Book a demo

Microgrid Controller Simulation Patents: Who Leads, Gaps 2026

Microgrid Controller Simulation Patents: Who Leads, Gaps 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/microgrid-controller-simulation-and-modeling-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Smart Grid & Energy Systems · Patent Landscape
Microgrid controller simulation and modeling patents: a small, still-forming field
  • Only 13 published families sit inside this search since 2015, with filing still rising rather than plateauing — the midpoint year shows zero and the peak came later, in 2018.
  • H02J dominates every filing while digital-twin and real-time simulation claims mostly ride inside power-supply and grid-system art rather than standing on their own in G06F or G05B.
  • The US receives more than half of all filings with China, Europe, India and a single PCT filing making up the rest — this is not yet a globally distributed filing pattern.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
13
Published Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
9
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (3 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

A narrow, US-centred field still finding its shape

Microgrid controller simulation and modeling sits at the intersection of grid control hardware and the software used to validate it before deployment — real-time digital twins, power-flow simulation and stability analysis run against a microgrid energy management system. The dataset behind this page captures only 13 published patent families since 2015, which makes this one of the smaller landscapes in smart grid IP: a technology area where claim space is not yet crowded, but also one where any single filer can move the balance noticeably.

Filing activity peaked in 2018 and, after a quiet middle period, is accelerating again toward the most recent year — though that final year is necessarily undercounted, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. Most of what has been filed sits under power supply and grid-system classifications rather than under dedicated software or control-systems codes, suggesting that simulation and digital-twin claims are still being drafted as extensions of hardware-control patents rather than as freestanding modeling inventions.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1ABB Schweiz AG (ABB Switzerland Ltd.)3
  2. 2The Regents of the University of California2
  3. 3China Agricultural University2
  4. 4CHARGE BLISS CONSTRUCTION CA INC2
  5. 5ABB Power Grids Switzerland AG2
  6. 6VELLORE INSITUTE OF TECH1
  7. 7OPERATION TECHNOLOGY INC1
  8. 8ISHCHENKO DMITRY1
  9. 9CINTUGLU MEHMET H1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microgrid Controller Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 13-family dataset: how filing has moved year over year, and which classification codes carry the claims.

Filing trend: slow start, renewed acceleration

Filings ran to zero in 2017, rose to a peak of 4 in 2018, fell back to zero by the 2022 midpoint, and are climbing again toward the most recent year. That U-shape is more consistent with a niche technology attracting a second wave of filers than with a maturing, saturating one.

Filing trend: slow start, renewed acceleration012340201742018201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition: grid-system codes dominate

H02J covers every one of the 13 families, with G06F, G01R and H02H trailing well behind and G05B and G06Q appearing only once each. Simulation and digital-twin functionality is being claimed as a feature of grid-control hardware, not carved out as a separate modeling invention.

IPC composition: grid-system codes dominateH02J · Power supply & grid systems13100.0%G06F · Electric digital data processi…430.8%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement215.4%H02H · Protective circuit arrangements215.4%G05B · Control & regulating systems17.7%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…17.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 13 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microgrid Controller Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Microgrid Controller Simulation and Modeling with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about microgrid controller simulation and modeling and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records anchor the field

Representative Filing
US12483063B22025-11-25

US12483063B2 — Secure distributed state estimation for networked microgrids

ABB SCHWEIZ AG

Systems, methods, techniques and apparatuses of networked microgrids are disclosed. One exemplary embodiment is a method for removing false data from a networked microgrid system including: calculating a first local state estimation with the microgrid control system; calculating a plurality of global state estimations with the microgrid control system and the plurality of microgrids; determining the plurality of global state estimations did not converge; detecting false data in a first global state estimation of the plurality of global state estimations calculated with the microgrid control system using the microgrid control system and the plurality of microgrids; and removing the first globFiled by ABB Schweiz AG, published 2025-11-25 — one of the most recent grants in this dataset and a direct descendant of the earlier, more heavily cited state-estimation family from the same assignee.

US12483063B2 — patent drawing 1US12483063B2 — patent drawing 2
View full patent record
Most-cited patents in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20200195011A1Battery energy storage system and microgrid controller18
2US20200099252A1Secure distributed state estimation for networked microgrids15
3CN105429130A基于RTDS和dSPACE的微电网仿真实验系统及方法7
4US20210351590A1Battery energy storage system and microgrid controller2
5US11128137B2Battery energy storage system and microgrid controller2

Citation counts reward older filings inside any searched corpus — treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current technical relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (5 of 5 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microgrid Controller Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the citation and filing pattern signals

Three findings that shape how a filer or licensor should read this landscape.

