Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This landscape tracks 2,131 patent families filed between 2015 and 2026 at the intersection of microphone array hardware and the signal processing that makes it useful: direction of arrival estimation, noise suppression, echo cancellation and far-field pickup. The search spans H04R (loudspeakers and transducers), G10L (speech and audio analysis) and adjacent classes covering telephony, stereophonic systems and positioning, so it captures both the physical array and the algorithms that steer it.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend view understate real filing activity. Even accounting for that lag, the shape of the curve — a 2019 peak followed by a flat-to-declining midpoint — points to a field where core claim space has already been staked out rather than one still expanding.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Annual filing counts and IPC composition together show a technology area that grew through the late 2010s and has since leveled off, with hardware classes still carrying the bulk of the volume.
Filings ran from 131 in 2017 to a peak of 208 in 2019, then eased to 139 at the 2022 midpoint and down to 16 in the most recent, still-partial year. Read the tail end cautiously: publication lag means recent years will fill in somewhat, but the multi-year trajectory before that lag window is already flat to declining.
H04R (transducers and loudspeakers) accounts for 1,756 records and G10L (speech and audio analysis) for 1,031, the two largest classes by a wide margin. Smaller but active pockets sit in H04M (telephony, 167), H04S (stereophonic systems, 152), G06F (digital processing, 139), G01S (positioning, 137), G10K (acoustics, 129) and H04N (video, 79) — evidence that array and beamforming claims increasingly touch conferencing, automotive and video-conferencing use cases rather than standalone audio hardware.
Shares are the percentage of the 2,131 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about microphone arrays and beamforming and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe filing describes a conferencing device combining a microphone array with a processing pipeline that runs beamforming, acoustic echo cancellation and post-processing in sequence, then uses far-end signal activity to gate which post-processed signal gets selected for transmission.Filed by Biamp Systems and published 2024-01-18, this is a practical illustration of how beamforming and echo cancellation are now claimed together as a single conferencing pipeline rather than as separate inventions.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20050195988A1 | System and method for beamforming using a microphone array | 367 |
| 2 | US5574824A | Analysis/synthesis-based microphone array speech enhancer with variable signal distortion | 330 |
| 3 | US20160358619A1 | Multi-Microphone Speech Recognition Systems and Related Techniques | 281 |
| 4 | US20120078624A1 | Method for detecting voice section from time-space by using audio and video information and apparatus thereof | 271 |
| 5 | US20160071526A1 | Acoustic source tracking and selection | 260 |
| 6 | US20130058492A1 | Apparatus and method for measuring a plurality of loudspeakers and microphone array | 240 |
| 7 | US20120182429A1 | Variable beamforming with a mobile platform | 240 |
| 8 | US20060262943A1 | Forming beams with nulls directed at noise sources | 239 |
| 9 | US20060233389A1 | Methods and apparatus for targeted sound detection and characterization | 233 |
| 10 | US20070025562A1 | Methods and apparatus for targeted sound detection | 232 |
Citation counts inside this corpus favour older filings by construction — a document published in 2005 has had two decades to accumulate citations that a 2023 filing has not. Treat the ranking as a map of foundational influence, not of what matters most today.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are put in context: where the claim density sits, who is still active, and how citation weight should be read.
The corpus skews toward transducer and array hardware (H04R) over speech/audio processing (G10L) by a wide margin, even though direction-of-arrival and noise-suppression search terms pulled in the processing side deliberately. This suggests hardware configuration claims remain the more heavily filed layer.
Peak filing activity landed in 2019, and the 2022 midpoint already shows a lower run rate. Combined with publication lag, the honest read is a technology area consolidating rather than one in an active filing race.
Nokia, Philips, Microsoft, MH Acoustics, Qualcomm and Harman Becker all show zero filings in the most recent year, several with a -100% year-on-year change. That does not mean disengagement from the technology, but it does mean their patent activity has shifted elsewhere or matured.
