Book a demo

Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
Data to 2026-07-31

Micromachined ultrasonic transducer patents: who holds the CMUT and PMUT claim space

Top 5 filers hold 43.7% of all 284 records in scope — concentrated but not closed, since more than half the field sits outside that group. Filings rose from 17 in 2017 to a peak of 25 in 2021, then declined to 12 by 2024 — a -52% move over that three-year span. Readings for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete due to publication lag and should not be read as a continued decline.

A 2021 peak, then a pullback
Complete Incomplete
A 2021 peak, then a pullback06131925172017201820192020252021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.
284
Published Records
44%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-52%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Top filers · published records
  1. 1THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV33
  2. 2OLYMPUS CORPORATION(JP)27
  3. 3GEORGIA TECH RES CORP26
  4. 4INVENSENSE INC22
  5. 5KOLO MEDICAL (SUZHOU) CO LTD16
Published by Patsnap Research·

See the full micromachined ultrasonic transducers analysis in Eureka

  • The complete ranking, not just the top five
  • Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
  • The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Read more about this analysis in Eureka
FAQ

Common questions on CMUT and PMUT patents

What is the difference between CMUT and PMUT patents in this landscape?+

CMUT (capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer) patents typically claim electrostatic membrane actuation, bias-voltage schemes and collapse-mode operation, while PMUT (piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducer) patents claim piezoelectric thin-film actuation on a MEMS membrane. Both are captured in this 284-record dataset because the search targets either term appearing in the title alongside fabrication and performance language. In practice, the IPC mix shows heavy overlap in B06B and H10N classes, meaning many filings claim structural or fabrication features common to both approaches rather than being purely CMUT- or PMUT-specific.

Who are the leading patent filers in micromachined ultrasonic transducers?+

The ranking covers 57 companies, with the leading assignee holding 33 records against 16 for the fifth-place filer — a meaningful gap that marks genuine leadership. The top five combined account for 43.7% of all 284 records, and the top ten reach 66.5%, so activity is concentrated but far from a duopoly. Beyond the leading group, filing counts drop quickly into single digits across a long tail of academic and corporate entrants.

Is patent filing activity in this field growing or slowing?+

Filings peaked at 25 in 2021 and fell to 12 by 2024, a -52% change over that span, which reads as a genuine pullback from an earlier filing wave. However, publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so figures for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete and should not be read as confirmation of further decline. The safest read is that the first wave of core fabrication patents matured around 2021 and later activity has shifted toward narrower, more specific claims.

Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.

Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.