML module configured to train a control model using one or more… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Adaptive power for ai/ML systems and methods in a … — patent drawingAdaptive power for ai/ML systems and methods in a … — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Power distribution management based on distributed…60
2Emergency Load Management Using A DC Microgrid Dur…42
3Power distribution management based on distributed…15
4Emergency load management using a DC microgrid dur…13
5Charging and discharging of DC microgrid energy st…12
6System, device, and method for mode-based energy s…10
7Power distribution management based on distributed…6
8Power distribution management based on distributed…6

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of high concentration, a maturing lifecycle, identifiable co-filing partnerships, and US-led jurisdiction coverage points to a field where differentiation through adjacent technical routes or geographic diversification offers the clearest entry paths.

Maturity

Field has plateaued near peak annual volume

The lifecycle stage is assessed as maturity, with annual filings plateaued near their peak. The two activity bursts (2020 and 2024–2025) suggest the field responds to external demand catalysts rather than exhibiting sustained organic growth. New entrants should expect incremental rather than transformational white space in the core H02J domain.

Lifecycle: Mature
Concentration

Single leader with a wide gap to the second tier

DMK Nano LLC holds 10 patent records against a second tier of applicants at three to four records each. The top five filers represent 56% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total. This degree of concentration in a 28-family corpus means freedom-to-operate analysis around the leader’s H02J and G06F claims is a prerequisite for any new development program.

High Concentration
Collaboration

Three active co-filing pairs identified

The most active co-filing partnership is Robert Bosch GmbH (Germany) with Robert Bosch Corp (US entity), sharing 3 joint records — reflecting cross-border internal IP coordination rather than an external alliance. Total Solar International and North Carolina State University also share 3 joint records, representing an industry-academia pairing in the solar-microgrid space. University College Cardiff Consultants Ltd and Challoch Energy Ltd share 1 joint record. These pairings signal that academic-industry collaboration is already present but limited in scale.

Co-filing Partnerships
Geography

US-centric with selective PCT and EPO coverage

The United States leads with 15 patent records, followed by Europe (EPO) and WIPO (PCT) each at 5, and India at 4. The relatively light PCT and EPO footprints suggest most applicants are not yet pursuing broad international protection, which may leave geographic white space in key European and Asia-Pacific markets for well-resourced entrants.

US-Led, Limited Global Reach
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Robert Bosch GmbHRobert Bosch Corp3
Total Solar InternationalNorth Carolina State University3
University College Cardiff Consultants LtdChalloch Energy Ltd1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle assessment, collaboration records, and jurisdiction distribution.Explore insights →
Leaders

DMK Nano LLC dominates; Span IO Inc is the emerging challenger

Two applicants stand out on volume: DMK Nano LLC as the clear leader with a broad power-and-digital focus, and Span IO Inc as the most active challenger with a recently demonstrated new-entrant trajectory.

Leader · DMK Nano LLC

DMK Nano LLC

DMK Nano LLC leads the corpus with 10 patent records and is assessed as a new entrant on recent momentum, indicating its portfolio was built relatively quickly. Its technology emphasis spans H02J 3 (grid-connected power systems), G06F 1 (digital data processing), and G06G 7 (analogue computing), suggesting an approach that combines physical grid management with computational control architectures. This breadth positions the firm as the de facto standard-setter in the current corpus.

patent records: 10
Challenger · Span IO Inc

Span IO Inc

Span IO Inc holds 4 patent records and is also assessed as a new entrant with a recent filing count of 4, signalling a concentrated and recent build-out. Its technology focus aligns with smart electrical panel and EV integration themes (B60L 53, H02B 1, H02J 3), distinguishing it from DMK Nano LLC’s more computation-heavy approach and pointing toward a building-integrated hardware strategy.

patent records: 4
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore all ranked filers, their technology emphases, and recent momentum shifts in the full PatSnap Eureka analysis.
North Carolina State UniversityPila Energy Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
DMK Nano LLC2▲ new entrant
Span IO Inc4▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards are based on patent record counts from the top-100 applicant ranking and technology focus from IPC class analysis.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in EV integration and grid-services data processing

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant H02J core have low patent-record counts and share in the current corpus, making them worth monitoring as candidate areas for differentiated technical development — though smallness alone does not confirm commercial viability.

B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion integration

B60L holds only 5 patent records (7% share among the top IPC classes), yet vehicle-to-building and vehicle-to-grid charging architectures are a technically logical extension of microgrid control for buildings. Span IO Inc is the most active filer here, but the branch remains sparse relative to the H02J core. An entrant with existing EV charging IP could bridge these domains with incremental claim drafting around bidirectional power management within a building microgrid context.

Search this in Eureka →

G06Q · Business and administrative data processing for energy

G06Q holds 6 patent records (8% share), covering demand-response, energy trading, and grid-services market interfaces. Total Solar International and North Carolina State University are the primary filers here, often via their joint collaboration. The branch sits at the intersection of energy software and building energy management — an area where software-platform or SaaS-oriented firms could file without competing directly on hardware-level H02J claims. Entry plausibility depends on the applicant already having energy-market or building-management software assets.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
The complete analysis covers all sparse IPC branches, freedom-to-operate signals, and prioritised entry pathways across the full corpus.
G05B · Control and regulating systemsH02B · Power switchboards and substations+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch observations are based on relative IPC class sparsity within the current corpus and do not constitute validated commercial opportunity assessments.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by IPC technology route

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH02J 3 · Power supply & grid systemsH02J 13 · Power supply & grid systemsG06F 1 · Electric digital data processingG06Q 50 · Business, commerce & admin data processingH02J 9 · Power supply & grid systems
DMK Nano LLCStrong · 10Moderate · 5Strong · 10AbsentAbsent
Robert Bosch GmbHStrong · 5AbsentAbsentAbsentStrong · 4
Pila Energy IncStrong · 3Moderate · 1AbsentAbsentStrong · 2
Robert Bosch CorpStrong · 3AbsentAbsentAbsentStrong · 3
Span IO IncStrong · 3Moderate · 1AbsentAbsentAbsent
Dr. D X Tittu GeorgeStrong · 1Strong · 1AbsentStrong · 1Absent
Dr. S J Ben ChristopherStrong · 1Strong · 1AbsentStrong · 1Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own microgrid control landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.