The most-cited records in this corpus date back to the mid-2000s and mid-1990s, underscoring that the core beamforming and speech-enhancement methods were established early. New filings are more likely to be building on these foundations than displacing them.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to microphone arrays and beamforming, with the prior art for and against each one.
Filing activity concentrates among a small number of historical leaders, with co-filing patterns showing tight, small research teams rather than broad alliances.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the corpus, the strongest being MH Acoustics with named inventor Gary W. Elko at 4 shared filings. This points to small, stable inventor-assignee teams rather than joint ventures or cross-licensing consortia.
United States filings outnumber the next-largest office, the EPO, by more than three to one, with China and WIPO PCT filings close behind each other. India and the UK make up a smaller but present share of the filing footprint.
Several of the largest historical assignees — including Nokia, Philips and Qualcomm — show zero filings in the latest year on record. This is consistent with a field where the core patent estate is largely built out among incumbents.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Nokia Technologies | 0 | — |
| Koninklijke Philips N.V. | 0 | -100% |
| Microsoft Corporation | 0 | — |
| MH ACOUSTICS LLC | 0 | — |
| Qualcomm Incorporated | 0 | — |
| Harman Becker Automotive Systems | 0 | — |
| BURNETT GREGORY C | 0 | — |
| Facebook Technologies, LLC | 0 | — |
The landscape points to a maturing core with pockets of open claim space at its edges. Two directions make sense depending on whether the goal is defensive clearance or new filing strategy.
Because the most influential prior art dates back to the mid-2000s and earlier, a freedom-to-operate review should start with those foundational claims before assessing recent filings, since newer patents are more likely to sit downstream of them.
Run an FTO scan in EurekaMulti-modal direction-of-arrival and automotive far-field pickup show thinner filing density than the core beamforming claims, making them worth drafting against before the space fills in.
Draft claims in Patsnap EurekaThe historical filing leaders in this dataset include Nokia, Philips, Microsoft, MH Acoustics, Qualcomm and Harman Becker, based on assignee volume across the corpus. Notably, all six show zero filings in the most recent year tracked, which suggests their core patent positions were built out earlier rather than being actively expanded now. Newer or smaller entrants may be filing at a steadier pace, but the largest historical volume sits with these incumbents.
Not on the evidence here. Filings peaked at 208 in 2019, and the 2022 midpoint already shows a lower count of 139, indicating a flat-to-declining trend rather than continued growth. Publication lag of roughly 18 months means the most recent one to two years are undercounted in any trend chart, so the true recent-year total is somewhat higher than reported, but the multi-year direction before that lag window is clearly downward from the 2019 peak.
H04R covers loudspeakers, microphones and other audio transducers — the physical hardware side of a microphone array — and accounts for 1,756 records in this corpus. G10L covers speech and audio analysis and synthesis, the algorithmic side including noise suppression and direction-of-arrival processing, with 1,031 records. A single patent family can and often does touch both classes when it claims an array alongside its processing pipeline.
Filing density is comparatively thin in multi-modal audio-visual direction of arrival, automotive cabin far-field pickup, video-conferencing signal selection gating, acoustic source tracking under occlusion, and positioning-integrated array calibration. These sit adjacent to the dense core of beamforming and echo-cancellation claims rather than replacing them, and each pulls in classes outside the main H04R/G10L pairing, such as G01S positioning or H04N video. A first claim in these areas would typically need to combine an array or transducer element with a specific downstream use case rather than claiming the acoustic method alone.
This Biamp Systems filing, published January 2024, claims a conferencing device that runs beamforming, echo cancellation and post-processing as a single pipeline, then gates signal selection based on far-end activity. It is a useful marker of how recent claims bundle previously separate functions — array steering, echo removal and transmission selection — into one integrated system claim. Companies designing conferencing hardware should check whether their own pipeline architecture overlaps with this specific sequencing and gating logic, rather than assuming standalone beamforming or echo-cancellation claims are the only risk.
Go past this page: query the whole microphone arrays and beamforming corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.