Microgrid Controller Patents: Who Leads, Trends & Gaps 2026
- 165 patent families, every one classified under H02J, with China's receiving office (117) accounting for the large majority of filings.
- Filing has slowed since a 2020 peak of 16, easing to a midpoint of 8 in 2022 and 9 in the latest partial year — the core control architecture looks settled, not abandoned.
- AI-dispatch, EV integration and controller-to-controller communications, each sit at single-digit record counts, marking them as the least-claimed branches adjacent to the dense energy-management core.
Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (13) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 165 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this patent landscape covers
This dataset covers 165 patent families filed against microgrid controllers, microgrid control and microgrid energy management, restricted to records classified under H02J3/38, H02J3/00 and H02J13. Every family in the set carries an H02J classification, confirming the search sits squarely on power-supply and grid-system control rather than drifting into unrelated software or hardware.
Filing activity runs from 2017 through a partial 2026, with the bulk of records originating through China's receiving office. Secondary IPC activity in business-data processing, digital data processing and AI-model computing signals where energy-management logic is being layered onto the core control hardware.
Filing trends and technology composition
The filing curve and the IPC spread below show where microgrid controller activity has concentrated and where it has only lightly touched adjacent fields.
Filing activity, 2017–2026
Filings opened at 9 in 2017, rose to a peak of 16 in 2020, eased to 8 at the 2022 midpoint, and stand at 9 in the most recent, still-partial year. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years will read higher once the backlog clears.
Technology composition by IPC subclass
Every record in this set carries an H02J classification (power supply and grid systems), confirming the search is anchored correctly. Beyond that core, G06Q (business/admin data processing, 34 records) and G06F (electric digital data processing, 14) show meaningful secondary activity in dispatch and data handling, while G06N, H04L, B60L and G05F each sit in single digits — evidence of thin, early-stage claiming rather than a mature secondary front.
Shares are the percentage of the 165 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Microgrid Controller Microgrid with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about microgrid controller microgrid and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaKey patents shaping the claim landscape
Methods and techniques for protection of microgrid energy management system with distributed storage
A microgrid energy management system can include: a bus providing a power; a transmission line connected to the bus; a relay connected to the transmission line, sensing a microgrid according to a state of the transmission line, adjusting a relay setting, and generating a trip signal representing the relay setting; and a circuit breaker receiving the trip signal. In addition, the microgrid energy management system further includes an energy storage device connected to the bus.Filed by the Florida International University Board of Trustees; granted 2019-04-23. Claims a relay-triggered protection chain for storage-connected microgrids — narrow in scope but a concrete design-around reference point.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2019192040A1 | 风光柴储智能交流微电网系统 | 110 |
| 2 | CN102710013A | 基于微电网的园区能源网能量优化管理系统及其实现方法 | 106 |
| 3 | CN103633739A | 一种微电网能量管理系统和方法 | 104 |
| 4 | CN105743126A | 一种实现负荷管理的微电网能量管理系统 | 103 |
| 5 | CN102856924A | 一种基于复合储能的微电网平滑切换控制方法与策略 | 78 |
| 6 | CN107979111A | 一种基于两阶段鲁棒优化的微电网能量管理方法 | 56 |
| 7 | CN107196294A | 源网荷互动模式下微电网多时间尺度自适应能量调度方法 | 55 |
| 8 | CN112332444A | 一种基于数字孪生的微电网能量管理系统 | 50 |
| 9 | CN108649602A | 风光柴储智能交流微电网系统 | 40 |
| 10 | US20200153274A1 | Distributed energy resource management system | 36 |
Ranked by citation count within this searched dataset; older records accumulate citations by virtue of age, so treat rank as a measure of influence rather than current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern signals
Three figures in this dataset matter more than the raw counts: where citations concentrate, how filing volume has moved, and how thin the newer technical branches remain.
A handful of energy-management architectures anchor the field
The five most-cited records are dominated by Chinese energy-management-system filings from the early-to-mid 2010s. Their citation counts (up to 110) reflect age and reference-network position within this corpus, not that they remain the most commercially relevant architecture today.
Growth has slowed after a 2020 peak
Filings rose from 9 in 2017 to a peak of 16 in 2020, eased to 8 by the 2022 midpoint, and register 9 in the most recent, still-incomplete year. Publication lag of roughly 18 months means the last one to two years will likely revise upward.
AI-assisted dispatch is present but not yet dense
G06N, H04L, B60L and G05F each sit in single digits against the 165-record base, well behind the H02J core and the G06Q dispatch-data layer. These branches are technically adjacent but only lightly claimed so far.
Filing activity is concentrated in one jurisdiction
China accounts for the large majority of receiving-office filings, with India, the US, the EPO, South Korea and WIPO/PCT trailing well behind. Any competitive read of this space has to weight the Chinese filing pool heavily.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to microgrid controller microgrid, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gaps sit
Filing activity concentrates around a small group of Chinese state-grid-affiliated entities, with international equipment makers filing at lower volume. Recent-year momentum has flattened across most top assignees, and several adjacent technical branches remain lightly claimed.
