Book a demo

Microgrid Controller Patents: Who Leads, Trends & Gaps 2026

Microgrid Controller Patents: Who Leads, Trends & Gaps 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/microgrid-controller-microgrid-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Smart Grid & Energy Systems · Patent Landscape
Microgrid Controller Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Sit
  • 165 patent families, every one classified under H02J, with China's receiving office (117) accounting for the large majority of filings.
  • Filing has slowed since a 2020 peak of 16, easing to a midpoint of 8 in 2022 and 9 in the latest partial year — the core control architecture looks settled, not abandoned.
  • AI-dispatch, EV integration and controller-to-controller communications, each sit at single-digit record counts, marking them as the least-claimed branches adjacent to the dense energy-management core.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
165
Published Records
22%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+160%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (13) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 165 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Landscape Overview

What this patent landscape covers

This dataset covers 165 patent families filed against microgrid controllers, microgrid control and microgrid energy management, restricted to records classified under H02J3/38, H02J3/00 and H02J13. Every family in the set carries an H02J classification, confirming the search sits squarely on power-supply and grid-system control rather than drifting into unrelated software or hardware.

Filing activity runs from 2017 through a partial 2026, with the bulk of records originating through China's receiving office. Secondary IPC activity in business-data processing, digital data processing and AI-model computing signals where energy-management logic is being layered onto the core control hardware.

Filing trend and IPC composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1STATE GRID CORPORATION OF CHINA13
  2. 2CHINA ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE CO LTD8
  3. 3CATERPILLAR INC6
  4. 4SIEMENS AG5
  5. 5HITACHI ENERGY LTD5
  6. 6SHANDONG LUNENG SOFTWARE TECH4
  7. 7ABB RES LTD4
  8. 8SOUTHEAST UNIV4
  9. 9NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIV4
  10. 10CHINA ENERGY ENG GRP GUANGDONG ELECTRIC POWER DESIGN INST CO LTD4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microgrid Controller Microgrid covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The filing curve and the IPC spread below show where microgrid controller activity has concentrated and where it has only lightly touched adjacent fields.

Filing activity, 2017–2026

Filings opened at 9 in 2017, rose to a peak of 16 in 2020, eased to 8 at the 2022 midpoint, and stand at 9 in the most recent, still-partial year. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years will read higher once the backlog clears.

Filing activity, 2017–20260510152092017201820191620202021202220232024202592026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

Every record in this set carries an H02J classification (power supply and grid systems), confirming the search is anchored correctly. Beyond that core, G06Q (business/admin data processing, 34 records) and G06F (electric digital data processing, 14) show meaningful secondary activity in dispatch and data handling, while G06N, H04L, B60L and G05F each sit in single digits — evidence of thin, early-stage claiming rather than a mature secondary front.

Technology composition by IPC subclassH02J · Power supply & grid systems165100.0%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…3420.6%G06F · Electric digital data processi…148.5%G05B · Control & regulating systems127.3%G06N · Computing based on AI models95.5%H04L · Digital information transmissi…53.0%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion42.4%G05F · Electric/magnetic variable con…42.4%Other2012.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 165 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microgrid Controller Microgrid covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Microgrid Controller Microgrid with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about microgrid controller microgrid and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative Filing

Key patents shaping the claim landscape

Representative Record
US10269509B12019-04-23

Methods and techniques for protection of microgrid energy management system with distributed storage

THE FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES

A microgrid energy management system can include: a bus providing a power; a transmission line connected to the bus; a relay connected to the transmission line, sensing a microgrid according to a state of the transmission line, adjusting a relay setting, and generating a trip signal representing the relay setting; and a circuit breaker receiving the trip signal. In addition, the microgrid energy management system further includes an energy storage device connected to the bus.Filed by the Florida International University Board of Trustees; granted 2019-04-23. Claims a relay-triggered protection chain for storage-connected microgrids — narrow in scope but a concrete design-around reference point.

US10269509B1 — patent drawing 1US10269509B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record →
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2019192040A1风光柴储智能交流微电网系统110
2CN102710013A基于微电网的园区能源网能量优化管理系统及其实现方法106
3CN103633739A一种微电网能量管理系统和方法104
4CN105743126A一种实现负荷管理的微电网能量管理系统103
5CN102856924A一种基于复合储能的微电网平滑切换控制方法与策略78
6CN107979111A一种基于两阶段鲁棒优化的微电网能量管理方法56
7CN107196294A源网荷互动模式下微电网多时间尺度自适应能量调度方法55
8CN112332444A一种基于数字孪生的微电网能量管理系统50
9CN108649602A风光柴储智能交流微电网系统40
10US20200153274A1Distributed energy resource management system36

Ranked by citation count within this searched dataset; older records accumulate citations by virtue of age, so treat rank as a measure of influence rather than current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microgrid Controller Microgrid covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Read

What the filing pattern signals

Three figures in this dataset matter more than the raw counts: where citations concentrate, how filing volume has moved, and how thin the newer technical branches remain.