Citation Concentration
18 citations
top-cited record

Two ABB filings anchor the citation graph

US20200195011A1 and US20200099252A1 carry 18 and 15 citations respectively — far ahead of the next tier, which sits at 7 or below. Both are early ABB filings on battery-integrated microgrid controllers and distributed state estimation, and later ABB filings, including the 2025 grant US12483063B2, build directly on that state-estimation lineage.

Signal: influence, not necessarily current commercial weight.
Filing Geography
US 7 of 13
receiving-office share

Filing is US-weighted with a thin international tail

Seven of the thirteen families were filed in the United States, with China and Europe each receiving two, and India and WIPO one apiece. A filer targeting only the US risks missing the CN filings that include the earliest RTDS/dSPACE simulation work in this set.

One PCT filing suggests limited multi-jurisdiction strategy so far.
Collaboration Pattern
3 co-assignee pairs
co-filing links

Collaboration is thin and centred on one company

All three identified co-assignee pairs in this dataset involve ABB (瑞士)公司 alongside two named individual inventors, Ishchenko Dmitry and Cintuglu Mehmet H. There is no visible cross-company joint filing — collaboration here reads as internal inventor teams, not industry partnerships.

No cross-assignee joint ventures detected in the data.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to microgrid controller simulation and modeling, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Inventor-level collaboration around ABB
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
ABB Schweiz AG (ABB Switzerland Ltd.)ISHCHENKO DMITRY1
ABB Schweiz AG (ABB Switzerland Ltd.)CINTUGLU MEHMET H1
ISHCHENKO DMITRYCINTUGLU MEHMET H1

The only repeated co-filing links trace back to a single assignee and two inventors, not to partnerships between separate organisations.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microgrid Controller Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

A field led by one incumbent, with a long single-filing tail

ABB's two corporate entities carry the citation weight and the most recent grant, but recent-year momentum has shifted to a first-time academic filer rather than to any of the established names.

Incumbent
18 & 15 citations
on its two earliest filings

ABB (瑞士)公司 / ABB Schweiz AG

Holds the two most-cited records in the dataset and the newest grant, US12483063B2, on secure distributed state estimation. Its filings form the backbone of the citation graph that later entrants build against.

0 filings in the latest year — momentum has cooled for now.
New Entrant
1 filing
in the latest year

Vellore Institute of Technology

The only assignee with any activity in the most recent filing year, ahead of every incumbent named in this dataset. A single filing is not yet a strategy, but it is the most current signal available.

Worth tracking for follow-on filings.
Academic Filer
13 total families
across the whole dataset

University and public-research assignees

The Regents of the University of California and China Agricultural University both appear among the named assignees with no filings in the latest year, indicating earlier-stage academic contributions rather than sustained programmes.

Their filings sit outside the ABB-anchored citation core.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches with thin coverage relative to the core H02J filing base — candidates for a first-mover claim.
Cyber-physical false-data injection detectionHardware-in-the-loop RTDS/dSPACE co-simulationDigital twin fault-ride-through validationDistributed state estimation convergence protocolsBusiness-model layer for microgrid dispatch (G06Q)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
VELLORE INSITUTE OF TECH1
ABB Schweiz AG (ABB Switzerland Ltd.)0
The Regents of the University of California0
China Agricultural University0
CHARGE BLISS CONSTRUCTION CA INC0
ABB Power Grids Switzerland AG0
OPERATION TECHNOLOGY INC0
ISHCHENKO DMITRY0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microgrid Controller Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

This landscape is small enough that a single new filing can change its shape — the next step is usually a closer read of specific claims rather than more aggregation.

Map claim scope against ABB's state-estimation family

US12483063B2 and its cited predecessors form the densest claim territory in this dataset. Understanding exactly what they cover is the first step before drafting anything adjacent.

Explore claims in Eureka

Track the Vellore filing for follow-ons

A first-time academic filer leading the most recent year's activity is worth watching for a continuation or a second filing that signals a sustained programme.

Set up monitoring in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches

Hardware-in-the-loop co-simulation and false-data-injection detection both sit at low filing density inside a small dataset — a first, well-drafted claim there faces less prior art than in the core H02J space.

Run a white space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microgrid Controller Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microgrid Controller Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Microgrid Controller Simulation and Modeling in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole microgrid controller simulation and modeling corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.