Collaboration is limited and tightly clustered
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the corpus, and the strongest of them link State Grid Corporation of China to its own research and equipment affiliates. Co-filing outside that cluster is rare, which leaves the field open to solo filers building in adjacent branches.
Top filers show flat recent-year activity
Every top-ranked assignee in the momentum data, including State Grid Corporation of China, Siemens AG and Caterpillar Inc., shows zero filings in the latest year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this likely understates true recent activity rather than signalling withdrawal.
Filing is heavily weighted to one jurisdiction
China's receiving office accounts for 117 records against 11 for the United States, 15 for India and single digits for the EPO, South Korea and WIPO/PCT. A freedom-to-operate review focused only on US or EPO filings would miss most of the active claim territory.
EV-microgrid integration is barely claimed
B60L and G05F each register only 4 of 165 records, despite clear technical overlap with vehicle-to-grid dispatch and fine-grained control loops. These branches sit next to a dense H02J core but have attracted little dedicated claiming so far.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| State Grid Corporation of China | 0 | — |
| Aibao Research Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| China Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Siemens AG | 0 | — |
| State Grid Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| North China Electric Power University | 0 | — |
| Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute of China Energy Engineering Group Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis next
The filing and citation data point to a settled core and several thin adjacent branches. Turning either into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision needs claim-level review beyond what aggregate counts can show.
Run a freedom-to-operate check against the cited cluster
The most-cited records anchor the energy-management claim space; a formal FTO review against those specific claims is the next step before filing in that core area.
Start an FTO check in Eureka →Map the thin branches to concrete claim drafts
AI-dispatch, EV integration and controller communications are lightly claimed but technically adjacent to the dense core — turning that gap into a defensible claim needs a side-by-side comparison against existing filings.
Draft claim comparisons in Eureka →Track assignee momentum past the publication lag
Recent-year filings for every top assignee currently read as zero because of the roughly 18-month publication lag; revisiting this ranking in future quarters will surface real momentum shifts.
Set up assignee tracking in Eureka →Frequently asked questions
State-grid-affiliated Chinese entities dominate the assignee ranking in this dataset, led by State Grid Corporation of China and its research affiliates such as China Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd.. International players including Siemens AG (Siemens), Hitachi Energy Ltd. (Hitachi Energy) and ABB-affiliated entities also appear, but with lower filing volumes. Recent-year momentum for most of the top-ranked assignees shows zero filings in the latest year, which reflects either genuine slowdown or the normal publication lag rather than an abrupt exit from the field.
Every record in this corpus carries an H02J classification, the core power-supply-and-grid subclass, which confirms filings are squarely about grid hardware and control rather than adjacent software alone. The next largest groups — G06Q for business/data processing and G06F for digital data processing — show that dispatch optimisation and data handling are established secondary claim areas. Smaller subclasses like G06N (AI models), H04L (digital communications), B60L (EV propulsion) and G05F (electric variable control) each account for single digits of the 165 records, indicating those integration points are still open rather than heavily claimed.
Of the receiving offices in this dataset, China accounts for 117 of roughly 156 identifiable filings, far ahead of India (15), the United States (11), the EPO (5), South Korea (4) and WIPO/PCT filings (4). This concentration tracks China's large-scale microgrid and distributed-energy deployment programmes, which have driven state-grid-affiliated entities to file defensively and offensively around energy-management and protection architectures. It does not necessarily mean the underlying technology originated in China, but it does mean freedom-to-operate analysis for the Chinese market needs to weight this corpus heavily.
US10269509B1, assigned to the Florida International University Board of Trustees, claims a specific protection architecture: a bus, a transmission line, a relay that senses microgrid state and adjusts its setting to generate a trip signal, and a circuit breaker that acts on that signal, with energy storage connected to the bus. It blocks that particular relay-to-breaker protection chain when storage is present, not energy-management or dispatch logic generally. A new entrant building dispatch optimisation, islanding control without this specific relay-triggered breaker mechanism, or communications-layer coordination would likely sit outside its claim scope, though a formal freedom-to-operate review is still advisable before commercial launch.
The thinnest branches relative to the 165-record base are AI-model-driven dispatch (G06N, 9 records), communications and protocol coordination between controllers (H04L, 5 records), EV-integrated microgrid dispatch (B60L, 4 records) and fine-grained electrical variable control (G05F, 4 records). These sit adjacent to the dense H02J energy-management and protection core but have not attracted concentrated filing yet. A first claim there is more defensible if it ties a specific measured trigger — a latency threshold, a droop setpoint, a vehicle-state input — to a control action, rather than re-claiming the islanding or dispatch methods that the most-cited records already cover.
Research Microgrid Controller Microgrid in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole microgrid controller microgrid corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.