Citation Concentration
110 cites
top-cited record, WO2019192040A1

A handful of energy-management architectures anchor the field

The five most-cited records are dominated by Chinese energy-management-system filings from the early-to-mid 2010s. Their citation counts (up to 110) reflect age and reference-network position within this corpus, not that they remain the most commercially relevant architecture today.

Read citation rank as influence, not current priority.
Filing Momentum
16 → 9
peak (2020) to latest partial year

Growth has slowed after a 2020 peak

Filings rose from 9 in 2017 to a peak of 16 in 2020, eased to 8 by the 2022 midpoint, and register 9 in the most recent, still-incomplete year. Publication lag of roughly 18 months means the last one to two years will likely revise upward.

Treat the most recent year as a floor, not a ceiling.
Technology Spread
9/165
records tagged G06N (AI models)

AI-assisted dispatch is present but not yet dense

G06N, H04L, B60L and G05F each sit in single digits against the 165-record base, well behind the H02J core and the G06Q dispatch-data layer. These branches are technically adjacent but only lightly claimed so far.

Thin branches are where new claims still have room.
Filing Geography
117 of ~156
records via China's receiving office

Filing activity is concentrated in one jurisdiction

China accounts for the large majority of receiving-office filings, with India, the US, the EPO, South Korea and WIPO/PCT trailing well behind. Any competitive read of this space has to weight the Chinese filing pool heavily.

Jurisdictional concentration shapes where enforcement risk sits.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to microgrid controller microgrid, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microgrid Controller Microgrid covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

Filing activity concentrates around a small group of Chinese state-grid-affiliated entities, with international equipment makers filing at lower volume. Recent-year momentum has flattened across most top assignees, and several adjacent technical branches remain lightly claimed.

Assignee Concentration
10 pairs
total co-assignee pairs

Collaboration is limited and tightly clustered

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the corpus, and the strongest of them link State Grid Corporation of China to its own research and equipment affiliates. Co-filing outside that cluster is rare, which leaves the field open to solo filers building in adjacent branches.

Joint filings concentrate inside one corporate family.
Momentum
0 in latest year
across most top-ranked assignees

Top filers show flat recent-year activity

Every top-ranked assignee in the momentum data, including State Grid Corporation of China, Siemens AG and Caterpillar Inc., shows zero filings in the latest year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this likely understates true recent activity rather than signalling withdrawal.

Read the latest year as incomplete, not as a trend reversal.
Jurisdiction Mix
117 vs 11
China vs United States receiving-office filings

Filing is heavily weighted to one jurisdiction

China's receiving office accounts for 117 records against 11 for the United States, 15 for India and single digits for the EPO, South Korea and WIPO/PCT. A freedom-to-operate review focused only on US or EPO filings would miss most of the active claim territory.

Jurisdictional weighting should drive where FTO work is spent.
Technical Gaps
4/165
records tagged B60L (EV propulsion)

EV-microgrid integration is barely claimed

B60L and G05F each register only 4 of 165 records, despite clear technical overlap with vehicle-to-grid dispatch and fine-grained control loops. These branches sit next to a dense H02J core but have attracted little dedicated claiming so far.

Thin adjacency is where new filings face the least prior art.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth watching
Branches adjacent to the H02J core that remain lightly claimed relative to the 165-record base:
AI-driven dispatch optimisationcontroller-to-controller communication protocolsEV-to-microgrid dispatch logicfine-grained droop/setpoint controlgrid-forming inverter coordination
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
State Grid Corporation of China0
Aibao Research Co., Ltd.0
China Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd.0
Caterpillar Inc.0-100%
Siemens AG0
State Grid Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd.0
North China Electric Power University0
Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute of China Energy Engineering Group Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microgrid Controller Microgrid covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis next

The filing and citation data point to a settled core and several thin adjacent branches. Turning either into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision needs claim-level review beyond what aggregate counts can show.

Run a freedom-to-operate check against the cited cluster

The most-cited records anchor the energy-management claim space; a formal FTO review against those specific claims is the next step before filing in that core area.

Start an FTO check in Eureka →

Map the thin branches to concrete claim drafts

AI-dispatch, EV integration and controller communications are lightly claimed but technically adjacent to the dense core — turning that gap into a defensible claim needs a side-by-side comparison against existing filings.

Draft claim comparisons in Eureka →

Track assignee momentum past the publication lag

Recent-year filings for every top assignee currently read as zero because of the roughly 18-month publication lag; revisiting this ranking in future quarters will surface real momentum shifts.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microgrid Controller Microgrid covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Questions Practitioners Ask

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microgrid Controller Microgrid covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Microgrid Controller Microgrid in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole microgrid controller microgrid corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.